For RNC Chairman: Newt Gingrich.


A few weeks ago, Jon Henke at The Next Right brought up the idea of installing Mitt Romney in the Chairman’s chair at the Republican National Committee. I think it’s a worthy idea for consideration, not just because I supported Mitt for the nomination way back when (I love Palin, but I still believe the better ticket would have been Mitt Romney/Peter Pace), but because I think the GOP needs a major overhaul from top to bottom, and love him or hate him (and quite a few people here quite obviously still do really hate him), Romney has made a career of turning troubled entities around into highly successful enterprises. However, since the man is reportedly not interested in it, it’s a moot point.

Going with yet another guy who ran for the nomination this year, there’s an active movement afoot in favor of drafting Fred! for the job. Jon Henke in his follow-up post to his Romney for RNC Chairman trial balloon suggested once again dividing the Chairman’s spokesman and management roles (i.e. Paul Laxalt/Frank Fahrenkopf Jr. in the 80s and Mel Martinez/Mike Duncan in 2007) between Fred and Mitt to give us the best of both worlds.

Another very, perhaps even more popular name, with people I deeply respect, than either Mitt or Fred – especially in the aftermath of 2006, and now in the aftermath of 2008 – is that of former Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele. Would it that President Bush had listened then, because now, the GOP offering the job to one of the better qualified men on the scene will almost certainly open ourselves to the charge of engaging in the crassest form of tokenism. Notwithstanding his qualifiations, a hostile Press Corps is certain to report that his selection was solely in response to the Democrats giving the nation it’s first black President. That said, the fact is that the man ran one of the best campaigns in 2006 and likely would have won were it not for the albatross President Bush and his Administration’s political incompetence had become around the neck of every Republican. Add all this to his very successful tenure as Chairman of the MD GOP and his two years as the current sitting Chairman of GOPAC and he clearly has the resume to take the reins at the RNC. Another advantage is that he is a highly charismatic and able communicator – a welcome difference from the last eight years of New Tone™.

In other words, Michael Steele is a first class choice …

But, at the moment, I believe a better person would be Newt Gingrich. Back when I heard that the former Speaker was thinking about throwing his hat into the ring for the Presidency in 2007, I was very definitely not happy. But as the Chairman of the RNC, I believe the chances are better than even that he would prove as positively transformational a figure as he did when he took over the leadership of the House GOP from Bob Michel. First of all, his opinion of the GOP’s pedestrian coterie of pencil-pushing campaign consultants pretty closely matches my own (strangely enough, so do a lot of actual GOP campaign consultants). And second, and most important of all; he gets it – the fact that political success is about all of the following in equal parts; salesmanship, vision and principle.

Watch this below; this is Newt at Mackinac Island, Michigan last year. Take note of the fact that he points out the need for innovation in communications strategies to circumvent the liberal Press Corps, he mentions outreach efforts and messaging, he talks about recruiting in every area for offices at all levels of government, he addresses the importance of ideas and following Thatcher’s algorithm of winning the argument in politics – the basic building blocks of any overaching strategy to rebuild a party on the ground and struggling to get up. Consider also, that he has been on the receiving end of what Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, and most recently, Sarah Palin and Joe (the Plumber) Wurzelbacher have endured, and therefore, unlike every other top echelon Republican, he’s not burying his head in the sand about the MSM’s partisanship and bias.

Newt has apparently let it out that he would be willing to serve if called upon by the Republican National Committee and apparently both his and Steele’s camps are gearing for the selection by the full committee in January. He’s also made it clear what direction he wants to go …

The RNC has to do some soul-searching and decide what level of change is necessary. If that answer is bold, energetic change led by someone who has done it before, then Newt would be a good choice … If the party is eying a shift toward the middle, that isn’t Newt …

In truth, I’d be happy with either Steele or Newt. But at the moment, I believe that every Republican interested in guaranteeing that our sojourn in the wilderness would end much sooner than the Left is gleefully predicting should inform the 168 people that constitute the full body of the Republican National Committee to elect Newt Gingrich to be the next Chairman of the RNC.


Category: , , ,

RSS feed

9 Comments Leave a comment

What a dilema

Brian Simpson (Diary) Tuesday, November 11th at 9:17PM EST (link)

I read the front page article and I get all gung ho for Steele. Then you throw this at me and I go right back to not knowing who to support. Thanks Martin.

