Republicans should introduce the ‘Warren Buffett Tax Me Regulation’ as part of the tax package being negotiated with Democrats.
Republicans want to leave tax rates as they are while progressive Democrats want to enable a tax hike on incomes progs deem ‘rich.’
The rich have been variously described at levels beginning at either $200,000 or $1,000,000 (single filers) depending on who’s doing the talking.
Conservatives in general believe tax rates should be left alone for a number of reasons. First, Heritage Backgrounder No. 928 shows when a tax increase is enabled, Congress spends more. Progs have set records in Congress for spending since taking control of Congress in 2006, and it is statistically likely the ideology will not change.
Another reason is that American wealth does not belong to the government or to progs who love the concept of taxing “richie.” The prog approach is endorsed by most government-friendly media—almost every headline about the tax issue suggests Democrats want to give the “middle class” a tax break and levy more taxes on “richie.”
Richie icon Warren Buffett has been outspoken in calling for a tax increase—apparently he has a certain amount of guilt over the wealth he has accumulated. Other fellow zillionaires have joined him in calling for tax increases that would also impact any number of small businesses. Incidentally, political fact often overrides common sense where progs are concerned.
The solution to the dilemma rests in introducing a ‘Warren Buffett’ regulation. The regulation can be named to honor one of the wealthiest tax fans in the world.
Rather than rewrite any tax code, the regulation could be designed as a stand-alone form. The form could be used for zillionaires and any other tax increase fans (regardless of income) to donate money to the federal government for any purpose Congress or the president deems aligned with progressive spending.
The contribution would not be tax deductible because according to Vice-President Joe Biden, paying taxes is patriotic (Rep. Charlie Rangel and others aside).
The simply worded stand-alone regulation could simply be filed with the taxpayer’s income tax forms and payment could be accepted by existing procedures.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid should be first in line to contribute funds—they’re big pushers in the tax increase movement and they have contributed to historically record levels of spending.
Introducing the regulation into whatever package is agreed upon is a simple way of seeing exactly which progressives are willing to put their own money where they’d like to put others’ money.
Meanwhile Mr. Buffett can man up and be first to contribute some of the wealth that apparently troubles his conscience.
[First publication at The US Report.]
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
I love that idea!
Menlo (Diary) Sunday, December 5th at 3:27PM EST (link)I’m not sure how the IRS deal with payments in excess of the amount owed, but that would be a great way to remind these people come tax time and to ensure that excess payments would be accepted.
Along with Joe Biden, I expect Ted Turner and Bill and Melinda Gates to be among the first to join him.
“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter
The Oracle has no intention of paying
texasgalt (Diary) Monday, December 6th at 10:15AM EST (link)higher taxes because, well . . . he’s the Oracle. What he really wants is a 40% top tax rate for little millionaires, smaller business types, and high wage earners. Then he can go on his merry way seeking the next crony deal like he got with Goldman Sachs.
Like all on the left, Buffett fudges the truth, claiming his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does. Really? Not exactly:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/warren-buffets-faulty-tax-math/
Old Warren takes a lot of income from dividends and cap gains:
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2007/06/warren-buffet-p.html
Put a 95% tax on all net worth over $20 billion
calgacus (Diary) Monday, December 6th at 11:56AM EST (link)That would pretty much effect only Gates and Buffett (serves them right).
The Treasury Dept
aesthete (Diary) Monday, December 6th at 12:21PM EST (link)accepts donations, fyi.
BTW, in Buffet’s case, an increase in the estate and income taxes would be a net benefit for him: he has made a pretty penny from purchasing the remains of several businesses, and having them sold off at a discount as a result of the estate tax would be a boon for him. The income tax would similarly have little effect on him, but would benefit him in his business dealings: as with most of the extravagantly wealthy, he keeps a large part of his wealth in interest-earning assets.
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton