From my 30 years in business, I have learned the absolute importance of setting goals. If you do not set a goal, you do not put the proper mechanisms or plans in place to achieve those goals. Without a solid goal, what you have is nothing more than a wish, and you will most likely fail.
I’m concerned because although I see a great deal of momentum and enthusiasm I do not see goals for the elections is 2010. I hear statements like we might win this many seats in the House or this many seats in the Senate, but I do not hear a goal. I would like to suggest one.
What should our goal be? Lets tie that goal to the popular statement “We want our country back.” To accomplish that statement we would need to remove the power form the tyrannical left that now has it. What this means is practical terms is that our goal needs to be that we win the necessary seats to override a Presidential veto, in other words a 2/3 majority. Once that point is understood, that we can wrestle power away from Obama, the country will unite behind it. That is our goal, and with that goal we will regain control, but we need to set this goal in stone. All of our efforts, planning, allocation of resources, public support need to rally around this goal. If the American people understand the stakes, understand the goal, we can begin to move mountains. Massachusetts had such a goal, and that was to send a message to Obama, and Scott Brown united the people behind that goal, and accomplished the seemingly impossible. We must have a goal, or we will not be laser focused on any tangible endpoint, and we will greatly reduce our chances of success. Think about it, isn’t this what the country really needs is the veto power over Obama? Do we want to spend the next two years after the 2010 elections without it? The American people can accoplish anything they set their minds to. Every Democratic seat is in play right now, and with the Supreme Court ruling we have more options than ever before. C’mon lets do it, we should aim for nothing less. 2/3 of a cup of Tea Lefites??
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
One Goal: Present Clear, Concise, Conservative Ideas
Ausonius (Diary) Friday, January 22nd at 11:48AM EST (link)This was the simple genius behind Scott Brown’s win in Massachusetts: besides opposing the Monster Hell-th Care Bill, he also campaigned on conservative ideas of lower taxes leading to less government leading to more freedom and prosperity, rather than waging a War On Business and causing businesses to contract.
Another part of his campaign focused on a more effective response to the War On Terror than bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia, where a 13 year-old girl will soon be whipped 90 times for having a cell phone, and apologizing for America’s simple existence, which makes Islamo-Terrorists angry and murderous. The modest surge in Afghanistan might work, but since the surge is c. 50% smaller than what was recommended, I believe many people are skeptical. Not to be forgotten: trials on the East Coast for Arab terrorists was another issue in Massachusetts!
If Republican candidates address these items, they should be successful in most places outside of Harvard Square and Haight-Ashbury.
Ausonius: 310-395 A.D. Teacher, Poet, Consul, General, Farmer.
Personal Tutor to the future St. Paulinus of Nola and to young Gratian, heir to the throne during the turbulent final years of the Western Roman Empire. When his former student Gratian was assassinated, Ausonius threw up his hands and retired to his farm in Gaul. Rome was captured by barbarians 14 years after his death.
Cato@rock.com
How's this for a start?
Gandalf (Diary) Friday, January 22nd at 11:59AM EST (link)Not that anyone’s suggesting them all right now:
Health-Care
-Require insurance companies to compete
-Tort-Reform
Immigration
-Secure the Borders
-Require States to enforce already existing laws
Economics
-Balance the Budget
-Constitutional Amendment forbidding the U.S. government from having a deficit
-Forbid earmarks
-Overhaul the tax code (Flat Tax, Fair Tax, ANYTHING)
Overcoming Corruption
-Term Limits on Representatives and Senators
-Double the amount of Representatives in the House so as to force them back closer to the People they actually are supposed to represent. The House is becoming more and more like the Senate with their Aristocratic leanings.
-National ban on gerymandering
Energy
-Increase domestic drilling
-Increase tariffs on foreign (except NAFTA) energy sources
-Provide tax incentives to those developing new alternative energy sources
Social Issues
-Define “Person” as protected in the Constitution as anyone after conception
Anything else?
Christian Conservative First
Patriotic American Second
Dedicated Republican Third
Yes, the order is important.
Goal: Win the general elections.
ColdWarrior (Diary) Friday, January 22nd at 12:18PM EST (link)Yes, setting concrete goals is the key. Then work backwards from there.
We decent Americans outnumber the socialist/liberal/Commies. But we are splintered. And we don’t realize this is, in the end, about one thing and one thing only — getting more people to vote for OUR candidates in the general elections. We conservatives need to UNITE within the Republican Party itself at the grass roots, precinct committeeman level. HALF these slots were empty, nationwide, on Election Day, 2008. And split about 50-50 between conservatives and liberals/moderates/RINOs. That ration would go to 75-25 in favor of conservatives IF conservatives would INVADE the Party and fill up these empty slots. It’s happening. We’re making it happen where I live.
HOW do we offer the electorate a choice, not an echo, at the general election? (As Scott Brown did?) We conservatives do it by making sure a conservative candidate wins the all-important, traditionally very-low-turn-out primary election.
HOW? By making sure conservatives outnumber liberals/moderates/RINOs in “the most powerful office in the world” — the precinct committeeman positions.
WHY? Because then those conservative PCs can vote to endorse the BEST conservatives in the primaries and help get out the vote for those conservative candidates. Primary elections, historically, have VERY low turnout. If a majority of the PCs are conservatives working hard to get the vote out in those crucial primary contests, for the BEST conservative candidates, then the BEST conservative candidates WILL win.
“We the [conservative] people” are slowly waking up. But holding a sign at a rally doesn’t really change anything. ONLY real, grass roots, in the trenches political participation does. And that happens at your monthly local GOP meetings.
In my legislative district in Tempe, Arizona, we conservative precinct committeemen, through aggressive recruiting at Tea Parties and hell-th care protests, etc., have DOUBLED our PC ranks since January, 2009, and almost all of the recruits are conservative.
Go here to read what I wrote about it earlier: http://www.redstate.com/stix/2009/12/08/conservatives-and-the-gop/#comment-131
And we have gone, county-wide, since Election Day, 2008, having 31 per cent of our 6,231 precinct committeeman slots filled to 53 per cent — the most ever in Maricopa County GOP history. Read about our success here: http://www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2010/01/16/jd-hayworth-creams-mccain-in-straw-poll-at-maricopa-county-rep-party-annual-meeting-sources-a-more-conservative-party/
I believe the number one priority of every conservative should be becoming a voting member of the Republican Party — a precinct committeeman. THEN we have a chance of sweeping the 2010 general elections. But first, we have to make sure the BEST conservatives win the primaries.
In my humble opinion.
Thank you.
ColdWarrior
No More Scozzafavas!
In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?
Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Unified Patriots.
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and
Precisely.
acat (Diary) Friday, January 22nd at 12:48PM EST (link)Pick the best candidates for the district or state.
Back those candidates to the hilt.
Vote for those candidates.
Win the election.
The devil, of course, is in the detail of picking the best candidate. Scott Brown is the right candidate for Massachusetts, but not for Utah or Arizona.
We can do better in both of those states than returning tired old warwhore (erm, war horse) McCain for another go-round, and Bennett in Utah is another case of a state electing a more purple candidate than they need to.
California may require someone more in the Scott Brown vein than I would like… but the same is true in Illinois, and I’m good at holding my nose while voting.
Mew
(strolls away singing “I see a purple pol and I want to paint him red…”)
——

Caveat Suffragator