219 Terrorists Attack The American People And The Constitution From The Floor Of The House Of Representatives


Terrorism has been described as, “acts which are intended to create fear and to perpetrate an ideological goal.” While the vote which took place in the House of Representatives did not take on the usual violent actions of terrorism, the attack through the passage of the government take over of the health care system was a blatant and planned attack against the will of the American people and the fundamental principles of freedom found in our Constitution. An attack based on fear and a socialist ideological goal by Democrats and the administration of Barack Obama.

218 Democrats and one lone turncoat Republican from Louisiana signaled clearly to the American people by their vote passing the House version of health care, that they do not care what the people think and that the Constitution of The United States is nothing more to them than a historical document whose day has passed and whose principles have no meaning in the political climate of Washington under the socialist umbrella of the Obama Presidency and the Pelosi Congress.

Never before in our history have elected representatives whose Constitutional oath and responsibility is to listen to and act in accordance with the will of the people, shown such a total usurping of the foundational Constitutional principles of liberty and taken such a ideological stand against the people as they have with the passage of this unconstitutional and freedom stealing health care monstrosity.

Before and especially after the vote Congressional leadership and the President arrogantly claimed that what they were about to do and eventually did was for the people and what the people wanted. Yet poll after poll clearly have shown that no more than 35% of the people favor the government take over of health care. Even as the bill was being debated tens of thousands of angry Americans were standing outside of the Capitol screaming to, “kill the bill.” Millions more have expressed their anger and disgust with the bill by e-mail and phone yet 219 terrorist representatives forced an ideological nightmare of socialism down the throats of the American people.

Prior to the debate Barack Obama went behind closed doors with Democrats to arm twist many who still opposed the bill and refused to meet with any member of the opposition which were only foot steps away from his location at the Capitol. So much for transparency and promises of bipartisanship. Nancy Pelosi took to the cameras with her evil botox smirk after the meeting and after the vote lying that this, “historical,” legislation was for the people. The only people that this debacle is for are the liberal socialists who see health care as their greatest opportunity to control our lives using government as the means of that control.

Everything about this bill stands in direct contrast to the Constitution. From the provision which requires every American to purchase health care or face fines and imprisonment to its total deconstruction of private insurance and private health care. Making government the deciding factor in the free process of individual health care decisions and the government running private insurance companies out of business through, “competitive, ” practices designed to give government health care the greater financial advantage in the cost of coverage.

The passage of the House bill is not the final outcome of the seeming never ending health care debate or a signal that government will take over health care. The Senate still has yet to put together their final bill and vote on the Senate floor. In fact opposition is so fierce in the Senate to its version of health care that Harry Reid has signaled that it will be January at least before the Senate takes up the bill moving it into an election year which stands to favor Senators paying more attention to the voice of the people.

Which means our task as citizens who love our freedom and do not want a socialist take over of our health care have much more work to do. It will require each of us to place the fear of our vote and our anger in the very soul of every Senator who enters that Chamber when Reid places their bill on the floor for debate and vote. Senators have shown at least a passing sensitivity to what the people think as opposed to the total arrogant ignoring of the people by most in the House. Yes many Senators, Harry Reid among them, could care less about what we think and the principles of the Constitution but more actually seem to listen than not.

So we as Americans who believe in liberty and believe in a Republic of the people where government is not our controlling force and the individual is the deciding factor in every aspect of our lives, we must take an even more determined stance than ever before. We must also mark for destruction every terrorist who voted for passage in the House of Representatives. Destruction of any possible future for a political career. Any possible re-election. Any possible opportunity to usurp the Constitution and the will of the people again.

We are at war with these socialist terrorists and just as our military has systematically taken out Al Qaeda we must by our vote and our activism take out the socialist terrorists who have shown that creating fear and their socialist ideology is more important that freedom and the people of The United States. Their day is done and their cause is finished. Their cheers which permeated the House floor after the final vote was tallied will be silenced by we the people. If they thought we were loud and angry before they have not even begun to see our wrath and revenge as we are resolved to save our Republic and our way of life from their government sponsored terrorism.

Ken Taylor  The Liberal Lie, The Conservative Truth


Category: , , , , ,

RSS feed

8 Comments Leave a comment

It's not over yet in the House

GregInFla (Diary) Sunday, November 8th at 11:14PM EST (link)

These same 435 people (grant me some leeway here) get to vote on the Conference Committee bill if/when the Senate passes something. If we keep the pressure on the Reps who voted Yea, and insist the No’s retain their No vote, we just need to turn a few votes. In the meantime, exposing the b*s*t that is in the Pelosi bill will help such as why are unions in a bill that is supposed to reduce costs. You can bet that the next bill will cover the murder of innocent vulnerable human beings (not their care) so we need to make those pro-life Dems vote No.


– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.

 

Will all Federal Employees be switched to the public option?

6eorge Jetson (Diary) Sunday, November 8th at 11:18PM EST (link)

If it’s so good, why not?

If it's so good, why won't Congress use it?

Xasteius (Diary) Monday, November 9th at 12:04AM EST (link)

To me, leadership is by example. In politics, it seems to be “do as I say and not as I do.”

Frankly, I despise the word ‘leader’; it has been horribly abused, IMO.

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

The only poll that counts is the one at the ballot box.

I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be a Chance/Soros hybrid.

 
 

Well said

chbroussard (Diary) Sunday, November 8th at 11:24PM EST (link)

This says what happened yesterday better than anything I’ve read all day. You are right. We still have much work to do. But I truly feel that the number of angry Americans is increasing every day as more and more of this unconstitutional agenda is crammed down our throats. You can only cram so much down before we start to regurgitate.

Let’s all make a commitment to volunteer our time, talents, and money to candidates who support the Constitution and the ideals upon which this country was founded. The United States of America is worth the fight.

Its what we've been saying all along

gekster (Diary) Sunday, November 8th at 11:36PM EST (link)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved

 
 

I would use the phrase...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Monday, November 9th at 12:12AM EST (link)

wayward Republican, not turncoat. I liked where you were going with the 219 Democrats, no need to bring Cao into this, then again that’s just my opinion.

Lastly, I do not the provision that requires every American to have health care insurance or face imprisonment or prosecution will make it through the Supreme Court. It is so blatantly unconstitutional, and how will the homeless and destitute be able to buy this healthcare insurance or even register for it? So, I think this bill has much trouble ahead for it. Unconstitutional plain and simple, the whole bill will have to be striked because of the mandates and fines. No one is mandated to drive a car; therefore, no one is mandated to acquire car insurance. End my rant.

It is a de facto income tax

Menlo (Diary) Monday, November 9th at 2:05AM EST (link)

They just don’t want to call it one because that would show Obama for the liar that he is.

The law sets it up to be paid and enforced the same way as a 2.5 percent income tax increase from which people with government insurance are exempt. Obviously, the more serious penalties apply for failing to pay taxes.

I believe most employers would provide insurance given that they are charged a penalty if they don’t, upon which I believe employees are automatically put on the “public option.”

Otherwise, if one is unemployed and has no income, then he or she obviously has no penalty for not being insured (2.5 percent of 0 is 0).

I think the question here is whether it is constitutional if it is constitutional in practice and unconstitutional in theory and intent. I suspect lawyers and judges would have different opinions on that.

I know Germany has a similar mandate, but they only apply the penalty when someone seeks care and cannot pay for that care, also adding back-penalties. That would seem to me a better way of going about it.

Even setting that aside, the whole bill is a big mess that cannot possibly improve anything for anyone besides a few special interests and big insurance companies.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

 
 

If anything ever does pass....

izoneguy (Diary) Monday, November 9th at 12:42AM EST (link)

Over whelm the judical system with 50,000,000 lawsuits….

I am working on mine right now.

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.