You are a stud, I was stoked to see someone stand their ground and state their case!

Combs, he’s getting SO predictable, day in and day out, today though he was just run over…;-)

Cheers!

reveals what a bunch of whackjobs the Obots are.

so…you’ve got a little bit of P&V in you?…

Good to see…wish more in the GOP did

It was apparent that Colmes didn’t like your free speech assessment of Obama’s votes.

Now that was some straight talk.

Great job, Erick.

Brooks Brothers has free shipping for online purchases. You may want to check it out…. Just kidding; not.:-)

I saw this live as I was eating dinner. Thank God it was TV, because otherwise I would have been grossed out by the gratuitous spittle coming from Murphy; ewww.

Since body language is very important. Notice you had Colmes leaning over and spending significant time looking at notes. That is a submissive posture – in case you are interested.

Keep pounding on this brother.

I almost feel bad watching someone get torn apart on facts… You could almost see it register that he kept saying 1976 and Erick kept saying 1984.

It was a fun segment to watch, because while Erick was the quiet one, he was the one with actual details, facts, and information. They type of stuff that might let someone do research on their own.

Alan: 0 | Erick: 1

seems to be the best response to the lefties. They can’t reasonably respond to that. Keep it going!

And thanks for posting this Moe. I missed these arguments when they were broadcast and wouldn’t have seen this if you hadn’t given us the vids.

In part two, the Gephardt advisor was able to say, unchallenged, that John McCain wouldn’t allow for an abortion under any circumstances whatsoever… as far as I know his position, that isn’t the case. After all, the absolutist position (no rape/incest/life of the mother exceptions) is almost as far outside the mainstream as Obama’s position (which that should’ve been pointed out… even if true, it’s less crazy than allowing a living child to be murdered).

And that same shill’s “take away a woman’s right to choose” line being repeated over and over as his fallback is almost creepy after a few listens.

Yes, yes I think that is what try are trying to say!

I have some sympathy for these poor guys trying to defend Obama on this issue. The whole thing would be funny (in a dark, tasteless sort of way) if it weren’t actually true.

you looked and sounded awesome. No matter how the liberals try to spin this they lose. Obama said what he said and they can’t change it. Keep up the good work.

like his former boss.

For all the things that Barack Obama is (i.e., arrogant lying proto-Marxist liberal snob), he’s not a baby-killer. Remember the SCHIP debate of a few months back? Nancy Pelosi proposed this dramatic expansion of SCHIP, ostensibly to “help the children”, but what we conservatives really understood was that it represented the camel’s nose under the tent towards socialized medicine. They even admitted as such in moments of candor. We were right to oppose it on these grounds and of course we were falsely accused of hating children by “our friends” on the left. I view BAIPA as no different from Obama’s point of view. That is essentially why groups like NARAL oppose partial-birth abortion bans – they view them as the slippery slope to overturning Roe v. Wade, and I think that is a far more likely reason why Obama would oppose BAIPA. That is bad enough – he opposed a bill that was unanimously favored in the US Senate and has broad bipartisan support all over the country. That definitely puts him on the extreme liberal edge of abortion politics in this country. But it’s not because he has some bloodlust for infant flesh. We risk ruining our own credibility when we make claims like this. After all our side will have a great deal more to say about Obama in the future, and we don’t want our future statements which are also going to be quite important in speaking to Obama’s judgment (Rezko anyone?) in addition to this issue, and we don’t want our other legitimate claims to be dismissed casually as “oh that’s coming from the same folks who think Obama’s a baby-killer, they will say anything to trash him”. Look, it’s very very VERY important that Obama loses. If he wins, it is a certainty that we will get socialized medicine and that change will be irreversible – not even Gingrich’s Class of 1994 was able to eliminate even a single government agency, let alone something big like socialized medicine. We will advance rapidly down the slippery slope of Europeanization where we have sluggish economic growth, huge tax burdens, and an ever-more intrusive nanny state, not to mention significantly reducing our chances of victory in the GWOT. The stakes are just way too high to risk so much of our credibility on a claim of infanticide that is IMO dubious. Obama’s votes can be explained in a manner that is far more consistent with extreme liberal politics and does not cast him in the role of moral monster, which nobody will believe anyway. That is my sermon for today.

When the issue came up about the nurse that came out and told what was happening with these children, Colmes basically accused her of not doing anything to keep them alive, specifically referring to the time she held the infant for 45 minutes while he died.

I saw the interview last night, and, darnit, I was just proud.

Watching those clowns fuming in anger was seriously the best part of my day yesterday. And I’m extremely pleased at how you kept calm, while you had those two nutjobs literally SCREAMING that Obama DID NOT support infanticide. You could almost see them plugging their ears in the face of the facts going “la la la, I’m not listening.”

Infanticide-supported Obama will do whatever it takes to protect women from being ‘punished with a baby’.

To the gates of Hell to you Margaret Sanger and now Barack Obama

I did a post on this young lady and her stand that embarrassed the Colorado Democrats…

“Her name was Gianna Jessen.

Gianna said “Hello,” welcomed everyone, and then sang three of the most beautiful Christian songs I have ever heard.

She then began to give her testimony. When her biological mother was 17 years old and seven and a half months pregnant, she went to a Planned Parenthood clinic to have an abortion. As God would have it, the abortion failed and a beautiful 2-pound baby girl was brought into the world. Unfortunately, she was born with cerebral palsy and the doctors thought that she would never survive. The doctors were wrong.

Imagine the timing! A survivor of a Planned Parenthood abortion arrived in town just days before the Colorado House of Representatives was to celebrate Planned Parenthood’s “wonderful” work.

As I listened to Gianna’s amazing testimony, the Lord inspired me to ask her if she could stay in Denver until Monday morning so that I could introduce her on the floor of the House and tell her story. Perhaps she could even begin the final day’s session by singing our country’s national anthem!”

Gianna’s story

Barack Obama is a killer of babies by default of doing nothing….the abortion doctor is NOT a doctor and THEY will always decide to throw away an aborted baby. Good men allow evil to happen by doing NOTHING Barack Obama is not a good man because HE did something when he voted against the bill.

Hello everyone. Sorry that my first post is a question, but so far I haven’t had any luck finding the answer on my own. Does anyone know what, if any, specific state law (which allegedly protected aborted babies born alive) was on the books at the time of BAIPA?? Obama’s “fact check” portion on his website claims the existing law was 720 ILCS 510/6. Was that the one that Erick was referring to last night that was declared unconstitutional in 1984? I’ve looked at that law and it appears to still be valid (although I don’t believe it applies to pre-viable aborted babies as Obama claims). So, if that’s not the law Erick was referring to, what law was declared unconstitutional in 1984?? Does anyone know where I can find that federal case that Erick referenced on the show that declared the law unconstitutional?

I apologize if my question(s) are confusing. Thanks in advance for any help!

Quote of the night – “He (B. Hussein Obama) wants you to be able to finish off a kid if it survives an abortion”!!!

I love it!!! Finally, someone with a “pair” sticks up for conservatives!!

Semantics is important in the abortion debate.

Decades ago the left-wing saw they could not win the battle of “when does human life begin?” or the even more ridiculous argument, which was used back then sporadically, that the fetus is not a human being.

Since humans do not give birth to troglodytes or gorillas, that last one was easy to knock down.

Their success in preserving abortion came mainly from their success in changing the language of the debate.

Suddenly they were not “pro-abortion” (and certainly not “anti-life”): they were high-mindedly in favor of the gentle “woman’s right to choose.”

The result is the American holocaust of the last 4 decades.

Erick, a suggestion. Next time someone insists that laws were already in place to protect infants born alive after a botched abortion, why don’t you ask them, “Then why isn’t the doctor that allowed this baby to die behind bars today?”

If a man took a new born that was just delivered in the hospital minutes before, and killed the baby because he thought the woman should have had an abortion, wouldn’t he be labeled a “monster” and convicted of First Degree Murder (and rightly so…)?

And in California, when Lacy Peterson was killed with a baby that was not yet born, how can someone that kills her also be tried for murder of the unborn baby, if the mother can kill the baby via abortion and not be prosecuted? Seems that saying you can be convicted of murder on the unborn, is saying that the unborn is a life!

Such double standards on the left.