<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another concern troll waxes eloquent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/2009/05/13/another-concern-troll-waxes-eloquent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/2009/05/13/another-concern-troll-waxes-eloquent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leopard1996</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/2009/05/13/another-concern-troll-waxes-eloquent/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Leopard1996</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/?p=17#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Yeah, all my professors were too, even one who was my adviser from Jamaica, who I would have thought would have been a bleeding heart socialist, until he told me in a meeting that he told some kid doing an independent study that was espousing socialism in the black community to get the hell out of his office with that bull&amp;*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, all my professors were too, even one who was my adviser from Jamaica, who I would have thought would have been a bleeding heart socialist, until he told me in a meeting that he told some kid doing an independent study that was espousing socialism in the black community to get the hell out of his office with that bull&amp;*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/2009/05/13/another-concern-troll-waxes-eloquent/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/?p=17#comment-193</guid>
		<description>but i learned the same things.

(in fact all my professors were disciples of Milton Friedman)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but i learned the same things.</p>
<p>(in fact all my professors were disciples of Milton Friedman)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leopard1996</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/2009/05/13/another-concern-troll-waxes-eloquent/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Leopard1996</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/kyle8/?p=17#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Is Anti-intellectual I wonder. The part that reads the second amendment right after the first amendment and sees that the first amendment is read as an individual right to free speech, freedom of religion, etc, so it would make sense that the second amendment worded about the same way protects the right to bear arms.  Or is it anti-intellecutal to believe that the articles in the constitution which detail what each branch of the federal govenment is supposed to do actually mean what it says.  Or is it anti-intellectual to realize that policies that shift the aggergate supply curve to the right, increases output despite where the aggergate demand curve is at 80%

I guess I am just a dumb ass then, but a dumb ass that got an Economics degree from a relatively decent private school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Anti-intellectual I wonder. The part that reads the second amendment right after the first amendment and sees that the first amendment is read as an individual right to free speech, freedom of religion, etc, so it would make sense that the second amendment worded about the same way protects the right to bear arms.  Or is it anti-intellecutal to believe that the articles in the constitution which detail what each branch of the federal govenment is supposed to do actually mean what it says.  Or is it anti-intellectual to realize that policies that shift the aggergate supply curve to the right, increases output despite where the aggergate demand curve is at 80%</p>
<p>I guess I am just a dumb ass then, but a dumb ass that got an Economics degree from a relatively decent private school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

