Left Pushes Obama To Break His “No New Taxes” Promise; And He Might Do It


I count myself as one of many Americans who knew better than to trust congressional Democrats. When they were working to elect Barack Obama president, they kept quiet as he proclaimed that he was not a tax and spend liberal. He promised that we in the middle class needn’t worry about taxes increasing. If you make less than $250,000 a year you “will not see your taxes go up one dime.” Many of us were skeptical then, and it seems we may have been right.

It appears that the liberals in Congress are about to ask the president to break that promise. They are looking at a plan that will increase taxes on the middle class, starting with incomes as low as $30,000 a year. The reason? It seems that Congress has come to the conclusion that the country is broke when it comes to fighting the war in Afghanistan. There is plenty of money for their social programs, but not the war effort. You see, they hate the war, and by taxing us to fight it, they want to make us hate it too. And it also frees up money they need to push new social legislation. From bailouts, green energy, junk cars, welfare programs, illegal aliens and more bailouts, the Dems need some new cash. They call their war tax temporary. But we all know what that means. Long after we are out of Afghanistan, this tax will continue. After all, we just recently got rid of the telephone tax that was imposed over 100 years ago to fight the Spanish-American War.

So now Obama faces a critical decision. If he goes along with the congressional  liberalswho support this tax increase, ge breaks his most important promise to the middle class. Most of the Democratic leadership in the House favors the tax. From Speaker Pelosi, to her committee chairmen Charlie Rangel, John Murtha and John Larson. they are calling it the “Share The Sacrifice Act.” It raises taxes on millions of Americans, including a 1% surtax on households earning between $30,000 and $250,000 a year. There was no effort to “share the sacrifice” for health insurance because they don’t want that issue tied to a tax increase.

The Government Accounting Office has recently released a report that shows how much federal spending is truly wasted. It is far and away more money than the Democrats will raise with their new taxes. Remember, we are spendiong $43 billion on the war in Afghanistan. Here are some examples of where they could get the money to pay for the war:

  • Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other entitlement programs made improper payments to people and doctors totalling $73 billion.
  • The federal government pays $25 billion a year maintaining buildings around the country that unused or vacant.
  • The GAO determined that 22% of all government social programs have no impact whatsoever on the populations they serve, costing $123 billion.

The problem is program duplication. Congress continues to churn out more social programs every year without determining if there is already a program that does the same work. In an effort to please all their special interest groups, they end up piling program on top of program, all doing similar work. Examples:

  • The Government Accounting Office reports that there are 342 economic development programs, 130 programs serving the disabled, 130 programs serving “at risk” youth, 90 early childhood develpment programs, 75 programs funding international education and culturaql programs, and 72 safe water programs.
  • Nearly half of all credit card purchases on federal government credit cars are improper. We taxpayers funded federal employees mortgages, gambling trips, XBoxes, IPods, jewelry, internet dating services, just to name a few.
  • Many federal employees refuse to fly coach, costing $146 million.
  • Bloomberg reported in an article dated August 16, 2009, that the Pentagon spent over $998 thousand to ship two 19 cent washers to Florida.
  • After Hurricane Katrina, victims of the disaster were sent debit cards to purchase food and basic necessities. When the reciepts started coming in, they were for Carribean vacations, NFL tickets, “GIrls Gone Wild” videos, a sex change operation, and lots and lots of jewelry.

The list above is not nearly complete, but shows a few examples of fraud and waste in government. Congress has not considered closing these loopholes before going to the taxpayer to pay for the war. They ignore the cost overuns that cost the budget over $1 trillion a year, duplication of programs, and many other GAO reported fraud and waste examples. Many of these costly and wasteful programs have the names of members of Congress attached to them, so they aren’t going anywhere soon.

If Congress pushes Obama to break the promise he made to the middle class, I will gladly join an impeachment movement that is already gaining support due to  other problems with this administration. He would be wise to resist the liberals and turn back this ill advised piece of legislation.



RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

a war tax makes sense

dave_in_atl (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 2:54PM EST (link)

Both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have been off budget since the beginning and so far look to surpass one trillion dollars. I have nothing against fighting these two battles, but they should be paid for.

As long as its explicit that the tax can only be used to pay for the wars, and is immediately repealed when the war is over.

I would agree

notreallyrepublican (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 2:59PM EST (link)

Im not opposed to ‘use’ taxes, where you get taxed based on your consumption (like a sales tax/flat tax). Bush kept the two wars off the books to try and pretend he was one of us, a small government, small budget conservative. The wars are worth it, and the increased cost of our military fighting them is a ‘use’, the fighting force I’m proud to support is out there defending my freedom. Seems right to pay for it.

And you’re right, as soon as the wars are over and that increased cost isn’t there, it needs to be written so that they vanish at that point, since im no longer ‘using’ the increased readiness war requires.


I’m a conservative, not a Republican. If the GOP forgets about that, I’d be more then happy to vote third-party. Wouldn’t give me any less representation then I have now, and might give me more.

 

why not give a breakdown of all taxes spent

bk (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 3:12PM EST (link)

Extra war cost
Other DoD cost
Medicare
Medicaid
Welfare
Parks
Housing
Etc. Etc. Etc.

The Dems just will find any excuse to try to raise taxes. If they were to add a “war tax” do you think it would end as soon as we leave that area? Nah, it would become a “peace dividend/investment” that the people in Washington just could not live without. How many years did we pay that 1800s telephone tax?

...

dave_in_atl (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 3:47PM EST (link)

Seems like we have two options… Pay for it now, or pay for it later with interest.

Seems like it should be possible to pass a law that says taxes will be levied to pay for X. Maybe sunset it every 12 months that way it has to be re-passed every year (try passing a war tax with no war)

 
 

The alternative

zroxx (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 3:21PM EST (link)

It’s a fundamental problem that our government assumes that to pay for a new priority deemed important, it is necessary to increase taxes instead of looking at what should be de-prioritized and terminated, freeing up funds to cover the new expenses.

(R)s missed a great opportunity when they were in power to use the increased expenses resulting from Iraq to fight for proportional spending cuts in programs that aren’t even a reasonable priority outside of a prolonged military engagement.

Perhaps this is another opportunity to take the principle that government should be covering the costs of what it engages in but differentiate from (D) policies by proposing such spending cuts in lieu of a tax increase.

 

My problem is that now they want to pay for things

Leopard1996 (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 4:42PM EST (link)

But the stimulus that was passed by Obama and the congress, not paid for.

Health care-they are front loading the front end with taxes, to start spending in the back-end but after the estimates, that won’t be paid for.

Omnibus bill, not paid for.

Find a way to pay for all of those, or put the money back in the treasury, then I will talk about a war tax.

“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen