The Sunday Morning Talk Shows: The Review


ImagePREFACE:

On FNS, John Podesta, Obama’s transition guru, asserted that there was a progressive wing of the Republican Party but it had died several decades ago. He also admitted that his organization, Center for America Progress, had sucked down Soros dollars.

Next on FNS, Eric Cantor and Mike Pence spelled out that there was no realignment of the electorate in the last election, no move toward big government; rather, it was an expression of voter mistrust of government. Pence specified that it was an individual moment with a compelling candidate.

On TW, incoming Obama CofS Rahm Emanuel didn’t swing at many of Steph’s softballs but did say that energy and health care were the two big issues and that the ongoing economic crisis gave Obama cover to deal with them however he will. He expects that John McCain will be a partner in this.

On MTP, Obama crony and transition co-chair Valerie Jarrett told moderator Tom Brokaw that Michelle Obama was not interested in being “co-President.” He did not ask Ms. Jarrett if she were interested in being the next U.S. Senator from Illinois.

On FTN, Rahm said that for this lame duck Congress’ work on the additional stimulus package, Obama will remain in Chicago doing this and that. He has shown leadership, Obama insisted, through his “call for action.”

On LE, Harry Reid told guest host John King that he has forgiven McCain but still carries around the Thad Cochran statement of revulsion at the thought of a President McCain. But Reid said the Dems have a mandate to stop the divisiveness, and McCain told him that the election was over. Reid would approve of Obama retaining SecDef Gates because Gates is not a registered Republican.

JOHN PODESTA ON FNS. On FOX News Sunday, host Chris Wallace interviewed Obama transition guru John Podesta.

Podesta stated that Obama wants another stimulus package and either the Bushies “cooperate” or Obama will roll it out first thing after he takes office. Obama wants nothing to do with any Bush appointees dealing with the economic crisis, Podesta stated flatly; he will bring in his “own team.”

Obama wants to “restore wages,” Podesta told Wallace, who asked him if Obama might run the risk of cluttering the agenda. Podesta allowed that there is “always a danger to clutter the agenda,” but Obama wants to address the “top tier issues” immediately.

Wallace asked Podesta if Obama had a “mandate,” and he answered: “I think he feels there was a strong vote for change… a real mandate for change.”

Podesta offered that there was a progressive wing in the Republican Party but it had “died… in the past several decades.” (We called them the “Rockefeller Republicans.)

Podesta stated that the Obama transition began in early August.

Podesta admitted that George Soros was an early contributor to his little Center for American Progress organization, which is sometimes though of us a division of Soros’s Open Society Institute. Podesta said that he will not take part in Obama’s Administration.

CANTOR AND PENCE ON FNS. Next up for host Wallace were Congressmen Mike Pence (in studio) and Eric Cantor (via satellite). Cantor argued that there had been no realignment of the electorate in the recent election, no shift to European-style socialistic government; rather, he said, the voters acted on their mistrust of government. This was not about right vs. left, he said, but right vs. wrong.

Pence added that this was no victory for progressive/liberal politics; rather, it was a victory for Barack Obama and the “enormously effective” Obama campaign. He said that this country had found an “extraordinary moment” in its history and backed a “compelling figure.”

“I’m a conservative,” Pence admitted, “but I’m not in a bad mood about it, Chris.”

Cantor averred that “we have to show that we understand what people are going through.” The GOP, he argued, has to run as the party of reform. The GOP must change, he insisted, and adapt to the new technology to reach people.

Wallace argued that this election was about issues, “not just charm.” Pence argued that the Republicans have to communicate their issues of limited government, reduced taxation, life, a sound national defense, etc. He said that Republicans had learned in their last two years in the minority that they must speak directly to the people. He said that in this 24/7 News Cycle, with the Internet, the Republicans can communicate their differences and turn things around sooner rather than later.

RAHM ON TW. On ABC, This Week host George Stephanopoulos interviewed one guest of note, Obama CofS Rahm Emanuel , before slipping into the intellectually lukewarm vat inhabited by such as David Gergen and Fareed Zakaria.

Rahm described John McCain as a “true patriot” who will be supportive of what the Obama Administration does. He will be a “partner” in helping to solve the huge problems.

Steph asked Rahm if Obama will give the automobile industry the money from the reserve fund, and Obama did not answer, yea/no. He said that they could give the industry immediately the $25-billion already allotted and they can look for other stuff.

Rahm said that two issues, energy and health care, have hurt the middle class, and the ongoing crisis in our nation’s economy gives the Obama Administration cover to deal with them as they will.

Asked about Harry Reid and Joe Lieberman, Rahm said that this was Congress’ problem. Obama will be focused on the immediate problems facing the country.

Finally, Steph asked Rahm about Obama’s replacement in the Senate. Would Obama select Valerie Jarrett, his senior advisor? Rahm did not answer.

VALERIE JARRETT ON MTP. On NBC’s Meet the Press, as luck would have it, moderator Tom Brokaw’s guest was that selfsame Obama crony and would-be U.S. Senator Valerie Jarrett. She was born in Iran. She was a single mother in Chicago and a White Sox fan who did undergrad at Stanford and got her JD from U. of Michigan. She worked as Deputy CofS for Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. Etc.

Now, she is co-chair of Obama’s transition team, and Obama has said of Jarrett: “I don’t make any major decisions without asking her about them.” Is this more troubling to the media than was Karl Rove in ’00? Nope.

Jarrett said that the economy and national security are Obama’s top priorities. She admitted that failed Michigan Governor Jen Granholm was one of Obama’s top economic advisors, along with Rubin, Volcker, Buffett, etc.

Brokaw asked Jarrett, what with are bad and constantly worsening economy, when Obama will name his Treasury Secretary when he feels like it, adding that he has a “wealth” of qualified people who want the job. (Waiting for the chance to implement their lifetimes’ Keynesian dreams.) She gleefully refused to give Brokaw any names other than the usual, media-listed folks.

She said that Obama will name Republicans to his cabinet because he believes in bipartisan discussion. Brokaw didn’t demand names. Brokaw suggested that Obama might retain some of President Bush’s cabinet members, specifically Gates. Jarrett said anything was possible.

Brokaw described Rahm as someone with “very sharp elbows” and asked: “Is there going to be a kinder, gentler Rahm Emanuel?” She said that Obama wants a bipartisan, collegial administration and that “there’s no one who can hit the ground running faster than” Rahm.

Brokaw mentioned the Clinton connections – Podesta, Rahm – and asked if Obama had been talking directly to President Clinton. Jarrett answered that Senator Clinton has been a “key advisor.”

Jarrett said that Michelle Obama is not interesting in being a “co-President,” then Brokaw asked if she had “a vote in the puppy selection.” That’s up to the Obama kids.

He did not ask Jarrett if she wanted to be Senator.

RAHM ON FTN. On CBS, Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer spoke to Rahm. Rahm said that Obama is already developing his economic team and that he will work at a “deliberate pace.” Schieffer want a time frame, and Rahm did not give him one. “Deliberate pace.”

Schieffer asked about the lame duck session of Congress and how Obama “will insert himself.” Will he take a leadership role? Rahm said that he’s already taking a leadership role, but Schieffer wanted to know if he’ll be in Washington as Senator from Illinois or back in Chicago assembling his team. Rahm answered that Obama will be in Chicago. Obama’s role will be limited, Rahm said, to his lame “call for action.”

Schieffer asked if Obama will demand that the Bush White House go along with the Reid-Pelosi solution to the automobile industry crisis. Rahm answered that there is one President at a time and that there was plenty of money in the pipes from the industry. “The automotive industry is a central part of our economy.”

Schieffer asked if Obama would propose permanent tax cuts for the middle class, and would he delay the tax hikes on the wealthy. Rahm said that Obama will use this crisis to reform education, energy, and health care. It’s part of Obama’s economic strategy, you know.

Schieffer concluded that Emanuel did not answer anything.

HARRY REID ON LE. On CNN, Late Edition guest host John King aired his interview with Harry Reid. King asked Reid if the voters were rejecting the Republicans or embracing the Dems. Harry explained that he’s read the lefty pundits and determined that this is a permanent change. Nevada, he said, is “very blue.”

Reid said that the Democrats had a “mandate to end the divisiveness.”

Reid said that he had a talk with McCain and told him that some of his statements were expressed in a way he no longer liked, and “John” told him that the election is over with.

King asked if Reid still carried n his pocket Senator Thad Cochran’s statement on John McCain, that the thought of a President McCain “sends a cold chill down my spine,” and Reid said that he did but that he was going to throw it out.

Reid said that McCain had said some mean things about him. He compared himself as a young man to John McCain as a young man. (At about the age when John McCain was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, Dingy Harry was lieutenant governor of Nevada.)

Reid said that he is tired of the Iraq war and that Obama will bring our troops home.

Reid will accept Secretary Gates’s return as SecDef, should Obama choose him, because Gates is not a registered Republican.

Reid said that what Joe Lieberman did “was wrong,” but the caucus would decide what to do with him.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

And this is a post-election, pre-partisan flight of fancy. Have at it.


RSS feed

25 Comments Leave a comment

Please take this country back!

peanutcain Sunday, November 9th at 1:36PM EST (link)

Pleeease!

cookcountyconservative (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 1:58PM EST (link)

Did I actually hear Bob Scheiffer say Obama’s campaign did not go after Sarah Palin during the election?

 

Energy, Education and Health

redneck_hippie (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 2:19PM EST (link)

Care…

The honeymoon period will be used to push for reform of these, which will come with a catastrophic price tag for the country. May I predict that Conservatives and Small Government Republicans will rise against this and that the party in power will thereby villify all nonliberals as selfish and meanspirited partisans?

This is change? What would be a change is if The Administration Elect is honest with the people and tells them we can’t afford to do everything we would like (or not like) to do. Instead of gutting our military to expand the welfare state, we must expand choice, trade and freedom from oppressive taxation.

Why not expand incentives for investment instead of sending out a government check? One tires of the populist hooey, regardless of the party who is spewing it. Did anyone who received a $600 stimulant this year decide to hire another worker? No? I thought not.

Note 2 Mark: Your review is awesomely awesome every dang week.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

Valerie Jarrett on MTP

David Hinz (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 2:34PM EST (link)

says that President-elect Obama has a wealth of people who are eager to become Treasury Secretary.

By definition, anyone “eager” to become Treasury Secretary in the present climate is disqualified for that position.

 

Eric Cantor

Scope (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 2:38PM EST (link)

When the first Bailout Sham came up for the first vote, I watched the Republicans come out to speak to the press as soon as it failed. I may be wrong, but it appeared to me that Eric Cantor did all he could to get in front of the camera immediately with his voice, and a copy of the speech Pelosi gave right before the vote. He held the letter up to the cameras and said that that was why the Bailout was not passed. It was obvious he wanted it to pass. I was very dissapointed that he backed the legislation to begin with, but to say Pelosi’s partisan speech was the reason for the failure gave me the creeps. If he really is the conservative that he claims to be, and his voting record before was pretty conservative, then why did he not stand up against legislation that a majority of We The People (something like 80%) said no to. And, then he added his stupid insurance language to the legislation, which is voluntary and worthless. Because of that I was not going to vote for him as he is my district rep.

This morning has sealed the deal for me, I will not vote for him again in 2010. To say that he didn’t think the country voted for an ideology, but because the R’s lost their way was speaking out of the side of his mouth. The R’s surely did lose their way, however, a majority that voted for Obama do in fact want the government to take care of them from cradle to grave. They may not understand what a Socialistic Type of Government is, but they know they want the Government to do everything and give them everything. They want a free ride. And then, he spilled his real beans when he said that the R’s are going to work with Obama and his administration and Congress to pass important legislation for example Global Warming legislation. To me that means compromise compromise compromise. Didn’t the conservatives just learn the very hard way that to be moderate and to reach across the isle on the most important issues facing us will only spell defeat after defeat not only for the Conservatives but the R’s as a whole. Did we not just learn that we need to hold to our core principles and not be such a pale color that we appear as D lights.

Cantor is trying hard to become the Minority Whip. What do you think he will do with his already showing true colors? He will run right across the isle along with McCain and Graham and yep that’s right- Conservatism will be dead forever. After all, he ran right out to support McCain almost before his nomination was securely in the bag.

Cantor is a RINO!

 

Energy

DerKrieger (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 3:19PM EST (link)

Among the Dems plans for our collective future their plans for energy scare me the most.

They seem to have not done their math at all as it regards their preferred alternatives as http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/2008/11/solar-follies.html.

The Dems will be in thrall to the eco-Marxists who are little more than modern day Chicken Littles who literally believe the sky is falling.

They claim to be the party of the average working class people yet are determined to raise the price of energy. Obama said, when gas prices were at $4/gal that he just would have preferred for prices not to have risen so fast. More recently he said that electricity prices would necessarily “skyrocket” as he implemented his cap & trade plan.

Not only will consumers be hit hard, many of the employers will also be hit hard and possibly either lay off workers or offshore additional jobs to escape punishing energy costs *imposed *on us by zealots.

Will the Democrats accept responsibility for the results of their policies? Will voters understand why their energy costs are out of control and vote accordingly?

Time will tell.

“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison

Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690

 

How interesting...

Mushy_MiddleGuy (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 3:32PM EST (link)

Barack Obama’s “call for action” is considered leadership by Rahm-bo, but John McCain’s was a publicity stunt? Double-standard, much?

 

Education

Scope (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:03PM EST (link)

If the conservatives are ever to take back a leadership role they must figure out some way to counter the liberal indoctrination of our students from pre school to the University level. I firmly believe that a balanced education in all forms of government will be very necessary. I don’t know how we will ever accomplish that with the Teachers Union being so in the tank for Obama/Liberals as are the rest of the unions. When we see home schooling and voucers go by the wayside we are in deep trouble. It must be tremendously difficult for parents to try to teach their children one way, and then watch them come home from school inundated with liberal ideologies pumped into their impressionable minds. How do we get past that?

Again- If you are 20 and not a Democrat, you have no heart. If you are 40 and not a Republican, you have no brains.

 

I guess I'm part of that Progressive Wing

kowalski (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:10PM EST (link)

I didn’t watch the interview, but I guess I’m part of that “Progressive Wing of the Republican Party that Died Off 30 Years Ago.”

I’m not a Rockefeller Republican, I’m a Kowalski Responsibilist, and my progressivity consists in what trying to help America continue to thrive and survive as the preeminent power in the world. My belief is that we accomplish this the old-fashioned way: through low taxes, rewarding individual initiative, inclucating a sense of moral and social responsibility for adults and children, taking control of our energy supply and making it cheaper and more abundant and also less environmentally deleterious, maintaining a completely frightening and overwhelmingly powerful military, and teaching people to learn English as a precondition for becoming citizens.

And don’t try to take my guns, Bubba. They’ve never hurt you, and they’re not going to unless you try to take them on the basis of a pile of conterfactual claptrap.

I am willing to tolerate some of the wilder stuff if those basic conditions are met. On gay marriage I say, for example: “Ok. Please try to make it beautiful, not tawdry and sad.”

My apology to Paul Cella is coming, and this post should probably be longer. I’ll save it for now.

The Republican food pyramid

SteveLA (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:19PM EST (link)

K,

You’ve described a pretty good Republican food pyramid, but the argument going on right now is what’s the mix? Unless you’re part of the group that is saying eliminate the social conservative “red meat” from the diet, I don’t buy that one.

For the last few years in my view the pyramid has had one sort of allocation between all the Republican “foods”, the question is will that allocation stay the same going forward. I’m all for making kitchen table issues the base of the Republican food pyramid by the way.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity and litmus tests

I don't think so

zuiko (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 4:33PM EST (link)

The “progressive wing” didn’t seem to be interested in lower taxes, less regulation, or anything at all that might have made them distinguishable from the Democrats. That part of the party didn’t die off so much as move to a party more congruent with their positions. Good riddance.

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. – Milton Friedman

Eric Cantor said that...

Mark Kilmer (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 5:05PM EST (link)

last Tuesday, the nation did not turn to the left; rather, the voters were sick of how the Republican Party had been behaving. This has been a big government party of late, after all.

Congressman Cantor is a conservative Republican. I respect your opposition to him, but I’ve seen the term “RINO” used to mean “Anyone Who Disagrees With Me on Any Issue.”

The answer is simple, the implementation is hard.

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 5:52PM EST (link)

Eliminate direct funding of public schools. Hand an “education voucher” to every parent for each school age child. Let the parent make the decision where the child will attend school.

Liberal Education

Scope (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 6:46PM EST (link)

Do you think this has any chance with an Obama presidency and a democratically controlled congress? And especially with an Obama community organizer appeal to the teachers union?

No. Hell will freeze over first.

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 7:44PM EST (link)
 
 
 
 
 
 

I can't even read a -summary- of what Harry Reid says

randy streu (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 7:47PM EST (link)

without wanting to slap him around.

Seriously, who the hell does this guy think he is?

Mark Kilmer

Aetius728 Sunday, November 9th at 7:59PM EST (link)

You are partially correct. Last Tuesday, the voters demonstrated that they were sick of all high gas, energy, and food prices, high healthcare costs, high national debt, the financial crisis, etc, and they believed that these were caused by policies of republicans(specifically President Bush) such as low taxes for the rich, outsourcing, and deregulation of Wall Street.

The Conservative base if sick of Republicans abandoning their principles, but the majority of Americans are sick of all of the problems they believe that Republicans create. Our failure is that we haven’t found an effective communicator.

Find a couple socially moderate to conservative blue collar or suburban voters who voted for Obama. Ask them why they didn’t vote Republican. I guarentee you the answer you get won’t be “they spent to much,” or “they made government bigger.”

false dichotomy

Hooke Sunday, November 9th at 8:27PM EST (link)

The linked article posits that nuclear energy and solar/wind are mutually exclusive, i.e. that you can choose solar or nuclear, but not both. And it makes this argument by comparing energy densities per acre. This is flawed logic. There is no reason why solar, wind, geo, hydro, and nuclear can’t coexist, and the case for solar is not made on the basis of energy density, it is made on the basis that it can generate electricity in otherwise off-limits areas (like your roof, where you probably would not want a nuclear reactor), in a carbon neutral way.

It goes on to say that renewables can’t replace “traditional” energy due to the intermittancy of their output. This is incorrect for two reasons. 1, he ignores the fact that hydro and geo don’t have that issue, and 2. he ignores on-site storage technologies that allow power to be produced when it is favorable, but released to the grid when it is needed.

He also argues that hiding millions of acres under solar panels could have unknown environmental impacts. Quite aside from the fact that we do this all the time when we build, well, anything large (like a traditional power plant or a subdivision, for instance), it’s also unnecessary. Rooftop solar is an excellent way to get energy out of otherwise wasted acreage.

Simply put, the article liked, (and the one that it in turn links) are nothing but giant red herring arguments that boil down to the statement “Don’t let them build renewable energy power plants, because it will stop us from building nuclear and bankrupt the country”

I’m all for nuclear, but this is just bad reasoning.

Actually...

Mark Kilmer (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 8:43PM EST (link)

If the Republican Party had danced to the tune it was singing, at least in part — limited government, personal freedom, individual rights, reduced taxes — they would have won the election. Those are majority views in this country.

The Republican Party did not stand for those things last election, no matter what some said.

He is the new, bipartisan Harry Reid.

Mark Kilmer (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 8:50PM EST (link)

Evidently, Barack Obama has inspired him to be a better man without admitting that the man he has been has been like lunatic pond scum.

He did not apologize to John McCain for the awful things he said about him, but he told McCain that he might have said these things differently. And besides, McCain’s said some bad things about him.

Harry Reid should not be entrusted with any political power.

"bipartisan"

randy streu (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 8:54PM EST (link)

I think that word to a democrat translates roughly to, “well, I don’t think all Republicans should be shot without trial.”

 
 
 
 
 
 

Gates

Dempsey Sunday, November 9th at 9:39PM EST (link)

I highly doubt that Bob Gates sticks around for the Obama Administration. I saw him on CSPAN about 2 months ago, and he commented that he wanted to go to the Pacific Northwest after his current stint is over. Can’t blame him one bit.

 

More on Harry Reid

Whitehorse (Diary) Sunday, November 9th at 9:49PM EST (link)

I believe that in a few short months it’s likely that he will be one of Obama’s least liked people. I don’t see him changing his ham-handed ways, & will push for over-reaching by the Democrats in the senate.

What we Republicans need is leadership to fix the stool. The leg of small government conservatism/spending restraint is broken, & we need leaders to fix that so we can once again be balanced. I’m not sure if it will be Newt, Palin, Jindal, or someone else who will step up or if a group will step up for this. When that happens & we have all three legs of the stool, the game will change dramatically.

No To Vouchers, Yes To Tax Credits

IJB Sunday, November 9th at 11:17PM EST (link)

Reagan was right: Tax credits are the way to go on education (assuming a Flat Tax hasn’t been implemented).

Vouchers would just be a way for the government to get into private education through the back door (the price for vouchers would almost certainly be “accreditation”, and there goes independent private education).

 
 

Kilmer, I don't know how you do it week in and week out

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 12:57AM EST (link)

Watching all this garbage. Although the Cantor/Pence thing was refreshing and encouraging.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO