To get at the heart of the matter . . .
To distill a solution down to its essence . . .
These phrases describe an inherent human proclivity. We are built to look for patterns and because we are so good at it, planes fly, cars go vroom, and computers work. Patterns and causation and correlation are much appreciated in the physical sciences and in everyday science . . . we can readily appreciate that if we water and fertilize our gardens, they are much more likely to produce a bumper crop.
Unfortunately, our talent for pattern recognition in the physical arena does not well transfer to the metaphysical. This no doubt has much to do with a dearth of education in critical thinking, philosophy, and ethics. Why, after all, waste time with that stuff when educators can better spend precious school hours instructing high school students on the nuances of putting condoms on bananas?
Take, for example, the following series of events/movements/attitudes. What is the commonality among them?
-
David Letterman’s child rape “joke”
-
Playboy Magazine Online’s recent “hate f**k” list of conservative women
-
The “tea bagging” comment on CNN
-
Defense of abortion/the abortion industry
-
Voracious opposition to any sex ed based on abstinence
-
A high divorce rate
-
Calvin Klein’s New York threesome advertisement
-
Reality Television
At first blush, the common thread among the above events/movements/attitudes would seem obvious. However, I suspect many would initially answer incorrectly . . . if you answered ‘sex’, then I say you answered in error. The commonality, in my opinion, is not sex. Rather, it is the abuse and corruption of sex. Underlying even the abuse/corruption of sex is the ancient past time of man, hedonism. In my opinion, these are the underlying, metaphysical common denominators.
The late Pope John Paul II spent a great deal of his pontificate thinking and writing about the Theology of the Body. His writings are a sublime and beautiful exploration of human nature and what it actually means to be created in the image and likeness of God. In short, sex does indeed have a pleasurable, jolly good time component to it, but that is only a single aspect of it and, in and of itself, the jolly-aspect isn’t its purpose.
Hedonism is the underlying culprit behind why so many focus all their attention and energies on the jolly-aspect while ignoring every other facet of sex. In effect, hedonism leads to single-mindedness on one tree at the expense of the whole forest. When one and only one element is hyper-accentuated, abuse and corruption are sure to follow. By way of analogy, think for a few moments about a normal diet. A balanced diet becomes corrupted if it were to feature only dessert. If you ate only cookies, candy, cake, and ice cream, you’d end up fat, anemic, and malnourished . . . the effects of hyper-accentuating a single aspect (i.e. dessert) of a normal diet. But, hey! Cookies taste good, right? The hedonist answers, “Yes! So by all means, indulge!”
Sex has a grandiosity that is quite difficult to adequately do justice to in a single blog. Although God is pure spirit, human sex is a physical representation and expression of God’s divine nature. Sex is a material expression of the love of God. It is meant to humanly reflect Agape, the perfect, selfless love of the Trinity, which is the very atmosphere of the Kingdom of Heaven. Sex also signifies, in the human flesh, the oneness of God (He is 3 persons . . . Father, Son, and Holy Spirit . . . in one divine nature). And, sex humanly expresses a prolific divine trait . . . life, for without sex, there can be no procreation. All of these other aspects . . . unconditional love, oneness, and life . . . are a part of sex precisely because we are created with the Imago Dei (i.e. created in the image and likeness of God).
When hedonism runs rampant and the pleasure aspects of sex are allowed to both trump and drown out every other aspect, corruption ensues, abuses follow, and the culture becomes coarsened in no time at all. How else can an adolescent in an old man’s carcass such as David Letterman not be summarily run out of show biz for “joking” about the rape of a 14 year old child, or an 18 year old young woman for that matter? It is because sex has been made so thoroughly frivolous and in doing so, everything has been sexualized in a deformed manner from political discourse (i.e. “Tea Bagging”), to entertainment, to advertisement, to education, to children (witness Bratz Dolls for pre-teen girls . . . each one looks like it belongs in some red light district dancing on a pole).
Finally, in my opinion, liberals are the great proponents of hedonism. It is they who joke about tea bagging and raping. It is they who view traditional marriage as an enemy of “equal rights.” It is the liberals who balk at abstinence education and mock religious people as sexually repressed prudes. They are the ones that push for their version of sex ed at ever younger and younger ages. The liberals and progressives have taken a beautiful element of humanity and thoroughly corrupted it. Instead of making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear, they’ve done just the opposite. They’ve made a sow’s ear out of the beautiful and then jumped headlong into the sty . . . it should be no surprise then when the David Letterman’s of the world make light of child rape.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
I was going to say the commonality was
kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, June 16th at 4:45PM EST (link)perversion and tastelessness.
Unfortunately you cannot legislate such things away.
