<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama: Unitary Executive Theorist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1990</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>now, but Republican governors still seem to be stuck on stupid.  If we wait until the federal auditors and investigators are perp walking people out of Red State capitols, it will be too late.  As I&#039;ve said before, the rules on federal financial reporting are so obtuse and subjective that any fund manager who signs an FSR or other federal report is essentially signing his/her life away if the fed wants to come after him.  It is an absolute certainty that this Administration will use this tool on the Red States in furtherance of the Democrat &quot;All Republicans are Corrupt&quot; meme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, but Republican governors still seem to be stuck on stupid.  If we wait until the federal auditors and investigators are perp walking people out of Red State capitols, it will be too late.  As I&#8217;ve said before, the rules on federal financial reporting are so obtuse and subjective that any fund manager who signs an FSR or other federal report is essentially signing his/her life away if the fed wants to come after him.  It is an absolute certainty that this Administration will use this tool on the Red States in furtherance of the Democrat &#8220;All Republicans are Corrupt&#8221; meme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1988</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>really sharp, really agressive and REALLY nasty attorneys who can fill US Attorney slots in the next Republican administration.  We should be looking for people who will be willing to pursue indictments against anybody and everybody with a &quot;D&quot; behind his name for anything even remotely felonious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really sharp, really agressive and REALLY nasty attorneys who can fill US Attorney slots in the next Republican administration.  We should be looking for people who will be willing to pursue indictments against anybody and everybody with a &#8220;D&#8221; behind his name for anything even remotely felonious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icbm</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>icbm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>n/t

by the way, my position on executive firings hasn&#039;t been law since the &quot;Humphrey&#039;s Estate&quot; decision in the 1930&#039;s, when the Supreme Court overturned a magnificent 1920&#039;s decision by Chief Justice Taft, &quot;Myers v. U.S.&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_v._United_States</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n/t</p>
<p>by the way, my position on executive firings hasn&#8217;t been law since the &#8220;Humphrey&#8217;s Estate&#8221; decision in the 1930&#8242;s, when the Supreme Court overturned a magnificent 1920&#8242;s decision by Chief Justice Taft, &#8220;Myers v. U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_v._United_States</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1985</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icbm</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>icbm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>n/t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n/t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>the amended law came up and that&#039;s where I found it was an amendment to the &#039;78 Act.  You have to go a ways into the stack to get that one as it was enacted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the amended law came up and that&#8217;s where I found it was an amendment to the &#8217;78 Act.  You have to go a ways into the stack to get that one as it was enacted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1982</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>at that level he doesn&#039;t have access to an adminstrative remedy.  &#039;Course, if you do that you&#039;d better be fixed for awhile &#039;cause you ain&#039;t working anywhere that a Democrat government has any influence.  

When I rather noisily quit my merit system job over Knowles Administration corruption, both the Administration and various union leaders very publicly said that they&#039;d make sure I never worked in Alaska again.  They were very nearly successful with that for awhile, people in politics or working for the government would cross the street rather than be seen talking to me.  Finally, the Republican controlled legislature started pitching me some scraps in the form of contracts to work for them.  I&#039;ll admit now that I really only planned for scraping by for the remaining two years of his term and I could not conceive of the SOB being re-elected.  When he did get re-elected and I was facing another four years with no way to make a decent living in my field, things were getting grim.

Interestingly, by about half way through the second term, the Administration was so sick of their union friends and all the internal problems from what they&#039;d done to the State&#039;s HR/LR functions, they hired me back as a supervisor to fix the mess.  After four years in the wilderness living off scraps, I&#039;ll be the first to admit that I had mellowed some of my delicate sensibilities about the stuff they were doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at that level he doesn&#8217;t have access to an adminstrative remedy.  &#8216;Course, if you do that you&#8217;d better be fixed for awhile &#8217;cause you ain&#8217;t working anywhere that a Democrat government has any influence.  </p>
<p>When I rather noisily quit my merit system job over Knowles Administration corruption, both the Administration and various union leaders very publicly said that they&#8217;d make sure I never worked in Alaska again.  They were very nearly successful with that for awhile, people in politics or working for the government would cross the street rather than be seen talking to me.  Finally, the Republican controlled legislature started pitching me some scraps in the form of contracts to work for them.  I&#8217;ll admit now that I really only planned for scraping by for the remaining two years of his term and I could not conceive of the SOB being re-elected.  When he did get re-elected and I was facing another four years with no way to make a decent living in my field, things were getting grim.</p>
<p>Interestingly, by about half way through the second term, the Administration was so sick of their union friends and all the internal problems from what they&#8217;d done to the State&#8217;s HR/LR functions, they hired me back as a supervisor to fix the mess.  After four years in the wilderness living off scraps, I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that I had mellowed some of my delicate sensibilities about the stuff they were doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>he could hook the two of you up...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he could hook the two of you up&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>amendments.  It specifically says the IG is not considered a policy makingl position, so it wasn&#039;t a serve at the pleasure position even under the old law.  So, probably most any cause would be sufficient, e.g., &quot;doesn&#039;t fit in with our management plans,&quot; but if you state a cause, it has to be a legal cause and you have to be able to prove it.  I&#039;d be happy to represent the guy in a labor arbitration armed only with the stuff the management said about his being disoriented etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amendments.  It specifically says the IG is not considered a policy makingl position, so it wasn&#8217;t a serve at the pleasure position even under the old law.  So, probably most any cause would be sufficient, e.g., &#8220;doesn&#8217;t fit in with our management plans,&#8221; but if you state a cause, it has to be a legal cause and you have to be able to prove it.  I&#8217;d be happy to represent the guy in a labor arbitration armed only with the stuff the management said about his being disoriented etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janis</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>person to work for and around, too.  After working for the Bush family for 8 years, how much must it suck to work for people who probably treat you like appliances again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>person to work for and around, too.  After working for the Bush family for 8 years, how much must it suck to work for people who probably treat you like appliances again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>are for political purposes only, i.e. for Congressional oversight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are for political purposes only, i.e. for Congressional oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>and of course Bush&#039;s mistake was in trying to justify the firings rather than simply brushing off the questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and of course Bush&#8217;s mistake was in trying to justify the firings rather than simply brushing off the questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tbone</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>Tbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>When you&#039;re right, you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re right, you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>this person not &quot;at will&quot; or &quot;at the pleasure.&quot;  There may not be access to the administrative appeal mechanisms that merit system employees have, but such an employee does have remedy available through the courts with a wrongful discharge suit.  This guy&#039;s biggest problem will be the opposite of that faced by Ted Stevens.  All you had to do to Sen. Stevens is charge him with being a Republican and a DC jury would sentence him to death.  In this case, all you have to do is charge IG Walpin with opposing the Will of The One, and they&#039;ll find against him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this person not &#8220;at will&#8221; or &#8220;at the pleasure.&#8221;  There may not be access to the administrative appeal mechanisms that merit system employees have, but such an employee does have remedy available through the courts with a wrongful discharge suit.  This guy&#8217;s biggest problem will be the opposite of that faced by Ted Stevens.  All you had to do to Sen. Stevens is charge him with being a Republican and a DC jury would sentence him to death.  In this case, all you have to do is charge IG Walpin with opposing the Will of The One, and they&#8217;ll find against him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eburke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>eburke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>But someone like that would *never* be accepted or promoted to, let&#039;s say, majority leader in the party that so embraces diversity, tolerance and love.

(I must now leave my keyboard as I think I made myself nauseous typing that last sentence)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But someone like that would *never* be accepted or promoted to, let&#8217;s say, majority leader in the party that so embraces diversity, tolerance and love.</p>
<p>(I must now leave my keyboard as I think I made myself nauseous typing that last sentence)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>What Republicans should be doing is seeking out the people that Comrade Obama is pressuring or forcing out and find jobs for them on our side of the ditch.  We don&#039;t have the shadow government of non-profits, unions, and law firms, but we do have some resources to give jobs and contracts to the dissidents and whistleblowers.  Then we can use them for a counterattack.

This is Democrat playbook since the Clinton days and they do it at the state level as well. An IG is pretty brazen since they do have explicit cause protection, but that really doesn&#039;t seem to matter to them.  As soon as they take office they set out to remove or intimidate into silence all the senior level career employees, the people who actually know and follow the rules and who make the government run.  If they can&#039;t get rid of them, they reassign them to doing nothing and give them an office with no windows or phone and a seat that flushes; you have to be really close to retirement to be able to stand that for long.  It is really hard to come to work when nobody will dare be seen talking to you, you don&#039;t have anything to do, you get jerked around by the boss, who you know is trying to provoke you into doing something stupid.

Once they get the experienced people out of the way, they replace or supplant them with either Democrat operatives or with very junior employees who don&#039;t even know what they don&#039;t know.  Then there are no complaints from inside the workforce about who the money gets sent to, how the contract gets let, or who got hired for what.  This is all combined with a PR campaign about how they&#039;re cleaning up and streamlining.  What they&#039;re really doing is eliminating all the rules about money, people, and stuff so they&#039;re free to do as they please.  Then, the only thing they have to worry about is public opinion and since Democrats can count on good press and on the media never peeking under their skirts, they can do as they please without regard to those silly laws and things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Republicans should be doing is seeking out the people that Comrade Obama is pressuring or forcing out and find jobs for them on our side of the ditch.  We don&#8217;t have the shadow government of non-profits, unions, and law firms, but we do have some resources to give jobs and contracts to the dissidents and whistleblowers.  Then we can use them for a counterattack.</p>
<p>This is Democrat playbook since the Clinton days and they do it at the state level as well. An IG is pretty brazen since they do have explicit cause protection, but that really doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to them.  As soon as they take office they set out to remove or intimidate into silence all the senior level career employees, the people who actually know and follow the rules and who make the government run.  If they can&#8217;t get rid of them, they reassign them to doing nothing and give them an office with no windows or phone and a seat that flushes; you have to be really close to retirement to be able to stand that for long.  It is really hard to come to work when nobody will dare be seen talking to you, you don&#8217;t have anything to do, you get jerked around by the boss, who you know is trying to provoke you into doing something stupid.</p>
<p>Once they get the experienced people out of the way, they replace or supplant them with either Democrat operatives or with very junior employees who don&#8217;t even know what they don&#8217;t know.  Then there are no complaints from inside the workforce about who the money gets sent to, how the contract gets let, or who got hired for what.  This is all combined with a PR campaign about how they&#8217;re cleaning up and streamlining.  What they&#8217;re really doing is eliminating all the rules about money, people, and stuff so they&#8217;re free to do as they please.  Then, the only thing they have to worry about is public opinion and since Democrats can count on good press and on the media never peeking under their skirts, they can do as they please without regard to those silly laws and things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2009/06/18/barack-obama-unitary-executive-theorist/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/?p=158#comment-1971</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

