As a life-long Jewish Conservative the most repeated question has been, ‘Why are Jews liberals? Certainly, some attribute political and philosophical sympathies to events and experiences incurred by friends and relatives victimized during World War II. Surely, those impacted by the anti-Semitic reign of Nazi Germany and the horrendous atrocities during the Holocaust, attribute them to Germany’s right wing leadership.
Yet, a careful study of that country’s political status at the time indicates it was actually leftist in nature. In fact, on November 8, 1923 at a beer hall in Munich, Germany, a leftist revolutionary group, the National Socialist Party elected a leader by the margin of a single vote. The man selected Chairman was Adolph Hitler and it changed the course of history.
Under his Socialist-inspired leadership, religious freedom melted under depraved examples of anti-Semitism and religious persecution. Nazi Germany was neither right wing, free, conservative or capitalist in nature. It incorporated centralized control and authority and was a complete leftist dictatorship. For Jews to attribute any similarity between that system and American style Conservatism ignores the very principles that distinguish the average Jewish American family from the liberal, socialist dogma advocated by this country’s Democrat Party.
Hardly any other religious group places greater emphasis and importance on the potential and power of education and acquiring the knowledge and ability to be self-sufficient, independent and free. Individualism, professionalism and entrepreneurship are hallmarks of Jewish culture and self-reliance. No doubt, Capitalism and Conservatism not Socialism or Liberalism, are the engines that generate Jewish progress and success. As the Obama Administration and Democrat Party move closer to emulating Germany’s National Socialist Party by incorporating centralized authority and government interference in the private sector, it is hoped this will become abundantly clear. One can only hope the future question will become “Why are most Jews Conservatives”? The answer to that is simple. Because they should be.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
I'll use a Christian quote by G.K. Chesterton
AKSteveB (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 3:52PM EST (link)to try and explain this (I’m Jewish btw). “He who believes in nothing will believe in anything.” The vast majority of Jews in this country are highly secularized. The ones who aren’t actually tend to be conservative.
One of the things I believe more and more as I get older is that for most, the religious impulse is like the sex drive, if not acted on, that energy will go *somewhere*. If it isn’t turned towards traditional religion, it will be turned into something that makes the person believe they are “making the world a better place.” In our days that would be “social justice”, “the environment”, and that sort of thing. You especially see this in successful highly secular people.
Hell is other people – Sartre
That's about ths size of it, Steve
Kenny Solomon (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 5:36PM EST (link)I can’t really add much to the above, other than to say I’m deeply ashamed of the 78% of “my people” in the USA who voted for the speed-of-light downfall of our nation.
I’ve already had a very interesting conversation with a Jewish friend who simply can’t understand………… “What went wrong inside Obama to cause him to do such strange things after he took office?”…… his words, direct quote.
My response: “You voted for him, campaigned for him, sent money, even manned the phones and fed lies about him to me and everyone else you know. Don’t come to me looking for answers now. Enjoy what you’ve wrought. I saw through this Marxist piece of garbage from minute one and told you exactly what he was about before the election. You called me a racist.”……….. and I walked away.
He said something after that, but I tuned him out, got into my car and drove off. That was about two weeks ago.
I wonder how big the knot in his stomach is this evening…….he works one of the GM brand dealerships.
———
I stopped caring about the people who voted for this insanity……. really. They’re gonna go down first and hardest……. and I’ll watch along side with a big sign saying “See, I Told You So.”
As a secularized Jew, I can tell you for a fact that you are correct.
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 7:52PM EST (link)If one believes in God, then one must assume that things will turn out OK, or at least according to plan.
For Atheists, all there is is the work they can do on this earth.
The divide between conservative and liberal in American is, at least partially, religious in nature.
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
Have you ever read Dennis Prager on this issue? - nt
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 8:01PM EST (link)Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Yes.
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 8:10PM EST (link)He is right in his assessment of the nature of our culture war. If one believes in God, then his position, and your position by extension, is entirely rational.
I think he is intensely creative in his nonobservance of Judaism, but I guess I should support any rationalization of religion.
I believe Judaism greatest contributions to the world are Jesus and secular humanism. That society has become immoral and misguided is true, but I see the failure of our education system as the cause, not the dearth of religious conviction.
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
great points - more later - 24 is on - nt
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 8:28PM EST (link)Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Yeah Prager is my favorite of the radio
AKSteveB (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:44PM EST (link)guys. I guess my take on Judaism at this stage of my life is similar to his. I’m definitely *lapsed* but also can’t help but see what happens in a completely secular society. Time will tell, but as I’m finding out in other things, ultimately you have to be something or you are nothing.
Hell is other people – Sartre
A completely secular society does not have to be immoral. nt
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:47PM EST (link)I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
It doesn't necessarily have to be immoral
AKSteveB (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:56PM EST (link)but it won’t be the U.S. as we’ve known it. If nothing else, history seems to show that where religion isn’t ..government is. I’m also secular, and wish this wasn’t so, but I see no evidence to the contrary. In many ways, European “social democracy”/socialism has been the substitution of government for church.
Hell is other people – Sartre
The substitution of government for church is religion by another name, and just as bad. nt
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:58PM EST (link)I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
And it is as inevitable as e=mc^2 nt
AKSteveB (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 10:10PM EST (link)Hell is other people – Sartre
Nothing is inevitable, although some things are harder to stop than others. nt
Alitheia (Diary) Tuesday, March 31st at 12:07PM EST (link)I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
Where do you stand to confirm or condemn
Achance (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:58PM EST (link)an act in a completely secular society? Post-modernist philosophy, or personal relativism, is the ultimate result of secularism. Absent some immortal absolute, if it feels good, do it. How do you condemn me if I want my neighbor’s wife and I kill him because he’s in my way; I’m stronger and she wanted me too. Welcome to Nietzsche’s world.
This is the downfall of secular democracy: getting 50%+1 makes it right – whether it is nationalizing GM or implementing the Final Solution.
In Vino Veritas
There is an immortal absolute, it's just hard to figure out.
Alitheia (Diary) Tuesday, March 31st at 12:09PM EST (link)The main of goal of a secular-humanist society would be to find that immortal absolute. Except, we already have good rules we could follow: we can just borrow the ideals our Founding Fathers made for us.
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
that is funny because
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:44PM EST (link)I see the failure of our education system at least partly the responsibility of those who would call themselves secular humanists.
At least the more radicalized left wing among them.
I don’t have a problem per se with atheism. But I have a problem with those who believe that secular humanism is any sort of viable philosophy of civilization. Since it is based upon a mostly unspoken moral code (ie. one bequeathed by society at large) and since it rejects most limitations on personal behavior, and has no mechanism to enforce it’s morality at any rate. It is simply not a moral philosophy that can be taken seriously. It eventually degenerates into “anything goes, as long as it is politically correct.”
I would have much more respect for secularists if they had a morality based upon some sort of tradition, or even one created by committee, and then created a way to discipline their own members and hold their morality up as a form of truth. A strong philosophy, like for example Stoicism.
But it is a pipe dream because the reason many people reject either religion or tradition is precisely because they don’t want to be held to any standards.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
I solved that problem easily.
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:51PM EST (link)I stole my moral code from Judaism and Jesus, with some Buddhism thrown in for fun.
Teaching a moral code is necessary, and once we do that well as a country, our slide into barbarism will be halted. It has nothing to do with religion. Idiots abound in all ideologies.
Morality is about decisions, and decision-making is a key tool for any human. Schools need to teach it.
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
you miss my point
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:58PM EST (link)Secular Humanism does not have either a will nor a viable plan to teach any sort of real morality, Other than, the sort of feel good PC pablum you get out of public elementary schools.
It is not enough that some people who call themselves such have a moral code. They really have nothing to offer. If it did, if it had the moral authority of the stoics, then I would have some respect for it.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
True all the way through.
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:59PM EST (link)I will do my little piece; others will join in time.
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
Ruthless dictators are just that, be they left, right, or "center". nt
Alitheia (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 7:52PM EST (link)I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never be forced to live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
I once asked this question of David Horowitz
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 9:35PM EST (link)and he didn’t really have much of an answer. More or less just a cultural legacy.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Get Prager's book: "Why the Jews?" - nt
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 11:06PM EST (link)Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Prager on why Jews are mostly secular - excerpt and LINK
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 11:09PM EST (link)Link
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1642854/posts
Excerpt:
“To understand Jews, one must understand that most Jews are not religious.
This is true even if our definition of “religious” is minimal, i.e., observant of any specifically Jewish religious laws, attends synagogue once a month or even declares a belief in God.
According to a 2003 Harris Poll, “Only 16 percent of Jews go to synagogue once a month or more often”; and regarding belief in God: “Protestants (90 percent) are more likely than Roman Catholics (79 percent) and much more likely than Jews (48 percent) to believe in God. Religious affiliation here includes many people raised as members of a religion or religious group, regardless of what they practice or believe now.”
Why most contemporary Jews are irreligious, given that the Jews gave the world the Bible and introduced humanity to the God of monotheism, is a fascinating subject. It is also a vital subject given the role that secular Jews — such as Marx, Freud, and Einstein — have played in forming the modern world.
One reason was traditional (Orthodox) Judaism’s inability to keep most Jews religious once Jews were free to leave the ghettos and shtetls (small Jewish towns or villages throughout Eastern Europe) in which most Jews lived.
The only Jewish religious alternative was a new Jewish movement called Reform Judaism, begun in Germany in the beginning of the 19th century. But with all the good intentions of Reform’s founders to stem the departure of Jews from Judaism, Reform retained little that was distinctively Jewish. It dropped kashrut (the Jewish dietary laws), Hebrew as the language of worship, Jewish peoplehood, opposed the return of Jews to Israel (Zionism), and allowed moving the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday.
By the mid-19th century, some Jews broke away from Reform and founded Conservative Judaism, in order to “conserve” Jewish religiosity without being Orthodox.
While Reform and Conservatism appealed to many Jews, a deeply religious, God-centered alternative to Orthodoxy that can keep Jews religious has not yet arisen.
And why did most Jews reject Orthodoxy? Over the course of thousands of years, a combination of anti-Semitism and Orthodox Jewish law — one of whose primary purposes was to keep Jews separated from the non-Jewish world — kept Jews in isolation. And when any group has little or no interaction with other groups, its intellectual life begins to atrophy. This was not only true in Orthodox shtetls; it is a problem in much of the Islamic world today as well as in the secular left-wing university.
Therefore, once Orthodoxy was exposed to the light of freedom, it had few rational or convincing responses to the modern world’s challenges. Faced with the choice between science, Mozart, personal liberty and great literature on the one hand, and Orthodox isolation on the other, the choice for nearly all Jews was obvious.
And that brings us to a second reason for many Jews’ irreligiosity. Jews decided that the secular world of the arts, the university and celebration of reason — a world devoid of religion — was the world for Jews to work for. Secular Jews are still believers in the Enlightenment (despite the anti-Semitism of Voltaire, the father of the Enlightenment, and despite the anti-Semitism of secular Europe).
Which brings us to the third reason. Along with their rejection of Jewish religiosity, Jews also feared and loathed their Christian neighbors’ religiosity. European Jews had suffered for centuries from religion-based (especially European Christian) anti-Semitism. For example, Jews were tortured to death on a charge of “desecration of the Host,” which essentially meant being murdered for allegedly torturing a wafer. Christian anti-Semitism in Europe ensured that virtually no Jew would feel sympathetic to religion generally, let alone Christianity specifically. Therefore, when European culture began warring on Christianity, many Jews completely identified with the anti-religious warriors. Those warriors were the men of the Enlightenment, the self-righteous title the anti-Christians gave their movement.”
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
That explains why there is a tendency towards leftism, but
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 11:20PM EST (link)it does not explain why today’s Jews, seeing the failures of the left, seeing the left’s attacks on merit and achievement, seeing the anti- Semites of the left, and seeing the left making common cause with Islamic extremists are still liberal.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Prager on why jews are liberal - LINK
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 11:30PM EST (link)http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1642854/posts
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
excerpt from Prager on why jews are liberal
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, March 30th at 11:31PM EST (link)The most frequently asked question I receive from non-Jews about Jews is, why are Jews so liberal?
The question is entirely legitimate since Jews (outside of Israel) are indeed overwhelmingly liberal and disproportionately left of liberal as well. For example, other than blacks, no American group votes so lopsidedly for the Democratic Party. And the question is further sharpened given that traditional Jewish values are not leftist. That is why the more religiously involved the Jew, the less likely he is to be on the Left. The old saw, “There are two types of Jews — those who believe Judaism is social justice and those who know Hebrew,” contains more than a kernel of truth.
In no order of importance, here are six reasons:
1. Judaism is indeed preoccupied with social justice (as well as with holiness and personal morality), and many Jews believe that the only way to achieve a just society is through leftist policies.
2. More than any other major religion, Judaism has always been preoccupied with this world. The (secular) Encyclopedia Judaica begins its entry on “Afterlife” by noting that “Judaism has always affirmed belief in an afterlife.” But the preoccupation of Judaism has been making this world a better place. That is why the Torah (the Five Books of Moses) is largely silent about the afterlife; and it is preoccupied with rejecting ancient Egyptian values. That value system was centered on the afterlife — its bible was the Book of the Dead, and its greatest monuments, the pyramids, were tombs.
3. Most Jews are frightened by anything that connotes right-wing — such as the words “right-wing” and “conservative.” Especially since the Holocaust, they think that threats to their security emanate from the Right only. (It is pointless to argue that Nazism stood for National Socialism and therefore was really a leftist ideology. Whether that is theoretically accurate doesn’t matter; nearly everyone regards the Nazis as far Right, and, therefore, Jews fear the Right.) The fact that the Jews’ best friends today are conservatives and the fact that the Left is the home of most of the Jews’ enemies outside of the Muslim world have made little impact on Jews’ psyches.
4. Liberal Jews fear most religion. They identify religion — especially fundamentalist religion and especially Christianity — with anti-Semitism. Jews are taught from birth about the horrors of the Holocaust, and of nearly 2,000 years of European, meaning Christian, anti-Semitism. They therefore tend to fear Christianity and believe that secularism guarantees their physical security. That is what animates the ACLU and its disproportionately Jewish membership, under the guise of concern with the Constitution and “separation of church and state” (words that do not appear in the Constitution), to fight all public expressions of Christianity in America.
5. Despite their secularism, Jews may be the most religious ethnic group in the world. The problem is that their religion is rarely Judaism; rather it is every “ism” of the Left. These include liberalism, socialism, feminism, Marxism and environmentalism. Jews involved in these movements believe in them with the same ideological fervor and same suspension of critical reason with which many religious people believe in their religion. It is therefore usually as hard to shake a liberal Jew’s belief in the Left and in the Democratic Party as it is to shake an evangelical Christian’s belief in Christianity. The big difference, however, is that the Christian believer acknowledges his Christianity is a belief, whereas the believer in liberalism views his belief as entirely the product of rational inquiry.
The Jews’ religious fervor emanates from the origins of the Jewish people as a religious people elected by God to help guide humanity to a better future. Of course, the original intent was to bring humanity to ethical monotheism, God-based universal moral standards, not to secular liberalism or to feminism or to socialism. Leftist Jews have simply secularized their religious calling.
6. Liberal Jews fear nationalism. The birth of nationalism in Europe planted the secular seeds of the Holocaust (religious seeds had been planted by some early and medieval Church teachings and reinforced by Martin Luther). European nationalists welcomed all national identities except the Jews’. That is a major reason so many Jews identify primarily as “world citizens”; they have contempt for nationalism and believe that strong national identities, even in America, will exclude them.
Just as liberal Jews fear a resurgent Christianity despite the fact that contemporary Christians are the Jews’ best friends, leftist Jews fear American nationalism despite the fact that Americans who believe in American exceptionalism are far more pro-Jewish and pro-Israel than leftist Americans. But most leftist Jews so abhor nationalism, they don’t even like the Jews’ nationalism (Zionism).
If you believe that leftist ideas and policies are good for America and for the world, then you are particularly pleased to know how deeply Jews — with their moral passion, intellectual energies and abilities, and financial clout — are involved with the Left. If, on the other hand, you believe that the Left is morally confused and largely a destructive force in America and the world, then the Jews’ disproportionate involvement on the Left is nothing less than a tragedy — for the world and especially for the Jews.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Jews being Liberal...
Gyorc Nacain Tuesday, March 31st at 2:16AM EST (link)…first, outta curiosity I ask, why is this question asked so often here? There are lots of other groups who are also liberal, and the question doesn’t seem to be asked of them quite as often, especially when you are talking about a group that’s 2% of the population.
A big part of this is what I will call, for lack of a better word, cultural. People pick sides not just on the arguments that both sides present, but on a lot of other things – assumptions implicit in the way people talk, the jokes people make, how people talk about various things, whether it’s religion, history, sports, etc.
A few examples:
First, occasionally I hear people on the right speak against the idea of “tolerance,” saying that people use it to stifle free speech by imposing political correctness on others. I am reminded of the South Park episode, “the Death Camp of Tolerance” (I don’t even remember what it’s about, I just remember the name). Anyway, I think this causes most Jewish people I know (inc myself) to cringe…to Jews, tolerance is a good thing. And people saying that tolerance is a way of stifiling free speech, sounds like “I oughta have the right to be intolerant.” To which the response would be, “you have the right to do whatever but don’t expect my support.”
Is that fair? Maybe not, but it’s how people think, and how people pick a side.
Another…conservatives often use the Bible / Christianity to argue their side. I hear people say the US is a Christian nation, and others say that the country was founded on Judeo-Christian values*, and how they’re a Christian first and a conservative second, and how conservatism follows from Christianity, and etc. Now that’s not a reason to not be a conservative, but you have to think about opportunity costs. Imagine some Jewish person is deciding whether to be left or right of center, and listens to the message of each side for an hour before doing so. If the right spends 30 minutes talking about Christianity, well to someone who doesn’t care about that stuff you’ve wasted 30 minutes, and are starting from a disadvantage. Further, you have created the impression that you’re not really a conservative unless you are Christian…you can be in the tent, but you’ll be an outsider whilst inside.
Another thing…look at this Dennis Miller thing on Bill O’Reilly’s show. Particularly like 15-45 seconds. He says that liberals, esp liberal women, hate Gov. Palin because she looks like she has non-neurotic sex, and that women on the upper east side’s husbands haven’t been aroused since (some reference I don’t get from the 70s). To most here, this is probably harmless fun, but to anyone above the age of 40 in my family they would throw a shoe at the TV upon seeing this. They would see the words “neurotic,” “upper east side,” and the thing about unappealing women as digs against Jewish people. You may think that totally unfair, but I am telling it how it is, based on personal experience. And that last part, about the women on the upper east side being unappealing…well that’s pretty personal. And of course, a lot of Jews actually live on the upper east side, and a lot of Jews once lived there, or have family who lived there.
Building on that, you see conservatives talk negatively about the East Coast, Hollywood, and New York. And even when speaking positively about small towns, it is usually in contrast, implicitly or explicitly, with big cities. And it comes off to those living in big cities as being negative towards big cities. And especially towards New York. Stereotypically Jews have always been associated with these places, and are more likely to see an attack on those places as attacks on themselves. Especially the Big Apple.
I know I have mentioned New York a lot, but 1 million Jewish people live there, and probably another 1 million live in surrounding areas I would guess. Who knows how many more have family there, lived there previously, etc. There are only 5-6 million in the whole country. Every time a conservative says something negative about New York, the Jewish community’s collective ear to the conservative side of the aisle closes a little. It may not be fair, but it is how people think.
An attack on liberal elite people from the East Coast in general or NYC in particular, or Hollywood, will be seen by many Jews, more than you may realize, as an attack on Jewish people. Or at least that thought will weigh in on people’s minds, and cause them to be wary. That may not be fair, but that is the way it is.
Finally, just keep in mind that people who are more likely to see themselves as in a minority group discriminated or excluded by the larger main group are more likely to be left of center. This applies to racial and religious minorities chiefly, also gay people, and I’m sure other groups you could talk about. Also women – though women are the majority and men the minority you could argue that men have a larger share of power/influence, and even if this isn’t true today it certainly was once, and attitudes change slowly. Keep in mind that many areas which once prevented black people from living there, did the same for Jewish people…there are other examples of historical anti-Jewish discrimination as well…this is definitely part of the explanation.
*I think many Jews assume this is a phrase made up to include Jews, when really what is meant is Christian values. To bring an example, recently when I was in an argument here talking about Judeo-Christian values, the people arguing with me used “Judeo-Christian” and “Christian” interchangeably. Individual people usually stuck to one phrase or the other, but collectively it was a hodgepodge, and that is the impression which is given.
The reason I think the question gets asked so
AKSteveB (Diary) Tuesday, March 31st at 2:24PM EST (link)often is that the Jews are the group that consistently votes the most against it’s own self interests, economically and foreign policywise.
Hell is other people – Sartre
NYC
Beaglescout (Diary) Tuesday, March 31st at 8:24PM EST (link)Just so you know the reason why conservatives are infuriated at NYC is not because of the Jews who live there. It is because it used to be the greatest city in the country and the world, until it drove out its manufacturing industry with unionization, drove out its middle class with rent control, and finally drove out the financial industry with taxation and regulation. Now there isn’t anything left and NYC will surely go the way of the dodo.
“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”
all good comments, especially ks & devine
loewenbrau (Diary) Tuesday, March 31st at 2:16PM EST (link)that is the experience I have had in speaking with Jews. We learned in school that the Nazis were Right Wing ( they were not) —– some years ago, I researched this and found that American Jews did not want to be considered anything close to Nazis—ie. Right Wing/ Conservative) and wanted to be liked & seen by others as knowing which side to be on—- too bad it did not occur to them to stand up and say the Nazis wereLefties, even at the risk of ” being looked at & pointed to—” .
This ignorance( perhaps even cowardice), has allowed Israel to be see as the aggressor visavie the Palestinians,etc. , has allowed thousands of bright college kids to be indoctrinated( by parents/professors), has caused Jewish professors/teachers to work/propagandize for the Left, has kept most Jewish celebrities silent, ignored the slide from democracy to bondage and has caused rifts within the Jewish comunities and even families.