We live in a crude, coarse time, in a crude coarse culture and there is nothing for it but to do your best to rise above it on a personal basis.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
kyle8, I'd partially agree . . .
mailloux (Diary) Tuesday, June 16th at 4:55PM EST (link)perversion sums it up well, but in my opinion, tastelessness is too weak a descriptor.
I’d also maintain that conservatism isn’t just about what can and cannot be legislated. It’s also about the culture. For example, no one is trying to legislate David Letterman off the air, but it’s fair game to complain to his sponsors and promise not to buy their products.
I agree that we must rise above the coarseness in the culture on a personal basis, but I’ll go you one further. I believe we are obligated to influence others to reject the coarseness as well. I can do this in my family, my church, my work place, and my community . . . no legislating necessary.
Thank you much for taking the time to read my blog and to comment as well.
Take Care, mailloux
yes, but I imply as much
kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, June 16th at 5:21PM EST (link)Rising above, means both setting an example and speaking out.
I actually have a little hope for the future. Our culture is changing by the addition of millions and millions of Mexicans.
Living and teaching in Texas I see this Latin American culture up close. One thing I notice is that the Latin kids are almost universally more polite than the native children. And they are both religious and very pro-life.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
kyle8, sorry for any misinterpretations . . .
mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 9:21AM EST (link)and I appreciate too the example of hope you offered in some of your students. The example of their lives just may draw in the lukewarm.
Take Care, mailloux
Good point, mailloux.
TNJim (Diary) Tuesday, June 16th at 5:29PM EST (link)Coarseness in the culture should be risen above on a personal basis. Actions speak louder than words. I can say I’m a Christian al I want, but I’m not going to convince non-Christians it’s a worthy path if all I do is talk about it. It must be shown what an influence it has been. It’s better to show that by living the life, not just talking about it. I can attract attention by talking about, but if I then show hypocrisy by, oh for example, cussing someone who cuts me off in traffic or simply walking away when the cashier gives me back too much change will have them shaking their heads and walking away. The more I do that, the more I’ll be labeled a hypocrite and thus it destroys my credibility. Only by “walking the walk” will I really be taken seriously.
TNJim, spot on . . .
mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 9:17AM EST (link)You said more in your one paragraph comment than I did in the entire diary.
Thank You! mailloux
Interesting Mailloux, I had never quite thought about it in that light.
penguin2 (Diary) Tuesday, June 16th at 6:09PM EST (link)While I had understood sex as being part of the bond between a man and a woman, and for the creation of new life, I had not put it on such an elevated plane. That construct allows for the bond to be tighter and sacred in the marital relationship.
As regards the degradation and coarsening of the culture by the liberals of the past 50yrs., there is almost a helpless feeling about stopping it. Sexualizing children out of their innocence, and enabling the public discourse and perception of sex to be vulgar and trashy, only hastens the deterioration of our nation.
In my opinion, the real tragedy of the “sexual” revolution was to take away the protections children and women had. In addition to this, the vile tentacles spread throughout all aspects of our culture, tearing away at our core institutions. That’s why there is a lack of respect for authority, parents, the community at large. No manners, no class; and a decadent society cannot be sustained.
Sorry Mailloux, didn’t mean to get carried away. Once again, you have written a thought provoking diary.
Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills
Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List
Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots
penguin2, I consider your comment to be . . .
mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 9:32AM EST (link)good and piercing analysis . . . if that’s getting carried away with a topic, then by all means, do so! Your take on the sexual revolution, I think is perfectly accurate.
What it means to be created in the image and likeness of God could fill volumes and already has. Knowing all that the Imago Dei entails adds great depth and meaning to maleness, femaleness, love, marriage, intimacy, and sex. This blog barely scratched the surface of a very great treasure. What has been done with and to human sexual relations since the sexual revolution of the 60′s really is the equivalent of throwing pearls to the swine. It’s time now to retrieve those pearls, clean them up, and give them a proper and fitting place.
As always, thank you for your excellent comments (and the reco too!).
Take Care, mailloux
mailloux, from your experiences
Uma Richie (Diary) Tuesday, June 16th at 10:38PM EST (link)working on a college campus, teaching religion, and being a former 18-24 yo male, do you think there is any way to win the battle for the minds of young men in the culture war? The liberals tell them that they can have as much sex as they want with whomever they want with no negative consequences. It’s hard to compete with that message.
I do believe that realistic, fact-based sex education (not the condom peddling to which you alluded) would cut down on sexual activity among young women simply because women suffer greater consequences from STDs (cancer, infertility) than men. Chastity could be seen as a form of self-defense. I wonder if there is a similar self-preservation angle that would be effective in teaching the type of young man who would tune you out at the first mention of God.
Uma, thank you for the question . . .
mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 10:03AM EST (link)The task, as you so well stated, is not an easy one. The competition for the hearts and minds is very great. Pass through the checkout line of a seemingly family friendly grocery and traditional sensibilities are sure to be offended by magazines on display. Our local Piggly Wiggly is a prime example . . . friendly cartoon pig mascot appearing proximate some rather profane magazines. Then, there’s the quick yet discrete availability of pornography on the Internet. On search engines like Bing.com, you don’t even have to leave the search engine to view raunchy videos.
Against such great competition, reaching those with an animosity toward religion is quite a challenge. I tried a more secular approach with a colleague once. This fellow excitedly shared some news with me one time. He, beaming with seeming happiness, informed me that he was about to move in with his girl friend. I discouraged it and tried to make the case purely on secular grounds using social science. There are studies that show that living together before marriage tends to have a negative effect on the durability of the relationship. In other words, live together before marriage and the odds are that relationship will eventually be a failed one.
My colleague was a fellow researcher, a policy analyst, like myself. He was used to analyzing and coming up with quantitative cases for and against courses of action regarding the university. I thought my more secular approach would appeal to him. I was wrong. He ignored the evidence and went with his emotions . . . which is exactly the opposite of what he normally advises in his day job. One year later, the couple split in a most miserable way. It was an awful spectacle.
After that experience, I’ve not sworn off the more secular approach. If a circumstance seems appropriate, I will wield that particular sword in the battle for hearts and minds. However, I’ve got more faith and success with spreading the word in the context of religion.
I am by no means a leader among men. I’m a very far cry from a John the Baptist with a cadre of eager locals hanging on my every word. In reality, I’m just one guy and not a very influential one at that. But, what I can do, I do. I spread a conservative message about sex and marriage (a joyful one too! Not at all “repressed”) through my catechism lessons and with anyone else who cares to listen. This, at first glance, seems to impact only a few select people, but those people go out and impact others by their words and actions. The effect is viral. That is what I’m relying on . . . most of all, though, I’m relying on God to be God, and by his Grace in cooperation with frail man, to evangelize even the most hardened of hearts.
Uma, thanks again for such an excellent question.
Take Care, mailloux
Men without chests.
Diogenes314 (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 10:22AM EST (link)C. S. Lewis wrote about this in The abolition of man before the sexual revolution came along and ate it’s own young. The entire point of the sexual revolution was to ‘empower’ women by encouraging them to be as venal as men. The natural reaction to this was to remove the expectation of men to show respect for women. The result was to lower societies’ standards to the point that what would be considered abominable a generation ago now barely raises an eyebrow.
Welcome to the Jungle.
Diogenes314, C.S. Lewis references are always . . .
mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 4:52PM EST (link)most welcome! And, “The Abolition of Man,” is a book worth reading several times.
It is indeed a jungle out there, but I have faith that jungles can be cleared and swamps can be drained.
Thanks for reading and commenting.
Take Care, mailloux
Recomended...
Diogenes314 (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 7:42PM EST (link)For the record, but it didn’t seem to register. I tend to be not so optimistic about halting the devolutionary trend in our culture and society, but I hope I’m wrong.
Either way, keep up the good work.
mailoux, thanks for your service in the diaries that you post.
Vaughn Harold (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 11:47AM EST (link)This country needs to understand that Christians only want what is good and decent, and that there is always negative consequences when individuals choice to live certain lifestyles (your example above is a great example). We want people to be as free as possible to do as they choose, we do not wish to force anyone to live a particular way, we simply desire to draw attention to the need of personal responsibility and restraint for the greater good of others.
Oh, that America would listen and understand the evils associated with all sexual perversions, and understand what their personal responsibility is in respect to sexual relationships with others. Instead, it appears that all our country wants is to be consumed with self gratification apart from personal responsibility, and anyone who stands up against this supposed liberty/right, and calls it wrong is either ignored or labeled extreme.
As long as people choose to abuse their liberty by ignoring their personal responsibilities our government will continue to grow to meet the demand of the negative consequences that result.
Harold Vaughn, You're right about the cost . . .
mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 4:48PM EST (link)to all taxpayers with respect to the negative consequences of the sexual revolution. There is no such thing as a free lunch.
Freedom with personal responsibility and traditional morals is a good recipe for cultural success. Hedonism, in contrast, is a recipe for failure. This is exactly what Christianity is teaching.
Thanks so much for reading, your kind comments, and the reco too!
Take Care, mailloux
Another thought related to "We are built to look for patterns "
Vaughn Harold (Diary) Wednesday, June 17th at 12:00PM EST (link)Because of the depravity of man, we look for patterns that promote our personal self interest over that of others, especially in the arena of sexual relationships.
Again, thanks for the diary