The way forward for gays


Now there are defeats in three of the most liberal states in the Union, CA, ME, and NY.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gay_marriage_ny

While that sincerely upsets a lot of people who, rightfully perhaps, feel betrayed, there is a way forward. Eclipsed by the ME results were the election results from WA where the ‘everything but the name’ measure passed, giving gay couples all the rights that the state provides married heterosexuals. For reasons that are too deep and too tied to history and tradition, it seems, even many liberals are uncomfortable with the appellation ‘marriage’ for anything but a one man-one woman union; it seems a more practical approach to bypass that and go the route of civil unions and the ‘everything but name’ solution that WA gay rights groups successfully executed. Even I will be supportive of civil union legislation in my state, and I am one of those hated libertarian-conservatives.

It seems to me that with an approach that avoids using the term ‘marriage’ and has iron clad protections for religious entities (incl church/synagogue/mosque affiliated organizations) safe from judicial meddling, gay rights does indeed have a way forward in today’s political climate.



RSS feed

1 Comment Leave a comment

Well if gays can have "civil unions" why cannot....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, December 2nd at 7:11PM EST (link)

unmarried people living together have the same RIGHTS? If we are going down the path to getting ever more closer to marriage and two people of the same sex get healthcare benefits etc then so should a couple of heterosexuals who want to just live together, right?

I think also that anyone getting “civil unions” ought to be TAXED as if they were married because that is only fair as well, right?