And on the movie front we have “Green Zone”


with Matt Damon. It’s some kind of Iraq thriller, I haven’t seen it and knew nothing about it until I read this in the NYT. I haven’t read any reviews about it and the only real “qualitative” comment I’ve seen was this one:

Whatever you’re doing tonight, cancel ur plans & go see “Green Zone” with Matt Damon! Stunning, brilliant, brave film. Just saw it. Amazing!

And that one would certainly keep me away from a theater showing it, given that it’s a Tweet from Michael Moore.

So, anyway, Hollowood goes out of their way to make a movie about Iraq that MM approves of. They launched it at 3,000 theaters this weekend. And the result? Hey, thanks for asking…

LOS ANGELES — Hollywood suffered its first major flop of the year over the weekend with the debut of the expensive Iraq thriller “Green Zone,” which sold an anemic $14.5 million in tickets at North American theaters.

Despite playing in more than 3,000 theaters, “Green Zone,” starring Matt Damon and directed by Paul Greengrass (“The Bourne Ultimatum”), was a distant second to Walt Disney’s “Alice in Wonderland.” That fantasy film was No. 1 for the second weekend in a row, with about $62 million in ticket sales for a new total of $208.6 million.

Heh. Cost ‘em $100MM to make the turkey. That’s $100MM that won’t find it’s way into the November elections on the Left side. Good job guys.

Oh, and it’s good to see that Michael Moore still knows squat about the American People.



RSS feed

11 Comments Leave a comment

I wonder how long it will be before the producers ask for a bailout?

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 8:08PM EST (link)

http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2686&p=.htm

Speaking of director-actor collaborations, director Paul Greengrass and actor Matt Damon failed to replicate the box office success of The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum with their third teaming, Green Zone. The Iraq-set action thriller posted a mediocre estimated $14.5 million on approximately 3,400 screens at 3,003 sites, and it will ultimately gross only a fraction of its reported $100 million production budget. This was the latest Middle East-themed movie to disappoint, landing between the opening weekends of The Kingdom ($17.1 million) and Body of Lies ($12.9 million). Instead of politics, though, Green Zone’s marketing sold nondescript action and intrigue and stressed the Bourne connection, banking that that would carry the day. According to distributor Universal Pictures’ exit polling, Green Zone’s audience was 54 percent male and 67 percent over 30 years old, and its “B-” from moviegoer pollster Cinemascore suggests that word-of-mouth will likely be tepid at best.

Matt Damon has lost it – on the scrape heap of lefty losers.

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

 

Thanks, Becker, and I won't be wasting my money

The_Rebel (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 9:14PM EST (link)

And I’m glad I don’t have HBO, after the stupid remarks made recently by Tom Hanks saying that we fought a racist war in WWII and were bent on annihilating the Japanese. It looks to me as though Tom Hanks has no clue about the lives of the men his production “The Pacific” will portray, which by the way began airing this evening.

A Marine such as Gunnery Sergeant “Manila” John Basilone, for example, who will be one of the three Marines the mini series is based on. After John Basilone was awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions on Guadalcanal in 1942, he was returned to the states to enhance the war effort by touring the country to help sell war bonds. He wanted to go back with his men, though, got his wish, and was shipped out in August, 1944. He hit the beaches at Iwo Jima in February, 1945, and again performed above and beyond the call of duty, was killed on that first day, and was awarded the Navy Cross. This was a soldier who was a gentleman, first, then a Marine. He didn’t have a racist bone in his body. He loved his fellow soldiers, wanted to be with them in battle, and ultimately gave his life for them. It wasn’t about annihilating the Japanese.

It makes me wonder how Hanks will be portraying John Basilone. I don’t think it will be anything like this 7-8 minute tribute to John Basilone, but we’ll see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLCqO3WRoco

I canceled my HBO a long time ago

izoneguy (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 9:31PM EST (link)

After all the crap like Bill Mahar and Real Sex…..

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

 
 

See this Green Zone review

Erick Brockway (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 9:26PM EST (link)

Says all I thought it would be;

Paranoid Anti-Military Movie ‘Green Zone’ Hailed by Top NY Times Movie Critic
By Clay Waters
Fri, 03/12/2010 – 15:59 ET

The New York Times’s top movie critic A.O. Scott on Friday reviewed “Green Zone,” a leftist fantasy about the Iraq War starring Matt Damon, in which the U.S. military are the bad guys. As shown by the headline, “A Search for That Casualty, Truth,” Scott embraced the movie’s hard-left politics and fantastical anti-military plot, showcased in the movie’s “hero” played by Damon, disillusioned Army officer Roy Miller:

….when his search for phantom weapons of mass destruction has led him to uncover a web of lies, spin and ideological wish-fulfillment, Miller expands on the point. “The reasons we go to war always matter,” he says, throwing in an expletive to make sure his meaning is clear. “They always matter.”

Miller’s words put him at odds with some of his comrades and with a military culture that discourages service members from questioning whatever mission they are charged with carrying out. But this dutiful, serious officer is also offering a pointed, if implicit, critique of a lot of other recent war movies that have carefully pushed political questions to one side in their intensive focus on the perils and pressures of combat.

Scott saw “a hidden history of manipulation and double-dealing” in the real-life fruitless quest for WMD in Iraq:

To anyone who was paying attention in 2003 and after, this is familiar territory. Mr. Greengrass and the screenwriter, Brian Helgeland, deftly glean material from the historical record, and while they compress, simplify and invent according to the imperatives of the genre — this is a thriller, not a documentary — they do so with seriousness and an impressive sense of scruples. They have clearly studied journalistic accounts of the early days of the war, citing Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s vivid “Imperial Life in the Emerald City” as a particular inspiration, and while the picture they paint of infighting among the Americans and growing factionalism among the Iraqis may not be literally accurate in every particular, it has the rough authority of novelistic truth.

Without divulging the paranoid plot points of the narrative (Damon’s character is targeted for assassination by the U.S. military and corrupt government officials) Scott vouched for the basic truth of the anti-American story. In a June 2004 review of “Fahrenheit 9/11,” Scott treated Michael Moore’s disingenuous left-wing screeds in similar fashion, admitting the documentary film-maker was sometimes “tendentious” yet also “a credit to the Republic.

Oops, I messed the blockquotes, but you get the idea -nt

Erick Brockway (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 9:27PM EST (link)

I despise these types of movies

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 10:11PM EST (link)

Where Hollywood directors who’ve never spent a day in true reflection of political issues of the day use heavy-handed metaphors and stories to indict people and characterize events with a broad brush. I particularly dislike when such moralizing gets in the way of making a quality film.

In a way, Green Zone is the anti-Hurt Locker. Despite the Hurt Locker’s many inaccuracies, it was an honest look at a microcosm of the Iraq War, and an entertaining thriller, to boot. It didn’t take sides in the conflict, and its good guys were clearly the Americans (which, objectively, they should be by anyone when compared to the Mahdi’s army, the Baath Party, and Al-Qaeda). Green Zone, OTOH, tries to indict the Iraq War using fictional events, and is a boring thriller, to boot.

This quote from IGN UK’s review should help illustrate how anti-America this movie is: “Miller ends up virtually going to war with the American army and protecting a ruthless former Ba’ath party general who represents – the film suggests – a preferable alternative as rulers of Iraq to the US government.”

Oh, and BTW, Matt Damon and Greenwood are truthers, if that’s a clue as to the ideological makeup of the cast and crew.

Hey Hollywood, here’s a tip: people go to the theaters to be entertained, enthralled, or otherwise stimulated: that’s why Avatar, despite its refried plot, did so well at the box office. The Green Zone is not an entertaining film, and has only been declared such by critics with ideological blinders. People also want their values, institutions, and cultural mores affirmed along the way: Passion of the Christ is probably the most extreme and successful application of this principle, but it holds true for other successful movie franchises, too (Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, etc). How on Earth does a movie where the present-day US is depicted as more evil than Baath-dominated Iraq fulfill this very basic rule?

The question that should be asked is, why does Hollywood continue to shovel crappy movies with anti-American moralistic harangues down our throats, especially those that defend positions so extreme, that leftist pols would hesitate to embrace them? Do they really think that Americans will rush to the movie theatres to see two hours of “Saddam wasn’t that bad”?

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 

boo on Hurt Locker, btw

conservos (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 9:49PM EST (link)

aside from it being anti-, the story arc was crap

but it got academy awards — was it 4?

in Best Boot Costumery, Best Sandblasted Walls, Best Shrapnel, Best Psycho Portrayal

really minor awards, but just to make that “Winner of FOUR ACADEMY AWARDS!!” sticker on the face of the disk case.

pathetic.

One party, one vote.

Work from within.

 

Damon is a brain dead (*(^*^&*%^&%

Doc Holliday (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 10:02PM EST (link)

He will never get another dime from my pocket. I hope his movie tanks but good!

Molon Labe!

Same here nt

aesthete (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 10:16PM EST (link)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 

Michael Medved called the first hour...

Mr_Ed (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 10:26PM EST (link)

…of this movie “brilliant” with “the best war action sequences of the Iraq War” you will find anywhere. “Four Stars” for the first hour.

He went on to say the second hour was a total waste. Zero stars, with a Two Star rating overall.

Mr. Ed
Straight from the Horse’s Mouth

Michael Medved is an idiot. nt

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, March 15th at 7:57AM EST (link)