Sarcasm Off.

When the Larry Craig story broke (which the so-called journalist had been sitting on it for months) CNN was leading the top and bottom of the hour with Craig. I joked that CNN should become the Larry Craig network. (Same for Joe Wilson—-Gloria Vanderbilt had it the topic of every show for weeks).

CNN has become quite unwatchable as these so-called journalists take themselves so seriously as…..serious journalists. Ergo the SNL skits of late.

They have literally and figuratively become a parody.

the donks should have a “no-confidence” voter and then vote her out of the Speaker chair.Now. she is a disgrace.

It’s perfectly ok for “young gay men” to work for Bahney Fwank (from his basement?) but it is horrible for Massa to meet one for lunch?

I guess I get it. Has nothing to do with voting loyalty. All about “protection from sex starved congressmen”.

Always the last to know, out of the loop, no wonder healthcare dictatorship is in trouble.
In the meantime, friendly liberals advise us not to pay too much attention to this. I wonder what they know or how widespread these adventures range, apart from Foley/Craig, who seem to be the boundary lines of interest for our media.

his herd.

Easy boys. Easy. What is the issue with Massa they are trying to prevent us from seeing. Watch the hands, not the words. Is Massa bi-sexual? Here’s the issue, with the left working so hard to normalize gay relationships why are they using the “gay fear” tool as a way to discredit Massa?

The author buys in with this statement.

“Many junior staffers in congressional offices are young people, fresh out of college. Although they are not children, they are deserving of protection from sex starved congressmen who seek to use their high position to score a bit more than campaign contributions.

Yet Pelosi did nothing. For six months she and her office looked the other way as Massa shared a house with five staffers and abused his official position to try and bed young male staffers on his and other members’ staffs. Pelosi’s failure to do anything to stop Massa’s behavior once his Chief of Staff made her office aware of it is unethical and shameful and casts a pall over the entire House.”

Where is the evidence of gay sex, or attempted gay sex? We have a complaint-

“Joe Racalto, Massa’s chief of staff, was uneasy that Massa, 50, was living with several young, unmarried male staffers and using sexually explicit language with them”

What is “explicit language” and how does that translate into gay sex? When I was an active police officer we would make comments to one another that could easily be construed as “explicit” . For example when someone told us to do something we didn’t want to do I’ve heard comments involving the offender’s opportunity to perform a certain act upon the offended officer’s privates. Certainly not a very mature response, but hardly a serious offer. So, again what exactly happened? And why is it important now.

If Massa was becoming a problem for a number of reasons, the left could have handled it several ways- One, admit he’s a nut and a democrat and take the hit. Two- ignore him and hope he goes away (not likely). Three- start a preemptive series of strikes to isolate and discredit him early on. How? Make him gay bashing, closet homosexual, who is a serial liar. So when he says Rahm came after him naked and threatened him, you can say “Of course he when he thinks of Rahm, he sees him as “naked”, that how “those” people think.” Yet, if Massa was supporting the healthcare takeover, he could spend the weekends with Barney Frank in a San Fran bathhouse and nobody on the left would blink.

When Beck interviewed Massa it was obvious something had happened between the time Beck talked to him on the phone and the interview. I also noted several interrogation “tells” in Massa’s speech and mannerisms. Beck also pushed past several important issues trying to get to a specific accusation. I comment on that in my post-

http://truthandcommonsense.com/2010/03/09/becks-interview-goes-south-he-was-used-it-happens/

As Massa uncovered the ugly underside of being in D.C. Beck didn’t want to hear it. Like I said in the post- “It was like if Glenn was trying to interview a mobster and was saying, “Okay beyond the murder, kidnapping, drug dealing and extortion, what do you do that’s criminal?””

I don’t like Massa, he’s a worm. However, Sammy the Bull Gravano turned informant and his testimony bagged some really big fish. I understand later he went back to being what he was, a sociopathic criminal. But sometimes, as I learned early on, you have to deal with the witnesses you can find. You aren’t going to get a priest inside the mob.

Ya hey, I know – half the people on here are opposed to term limits for our rulers in Washington! I don’t see any other way for the sane people in flyover country to clean out this nest of corruption and greed that exists in the dissyland that we have to call our nation’s capitol.

The RNC… let her keep her position… don’t interrupt the dems and risk shoving someone even slightly competent into her job… wait until after the 2010 elections then bring everything out when she’s no longer *majority leader*…

She should be front and center the picture girl of dem incompetency and corruption until at least after the elections…

You occasionally risk having a premature blowup. Nancy and crew always keep their dirt evidence hidden until it can be most politically effective. Foley is an effective case in point. Charges introduced after the last date of selection of a substitute candidate in the state. Obama also knows it is easier to disqualify an opponent than beat them in the election.

What is the motivation and implication of the REP resolution passing 402-2 for an investigation?

Great quotes in “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof”

From Breitbart: “GOP loses bid for ethics probe of Dem leaders” – they are saying :

Instead, the House voted 402-1 to allow the panel to determine the next step—a move that could kill any further investigation.

If that is true, why did all the Republicans for for that measure? I’m confused….

Whatever the specifics of this vote, the entire Massa issue is a diversion from the health care debacle and the immigration overhaul Obama has started rolling.

Sure, go after Pelosi and Massa – but don’t lose sight of what else of more importance is being moved along while our eye is off the ball.

What!?! Pelosi is accused of lying for political gain and is now actively attempting to discredit the accuser and change the subject?? I’m shocked! *sarcasm*

Can you just picture this: Pelosi, Reid, Hoyer, Biden et,al., forming a large daisy chain and kissing each others ******* good bye?

Good slogans, but let’s not carry this to far. Get the dirt out of the Dems house? Who’s going to be left to turn out the lights.