Time Magazine and Our Nations Founding: Then & Now


By now you’ve probably read about this week’s issue of Time Magazine in which Managing Editor Richard Stengel ponders if the Constitution is even relevant to our country anymore.

NRO’s David Azerrad calls the article “deeply flawed” on even the basics of the Constitution, and Michelle Malkin notes how Stengel conveniently hides behind the First Amendment when it comes to journalism but seemingly wants to disregard the rest of it.

It’s old. And dusty.

Yesterday I was cleaning out my elderly mother’s garage when I found a copy of the July 4th, 1976 Bicentennial issue of Time Magazine. The special edition issue was structured “to reconstruct  with the tools of both history and journalism, and in our [Time’s] distinctive newsmagazine format, at least part of the life and soul of the events that gave birth to our nation”.


(Click on the linked photo to read the full letter from Grunwald.)

Imagine my surprise to read in it a letter from then-managing editor Henry A. Grunwald opining how “refreshing it is to return to our origins, to our fundamental values, and to try to illuminate how earlier Americans saw the world and their place in it.” Grunwald even goes so far as to suggest our nation actually was founded on Divine Providence by offering a quote from George Mason, author of the Virginia Constitution”:

“Taking a retrospective view on what has passed, we seem to be treading upon enchanted ground.”

Each department heading that normally appears every week in the magazine thoughtfully reported on life as it was during the week of July 4th, 1776. The Nation, this is the largest segment taking up over half of the whole magazine, reported on the events surrounding the signing of the Declaration of Independence. It included a full page on how the document was edited by Franklin, Adams, and Jefferson, another lengthy report on the chronology of events leading up to Independence, the inspirational forebears of the Document itself including Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, and John Locke, along with numerous profiles of the Declaration signers and of the colonies themselves.

The World section included reports on happenings in Britain under King George III along with a profile of Empress Catherine II of Russia, and report of Captain James Cook return to Haiti. The Religion segment differentiated the beliefs of the main American religions of the time; Theatre contained a review  London actor David Garrick farewell performance at the Drury Lane theatre; Music reviewed Christopher Willibald Gluck’s French Opera ‘Alceste’; and even Modern Living provided the latest in ladies powdered wigs styles.

So, it only took 35 years for Time Magazine to go from thoughtful retrospection and reverence of our founding era and documents to wondering if they are, in the case of Stengal, irrelevant.



RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

Time and Newsweek are dinosaurs.

charliebravoNH (Diary) Sunday, June 26th at 3:03PM EST (link)

I swear they put this garbage out there for people to notice them. Time and their writers are irrelevant to the national discussion. This is the 21st century, nobody wants to read an elitist rehash of last weeks news. Newsweek recently sold for one dollar. That means the magazine is worthless and the sugar-daddy who bought it is a corporate welfare check for the Ivy league educated snobs that work there.

I wish O Really and Beck would stop plugging these worthless magazines on their shows and just let then die. Let them go bankrupt. They deserve it.

Support the PC Strategy Alliance
http://concordproject.org/ http://party.procinct.net/
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com/

ChBRVNH

 

Time? What's that?

wennejunk (Diary) Monday, June 27th at 7:57AM EST (link)

A magazine about clocks?

There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’ -C. S. Lewis

 

TIME Magazine and Who EFFING CARES?

funwithknives Monday, June 27th at 10:36AM EST (link)

Time Magazine wants to be Relevant by dissing The Constitution? Since awareness of Our Social Contract is at an all time high, and more Citizens than ever seemingly want to learn and engage, who is TIME Talking To? (OR AT!) They are Preaching to: 1) those who do not Pay Federal Income Taxes 2) Those of THE GIMME persuasion 3) Hard Left Progressives who still think swooningly of a “Living Document”, combined with Judicial Activism curing all Their percieved ills. 4) You put in one! The word UTOPIAN springs to The Fore, and all becomes clear. TIME is really nothing more than a Fantasy Gamers Manual, issued Weekly. Call or write them and thank them for assisting in one of YOUR learning curves. You know, The one you use to show you what NOT TO DO!

 

Of course it isn't relevant!

Menlo (Diary) Monday, June 27th at 11:50AM EST (link)

These writers are engaging in an academic exercise as to whether it SHOULD be legally relevant. No one (or next to no one) in government has followed it in so long and so many have lied about it that it’s no longer possible to expect they could.

While I haven’t read the magazine (and won’t), I would guess the writers would still seem conservative compared to most “Constitutional law” professors who are actually training future lawyers, judges, and other government officials.

The magazine may be irrelevant in society, but the far more destructive “law” schools are not.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

Huge amens re how destructive are most law schools visa vis

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, June 27th at 5:04PM EST (link)

Time

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 
 

I wish I could post the whole magazine

jstjoan (Diary) Monday, June 27th at 1:06PM EST (link)

The whole issue is such a stark contrast to any of the MSM today. Such in-depth factual, respectful, and interesting reporting abut our founding can only be in the Right new media nowadays. It’s almost as if Editor Grunwald was a member of the Tea Party before it was cool to be so.

Three questions that destroy most Liberal arguments according to Thomas Sowell:
1. Compared to what?
2. At what cost?
3. What hard evidence do yo have?