Time for a New Moral Majority


For lack of a better term, a new moral majority is sorely needed. People of faith need a re-awakening to the fact that the eternal truths they hold dear in private are applicable to all of reality, all seven days a week, both in private and in public. There must be no more fear and no more diminishing of faith as a guide in private and in public life . . . a new moral majority needs to grab the cultural bull by the horns before it goes completely rabid with the progressive virus.

Where to start? By defining shared principles. Here are a few possibilities:

Mere deism, natural law, absolute values, inalienable rights – People of Abrahamic faiths coming together to reject moral relativism. We need to re-establish that truth exists outside of culture and time, and that we are beholden to this truth. How, though, can people of varying faiths agree on a basic set of truths? Start with the fundamental ones inherent in our own Declaration of Independence: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. These are the big three. The greatest means of attacking them is through the progressive, morally relativistic mantra of “true for thee, but not for me.” This appeal to relativism has been slung in the face of people of faith for far too long now. With depressing consistency, people of faith have slunk back from this kind of a charge, both afraid to offend and afraid of being labeled as a “black and white” thinker . . . a charge that’s become some kind of dunce cap, supposedly demonstrating a mind incapable of nuanced thinking. Well, I’m here to say, “Enough!” It’s the moral relativists who are the simple minded ones. It is they who show a lack of critical thinking and resort to an ad hominem attack based on arrogance and emotion. Moral relativists, your case is weak and absolutists of all faiths should be more than happy to correct you . . . tolerance be damned.

Personal Responsibility, the flip side to charity . . . misconstrued charity has created a call for the nanny state. A new religious right should champion all of the virtues, not just charity. Justice and responsibility come to mind. Yes, we are to feed the sick, cloth the naked, visit the imprisoned, but these are Christian duties, not governmental ones. We are also told, by God, that we will be held responsible for the use, misuse, and neglect of our talents. Herein is the oft neglected responsibility component. A new moral majority should indeed hold up something like the beatitudes as a model, but equally so, a new moral majority should also embrace the parable of the talents in Matthew 25: 14 – 30. We should always be reminded that personal responsibility, to the best of an individual’s capacity, is an expectation of adulthood in these United States. In the parable of the talents, the servant with one talent buried it for fear of the master. For reasons of fear, he abdicated his responsibility. Others abdicate responsibility for a multitude of other reasons, but most of those reasons can be categorized by one of the 7 deadly sins. Is it sloth? Why should I do it when the government can do it for me? Is it envy? Those richer than me need to be taxed heavily so that I can benefit from their work! A new moral majority needs to reject the Obama doctrine of bequeathing personal responsibility to the government and place it back into the hands of man.

Family & Marriage . . . outside of the religious context, marriage is just a grab-bag of legal goodies, not the bedrock of society. It is openly and regularly being assaulted by homosexual activists and is being withered to irrelevancy by radical feminism, among other concerted attacks. It’s time to take it back with a full-on, religious assault. Marriage is a Godly institution, and without God, it’s just a faint shadow of what it could be and barely has any substance to speak of at all (much like the inhabitants of Hell that visit Heaven in C.S. Lewis’s The Great Divorce). A culture that considers marriage nothing more than a civil right to a package of legal/tax perks is a culture in deterioration.

Plenty of gay couples adopt children; it isn’t outlawed. Afraid you can’t visit your partner in the hospital if he gets sick? Run on down to your nearest lawyer (they’re not too hard to find you know) and sign a medical power of attorney. Worried about your partner inheriting your estate after your demise? Then, get a damn will at that same attorney that drew up your medical power of attorney. Mad because you’re not entitled to any tax breaks as a couple? Vote Republican and fight for lower taxes for everyone, including you and your partner. Other than that, don’t come crying to me . . . marriage is bigger and more important than your hurt feeling and your sense of inclusion.

Championing the free expression of religion – Punishing the free expression of religion is perhaps one of the greatest bamboozles of all time, but it doesn’t surprise me in the least. We, as a culture, have been inculcated with only half a sentence in the religious clauses of the first amendment.

It reminds me of another successful ‘half-the-story’ con and that’s the old favorite of wagging the “judge not lest ye be judged” phrase in the face of Christians. It’s a half quote. Christians are to judge, but they are first supposed to remove the log from their own eye, which will better enable them to remove the splinter from their brother’s eye. Bottom line? Judging between good and evil is an expectation of Christianity.

This ‘half-the-story’ technique has been used with raging good success in suppressing religious expression in the public square. The government should not establish one, official state religion, but neither should it restrict free expression of religion. I doubt the founders meant to protect religious expression only in the context of a church. They invoked prayer in public all the time. This half truth has become so pervasive that any expression of religious sentiment is now generally seen as taboo and should only be expressed in your home with the drapes drawn or in church, synagogue, or mosque. It’s time to start living the other half of the amendment (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof). I say grace before eating when I’m in public. I talk in public about the importance of faith. I talk in public about God. If it rankles, then so be it. I’m also happy to debate the merits of religion. The founders gave me the right to free expression and I’m taking them up on it. So too should a new moral majority.

Embracing American Exceptionalism – as far as I’m concerned the United States is the fruit of Judeo-Christian Civilization, and, bar none, the nation that has most advanced freedom and prosperity in all history. Why be ashamed to state what is fact?  Not all cultures and civilizations are equal. Yes, rest-of-world, this really is better. So International community, if you’ve got some new ideas, then great, go ahead and share them, but don’t be surprised if I say America’s ways are better. And, don’t get your frilly European men’s undergarments in a bundle if we go it alone with a set of true, like-minded allies. Don’t like it? Fine, buddy up to Russia and see where that gets you.

One great way to embrace American Exceptionalism in an actionable way is to oppose and minimize our involvement with the useless, ineffective, and corrupt United Nations. This could serve as a starting point of this tenet of a new moral majority. Making the case that the United Nations is a useless, anti-American money pit is pretty easy.

Americans should not shrink from American Exceptionalism . . . neither should a new moral majority.

Re-education – It’s not any accident that I specifically used this term. Many in the United States have either lost through atrophy or have never been taught to critically think. Examples? Global Warming . . . accepted at face value; believing that Evolutionary Theory proves there is no God . . . often accepted at face value.

Truth and civility make for a sharp cultural sword. I was recently at a university function highlighting the services of an interfaith religious council available to students. At the luncheon, one high level university official took the opportunity to rail on how hard it is to deal with ignorant Christians who see the world in black and white. I retorted that I run into quite a bit of ignorance myself. I explained that too few students realize that reason is limited and that science can never prove nor disprove the existence of God, but that doesn’t seem to stop them from trying to beat down every Christian they meet with a Darwin bat. My colleague had no answer . . . perhaps he thought I was a dangerous radical about to explode in violence?

My point, though, is that there is a faux intellectualism going on out there. It crowns itself as unmitigated logic and as established science, and then responds to criticism by belittling the critic personally rather than engaging in debate. And there’s the key word, “debate.” Faux intellectuals simply don’t know how to do that anymore. A new moral majority needs to show them how. The time has come to school the faux intellectuals . . . the global warming/climate change farce is a great place to start.

Taking back the media – Kill most major newspapers by letting them financially wither. Support good local publications and good national journals. Stop watching TV. For the most part, it’s total garbage mixed with a generous dollop of pro-progressive propaganda. What value does reality TV offer? It’s the worse side of human nature sanitized for the masses and then presented as normal. What value does any of the major news networks (NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC), save for Fox, have? Not much. That was cemented for me when the likes of CNN were making sexual innuendo jokes about the Tea Party tax protests. Why offer any of these viewership and ratings? Let what is rotten wither. Instead, discriminate highly with media and entertainment. Otherwise, with all the free time from not watching TV, you can write blogs, learn more about religion or politics, pick up a hobby, re-connect with your family and community, and generally be a real pain in the ass to all the progressive forces out there that would rather have you sitting idly in your living room watching the idiot box.

Summary – These are only a few foundational ideas for a new moral majority. I predict, however, that this kind of a movement would have mass appeal. Why? Because we, as humans, are built to respond to holiness, which is defined as “soundness” or, in other words, something that is in the right order (that order being determined by God). People of all faiths typically pause in awe when in the presence of Godly people like Mother Teresa of Calcutta. The awe felt is not just an emotional reaction to a celebrity. It is a moral response to eternal truths, which are incredibly beautiful things when not tarnished by progressive lies.

Time’s a wasting . . . the Oba-barbarians are at the gate.


RSS feed

63 Comments Leave a comment

Your diaries are always a gem mailoux!

mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 1:56PM EST (link)

I wish I could insert them in every church bulletin across the US!!!! :)

mom2oneson, Thank You!

mailloux (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 2:36PM EST (link)

That is high praise indeed . . . I really appreciate it.

Take Care, mailloux

 
 

The Christian Right is sadly dead

its_a_right_wing_thing (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 4:01PM EST (link)

Ever since Dr. Jerry Falwell passed away there hasn’t been one leader to stop and pick up where he left off. Dr. James Dobson former head of the ineffective Focus on the Family (or wha’ts left of it) recently resigned and again, no one has stepped up to take his place.

The left has ACORN, Media Matters, Daily Kos, MSNBC, CNN, CNBC of which to indoctrinate the masses while we have only small sites like this and FOXNEWS to counter.

I had emailed FOF twice in the past and got a response within 24 hours. Last year leading up to the election when it appeared The One was going to win, I sent out a more urgent message for them to get on TV and tell their followers to vote their consience, morals etc. but for the first time it went unaswered. This is when I knew they were in trouble then last week I saw an interview I think it was on Hannity where it was Dr. Dobson’s first public interview since his resignation.

Sure Dr. Dobson spoke pointed and passionate as always with easy to follow explanations of his message and views but where was he earlier? Where was he and similar groups like Amrican Family Association prior to the election? Its too late now, we are stuck with this super majority Left for at least 1.5 more years.

note, good read and we need more diaries about the Christian Right and a revival to boot. I just wrote another comment on this in my profile but now is the perfect time for a tradionally conservative school like Liberty University or Hillsdale College in Michigan to get some free publicity and offer Ms. California, Ms. Carrie Prejean, a full ride scholarship to their schools.

Even if it is ceremonial and she has no intention of actually accepting it, they need to reach out to her and support her for her beliefs are theirs and ours. What a better opportunity than to reach out to young people the very demographic you want at your institution?

They need to practice what they preach. Hopefully she doesn’t get blacklisted by professors in whatever college she ultimately attends.

its_a_right_wing_thing, good, perceptive thoughts . . .

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 9:38AM EST (link)

As far as I can tell (and I’m more than happy to be corrected), the Christian right is currently leaderless. As you well pointed out, we were also unfocused during the 2008 election. Perhaps the Obama led assault on Christianity will get people riled enough to organize and speak out. Obama’s socialism motivated the Tea Day protests . . . why not a Christian pushback too?

Thanks for reading!

Take Care, mailloux

We have a leader, His name is Jesus

Wing Zero (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 1:21AM EST (link)

We just don’t always listen to him. (I include myself in that.)

I have always been surprised at how when I run into people that I KNOW are “plugged in” to God, like my current and former pastors, they say the same thing. The coolest thing about that is they have never met, emailed, or had any contact what-so-ever with each other.

When the Church (which is how we are described in the Bible) gets going, and ONLY when the church gets going, will the nation get moving in the right direction again.

1-21-09 – We are so screwed… Wait… maybe not just yet.

 
 
 

Let them wither on the vine and rot!

penguin2 (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 4:21PM EST (link)

More than anything else, I blame the media and Hollywood for the decadence and takeover of our country. Culturally, it appears they have succeeded and now politically it is like the last nails in the coffin.

One point I’d like to make is about the free expression of religion. We constantly see infringements of our practice of religion-just look at how the left has been able to get religion out of the public square, out of our schools-even to no longer calling it Christmas vacation, etc. Someday, the ACLU will succeed in making the churches and synagogues take down their public symbols-Crosses, Stars of David-from their buildings because it is offensive to someone living across the street.

This past week, we have seen the President of the United States succeed in covering up the name of Christ, a contestant potentially losing a pageant for not being for gay marriage, and people protesting government policies being labeled as right-wing extremists. People like us used to be the backbone of America; now the left marginalizes us and makes it seem that we are the exception, rather than the rule.

Sorry Maillux, I don’t mean to sound so down, but the nastiness and dishonesty of the MSM toward us has been hard on the spirit. I’d like to believe there are still more of us than them, but all I see is an assault on decent values and a destruction that is enabling a “Culture of Death” in more ways than one.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

penguin2, you have every right . . .

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 9:47AM EST (link)

to express your frustration and to feel down. All of your points are perfectly accurate.

I take heart, though, in the promise that not even the gates of hell shall prevail against the church. Christianity can take a beating and it has multiple times throughout history. In my opinion, this is not the worst assault on Christianity in history.

Faith and virtue is contagious whereas evil is a flash in the pan. All we need do, I believe, is humbly asked God that we be an instrument in His hand to do His Will. Grace will do the rest and we’ll be surprised to see that even the most meek among us is capable of extraordinary things.

Those who wish to stamp out God are spitting in a gail force wind.

Take Care, mailloux

Thanks Maillux, I needed that!

penguin2 (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 10:51AM EST (link)

I’d forgotten my history about the persecution towards Christianity. Perhaps, there will be a rising up from the people when they see how their religious freedom is truly threatened. I like your words”gale force winds” perfect for Earth Day. ‘Wayneinnh’ diary today “In the beginning” has an uplifting visual from our Creator.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 
 
 

Casting Crowns had a scathing song back in 2003

EvanWeeks (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 4:22PM EST (link)

“What if the armies of the Lord
Picked up and dusted off their swords
Vowed to set the captive free
And not let satan have one more

What if the Church, for heaven’s sake
Finally stepped up to the plate
Took a stand upon God’s promise
And stormed hell’s rusty gates

Chorus:
What if His people prayed
And those who bear His name
Would humbly seek His faith, yeah
And turn from their own ways

And what would happen if we prayed
For those raised up to lead the way
Then maybe kids in school could pray
And unborn children see light of day

What if the life that we pursue
Came from a hunger for the truth
What if the family turned to Jesus
Stopped asking Oprah what to do …”

The leaders of tomorrow are rising in churches around the nation. We’re young adults right now, and sadly not taken seriously by the majority of the establishment of the “religious right,” which seems to be giving up in favor of cloud-watching, apparently in the hopes of being the first to catch a glimpse of the Return. Best of luck to them. Me and the other young people like me will be happily about Christ’s work on Earth, sowing the seeds of faith behind enemy lines.

Me, I’m going back to school. I’m working towards an M/Div and possibly a M/Ed while I’m at it. I want to be part of the solution to the growing problem of self-styled Christians who attend church and sing hymns because they were raised that way, but have never experienced the longing for God’s Word, the hunger for the Truth. We as Christians have been complicit in the propagation of ignorance for long enough. It’s time to ring the school bell and wake people up.

EvanWeeks – Dad. Conservative. Patriot.

EvanWeeks, Good Luck and Godspeed . . .

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 2:10PM EST (link)

with completing your degrees. We need leaders exactly like you for exactly the reasons you bring up. It is indeed time, as you say, to “ring the school bell.”

I’m unfamiliar with the song lyrics you posted, but I love the line:
“What if the family turned to Jesus
Stopped asking Oprah what to do . . . ”

That’s good advice and it’s a one sentence description of the cultural problem at hand.

Take Care, mailloux

 
 

Mega 5's, mailloux. So many good points nt

David123 (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 11:39PM EST (link)

David123

David123, Thank You! (nt)

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 9:47AM EST (link)
 

Well said...oh...and you need to change your screen name...

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 11:42PM EST (link)

When I read your name…I see Mail and the X at the end of your name and my brain sees mailbox…LOL

Great diary!!!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

t

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 11:53PM EST (link)

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 

AceInTx, Thank you and . . .

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 9:52AM EST (link)

I’m glad you just saw mailbox instead of Maalox (the indigestion, diarrhea medicine). My screen name is my last name, so I’m well used to the different variations of it . . . in fact, my nickname back in my school days was “box”, short for mailbox.

Take Care, mailloux (aka mailbox, aka Maalox)

LOL...don't see Maalox...but at a glance I see Mailbox...it's kind weird...nt

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 7:20PM EST (link)
The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 

What's your background?

aesthete (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 1:28AM EST (link)

The last name sounds vaguely French.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

aesthete, sorry for the late reply . . .

mailloux (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 12:26AM EST (link)

I have relatives visiting and haven’t been near a computer.

The name is indeed French. My grandfather was born in Montreal and moved to the United States. He settled in Woonsocket, RI (ironically the topic of one of Moe Lane’s recent diaries).

I am not purely French, though. My dad is French and Irish and my mom is 100% Italian, making me an all too typical American mutt.

Take Care, mailloux

Cool :)

aesthete (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 12:30AM EST (link)

n/t

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 
 
 
 

Critical thinking - suppose Global Warming is true! ...

David123 (Diary) Tuesday, April 21st at 11:56PM EST (link)

It isn’t often written how MUCH global warming we’ll get from our “wicked industrialized ways”. But one hotter estimate is that in 100 years the temperature will go up by 5 degrees [I've also read arguments by global warming proponents that global warming will make the temperature go up by 1 degree in 100 years.]

But let’s say that global warming is real and that the temperature will rise 5 degrees in 100 years. Critical thinking time: HOW BAD IS THAT?

Let’s try January – ok, so instead of 10 degrees being a really cold day in January, in 100 years 15 degrees is going to be a really cold day in January. Umm … is that a bad thing??????

OK, well what about August – instead of a really hot day in August being 100 degrees, it’s going to be 105 degrees. Well that’s unfortunate, but it’s not the end of the world. And if you really don’t like it, you could move to Deadhorse, AK. Then instead of a really hot day being 55 degrees, it might start getting up to 60 there – in August. If that’s too hot for you, you’ll just have to tough it out till January when maybe all that global warming will get it up to a sweltering 30 degrees below zero in Deadhorse.

Bottom line – even if global warming is true, what’s the problem?

David123

you are asking for the tree huggers to out themselves

Doc Holliday (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:28AM EST (link)

there will be less glacier density, polar bears will float away on even smaller pieces of ice, storms, tornadoes, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria….

Molon Labe!

How much most people worry about polar bear extinction

David123 (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:38AM EST (link)

is inversely related to the distance between themselves and the polar bear.

David123

heh, yeah -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:38AM EST (link)

nt

Molon Labe!

 
 
 

Here's the problem with global warming...

6eorge Jetson (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:29AM EST (link)

Al Gore

I don’t want to see/hear more of him.

Al Gore should walk the walk

David123 (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:34AM EST (link)

I’m fine with him giving speeches about global warming in New York City.

But he should ride his bicycle from Tennessee to New York to do it. Talking the talk about global warming while you’re spewing pollution out of your Lear jet doesn’t cut it.

David123

No, Al Gore should walk

mbecker908 (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:39AM EST (link)

the plank.

Once, just once, I'd like to see Gore debate someone

TNJim (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:49AM EST (link)

from the other side of the global warming, climate change, whatever he’s calling it now, question. If he’s sooooo sure of himself, why no debates?

Oh, yeah, scientists on his payro… errr.. side, have reached a “consensus”.

Activism: What to do after the TEA party rally. Unified Patriots

Gore is an idiot, but he's not stupid. nt

mbecker908 (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 9:10AM EST (link)
 
 
 
 

It is true that we're in a period of greater climate instability

AKSteveB (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:20AM EST (link)

than before. We know there has been a general upward trend in worldwide temperaturre, so in that sense it is real. Problem is, that is the limit of what we know, the rest is guesswork with a healthy dose of Earth Worship. We don’t know how much if any effect man has on that. Given that there have been periods of great climate change before the existence of man, it is a huge reach to assume we have that type of influence. The answer to all of this. like the answer to almost everything else is ..cost benefit analysis. We don’t know where climate is going to go, though it seems more likely than not it will continue to go up, sort of another Krakatoa blowing up. We have absolutely no clue whether we can actually do anything aboutt it. The only thing to do that passes any reasonable cost benefit analysis is to make reasonable adjustments for what has a high percentage of likieliness, for example, realize the Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans won’t withstand ANY sea rise, and plan accordingly. It certainly isn’t as nice a warm fuzzy as “YOU can help save the Earth”!

Hell is other people – Sartre

 

I Recollect

OccamsRazor (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:34AM EST (link)

A physics 300+ course where we all had to give our final orally. Once mine was done, the sharpest student in the class gave his on GW. To this date, upon reflection, I still don’t know what his position was on the matter. But his conclusions were simple:

We just don’t know.

We haven’t been taking records long enough to extrapolate long term affects; global warming occurs over larger cycles, and the Data just isn’t there-everything else is politics and control.

Kowalski

OccamsRazor (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:42AM EST (link)

The larger cycles however can be viewed empirically, and there have been equal and larger periods in our past where the Earth has been hotter and life survived and thrived.

Personally, I view the Earth as a system and almost algebraic in nature. We aren’t harming the Earth because we originated from that system. When the system is expanded, the sun is a factor and it’s the sun which throws off any variable to that system to the point of breaking.

For example, a 101 astronomer will tell you that the sun is expanding. And as it does such, it’ll heat the Earth in the process. However, that oscillation is much larger in scale than anything we have to worry about anytime soon.

The old story

skorrent1 (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 11:23AM EST (link)

A student leaps to his feet during an astronomy lecture.
“You said the sun will burn out how soon?”
The prof replies, “We estimate in about 6 billion years.”
“Whew,” says the student, “I thought you said ’6 MILLION years.”

After 6 Billion years Sun won't exist

antisocial (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 12:11AM EST (link)

We must act now to slow that down. We need to care about future generations. We can’t allow life to be wiped out. What will happen to Solar panels installed all over America.

“Demise Of The Sun” – Documentary by Gore all set to be released this fall. To be shown in all classrooms in your kids schools.

Obama Doctrine – Boot On The Throat
—————————–
What is to be done?
——————————
No. You can’t – Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!

 
 
 
 
 

Spot on, mailloux

TNJim (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 12:53AM EST (link)

This, along with the 13 folds of the flag post, is why your diaries are becoming must-reads for me after my 2 short months as a member here.

Activism: What to do after the TEA party rally. Unified Patriots

TNJim,

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 10:41AM EST (link)

Thank you . . . being considered a must-read is a very humbling honor.

Take Care, mailloux

 
 

Could not have said it better myself

Hooah_Mac (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:52AM EST (link)

Of course, I haven’t been trying very hard, and neither have most of us who feel the same way. Thank you for taking the time to write this brilliant diary.

-Priorities-
1. Mission 2. Soldiers 3. Everything Else

Hooah_Mac,

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 10:52AM EST (link)

You are far too kind!

Thank you for reading, commenting, and the reco too.

Take Care, mailloux

 
 

Wow, what a great diary.

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:56AM EST (link)

I say that with no sarcasm or ridicule.

While I don’t consider myself a SoCon, I think that one of the best things that could happen to America (politically speaking) would be a new Moral Majority. I tire of being told that my views aren’t “nuanced” enough and that our world isn’t black and white, as if I were incapable of rational thought, and of not being able to point out obvious and life-giving truths in fear of awakening the professionally offended, all the while being treated as a child whose Big Brother knows best, and I think that many, many others do as well. The chains of political correctness which hold us in thrall to our political overlords need to be broken, and the untrammeled power of life and death that judges have given themselves needs to be re-taken. The poisoned well from which the children of America sip every day in the schools that they attend must be dried up. The Moral Majority, IMO, is a wonderful way to accomplish all of these things.

Most of all, I think that the Moral Majority has the capacity to destroy the post-modernist myth of relativity, and all of the evil that comes with it. The Moral Majority should associate itself with modernism, if not fully, at least in alliance. It’s no coincidence that Christianity was at its most vibrant since the early Church when the ideas of free speech, free markets, and objectivity blossomed in Europe, and in our own country.

Something that should be avoided by this new moral majority is any sort of capitulation to the religious progressives who join its ranks, remembering that “compassionate conservative” ends up being neither.

Anyways, great diary. In the free market of ideas, Christianity always wins, and I believe that this makes us the natural protectors of free speech. Public schools have never worked, and will never work, and the malignment that Judeo-Christianity receives gives us a perspective into the flawed school system. Implicit in the Judeo-Christian belief in the inherent dignity of man and the sanctity of choice is a belief in a government that doesn’t smother said choice with onerous regulations, fees, and laws, and in a government that makes laws to maximize it, instead. I think that these are the elements which will combine to catalyze a new Moral Majority in America.

One small quibble: I think that this new Moral Majority would do well to recognize that the government is a poor guardian of such a sacred institution as marriage, and that instead of government, churches and synagogues are more qualified to administer this holy rite, thus removing hte “gay marriage” debate from the picture.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

aesthete, your comments are a diary unto itself!

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 10:26AM EST (link)

And, if it were a diary, I’d recommend highly!

On the quibble about gay marriage, I do agree with you. Marriage is a sacrament and is at home in the church, synagogue, or mosque. With that said, I think that government should get out of the marriage business, except in a very limited way. The left is trying to make marriage into a civil rights issue akin to the legalized mistreatment of blacks prior to the civil rights movement of the 60′s. In my opinion gay marriage is not the same thing. Marriage, as far as the government is concerned, should not be a civil rights issue.

The government should be interested in marriage in only a limited, specific way. Traditional marriage should be encouraged with some perks (tax, etc.) because it’s the best way to produce future citizens. The government can, IMHO, encourage the best means of assuring a future populace. Human resources, for lack of a better term, are the lifeblood of any civilization. Traditional marriage is known to produce, on average, stable, productive future citizens at a higher rate than any other family system. Government’s involvement should be limited to this and only this interest. Anything else is an expansion of government intrusion into, what I consider, religious territory. A new moral majority would be successful if it put marriage into this kind of context. The evidence, in this context, is overwhelming as well . . . just look at what’s happened in Europe as a case study (Mark Stein’s book comes to mind).

Take Care, mailloux

I see your point

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 2:32PM EST (link)

I’m not entirely sure if I agree with it (I lean towards not), but if that’s the most disagreeable thing I can find w/a Moral Majority, I think that that would be excellent.

Also, I agree with you WRT the civil rights deal. I would probably be willing to grant homosexuals the same tax incentives and legal benefits given to married couples if it weren’t for the framing of the issue as a civil rights issue, when it’s not. Post-Civil War blacks would have killed to be in the position that homosexuals are in, both legally and culturally, and comparing the two struggles is offensive!

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

aesthete, to share something I struggle with

AKSteveB (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 6:43PM EST (link)

I can’t imagine ever considering myself a social conservative, my instincts are libertarian. As I see things unfold, and try to understand how we came to the point we are at, I more and more believe that there can be no actual freedom with social anarchy. Religious Conservatives like to quote John Adams “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any otherr.” The corollary to that is you can’t have freedom without self sufficiency. We can’t achieve self sufficiency without family. No Western society seems to hold on to family without religion. I have no answers, other than economic conservatism, aka freedom, needs the family.

Hell is other people – Sartre

Same here

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 7:11PM EST (link)

That’s why it conflicts me: one the one hand, I think that we should be fair to everyone, and that giving advantages to citizens based on marital status is inherently unfair. OTOH, the family is the basic building block of a functional, industrialized society, and its collapse would mean the collapse of western culture.

My conclusion has been that there is little that the government can do once its citizens have devolved into this state, and that a solid education free of anti-family propaganda (AKA homeschooling and private schooling) is probably the best remedy to the current breakup of the family we’re experiencing.

That’s one reason that I don’t like politicians Huckabee and their brand of religious progressivism at all: they don’t recognize that gay marriage and the like are symptoms of the breakup of the family, and not the causes. Still, I’ve more or less resigned myself to supporting a candidate that is socially conservative, because though I disagree with them on many hot-button issues important to social conservatism (gay marriage, the “War on Drugs”, and penalizing smoking and drinking are some), I at least know where they are coming from, and since they tend to be right on so many other (and more important, IMO) issues, and have a passion for the “big ones” that I agree with (abortion, education, defense, and free markets, generally speaking), they’re pretty much the closest I’ll get to my own views, and my own model of a “perfect” conservative/libertarian candidate. So long as it’s not someone like Bush or Huckabee, who seeks to “compromise” with the Dems on spending, I’m good :)

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

To kowalski

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 7:19PM EST (link)

My biggest problem with both religious and anti-religious progressivism, and their penchant for social engineering, was the hubris involved in making such sweeping decisions for an entire people. It always seemed to me to be the height of arrogance for a person to believe that they can, and should, change a culture with the flip of a taxation switch, or by penalizing certain behaviors, and expecting that such engineering will be smooth and flawless. That arrogance associated with making decisions for others has always bothered me, whether it comes from the left or the right. Social conservatism, when it started, seemed to (w/the exception of the War on Drugs) “get” this. Perhaps I’m just disillusioned with the Republican Party at large, but it seems like modern social conservatism lost its way under Bush, and that is, in large part, what makes me disassociate myself from the social conservative movement.

Diaries like this, however, do bring hope that perhaps a refocused socially conservative majority could bring sanity back to government (assuming that that was a quality it had in the first place, of course!), and that’s why I got such a kick out of it. Again, great diary, mailloux!

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

to AKSteve and aesthete...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 7:23PM EST (link)

I think you are both SoCons in the more traditional sense…you know before it got co-opted by the religious progressives.

A true SoCon would believe in the federalist position that social issues are best kept at the lowest level of gov’t possible as opposed to the religious progressives who think all issues of morality need to be made at the Federal level.

I truly believe that Federalism is the difference between todays Republicans and conservatives.

People need to be able to vote with their feet..right now that is going the way of the dodo.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


RE Modern conservatism: I think so

aesthete (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 1:58AM EST (link)

It’s unfortunate that the Constitution, one of the world’s most brilliant documents of political organization, is having its elegy sung to the tune of a “bipartisan” majority, and that so few see its passing as the moment of tremendous sadness that it is.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 
 

5x5

tcgeol (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 1:41AM EST (link)

This is great. With the exception of homosexual marriage (for me, at least), you’ve more or less described a lot of us, I believe.

Just your typical bitter gun- and God-clinger

Even the Left admits we’re Right

 
 
 
 
 
 

FNA -NT

OccamsRazor (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 1:57AM EST (link)

if Marriage is so sacred

lardin Wednesday, April 22nd at 2:22PM EST (link)

where is the outrage over the bachelor, bachelorette, Who Wants to marry my dad, sister, mother etc.

IMHO these “reality TV” shows are the worst offenders of Marriage. These are people gettting married to just to gain a pay check. Its a sham and all it does is bring marriage down to the lowest common denominator

you are right lardin...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 2:26PM EST (link)

those shows are crap and they hurt the institution of marriage.

The best way to get rid of crap like that is to not watch it.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 

lardin, I'm very glad you make this point . . .

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 2:46PM EST (link)

Marriage is sacred . . . even if it’s sullied by those it is entrusted to. As a Catholic, I view marriage as a Sacrament, which is a physical, material representation of a greater supernatural reality. Marriage is a reflection of the greatest of all supernatural realities and that is the nature of God Himself. That we are made male and female and enter into marriage is a physical expression of God’s nature. In a previous post of mine, I go into great detail (I basically explain a little of Pope John Paul II’s Theology of the Body). You can view that post here: http://www.redstate.com/mailloux/2008/12/16/why-sacramental-marriage-is-so-important/

Aaron said it quite succinctly in his reply to you . . . those shows “are crap.” To extend that analogy a bit, if I drop the most perfect, high karat diamond into a great big pile of manure, it doesn’t change the nature of the diamond at all, but it does make it much more difficult to appreciate the beauty, great value, and perfection of the diamond . . . after all it’s lost in all that crap.

Thank you for reading and commenting. I also notice you’re rather new to RedState. Welcome.

Take Care, mailloux

mailloux....thanks for translating my simplicity into a beautiful anology...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 2:56PM EST (link)

You are a good man!!

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Aaron, As far as I'm concerned, you qualify as the St. Michael of Redstate

mailloux (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 3:14PM EST (link)

St. Michael is of course the archangel who tossed Satan out of Heaven. He’s often portrayed with a sword stepping on Satan’s head. I like the image so much, I’ve got a little statue of it in my home. St. Michael’s also my 7 year old’s favorite saint (which isn’t a surprise . . . a sword, doing battle against evil. What 7 year old boy wouldn’t like that?).

You do a great service for the Redstate community by swooping in to engage in debate and the battle of ideas. I always appreciate when you show up on the scene. It’s like the relief one feels at the sight of the cavalry . . . or St. Michael.

Take Care, mailloux

Wow Mailloux...what a compliment...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 6:05PM EST (link)

St. Michael…I like it…on a side note he is also the patron saint of paratroopers…I wore him around my neck every jump.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 
 
 
 

Here is a moral issue that no one ever talks about

kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 5:05PM EST (link)

How about the immorality of politicians deliberately spending us into an inflationary spiral, debasing the currency, and destroying savings and investment?

I find that to be at least as morally reprehensible as anything else mentioned here.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

kyle8, you're absolutely right, it is a moral issue

mailloux (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 12:11AM EST (link)

It falls under responsibility and prudence. The vices driving such spending are greed, lust for power, and thievery. This is something else a new moral majority should champion . . . good stewardship of government with respect to spending and taxation.

Thanks for pointing this out.

Take Care, mailloux

 
 

I just don't know what to think of this diary

Doc Holliday (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 11:08PM EST (link)

I know it is well written, meaningful to the author, and powerful to readers. I know we need morality in this world, and a rebirth of faith in this nation. I also know surely that our founding documents and their authors were mostly religious men, and certainly they had a moral compass.

I wonder if religion or a new “Moral Majority” is what we conservatives need to stop the slide of Socialism and the Obama express. I do know that there ARE much better terms than “Moral Majority”, heck I could give you a few hundred that would be better.

There is little in this diary I can, or want to, directly refute. But in Realpolitik, I doubt a great Religious Awakening will return our nation to the values on which it was founded. Just off hand, the two largest religious groups are conservative whites and liberal blacks. We already have most of the religious whites, and we will not get any of the religious blacks by telling them then need to be more religious and moral.

What we need to return to power has not changed, we have changed, the times have changed, but the answer has always been there. We need to stand with all our power behind the libertarian-conservative values of our Founders and the modern men who best represented their views, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reagan.

We lost power and are losing our country because of non conservative groups such as the first Moral Majority. We lost it with big government fake conservatives such as Bush, Frist, and Kyle. We lost control of the government because we became of the government, we forgot that LIBERTY is the greatest moral gift of the Founders and the Creator.

Again, It is not the diarist’s beliefs with which I differ. It is only that I believe the way out of the Wilderness is to show how our religiously based, human liberty-minded beliefs are those that were meant for this country, in fact, they are the enshrined law of the land, given to us be the Creator.

If one truly believes in morality, they must offer a choice, as did our Creator. The government is not the moral center, the people are. The only way to enhance morality is to shrink the government and to let people choose how best to pursue life, liberty, and happiness.

I am calling for a Constitutional Majority. I am calling for a nation that knows and reveres its history and the men who spilled blood for our freedom. It is freedom, liberty, and the rights of the individual that are our greatest gifts from God in this life, in the next it is Salvation. The way to change the nation is bring back the love of each individual and his right to pursue his dreams.

Molon Labe!

5 to the power of 5

Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 11:11PM EST (link)

Very well said!

To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher

 
 

Ban (legal) marriage?

drealoth (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 5:00PM EST (link)

I don’t mean to offend, but unless I’m wrong in the middle there you seem to be arguing that marriage outside of a religious context is a bad thing (coming from your personal responsibility section). Am I correct? I think that a good argument in favor of legal marriage is it gives people another reason to tough out the bad times together. Although with that 50% divorce rate, perhaps not too much.

I would not outright reject moral relativism. Modern Christian morals are very much relative to society, and have been shaped into what they are today by 2000 years of reflection and reassessment. In 2000 more years, they will still be different, but not necessarily wrong.

For education and such, I’m convinced that the solution to most our problems is 1 or 2 years of military service for everyone like many European and Asian nations, and in school Latin classes and an hour of physical education every day. I think that there needs to be a certain level of pride in one’s country. Not necessarily blind nationalism, but more a feeling of being lucky to be American or live in America, and a feeling of responsibility and ambition to drive the country forward.

I am a supporter of the Canadian Green Party, but forgot to mention that when I came here to troll around.

drealoth, sorry to respond late . . .

mailloux (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 11:07PM EST (link)

I’ve got relatives visiting and haven’t been at the computer lately, but I’m quite glad you commented.

I think government has a limited interest in marriage . . . please see the response I wrote to aesthete above.

On the topic of moral relativism, I noticed from your profile that you don’t believe in God. Therefore, I’m not surprised that you don’t reject moral relativism. Without God, what else is there?

In 2000 plus years of Christianity, matters of discipline and tradition have changed, but core doctrine has not . . . in this respect, I’m speaking of the Catholic Church (by the way . . . as you might have guessed, I’m a Catholic). So, I do not think the 2000 plus years of Catholicism is a case of moral relativism in action.

Finally, I couldn’t agree with you more . . . there should be a feeling of pride to live in America and a responsibility to drive the country forward.

I greatly appreciate you reading and taking the time to comment. I’ll try to respond as quick as I can, but this weekend, we have a first communion and a birthday party . . . not to mention the visiting relatives!

Take Care, mailloux

 

Eek!

Menlo (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:07AM EST (link)

For education and such, I’m convinced that the solution to most our problems is 1 or 2 years of military service for everyone like many European and Asian nations, and in school Latin classes and an hour of physical education every day.

I’d have (speaking seriously here) committed suicide if that had been the case. I still would if I were ever drafted.

I also hated PE as a child. Exercise didn’t bother me, but they always did sports. I’ve hated all sports as long as I’ve been alive, and I was terrified to death of balls hitting me.

As for Latin, kids today aren’t even learning basic English!

I’m certainly thankful that education plan was never adopted when I was in school, and I hope it is one never taken seriously.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

 

On moral relativism

Menlo (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:27AM EST (link)

“Moral relativism” seems to be prevalent among those who identify as Christians. Indeed as I mention below, I think Christians’ failure to live like Christians has cost them credibility and caused younger generations to reject the faith.

You would probably find differences among “Modern Christian morals” as defined even by many within the same Christian denomination.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

You're also guilty of moral relativism.

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 5:04AM EST (link)

Only hypocrite Christians and the hypocrite Atheists practicing moral relativism will blame a Christian who failed to live with his own ideals.

Any Christian knows that that a Christian’s life is a constant struggle and the most difficult task.

Christian really means “be like Christ”. Who in this sinful world can successfully do that? But there is a mystery about being a Christian: The grace of God is more than sufficient to our weaknesses and failings.

In short, if a Christian fails, it’s so normal. But the envious thing about being Christian is the God’s gift of FAITH that in times of one’s failure, the blood of the Lamb is more than sufficient to wash away the guilt and sins.

Your assertion that “younger generations … reject the faith” is sweeping. The modern world has so much to offer for anyone to reject Faith all together. Seeing some Christians fail is just a lousy justification for such choice of rejection.

 
 
 

No

Menlo (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 1:38AM EST (link)

I was not around at the time of the “moral majority.” However, from what I’ve heard, it sounds to have been detrimental to both its stated legal and religious goals.

Christians should not need a “leader” other than Christ. We evangelize and spread the word to others through both our words and our actions. The decline in the percentage of Christians has been a result of too many Christians failing to live like Christians. Even whole churches have become problems in this regard.

Where legislation and politics is concerned, the only legitimate (and I believe Biblical) role of the Christian church is to seek to protect its own free exercise within the law. Where it cannot do so legally, it is still the duty of Christians to risk criminalization for evangelizing. Where we can work legally to protect ourselves, I think Christ would expect us to.

However, laws that extend to the rest of society should rest on a sufficient basis that excludes supernatural revelation.

I suspect many of the ends sought by the “moral majority” had perfectly legitimate rational and secular bases. However, they did not make the case for such bases and likely did not accept them themselves. The ends were defeated by improper and illogical means.

Certainly today, a political movement by Christian churches to defend our right to free exercise is in dire need. There is no question the government at all levels is trampling all over that.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter