After all, they must first adhere to the liberal talking points and the accompanying PC agenda. This means skewing the story to fit the pre-determined narrative.

Thankfully, as you say, this disingenuous agenda is eroding the power of Old Media at a fast rate. Our political and social fabric will be greatly enhanced with the fall of The Washington Post, The New York Times, and the rest of the journalistically fraudulent left-wing media enterprises.

When people see such obvious favorable treatment of black racist behavior it create a backlash of resentment. Added to the exoneration of a lot of white guilt by electing Obama and his subsequent abject failure as a President, black people in America have been setback 50 years.

Further, they don’t have an MLK, only race baiters and hustlers like Sharpton, Wright and Jackson to speak to and for their community.

Hard to make progress sitting around on the Democrat’s easy ride plantation.

That is because they believe the only racism that can be committed in America is by white people who speak English against groups of people who are either not white in hue or who speak Spanish. How white is white? Despite her obvious dark hue, Snooki is white, while Jennifer Lopez whose hue is lighter is not. That’s because it isn’t about the individual. The left doesn’t believe in individuals. They believe in groups, classes, races, gangs, the collective. And likewise they do not believe in individual freedom, but in the right of a class or ethnicity or collective to force its members into submission and uniformity, by terror if necessary. To stop collective action in order to protect an individual from it is racism, in their twisted mind, unless it targets a “white” collective such as a Christian church.

There are no principles at play. There are no assumptions that humans are the same under the skin. There is only universal racism on the Left: Universal racism and sexism, universal obsession with material goods, and power politics to divide and conquer then reap the spoils.

“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” –Alexander Hamilton

Study at Redstate University

It sounds to me that there were two or three different writers/editors working on this story.

The Post notes seems “few observers believe the violence was due to racial hatred. Instead, they cite isolation of different groups within the school, certain students’ warped “gangster” values, and for some, simmering resentments over perceived benefits for Asian students.”

It had nothing to do with racial hatred, just simmering resentments over race. It sounds like someone rewrote either the front of that paragraph or the end.

Also, note, that saying someone is being racially discriminatory -is- condemning the attackers (see pg. 3). It is funny what gets written some days. I would not think it is a neutral comparison to be associated with people who were racists like the father does in that paragraph.

Also: “”They’re just hating on other races. They don’t have anything better to do with their lives,” says Tyreke Williams [a former student], who graduated last June.” Did the Post not look at their own sources who note the violence has to do with racial hatred? Seriously, the students get that it is racial, the parents get that it is racial, the school gets that it has to do with race.

I don’t know anything about the incoming principal but what’s printed here, but he seems to have a good head on his shoulders.

The only people who have no clue that this is a racial problem are at the Post

occurred recently at the Des Moines, Iowa State Fair. A group of blacks attacked white fair-goers. The police described this as a racial incident. Now the police spokesperson who described it as racial has been re-assigned.
Nothing to see here, move along.

…Washington High School (outer Richmond). Early in my residence I noted the Asia kids travelled in large groups to and from campus and hanging out
during breaks, I asked an Asian friend (who’d attended SFOpublic schools) about it — she said it was for protection from the black kids who ganged up on Asians (Asian kids tended to be from the neighborhood, black kids were bussed in).

Rarely any problems with Hispanic, Pac Islander or Russian kids, at least on a group level. My friend (and her two sisters, all beauties) acquired a posse of helpful Samoan and Tongan bodyguards. And the Korean kids tended to handle their own security.

.

As described by Heather MacDonald, the Tucson public schools address the matter of more bad behavior amongst “minorities” by establishing a quota system for punishment. Imagine the white kid who realizeds one of his group will have to be picked out to balance the punishment quota.

This attacks on Asias is old news. Louis Farakan includes Koreans with the Jews in his rants. Korean immigrants live in cities. They work hard and their children do well in school.

This is why the suburbs expand.

A kid of the 60’s who went to Indianapolis Public Schools, I can say with 100% certainty that when a group of Black kids whom attacked a White kid, it was about race.
Sad but true.
This was where I learned how to bareknuckle fight.

Ahhh the virtues of a publik education.

some of the African-American students how much time they devote to studying outside the classroom. This is not hard. You simply walk up to one of the whiners and ask him or her, “Do you come to class prepared?” Of coures, that might sound raaacist.

I live in the Washington suburbs, about a 20-minute drive from the HQ of the Washington Post down on 15th and L Streets, N.W. I use the public libraries from Silver Spring to Bethesda, Md. to Fairfax to Burke, Va. regularly. Overwhelmingly, the carrels and study rooms are occupied by Persons Appearing to be of an Asian Ethnicity (I could be wrong and they could be African-Americans or Caucasian kids in disguise.) This is true not only on rainy Tuesday nights, but on sunny weekends. Almost without exception, my daughters’ HS friends of Apparent Asian Descent are dedicated, respectful, gifted students who show up on time with their homework done. Almost without exception, it is the Apparently Asian students who appreciate the opportunities an education has to offer.

I wonder why these “journalists” from the Post never ask the obvious follow-up questions that the rest of us already have answered.

The author of this piece just doesn’t get it. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Doesn’t he understand that it has been ordainedl Ordained that only blacks can be “victims” of racial violence.

Ho, hum. The more it changes, the more it stays the same.

I guess I should start by saying that as a 69 year old ex-GI, I’ve seen racial discrimination before. I’m from New England, but moved permanently to California with my folks in my teens, joined the army at 18, took basic at Fort Ord, Ca., then went to school at Fort Gordon, Georgia. (That was the only place I was ever stationed where I liked the post better than the town near it.) In September of 1959, I flew from California to Atlanta and had to take a Greyhound bus to Augusta. When I got off the bus, (wearing my class A greens) I was in a luggage room in an old wooden depot, with a wooden bench along the back wall with three old black men seated on it. As I was looking around, one of them asked: ” ‘scuse me, sarh, is you lookin’ fo’ yo’ luggage?” I replied I was, and he said, “Oh, you’ll find that in the ‘Front’ waitin’ room”. I thanked them and went through a door into a hallway which had two drinking fountains and four bathrooms, all clearly marked – “White”, and “Colored”. I remember thinking to myself: “Didn’t we fight a Civil War about this almost a hundred years ago?”. Obviously the good folks in Augusta hadn’t gotten the word back then. Look around today and ask yourselves if anything has changed? Then ask yourself if anything has remained the same? Yes, there is still racial prejudice, but not nearly as much as I encountered at the time, and not nearly for the same reasons. Let me explain it with this brief example: In San Francisco, there is a very, very prestigious public High School which practices extreme racial discrimination against Asians so that some white and more blacks can attend. Otherwise, they reason, the student body would only be made up of (very smart) Asians. Good, liberal thinking, that. Lower the threshold for some, instead of maintaining the same high standards for all. And that is what I was getting at earlier. It’s the institutionalized “Lowering of the Bar” (and the dependency it has inculcated into some cultures) for the last forty years that has led to the racial-cultural resentment that I see growing today. Some (on both sides) have noted it by expressing the idea in Animal Farm: “Some are more equal than others”. Yes, that is a part of it. So too is the notion: “It’s our (my) turn now” to get back at “them (the other)”. This smoldering ember seems to be being fanned into flame by the current administration, not doused by any fair and equitable actions of it’s Department of ‘Justice’. My suggestion? “Lets (Tea) Party, Like We Did Last Summer”.