Our forums here at Redstate are full of conversations of Romney’s fluctuating and inconsistent stances on a wide ranging variety of topics. None of them is more visceral, more emotionally captivating than abortion. Given Romney’s near stagnation in the polls you would think, being a Republican Candidate with a history of waffling on the issue of abortion, he would move to quiet his detractors and solidify his position on the murder of the unborn…..wouldn’t you?
Well break out the griddle and the batter folks cuz it’s time for some waffles and flap jacks. Mitt Romney refuses to sign the Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Pledge also known as the Susan B. Anthony’s List Pro-Life Presidential Pledge.
Mitt decided to fall back on that old stand-by so favored by politicos afraid of their own shadows. I can’t because, well , their might be “unintended consequences.”…..Yeah like fewer dead babies. But hey Mittens lets not let that get in the way.
How will this effect Romney’s chances? I know it will be a huge additional straw on that sway-back camels spine for some of us. And if he is thinking this might help him with Independents some how…..well Mitt I think it’s pretty obvious that those folks have no time for social issues at this time. For them It’s The Economy….Stupid!
In all fairness I need to point out that Cain also didn’t sign the pledge either. I ignored him entirely because, well he isn’t going to be the nominee and he doesn’t carry that same decades old Waffle House Brand that Mittens does.
Sorry for some reason I can’t get the HTML Link embed to work so here’s the link to story and video. =)
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/romney-cain-opt-signing-anti-abortion-pledge/story?id=13876080
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
If there is a litmus test for social conservatives...
nathanalbright (Diary) Sunday, November 20th at 9:48AM EST (link)…it’s hard to find a more obvious one than being against the mass murder of innocent unborn children. To not sign that pledge is a pretty obvious sign that one is not committed to defending the rights of the unborn.
Agreed, nathanalbright . . . "Yes" or "No" . . .
redmymind (Diary) Sunday, November 20th at 11:49AM EST (link)I’m through with “maybe,” or “well, it depends” candidates. Sign the darn thing or don’t. Don’t play political games with the lives of the unborn! COMMIT!!! . . . Not a lotta wiggle room, now is there?
Agreed...
nathanalbright (Diary) Sunday, November 20th at 10:35PM EST (link)…it’s not that hard to be forthright about it. If you don’t really think it’s murder, don’t pretend otherwise. And if you do, act (and vote) accordingly.
Romney just got Ayotte's endorsement
tngal (Diary) Sunday, November 20th at 11:16AM EST (link)In the blurb fox news just put up there was nothing about where he stood on pro-life, economy or less gov’t or immigraiton or any issues. When you read the whole thing its all about electability.
___________
“Ayotte said electability was a factor in deciding which presidential hopeful to support.
____________
I mean mittens was going to get NH anyway, but for some reason people think this is a big pickup. Again, I didn’t see anything about how she was in-tune with his stand on specific issues. Just the strongest one against BO.
To me mitt and bo are very similar.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/19/mitt-romney-set-to-win-key-endorsement-new-hampshire-senator/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29
(Go Cain!!!)
Was once at a town hall forum with a senator
jout99 (Diary) Sunday, November 20th at 12:43PM EST (link)who said he’s personally opposed to abortion. Gave a great speach against it and in the same breath said he is for it.
You can’t have it both ways. Everything he said afterwards I felt was a lie. How can you trust someone who won’t stand on principles?
So that is my abortion litmus test. You lie, you can’t be trusted in anything else. Kinda like the proverb of the talents.