50% self-righteous | 50% self-indulgent | 100% d-bag


Culture11, we hardly knew ye. And what a true tragedy for us, that we failed to recognize such brilliance, a guiding star, a beacon to lead us back to the path of…of…well, that was the problem, wasn’t it? That the people busy trying to win elections just weren’t cool enough. Not enlightened enough? Or just too stuck on Sarah?

“One of my proudest moments,” Kuo told me, “was when someone at RedState”—the conservative blog that attempted to mount an online purge of the movement’s reformists in the last weeks of the campaign—”said, ‘We aren’t even going to post a link to Culture11.’ “

SRSLY? *THAT* was one of your proudest moments? Not when you “left the administration unhappily and went on to write Tempting Faith, the most personal of the dissenting White House memoirs of the Bush years”? Or was it when the money ran out and you surveyed all you had built for a mere $X million? Give me a freaking break. Here’s your gold star-embroidered hemp sweater for standing up to The Man.

Please. First, to get this out of the way: there was no official RedState policy of not linking to Culture11. Culture11 had quite a few defenders inside RedState and readers in our community – and to be more precise, several of the folks involved with Culture11 had quite a few fans. Many of us didn’t just defend the site, but rooted for its success. Some of us even got used as professional references when all those writers ended up on the street.

But at the same time, there were more than few folks at RedState that looked at the sneering attitudes like Kuo’s and frankly didn’t shed a tear when that bunch failed to cajole even an angel investor (and I use the term loosely in the absence of a identifiable business model) to continue throwing good money after bad. We weren’t sad that a bunch of folks who burned through a load of righty cash and ended up at the end with nothing but fawning praise from the left got a little lesson in how markets work.

And see, that was the problem all along. It’s not just that Culture11 didn’t know what they were really setting out to do. It’s that they weren’t very good at it.


Category:

RSS feed

5 Comments Leave a comment

Lessons of Culture11

Dan McLaughlin (Diary) Tuesday, March 24th at 10:15AM EST (link)

There are several, but one of them is that if you want to criticize your own side, you should (1) first build a little credibility so people actually believe you are on their side and (2) maybe not go full throttle in the middle of a high-profile election campaign.

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

Well put

Jack_Savage (Diary) Tuesday, March 24th at 10:26AM EST (link)

I was thinking the same thing based on the article, but am not familiar enough with the project to comment.
Seems like the first thing people like this do is to trash their own side in order to gain credibility with the OTHER side, then wonder why the poject fails.

 
 

what the hell is Culture 11?

Doc Holliday (Diary) Tuesday, March 24th at 8:56PM EST (link)

see, I follow politics…a lot, so maybe their biggest question, which is serious, is their real problem, whoever they are.

Molon Labe!

5 to that Doc....never heard of them!...bad business model!..nt

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 10:09AM EST (link)

Yeah...

Steph C (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 10:51AM EST (link)

What Doc said.

Hardly knew is putting it kindly. Who the heck were they?

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics