Washington Post Staff Writer Who Wrote Rick Perry Attack Piece Has Criminal Past


On October 1, 2011, the Washington Post’s Stephanie McCrummen authored a story for publication in the Post concerning Texas Governor Perry’s lease of a hunting spot with an offensive name. Although a careful read of the story shows that there is no substantiation for the allegations of racism, Ms. McCrummen, the Post, and MSNBC have held a non-stop witch hunt, accusing Mr. Perry of everything under the sun. So, let’s examine the author using the same journalistic standards practiced by the Washington Post.

Ms. McCrummen has a rather interesting criminal history herself, as public criminal records in multiple states stretching across 4 time zones have shown.

Ms. McCrummen’s criminal history began with North Carolina Case # 1992 CR 00654, a violation of the Article 19 – False Pretenses and Cheats section of the North Carolina Criminal Code. Ms. McCrummen was convicted of a crime punishable by up to six months of imprisonment for writing a hot check that was deemed worthless.

In 2005, the apparently unrepentant Ms. McCrummen was again found guilty in the 2005 Virginia Case #059GT0504714900 for failing to obey a highway sign. 

The following year, McCrummen was found guilty in yet another Virginia criminal case, #153GT0604021200, speeding 46 miles an hour in a 25 mile speed zone. 

Last year, in August, 2010, Ms. McCrummen was found guilty in Arizona Case # M-07510TR-2010025209 of speeding once again. She plead guilty but failed to pay the fine imposed by the court and returned to Washington having skipped out on paying her fine to the criminal court. A collection review was held in September, after she had escaped Arizona’s jurisdiction to D.C., and her case was assigned to the Fines/Fees and Restitution Enforcement (FARE) Program established to collect delinquent court ordered restitution, fines, fees, and surcharges . After the FARE team tracked her down at her Washington D.C. apartment, they finally appeared to get her attention and on October 23, 2010 she paid the defaulted fine to the criminal court, almost two months after her conviction. McCrummen has now found herself a four-time loser in the states’ criminal courts. She currently resides outside of the jurisdiction of the three states where she committed her crimes. 

As you can see from this simple outline of Ms. Stephanie McCrummen’s past, under the Post’s journalistic standards, it is pretty easy to throw mud on someone even if they didn’t do anything truly wrong. Over the years, the journalistic standards of the Washington Post have fallen into a death spiral of innuendo and name calling, as seen in McCrummen’s ni**erhead story. They can create guilt out of thin air as we have in the public records concerning the Post Staff Writer in question. The Post should quit its despicable methodology of reporting the news. For now, Ms. McCrummen and the Post owe Governor Perry an apology. 

Mike Robinson is Sr. Partner at Robinson & Henry P.C., a Castle Rock, CO Law Firm. Ph. 303-688-0944.



RSS feed

15 Comments Leave a comment

I Agree

carolynr Wednesday, October 5th at 1:57PM EST (link)

I also think that the MSM…should get this info out also…but they will not. The sheeples will believes whatever they read…and that is too bad…because THEY VOTE.

 

Bravo! n/t

barleycorn (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 1:59PM EST (link)

This seems irrelevant / out of line / unbecoming of New Media.

kinggold Wednesday, October 5th at 3:56PM EST (link)

RedState should not be operating as a smear clearinghouse, and doing wrong to the reporter who wrote the piece doesn’t remedy what the Washington Post did to Perry.

The “criminal past” in “multiple time zones” amounts to three traffic violations and a bounced check. This has absolutely nothing to do with journalistic integrity or the Post’s editorial standards. There’s no legitimate reason apart from spite to air the dirty laundry of a reporter who wrote a story you didn’t like. That’s no better than the treatment afforded to Joe the Plumber when he upset the apple cart.

It’s a sad commentary that a post like this is getting front-page treatment.

pots and black kettles

mikerobinsonpc (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 4:05PM EST (link)

My mama says what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. NBC news spent several days laying into Rick Perry after the Washpost story went public.

Michael A. Robinson

 

You misunderstand the message here.

gekster (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 4:33PM EST (link)

It’s taking a nothing and turning it into a something.

If you want to misconstrue facts, what she did to the Perry story is what was done to her.
Taking a nothing and turning it into a something.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

Not So!

edintexas Thursday, October 6th at 1:08PM EST (link)

Agreed that the traffic citations are “nothing”, But before a DA’s office takes a bad check case the person (or entity) to whom she gave the check would have tried to collect, with a penalty for the bounced check. Failing to pay the debt at that point leaves the person holding the check no option but to escalate collection efforts. At this point the DA would usually try to get the debtor to pay and close the case. If it went to court (which this appears to have, as their is a docket number), then the debtor failed to take the opportunity to clear the problem by paying the debt.

That is not a “nothing”, that is a criminal act. A violation of an actual criminal statute, not a traffic citation with fine. It may only be a misdemeanor (although I don’t know that is all it is, I’m not going to look it up), but the sentence could have included jail time (although misdemeanor sentences usually involve stays in the County Jail and not the state prison system).

Just saying – she does indeed have a criminal record. She just (probably) isn’t a convicted felon.

Kowalski

edintexas Thursday, October 6th at 1:10PM EST (link)

“…as their is a docket number…” should be “…as there is a docket…”
One of those days…

 
 
 
 

Nice........

irishgirl Wednesday, October 5th at 5:44PM EST (link)

Well done Mr. Robinson.

 

Beautiful

toothpick (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 6:44PM EST (link)

The Left has been living by its “By Any Means Necessary” Alinskyite credo for many years now, and we are still consulting with the Marquis of Queensbury rulebook to learn what we are allowed to do. It;s long past time to take the gloves off, and you have given us all a tidy how-to lesson.

 

A load of hogswallow

Rick Moran (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 6:54PM EST (link)

Congratulations on your search skills. The trouble is, you have proven nothing.

Does the reporter getting a speeding ticket change the facts in the story she wrote? Does skipping out on a traffic violation by the reporter alter by one iota the witnesses stories about when they believe the offending word was covered up? They may be wrong. The reporter may have a bias streak a mile wide. But how does revealing the reporter’s past do anything except demonstrate the childishness and gutter mentality of this author?

Challenge the facts of the story. But smearing the reporter with this nonsense is what lefties like Larry Flynt and Sid Blumenthal do.

Keeping good company there, pal.

Hey Rick Moran.

gekster (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 7:00PM EST (link)

Look at my post upthread.
It’s obvious that you didn’t comprehend the message either.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

It's still hogswallow

Rick Moran (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 8:30PM EST (link)

Discovering whether a candidate for president is lying about a fact related to his past is hardly “nothing.” The reporter, on the other hand, made no such claim to truth about her past nor can such be implied by her employment at the Post – especially since you don’t know the circumstances of her hiring

There is no valid argument that can be made which posits remotely similar circumstances between what the reporter was writing about and the author’s intent to cast a personal shadow over the reporter’s reputation.There is no connection no association, no correlation and, no corresponding link that justifies such a vile attack.

This post stinks of gutter politics and doesn’t belong in legitimate debate over bias in the MSM.

So what candidate was lying about thier past.

gekster (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 8:34PM EST (link)

If you see the article that way, that’s fine,
but could you elaborate on the lying part.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

 
 
 

No Rick Moran, you are wrong

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 8:52PM EST (link)

The author of the Perry hit piece is the one that has proven absolutely nothing except that she was willing to get down in the weeds with another phony racist charge against someone who has an impecable record of being against racism. Interesting that you just showed up here now to defend someone who has no credibility at all. You must obviously be a part of the journolistas who have already been outed. The WaPo is accustomed to using racism against Republican candidates. They did the same with George Allen.

thanks

mikerobinsonpc (Diary) Wednesday, October 5th at 9:22PM EST (link)

Thanks scope for the clarity. In the end, there is no great news for Ms. McCrummen and no great news for Gov. Perry’s hunting lease. Wouldn’t it be nice if the msm reflected these normal actions by the two of them.

Michael A. Robinson