As a Warm-Up to Co2 Regulation, Obama’s EPA Kills 500 Jobs


MR. Obama “admonished” Republican’s today for “frightening” the American people. Let’s leave aside for the moment I have no idea how he defines “frighten”. Perhaps he just said, “shame on you, telling the American people the truth while I, your President, is trying to sell ethereal jobs saved nonsense and giving nice, fluffy speeches on unemployment”. Hail Caesar.

By the way, one of the White House staffers should tell Mr. Obama he is holding the unemployment chart upside down. It’s simply the right thing to do.

In a prelude to the mother of all job killers yet to come; Mr. Obama’s EPA just killed 500 jobs at West Virginia coal company CONSOL. Merry Christmas, from the man who actually does not believe in traditionally celebrating the holiday. Here is a snippet of their press release;

“To put it into human terms, we are talking about the jobs of nearly 500 of our employees at the Fola Operations, and the impact such legal interpretations will have on their quality of life and that of their families,” DeIuliis noted, adding that for each job in coal mining, several additional support jobs are adversely affected.”

“It is unfortunate that, at a time when reliable and affordable energy is so desperately needed to reinvigorate our economy, that the nation’s energy industries are coming under repeated assault from nuisance lawsuits and appeals of environmental regulations,” said Nicholas J. DeIuliis, CONSOL Energy executive vice president and chief operating officer. “It is CONSOL Energy’s policy to operate our coal and gas assets safely and within the framework of the laws regulating our industry, but we oppose any efforts to use them to unnecessarily impede our ability to sustain our operations.

Never mind the business community has already said the Co2 ruling will be another Obama job killer. The finding actually is starting to have the ring of another “Climate Gate” type scandal and the “science” (quotes intentional) used for the EPA ruling is being seriously brought into question and needs additional scrutiny.

Ah, but who actually believes the polls anyway.



RSS feed

4 Comments Leave a comment

Its intentional, there is NOTHING unforeseen about this.

nessa (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 6:42PM EST (link)

Ofama is intentionally throwing 500 American Citizens under the bus to “place a horse’s head” in the Harry’s bed. Do you think the rest of us are of any more intense concern for him? Step up to the curb America, your turn is coming!

“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Contributor to Unified Patriots

teh twitter

Don't worry nessa, Obama will just hire 500 more people at the EPA

Marcus_Traianus (Diary) Friday, December 11th at 9:16AM EST (link)

It’s a net sum game- the whole jobs saved versus actual, real unemployment of about 16%.

“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson

 
 

The EPA: keeping West Virginia safe for mayflies!

Steve Maley (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 7:03PM EST (link)

http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2009/09/07/our-epa-keeping-the-environment-safe-for-mayflies/

The blogger formerly known as ‘Vladimir’.

well Vlad, I think it's safe to say mayflies are in the jobs saved number

Marcus_Traianus (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 9:36PM EST (link)

- so saving them was in the public interest. Sort of a quid pro quo.

“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson