Two members of the Staten Island local of the Communications Workers of America say they were beaten and harassed – and one had a dead rat put in his locker – after they reported that union brothers were being paid for work they did not perform. The men say the union supported the retaliation: that a local vice president told members that “we have to deal with these spies on a personal level, like take them outside of the yard, off the company property and off company time and take care of them, because we can’t be ratting each other out,” according to the federal complaint.….
According to the complaint in Brooklyn Federal Court, DiStefano was a member in good standing with the union when in the summer of 2007 a union manager overseeing worked for Verizon on Staten Island told his men that so long as they did three “fiber to premises” jobs each day, they could put in for a full day’s pay no matter how many hours they actually worked.DiStefano says he refused to participate in the scheme, and told other workers, supervisors and union management that the practice was illegal. When Taravella went to work at the Verizon garage, he says, he expressed the same reservations.
DiStefano and Taravella say revealed the scheme to Verizon’s corporate security in May 2008. From then on, they say, they were subjected to increasing abuse from union brothers, shop stewards and union chiefs.They claim that Richard Meltz, a union chief, told angry union members to “do whatever you want with those two guys.”
Immediately afterward, the two men say they were brought up on false charges that they had made “discriminatory” gestures” to their co-workers. The case was supported by affidavits signed by many of their union brothers.
As a result, DiStefano and Taravella say, they were “terminated” from the Staten Island garage, relocated, demoted, and placed on bogus “final warnings” due to the false charges of “discrimination” and “harassment” and “making gestures” to their union brothers.
When they complained to superiors, they were told, “You guys did it to yourself,” according to the complaint.
Soon after that, Taravella says he discovered that somebody – allegedly shop steward Manny Rincon – had put a dead rat in his locker.
A month later, a union member called DiStefano a “rat” while hitting him about the face and head, an attack that left him with two herniated discs, he says.
In neither case did the union take action against the alleged perpetrator. Instead, in DiStefano’s case, he says the incident led to his termination for allegedly starting the fight.
The plaintiffs say the union encouragement the violence against them. They say that at an August 2009 meeting, Joe Macaleer and Mike Luzzi, two vice presidents of the Local, told members that the company was “having a lot of problems right now ‘due to a couple of troublemakers,’” and that “We have to learn that we can’t call corporate security because we don’t want those people getting involved in our business.”
The complaint claims that Macaleer said, “I don’t want nobody in this room to call corporate security any more.” [And] “I don’t care if somebody comes to work with a gun saying they’re going to shoot people, you don’t say anything … we have a lot of problems here due to the fact there are ‘spies ‘in the room.” [Ellipsis in complaint.]
Macaleer added, “You know who you are,” while looking directly at the plaintiffs, according to the complaint.
DiStefano and Taravella sued the CWA Local 1101, seeking damages for reckless indifference, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. [Emphasis added.]
This isn’t the first time the CWA local’s heavy-handedness has…well…gotten out of hand.
Following the Verizon strike of 2000, then-CWA boss Jim Trainor sent a letter to his members bragging about charges the union had filed against ‘scabs’ (people who had crossed the union’s picket line to work).
Imagine, paying a union that (allegedly) turns a blind eye to fraud, then beats the person who turns them in.
And union bosses wonder why they keep losing members! [Ha!]
Photo credit: Molly Theobald
——————————
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776Follow LaborUnionReport on Twitter.
For more news and views on today’s unions, go to LaborUnionReport.com
Moe Lane
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Dan Spencer
Dan McLaughlin
My Grandfather was a member of the Longshoremans
hickorystick (Diary) Friday, February 19th at 2:05AM EST (link)Union on the west coast. They meet evey year to commemorate Bloody Thursday. As long as he was alive, even after retiring, he would go to a meeting on the anniversary to remember his fellow workers killed in the dispute. That Union workers would beat one of their own, is shocking to me. These men are clueless. The original Unions had good cause to band together. Most of them have descended into 8th grade mentality frat houses.
Yeah, old Harry Bridges may have been a communist
Achance (Diary) Friday, February 19th at 10:39AM EST (link)but he made the longshorement the “lords of the dock.” With due respect to your father and the ordinary dockworkers, the ILWU was a communist front during Bridges’ whole tenure and it only dyed rather than changed its stripes with Taft-Hartley and ulitmately Bridges’ retirement. The ILWU, the Jones Act, and the unionized shippers are the pestilence of the West Coast to this day and extract an excise tax on the whole Country with the exhorbitant longshoring costs at West Coast ports. There’s a reason the big beef in the last big labor dispute with the ILWU was over keeping the “Dock Clerk” rather than using automated tracking of containers; the “Dock Clerk” is a union guy dispatched by the Hall and the Dock Clerk is the one who knows which container is worth stealing from or stealing altogether.
In Vino Veritas
Harry Bridges almost certainly was
hickorystick (Diary) Friday, February 19th at 4:47PM EST (link)but I still would seperate the workers banding together to develop a ‘Labor Interest’ from the leaders who often had an ideology different from the commen worker. Many of the men of this time were very “Salty” and didn’t mind tweaking the nose of the ‘establishment’. If that meant allowing characters and ideas into prominent positions to tweak the nose of the government and the establishment, which too often were the same interest, they would do it. It doesn’t mean they believed in the same thing. The Government(s) often broke with it’s own stated ideology, the American Constitution, in suppresing the strikes. In Everett the Sheriff’s group opened fire on IWW members and killed a small number of them.. The courts found in favor of the IWW in later prosecution of the affair. So, I’m just saying it’s a mixed bag. I have only begun to study this part of history. I do hate Communism,, but also recognize the desperation during these times Men must have felt.