Perhaps we did not purchase the bill of goods, but 68,588,471 American voters, most still alive and voting only once, were sold the campaign schtick – hopeCHANGEhope – and now they’re learning about it from Karl Rove. On their home turf, NBC’s Today program, Karl Rove reviews their messiah’s national security & foreign policy team and tells them this:
The team represents, to a substantial degree, continuity.
Ouch. Continuity = More of the Same. (Gates, btw, is not a Republican.)
(There’s more beyond the vid.)
The AP tells us of Rove’s appearance on the Fun with Matt Lauer Show:
Rove pointed to the retention of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the naming of James Jones as national security adviser, a Vietnam war veteran who rose to become a Marine four-star general and served as military chief of NATO during the Bush administration. Obama also named Hillary Rodham Clinton as his nominee for secretary of state.
Pejman Yousefzadeh notes that Obama’s “approach on decision-making seems to be lifted straight from the playbooks of George W. Bush and John McCain.”
Hillary for State was uninspired. Obama was forced to hire the “monster” for political reasons. He cannot govern without her, so he is now tied to the co-winner of an election held 16-years-ago. This isn’t just the status quo; it’s recycled. (And the media will proclaim that Obama’s saving the planet for it.) In accepting the nomination, Hillary talked of the same problems: Iran, the Norks, Palestine, etc. More. Of. The. Same.
Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano at DHS seems like another patronage appoint, which Presidents of all stripes have doled out for centuries, and it is… more of the same. She is not nearly as qualified as is Secretary Chertoff, unless she has some super power of which we’ve not been told. (This is always a possibility in the Obama Administration.)
I know Obama says that he will be the ultimate decider in his Administration, but this has also been done before.
If this is change from President Bush’s first term, we have been there and done that.
Perhaps Obama’s acolytes are beginning to understand that they have been had and they do not like the new bill of goods in the trunk. Too bad. To hear it from Karl Rove, well… this “revolution,” I am afraid, will be televised. Policy-wise, in the recently announced aspects, it is shaping up to be nothing revolutionary.
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
JaNo for Homeland Security
AthenaDelphi (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 2:48PM EST (link)Take it from me, I live in Arizona. She should be given a fair trial for crimes against the state of Arizona and then promptly hung, like justice used to be in the old west.
Where do I start with Arizona? We had Ev Mecham (died recently so I won’t say anything bad, just factual) – who asked if the Pope, who visited the state back in the 1980s, spoke English and said that ‘pickaninny’ was an endearment. Ev was a successful used car salesman and a mormon. He was impeached, and the woman who cast the deciding vote – an african american state senator – was later convicted of taking huge stacks of cash bribes (as seen on video tape during a sting). She hated Ev and so made sure he paid. So did she.
Moving on, we had Rose Mofford, of the Beehive hairdo, who was Secretary of State, when Ev got impeached. Her claim to fame was the statement that “they” were using “lasers” (think Dr. Evil from Austin Powers for the quotes) to listen in to her conversations. Rose Mofford was a democrat.
Then we had an election (yippee!) and we got Fife Symington (commonly known as 3 sticks because he was not a sr., nor a jr, but a “III”). Fife got caught up in the 1st round of real estate bubbles in Arizona by inflating the worth of one property to borrow against it and buy another. That stack, when it came tumbling down, caught up with him and instead of being impeached, he resigned, something happened where he was found guilty but served house arrest, then the charges were dropped due to a technicality, and old Fife went to cooking school and became a chef.
Fife was replaced by Jane Hull, of the red hair, who was the Secretary of State, and she filled the remainder of Fife’s term, ran for election on her own, and got elected. Yippee. Not much happened during those 4 years which is a GOOD THING in drama ridden Arizona.
Then, came all those pesky transplant Californians who wanted out of the illegal aliens that no one held accountable, the business killing tax environment of the largest state in the union, and also, the cheap housing where someone selling a $400k home in California that was about 1200 sq. ft. could get a 5000 sq. ft. house for that amount.
For this migration, we got higher property taxes, more illegal immigration, and Janet Napolitano for governor.
The kindest thing I can thank Obama for is picking this beast for Homeland Security to get her out of the state and have Jan Brewer, Republican, take over.
Since ol’ Janet never stood up to La Raza and the judges, (we’re told that spending $5000 per student on english language training is NOT ENOUGH, and under court order to get more), told the Arizona National Guard who were under attack and being shot at that they could NOT return fire but merely get into their trucks and leave the area, I hold out no hope for this lawyer to do anything other than dither on homeland security.
The one bright hope is that the new alert about bioweapons or wmd’s hitting one of the cities in the USA by 2012, that is being talked about on Fox News Channel this morning, will show that Arizona is the key state where we are the super highway from Latin America to the USA.
Think Hugo Chavez and the Russians and Al-Qaeda don’t know this? Think Al-Qaeda is afraid of heat and the desert? They live in the driest part of the world so I can only hope that they come up through Phoenix, stop at the waffle house for breakfast, and then move on to other states to do their dirty work.