At least I can look at that as a sort of good thing as we may actually have multiple good candidates for the job…never a bad thing when you are hiring.


| My RedState archive |
Important principles may and must be inflexible. ~ Abraham Lincoln

 

Of course my first choice

Darin_H (Diary) Tuesday, November 11th at 10:17PM EST (link)

is you Martin (as I’ve said many times), but that doesn’t look like it’s going to happen. I’d take Steele over Newt for a few reasons, but that doesn’t mean I would be unhappy (yay for double negatives!) with Newt.

A visionary coward says that anger can be power, as long as there’s a victim on TV – Flat Top, Goo Goo Dolls

 

OK, I've got a winning idea.

itrytobenice (Diary) Tuesday, November 11th at 11:13PM EST (link)

Steele for Chairman and Newt for Vice Chair.

Steele can do the media and schmoozing with potential candidates.

Newt can run the alternative media, try some new ideas and supplement Steele’s schmoozing.

As bad off as we are now, I’d like to see a shotgun blast of talent coming out of the RNC. I haven’t donated to them since 2006, but I would if they would show me that they were going to get serious.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

And as long as we're on it.

itrytobenice (Diary) Tuesday, November 11th at 11:18PM EST (link)

We should get Mitt to help with the fundraising, even though he doesn’t want to run the whole thing. He’d be a great assist for Newt and Steele.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 
 

It's Steele

StevenK (Diary) Tuesday, November 11th at 11:30PM EST (link)

The race for GOP Chairman was never going to be Steele vs. Gingrich.

When GOPAC needed a new chairman, the most powerful member and former Chairman himself, Newt Gingrich, decided to install Michael Steele as the leader. But who really runs GOPAC? Gingrich. He always has, always will.

With RNC Chair, it’s clear that what happened is that Gingrich wants as much influence on the party as possible. RNC Chair is a great way to do so. But he doesn’t want to give up on all the work he’s made on becoming “post-partisan” with his role as General Chairman of the “tri-partisan” American Solutions organization. So who does he look to to run the organization while actively listening to Gingrich’s advice? The same guy he chose to do the same job as GOPAC Chair: Michael Steele.

There’s a reason why Gingrich’s favorite novel is Puzo’s “The Godfather.” Gingrich is trying to hold all the strings while remaining Teflon to partisan criticism.

It’s the right move politically for Gingrich and the party. 2012 will be Gingrich’s comeback, not 2009.

 

I heard

sayoung80913 (Diary) Wednesday, November 12th at 11:00AM EST (link)

on the Sean hannity radio show yesterday, that Newt(he was on ) is considering running for president in 2012. In my own opinion, Newt is our best hope. He has all of the experience needed, is a force to be reckoned with and the democrats know it, and all of his past has been completely vetted ad nauseum. If this year’s election has taught me anything it is that,many Americans don’t seem to care about past associations,past deeds,or past misconduct. Of course, that may be only if the person they are referring to is a democrat, but Newt has been there and done that and he has found a way to work AROUND the MSM. Witness the bailout bill which he worked feverishly behind the scenes to prevent and succeeded in getting blocked the first time around. I know he eventually conceded that we would have to suck it up and support it,mostly because of Paulson’s “the sky is falling” mentality, however,here we are two month’s later, the money from the bailout still hasn’t even been doled out and yet, we’re still plugging along.In my opinion . MCCAIN was too damned moderate- Newt is the exact opposite and I ,for one, will enthusiastically support him in either endeavor-be it RNC chairman or President.

 

Sorry, but as I said in my diary the other day

Shawn Gillogly (Diary) Wednesday, November 12th at 11:18AM EST (link)

Newt has ‘way’ too much baggage to be a serious Presidential candidate. Don’t kid yourself, the Left would unload both barrels on his personal life and ethics questions in the House. And he’d be spending more time dodging personal attack bullets than countering the left’s message.

He’s a great Kingmaker. And Kingmaker is where he belongs. But Newt for President in 12 is doomed from the start. In any case, I think we need to take the focus off 12 and get our house in order for this current cycle and for framing a narrative that can counter the Democrats now.

“Liberals are always talking about pluralism, but that is not what they mean. In public school, Jews don’t meet Christians. Christians don’t meet Hindus. Everybody meets nothing.”- Dennis Prager

Shawn {shaking head} ... please read the diary again.

Martin Knight (Diary) Wednesday, November 12th at 8:58PM EST (link)

Martin, sorry

Shawn Gillogly (Diary) Thursday, November 13th at 6:36AM EST (link)

That was supposed to be a reply to StevenK above. Not to your diary. Either it didn’t attach or I goofed. Sorry for the miscommunication.

“Liberals are always talking about pluralism, but that is not what they mean. In public school, Jews don’t meet Christians. Christians don’t meet Hindus. Everybody meets nothing.”- Dennis Prager