The SEIU & Obama’s ‘Jobs Summit’: How much influence will the Queen of Labor have?


Behind every man, there is a woman…
Behind every king, there is a queen…
Behind SEIU boss Andy Stern, there is Anna Burger.

Who is Anna Burger?

She’s the less public face of the Union of Purple People Eaters (aka the Service Employees International Union). But her less-public profile should not fool you. She is as every bit as powerful (and perhaps moreso) than her public counterpart, the Lord of Labor, Andy Stern.

When SEIU boss Andy Stern broke apart the AFL-CIO in 2005, Anna Burger’s the woman that he appointed to head his new federation “Change to Whine Win.”

Make no mistake about it: Anna Burger is the Queen of Labor.

If Andy Stern is the hand in Barack Obama’s puppet, Burger could easily be the rubber glove.

In addition to her bonafides in the utmost upper echelons of the union pyramid scheme, Ms. Burger also happens to be the vice chair of George Soros’ Democracy Alliance.

When people focus on Andy Stern, they lose sight of just how powerful Ms. Burger is and how integral she has been in helping orchestrate the Left’s coup d’ etat…and how she, like Andy, has the president’s ear. 

On Thursday morning, President Obama is holding his overly-touted “Jobs Summit”. As Politico noted over the weekend:

It’s one of the oldest tricks in the presidential playbook: when you want to focus attention on an issue, hold a meeting and call it a “summit.”

However, on Sunday, with union bosses on the exclusive invite list, we questioned whether union bosses would use the “jobs summit” to push the job-destroying and hallucinogenically-named Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA).

All evidence suggests that, not only were we correct in our assumption (that EFCA would be pushed at the jobs summit), but that union bosses plan to use the jobs summit to push even more government spending programs that will further add to the nation’s debt.

Considering that the Queen of Labor has never created a job, we found what Ms. Burger wrote today in the Huffington Post rather fascinating:

Creating jobs isn’t rocket science. We just need the political will, courage and determination to make it happen.

Now it’s time to get to work.

1. We need to extend the safety net, including increasing unemployment insurance and expanding work sharing programs to provide unemployment benefits for reduced hours of work. and

2. We need to use TARP funds to increase credit for small businesses.

3. Federal fiscal relief to states and local governments needs to be expanded to save an anticipated 900,000 jobs and the vital services in our communities.

4. We need to target the fastest-growing sectors of human services such as child care, in-home services for the elderly and disabled, and other services our communities need through a public jobs program. This will create jobs in the public and private sectors and ensure our communities are healthy, educated, and well cared for.

5. We need to leverage private investment with public dollars through a Green Bank that will promote energy-efficiency and renewables as a major source of job creation, in both the short and the long term. The jobs we create today will lay the groundwork for the industries of tomorrow.

Expanding the home retrofitting programs begun under the Recovery Act will
create good jobs in construction and related industries. Including commercial and public buildings would increase the scope of the program, create high skilled jobs, and protect the planet by reducing demand for energy. By acting now, America can lead the way on green technology.

6. We must invest in our aging and failing infrastructure by rebuilding our schools, roads and bridges—putting millions to work. An Infrastructure Bank can foster public/private partnerships in developing regional and large scale projects critical for a 21st century economy.

7. The passage of health care reform will add tens of millions of Americans to the healthcare rolls and create more than a million new and different jobs in healthcare and related industries. We need to ensure our present healthcare workforce is prepared and we need innovative recruitment and training programs to meet this new workforce demand.

8. We must pass the Employee Free Choice Act to once again protect workers’ freedom to form unions and allow them to share in the prosperity of a new 21st century economy.

9. We need expanded worker training programs on a national scale so that young people are prepared for new industries and workers can the learn skills necessary to compete for new jobs. It’s time to coordinate across agency lines and provide flexible lifelong training for the new economy. [Emphasis added.]

Paid for by whom?

Without saying ‘you,’ Ms. Burger’s answer is as any wealth re-distributor’s would be: Tax the rich!

It’s time for Wall Street and the financial industry to pay back their debt to our society. Wall Street must do its part by paying a speculators tax on their obscene profits and transactions. This tax can fund the entire program over ten years.

This isn’t a hard ask. After the trillions in taxpayer investments to bail them out, the excessive profits of firms like Goldman Sachs, and the $150 billion in compensation and bonuses the top six banks plan to dole out this year, this is a small price for Wall Street to pay.

Of course, “Wall Street” is made up millions of “Main Street” investors who have their 401(k)s, their pensions, and their investments in Wall Street.

So, what Queen of Labor is essentially pushing for is a hidden tax on anyone with any kind of investment, covered in the “we’ll screw the rich” blanket.

Given that government can only steal from, expropriate, or tax the wealth of its citizens, it cannot create jobs without killing jobs in the private sector.

In ordinary times, Ms. Burger’s proposals would be laugh-out-loud funny.

However, these are not ordinary times where leaders in Washington understand basic economic principles (which is why there is a job summit to begin with) that, in order for the private sector to be able to create jobs, government needs to get the hell out of the way.

Unfortunately, these are extraordinary times. Our nation has a president whose ear is being bent by the Lord of Labor and his Queen whose only apparent know-how on meeting a payroll is through taking the hard-earned income from working Americans. And, whose only apparent growth plan is through higher taxes, bigger government, and stripping Americans of their right to vote on unionization.

Here’s our prediction: If President Obama chooses to take union bosses’ advice, he can be assured unemployment will reach 13% or more by 2012.

Follow LaborUnionReport on Twitter.

Cross-posted.
_____________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776


RSS feed

16 Comments Leave a comment

never ceases to amaze me how...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 12:39AM EST (link)

unsophisticated and sophmoric these labor leaders are. The idea that expanded unemployment benefits creates jobs in the long term makes me laugh; however, its a nervous laugh because these people now run the country.

Expanded benefits and gov't jobs...

nessa (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 2:01AM EST (link)

HFC! That is the stupidest thing I’ve read in a while. Unemployment benefits for lost hours? Gov’t created jobs from passing Obama/Pelosi/Reid Care? She didn’t even consider the private sector creating jobs except as a public/private shared enterprise. Pass Crap and Tax so the gov’t can spend billions on jobs to retro-fit homes and public buildings. Where do all these socialist cockroaches keep coming from? And when are we going to start stomping them out of existence?

“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

Contributor to Unified Patriots

teh twitter

 
 

WashTimes: "Critics not invited to jobs summit"

barrypopik (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 3:15AM EST (link)

Of course:

Missing from a partial list of attendees released by the White House are the self-proclaimed voices of business – the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business – both of which have been critical of Mr. Obama’s proposed health care overhaul.

Confirmed attendees include liberal economists credited with shaping the $787 billion stimulus package, union leaders, environmental advocates and executives from Google and other blue-chip firms.

“He’s going to get lots of recommendations to spend more money,” said Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business. “These are the very same people who gave us the stimulus package. My feeling is we’re not going to get what we need, and that’s a complete change in direction on economic policy.”

 

I'd love to see a "program" where these union people

Karina (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 6:45AM EST (link)

have to start and run a small business for one year. AND make a profit. At the end of the first year, their employees must join a union but they must still show a profit. Then they can see what life is like on the other side. They can see for themselves how America lives. They’re not allowed to stay in their current home, find a house/apt to rent instead. No car more car and driver. Ride a bike. It’s green!!! LOL

We can give them $100,000 and see what they turn it into. If they fail, they are never allowed to donate money, time, or influence to ANY poltical body. They also pay back all the money they lost with 20% interest.

FYI: Nancy Pelosi is "anti-union"...FOR HERSELF

LaborUnionReport (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 9:58AM EST (link)

“Nancy Pelosi’s socialist political views are exactly what have kept her elected in San Francisco, along with the flow of union campaign money. The staunch “union supporter” Pelosi has even received the Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farm Workers Union. But her $25 million Napa vineyards and winery, she and her husband own are non-union shops. The extra profit she earns is more than she gets from labor unions. But I don’t think she wants the rank and file to know this. Do you?”

“The hypocrisy doesn’t stop there. Pelosi has received more money from the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees unions than any other member of Congress in recent election cycles.”

“The multi-millionaire investors own a large stake in an exclusive resort hotel in Wine Country, the Napa Valley Auberge Du Soleil Resort. It has more than 250 employees. But none of them are in a union, according to Peter Schweizer, author of “Do As I Say, (Not As I Do) – The Hypocrisy of Democrats” and a regular contributor to the New York Times.”

“Pelosi is also partners in a restaurant chain called Piatti, which has 900 employees. The chain is – you might have guessed — a non-union shop. ”

Source: http://sadbastards.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/the-real-nancy-pelosi-multi-millionaire-non-union-resort-baroness/

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine December 23, 1776

In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.-Ayn Rand

LaborUnionReport.com
The Most Comprehensive Source for
News & Views on Today’s Labor Unions.


 
 

Actually, Karina et al., the labor leaders are quite good at running a business.

Achance (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 6:57AM EST (link)

A labor leader has anywhere from hundreds to millions of people working to pay him or her to be important. In half the states, they’ve been effective enough at it that they can make you pay them whether you want to or not. Looks like a pretty good business model to me.

In Vino Veritas

I'm not talking about a non profit

Karina (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 7:43AM EST (link)

I mean an actual for profit, non political small business. Like a bakery or a gift shop. Where they can’t use their political leverage to influence outcomes. Where they feel the effects of their ideas and policies in the real world.

A bakery or a gift shop is too much work and not enough money.

Achance (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 7:55AM EST (link)

The ideal in America any more is to have other people work and you rake off from it; banks and unions or government itself are ideal for this. As to the non-profit aspect, it is really only a matter of how one looks at profit. Granted, a non-profit isn’t paying out dividends to shareholders or having its proprietor figure out what’s left for him after the bills are paid like for-profits do, but a non-profit will have a cabal of leaders and staff who make some really fancy salaries and live quite well plus they usually have the benefit of having useful idiots who will work for almost nothing to do the real work of the organization. As I said, good business model.

In Vino Veritas

Which is exactly why I made the suggestion

Karina (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 8:14AM EST (link)

that they should be required to run that kind of business. When the majority of Obama’s advisors have never worked in the private sector, there is a huge disconnect between socialist theory and reality. I’d like them too experience it first hand and feel the pain too many Americans are feeling because of their policies. Away from their useful idiots and actually have to make a payroll, juggle inventory, and pay taxes out of their income. No special tax status to protect them.

But you gotta ask yourself, since the house is burning,

Achance (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 8:29AM EST (link)

shouldn’t you keep warm?

I’ve done both; worked private sector and public sector. Never worked a non-profit on purpose. I made some really good money in the private sector but my experience was that banks, credit card companies, and wives hated the life of a private business person. The only way you could get any credit was to demonstrate that you didn’t need it and women have an amazing tendency to prefer knowing that you’ll get paid a thousand bucks next Friday to knowing that you have a contract for two hundred thousand that you can bill out over the next three months. I never made anything like the money in the public sector that I’d made in the private sector but I lived better and bankers chased me down the street trying to loan me money. Between the two, I guess a well-paying wage job with a private company is better, but If I have to work for wages, I like the public sector better so long as I’m pretty close to the top of the food chain.

In Vino Veritas

you can't even get an apartment

mom2oneson (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 9:19AM EST (link)

We ended up in this over priced apartment because they did a credit check. Every other apartment wanted to see paycheck stubs. I thought we were going to have to go a weekly motel. My companies pay me as a contractor so I get direct deposits or checks but no paycheck stubs. I’m on the other end though, I would make a lot more working for an hourly wage or a weekly salary, they don’t pay minimum wage.
Forget about any type of loan either you are right. I had 780 FICO and I couldn’t get a loan for $2000 for a car that was worth more than that from a credit union without paycheck stubs.

 
 
 

Achance is right

mom2oneson (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 8:39AM EST (link)

I dated an accountant for a non-profit. Hindsight he is probably one of the few communist with a useful degree and he was clean and neat. He had no desire to enter the corporate world but was heck bent on working for some type of non profi to do good. He did all of the work of the organization, everything, even non accounting stuff writing letters and the receptionist answered the phone and did mailers. So those two people did everything. The rest of the staff that was paid the big salaries was like never there! The big person didn’t even live in that city. The person below him would check in until 10 or 11 am and go off for 3 days a week. The other 2 days she didn’t come in. They had more people on staff to that were never seen except for meetings within the larger organization. He wasn’t paid like a real accountant either he was paid like a clerical worker. He would be there after 6pm on a lot of nights and he got there at 8 am too. He wasn’t a time clock stretcher in fact he is one of the most disciplined people I know, very disciplined so he wasn’t just slacking off and staying late. He is the no sick days no late with all his clocks set 15 minutes early and all hsi clothes hanging in the same direction and freaks out if something is out oft of place ever type of person – I am sure he worked for the entire time except for short lunch and bathroom breaks. They didn’t even give him a real office he got this attic thing and he was 6’5″ the people that were never there got these big empty offices.

He is right about people thinking pay others is the way to make money too. Forever I’ve wanted to start my own business doing what I do and cutting out the middle man and just pay someone for tech support. Everyone says no, basically I should start one and employ or contract to other people that I don’t want to “work.” I enjoy what I do I just would like to accept some of the headaches and responsibility to get clients and earn more and I do not want to deal with other people working or contracting with me except a back up person. Everyone recommends not actually doing the work myself. There are so many chains now a lot of the smaller service type of businesses like a bakery have free family labor. I see a lot of people especially women with home small businesses that don’t take into account all the work and time they put into it. Usually they would earn more with less hours going out and working at a grocery store or physician’s office filing papers with a lot less headaches.

 
 
 

Art, you forget, I think

makemyday (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 9:01AM EST (link)

The labor side and their leaders have that business model because the public sector has tilted the table in their favor with labor laws, arbitration, collective bargaining. This is not a mano on mano situation. A business owner must be competitive against other similar businesses. Labor unions merely fall back on the environment created for them by government. They didn’t have to compete against anything in years past, it was their way or the highway. Today they are competing against billions of people around the world willling or not to work for peanuts and they are finding it difficult to compete. Their business model is failing and they have turned once again to their friends in Washington to help prop them up.

Everyone was so quick to say that GM should have been allowed to fail rather than propped up with a bailout but what about the UAW? Why can’t they fail also?

When all else fails…….. Shoot!

“Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” –American author Mark Twain (1835-1910)

“We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times.” –George Washington, letter to Philip Schuyler, 1777

Didn't forget, guess the sarcasm was too subtle.

Achance (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 2:46PM EST (link)

That said, it is a good ride. Even when I was a very wealthy state’s director of labor relations, whenever I was in a room full of union “leaders,” I was well aware that I was the lowest paid person in the room. Even almost forty years ago when I was still working with the tools and was a sometimes union officer and rep, I didn’t know what the back of an airplane looked like and NEVER paid a bar or restaurant tab.

I’m a lot more comfortable working for the employer but I’ll work for the unions on a righteous case, and there are plenty, because they both treat you better and pay you better. I wouldn’t work for some of the truly lefty ones, but they wouldn’t hire me anyway; that R behind my name is absolutely disqualifying.

In Vino Veritas

 
 

List of FORCED UNION DUES STATES:

LaborUnionReport (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 10:02AM EST (link)

To achance’s point:

Unions collect over $10 billion per year in union dues. The majority of workers who are unionized: 1) Never voted to be unionized (but went to work at an already unionized company), and 2) Are required to pay union dues (or agency shop fees) as a condition of employment (they either pay or are fired).

Here’s more, including the list of Forced Dues States:

http://www.1-888-no-union.com/refusaltopaydues.html

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine December 23, 1776

In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.-Ayn Rand

LaborUnionReport.com
The Most Comprehensive Source for
News & Views on Today’s Labor Unions.


It isn't mere coincidence that the Red/Blue mix

Achance (Diary) Thursday, December 3rd at 2:50PM EST (link)

on that map is almost identical to the Red/Blue mix in politics. When I was Alaska’s director of labor relations, the guy from CA and I were the only R-appointed L/R directors in the Country.

In Vino Veritas