As we like to say to snowbirds who come for the warm winters:
Thanks for visiting, Janet. Now go away.
Just as an aside: if anyone thought that Arizona was a republican state need only do a search and find out that the majority of governors since Arizona became a state have been….DEMOCRATS.
Oh, and pay no attention to the two windowless vans that were driving up I-10 and using AK47s to shoot at each other over morning commuters so that the coyotes could be first to market with their commodity: human slaves. Where was Janet? She deferred to the Federal Gov’t since immigration is a federal issue.
The word is "Flexible."
29Victor (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 3:59PM EST (link)Flex-ible
That’s what the NYT piece in my local paper called it.
Obama is being flexible about leaving Iraq and other campaign promises. He wasn’t lying through his teeth then and he’s not following that Bush status-quo now, he’s being “flexible.”
Sometimes change means being flexible enough to do things the way they’ve always been done before.
Why listen to Rove?
mrblonde Tuesday, December 2nd at 4:09PM EST (link)Come on guys, he’s not an honest commentator. Does anyone really believe that he gives his honest appraisal of anything as opposed to just saying whatever makes Republicans look good and Democrats look bad.
That’s fine for the political parties, that’s what they do, but we’re just citizens and I don’t see why we should give anything he has to say any particular weight. If Obama had just picked all new people do you think Rove would announce how pleased he was with his picks? Hell no,he would have claimed this is more proof that Obama is a radical.
I personally can not stand Hillary, but the idea in general of picking people with experience isn’t such a bad idea.
That line.
Mark Kilmer (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 4:42PM EST (link)“Sometimes change means being flexible enough to do things the way they’ve always been done before.”
No, it doesn’t.
Karl Rove seems to be able to keep
Mark Kilmer (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 4:50PM EST (link)to keep his hats properly sorted.
Obama’s latest advisory choices are not status quo simply because Rove says so. It doesn’t work that way. They are because they are. I highlighted Rove just because I thought it was neat for the Obama groupies to hear it from a man they hate and fear.
That’s all.
But you’re a blonde, aren’t you?
Sure it does. That's the beauty of platitudes.
29Victor (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 4:59PM EST (link)They can mean whatever you want them to.
In this case it means change faces, change names, change buzzwords, change NYT coverage, keep policy.
That’s change I can believe in.
Obama is trying to be Lincoln
historystudent Tuesday, December 2nd at 9:07PM EST (link)This is my first post to RedState, so please be gentle with me if you have comments.
I just finished reading the Politico piece comparing Obama’s speeches to Lincoln’s in which they pointed out that Obama strives to be like A. Lincoln by creating a “historic” presidency. They pointed out that Obama has been reading a lot of books on Lincoln lately, including Doris Kearns Goodwin’s recent biography, “Team of Rivals.” I am convinced that the “team of rivals” that Lincoln created with his cabinet is what Obama is attempting to emmulate. The problem with Obama is that he is NOT Lincoln, this is NOT 1860 and his rivals have their own best political interests in mind far above his or the best interests of this country. I finished Goodwin’s tomb about six months ago, and, while I disagree with some of her conclusions regarding Lincoln’s personal beliefs, she at least did a good job of clearing the air of the putrid stench of Gore Vidal’s hack job in which he insisted Lincoln had syphilis. One thing that struck me from her book was not just Lincoln’s ability to manage former rivals, but the great fortune that his chief political opponent in the Republican Party, William Seward, became one of his most loyal supporters and ardent allies. Forgive me the pessimism, but I highly doubt that Clinton will pay the same respect for Obama.
While men quickly turn from a historian who curries favor, they listen with ready ears to calumny and spite; for flattery is subject to the shameful charge of servility, but malignity makes a false show of independence. – Tacitus, The Histories, Book I.
Welcome to Redstate.
mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 9:18PM EST (link)Please punctuate your comments and your diaries (when you start writing them). It makes for much easier reading and understanding and some of us can use all the help we can get. :>)
With respect to Obama’s Presidency, he has one thing going in that no other President – save Washington – has enjoyed. His Presidency WILL BE historic, no matter what. And, given the political leanings of those who report the news, those who analyze the news, and those who write history, he has every right to think he’ll end up like Lincoln. Whether he’s a good President or not.
It’s quite interesting that a President who’s been held as one the most effective – FDR – is just now taking fire for the New Deal. We are just starting to see people publish books and articles – serious ones – that make the case that the New Deal only prolonged the Depression and likely made it deeper in the US. It will be quite interesting to see where all that ends up.
Bottom line, Presidents have little control over how history will view their term and it typically is well after they’re gone before a picture even starts to form.
Karl Rove has only one hat
mrblonde Wednesday, December 3rd at 9:38PM EST (link)I don’t see why he’s treated as a respectable source of information, that’s all.