Jim Cramer is smart…and also…not so much…


Cross posted to The Political Class.

In response to attacks of him and his criticism of the fledgling Obama administration and how it is handling the economy, he had the following, in part, to say:

Are they really that blind to the Great Wealth Destruction they are causing with their decisions to demonize the bankers, raise taxes for the wealthy, advocate draconian cap-and-trade policies and upend the health care system?

And furthermore:

After the White House briefing, Rush Limbaugh defended me as a wayward leftist who has seen the light. I am always glad to have any allies and defenders, but I do favor almost all of Obama’s agenda, right down to having the rich pay more of their freight in this great country. It’s just not the right time. We need to declare a war on unemployment and solve it before we let it get out of hand. We need to stop house-price depreciation. Neither the pork-laden stimulus plan nor the confusing mortgage proposal put forward by Obama will defeat either enemy. When Obama trounces both unemployment and house-price depreciation, he will have the power to enact anything he wants. But all the initiatives he wants to rush, like tax hikes, changes in health care, tinkering with the mortgage deduction — good grief, right now in the midst of the worst housing downturn ever — and the tough cap-and-trade rules, will derail any chance we have of turning this economy around. Instead, they put the Second Great Depression smack on the nation’s table. The markets thought he could stop it; hence the giant relief rally when he was elected. But in fewer than 50 days of his ascendancy, the markets’ hopes were totally dashed and the averages are now forecasting the worst decline since the Great Depression. As someone who listens to what the averages are screaming, I think they are accurately predicting the future.

Apparently Cramer wants Obama to wait for the stock market to recover, and then demonize bankers, raise taxes for the wealthy, advocate draconian cap-and-trade policies, tinker with the mortgage deduction, and upend the health care system!

If it is negative for the economy in bad times isn’t it equally bad for the economy, albeit easier to overlook, in good times?

What a joke!

Cross posted to The Political Class.


Category: , , ,

RSS feed

9 Comments Leave a comment

I was wondering about that too.

johnCV (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 8:34AM EST (link)

Liberals/leftists have a blind spot where logic is concerned – regardless of their intelligence or professional skills.

 

when did Cramer advocate cap and trade?

pilgrim (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 8:56AM EST (link)

I’d be interested if you can provide a link where Cramer favors cap and trade. He does say that when the economy is in good times he favors the rich paying more. That is like saying he favors a progressive tax. Adam Smith, the father of capitalism favored progressive taxes.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

found it. Cramer says on page 5 that he favors cap and trade

pilgrim (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 9:25AM EST (link)

“I am a fierce environmentalist who has donated multiple acres to the state of New Jersey to keep forever wild. I believe in cap and trade.”

Cramer is an idiot on this issue.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

No - Cramer Is an Idiot, *Period*

IJB Tuesday, March 10th at 10:25AM EST (link)

I’m constantly amazed that people can’t tell Jim Cramer is a huckster just by looking at him.

Don’t believe a word out of Cramer’s mouth – neither on politics, nor on stocks and finance.

 
 

Pilgrim, Can you back it up about Adam Smith?

The Political Class (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 10:43AM EST (link)

I don’t think you know what you are talking about. Can you please explain to the best of your understanding where Mr. Smith stands in regard to taxes on capital/labor and progressive income taxes? I’ll give you a hint – he stands rather distant from your implication, even though lefties have been trying for years to suggest otherwise.

www.thepoliticalclass.com

here is a link on Adam Smith from Irish Finance News

pilgrim (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 10:58AM EST (link)

http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_10004429.shtml

The article offers this quote by Adam Smith

It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expence, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.

The article went on to write about how Adam Smith was a champion of free trade and competition in the free market. The article concluded with the idea that trade unions would be better off if they embraced Adam smith instead of Karl Marx.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

Pilgrim, you didn't answer my question

The Political Class (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 11:11AM EST (link)

…my point was he was opposed to taxes on capital/labor, and viewed income taxes as “absurd and destructive.”

Just going around and saying Smith was in favor of progressive taxes is very misleading. His idea of a progressive tax was something akin to a luxury tax where people buying luxuries pay a higher transactional (INDIRECT) tax end up paying more than someone buying life’s daily necessities. He was much more in favor of that sort of situation, and related, like taxing property, than taxing capital (formation), income, labor, etc.

We already have all of that and more in many forms and from every direction, plus some of the highest taxes on income (personal and corporate) and capital gains. I’d be happy to accept Smith’s “progressive” taxes and lose all of these other punishments of capital, productivity, and wealth creation.

www.thepoliticalclass.com

I believe anything misleading has been cleared up

pilgrim (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 11:25AM EST (link)

You asked me to answer something that I did not post. We both are in agreement about what Adam Smith thought about progressive taxes.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 
 
 
 
 

I want my cake and eat YOUR cake too.

Common_Cents (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 10:30AM EST (link)

Liberalism has to be a mental illness. They are lost in utopia and must think one can be in two places at once. In utopia you can defy gravity. In utopia you can tax the heck out of people, grow jobs, and solve most problems through government.

Cramer needs to go on Dr. Phil. “Hows that workin for ya?”

I’d like to shake these idiot libs and ask them what the heck were they thinking when they voted? Obama was very upfront and transparent on what his plans where.

This reminds me of Madeline Halfbright saying Kim Jong il “tricked her”.

Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from, behind, the Back Nine.
Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.