Obama wants to control the salaries of everyone. From bank execs to loan officers the government is in charge.
Comrads! This just in from the Dear Leader’s headquarters. The leader of the Democratic Socialist Party plans to control all salaries of every financial institution. Victory for the Revolution! Full story here from the evil capitalists at the Wall Street Journal.
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has begun serious talks about how it can change compensation practices across the financial-services industry, including at companies that did not receive federal bailout money, according to people familiar with the matter.
The initiative, which is in its early stages, is part of an ambitious and likely controversial effort to broadly address the way financial companies pay employees and executives, including an attempt to more closely align pay with long-term performance.
Administration and regulatory officials are looking at various options, including using the Federal Reserve’s supervisory powers, the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission and moral suasion. Officials are also looking at what could be done legislatively.
Among ideas being discussed are Fed rules that would curb banks’ ability to pay employees in a way that would threaten the “safety and soundness” of the bank — such as paying loan officers for the volume of business they do, not the quality. The administration is also discussing issuing “best practices” to guide firms in structuring pay.
Just remember. If the socialists can convince everyone that they can control pay limits of top executives or mid level employees then the next thing they will go after is control over the minimum level of salaries offered to everyone else. Hint – that means that voting against the guy in office could mean a vote against how much you, the average private sector employee, is paid for your work.
I hate to say that we told you so but we did. Barack Obama seeks socialist oversight of executive pay – including companies that did not take or need bailouts. Next up – the health care industry. Cutting costs by cutting salaries. Because just like the financial sector it’s about quality and not quantity. Quality – you know that thing that federal bureaucracies know so much about.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Not surprising
daconia (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 11:47AM EST (link)Nothing coming from the Wizard of O surprises me these days. Is he willing to accept limits on his book earnings? It is time to Toto to pull back the curtain.
Obama is not just cutting off his nose,
izoneguy (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 11:48AM EST (link)he is chopping off both of his arms. I guess he thinks the “stimulus” money and all the unions will be enough to fund his 2010, 2012 election runs….
I would forget about those contributions he use to get from the banking & healthcare industries. Don’t worry Detroit – once you have served your purpose you will be thrown under the bus as well…..
Just wait until Obama makes a play for the oil industry.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
He won't need them for these upcoming elections.
larueladue (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 6:31PM EST (link)The Chinese will make up the difference…
Hmmn...Where will those that know how to milk the system go?
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 2:50PM EST (link)I’m thinking to K-Street. Just what we need.
Yeah, a lot of the Wall Street ultra fat cats IMO don’t produce anything near as valuable as what they earn. To those private actors that let that happen, my response is “Suckers!” Perhaps stockholders need a better platform to assert their interests than today’s lackey boards of directors. But it’s not like our political system has provided a compelling example of how to serve constituents and their interests without a siphoning of resources. And at least with the private sector, Americans can decline to participate.
What about Hollywood???
izoneguy (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 6:04PM EST (link)Are they exempt from salary controls because most of them support the one and contribute money to him???
On a Hollywood film the big stars get 10-30 million for about 4-6 months work…..
I say they spread the wealth around so that everyone from the production assistant to the big name star get paid the same???
That way a $100 a day PA could probably make $150,000 for 4-6 months work as well….what that is unfair to the highly paid stars???
Right – that is what, now you see our points…..
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
we need a windfall profits tax
kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 6:19PM EST (link)on all people in the entertainment industry, and trial lawyers too.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Hollwood is a great example
The Political Class (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 6:44PM EST (link)Those guys talk a lot about Wall Street while walking home with millions per film.
www.thepoliticalclass.com
and ...
kyle8 (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 6:46PM EST (link)putting their money into foreign accounts to avoid taxes.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
and...
thetexan (Diary) Wednesday, May 13th at 7:40PM EST (link)Were given special tax breaks from the Clinton administration because they are actors. The ones making more than $1 million per year of course.