<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bipartisanship Is Dead, Say Top Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>figuratively in the Political sense, of course... shame I have to even spell that out for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/08/22/frustration/&quot;&gt;Politically Brain-dead&lt;/a&gt; amongst us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>figuratively in the Political sense, of course&#8230; shame I have to even spell that out for the <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/08/22/frustration/">Politically Brain-dead</a> amongst us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoguePolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>RoguePolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Against reading the other person&#039;s post?
Your post seems to ignore mine so you can reiterate what you have already said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against reading the other person&#8217;s post?<br />
Your post seems to ignore mine so you can reiterate what you have already said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoguePolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>RoguePolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Against reading the other person&#039;s post?
Your post seems to ignore mine so you can reiterate what you have already said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against reading the other person&#8217;s post?<br />
Your post seems to ignore mine so you can reiterate what you have already said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>I never said I wanted it to pass, something you&#039;ve been ignoring for a while now. 

But, as you&#039;re not really debating the points I&#039;ve made, I&#039;m moving on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said I wanted it to pass, something you&#8217;ve been ignoring for a while now. </p>
<p>But, as you&#8217;re not really debating the points I&#8217;ve made, I&#8217;m moving on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gensec</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>gensec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Further up thread I already made your point that Republicans could cut off funding for Obamacare with a simple majority, even if they didn&#039;t have enough votes to outright repeal it over Obama&#039;s veto. And I also noted how well that would play into the Democrats media game, finding the most telegenic suffering patients that are in excruciating pain, because those nasty Republicans are withholding money for the prescribed medicine that patient is still legally entitled to under Obamacare.

There seems to be a recurring theme, that if we can just manage to get our butts kicked badly enough this round, that will set us up for some smashing victory down the road.

There were at least a few I saw in 2006 who thought a Democratic victory in Congress would teach wayward Republican congresscritters a lesson, and with Democrats in power the public would see them for who they really are. That supposedly would result in invigorated Republicans storming to victory in 2008. And then a few pushed similar silliness in 2008.

Now with Democrats firmly in control, we&#039;re tempted to pat ourselves on the back for a &quot;great victory&quot; whenever the damage Democrats inflict can be limited to something better the worst case scenario.

Sure I&#039;m glad that another huge &quot;stimulus&quot; probably can&#039;t happen, but the first one already has locked into place long term damage to our economy that will take many years undo. Sure, McCain probably would have appointed some airhead squish to the Supreme Court, but I still would have preferred that to Sotomayor.

Defeating Obamacare now is the best chance, far better than hoping to undo it later.

The problem with the mentality of &quot;Lets get our butts kicked now so we can win big later&quot; is that later keeps getting deferred, and we keep seeming to need more butt-kickings under that theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further up thread I already made your point that Republicans could cut off funding for Obamacare with a simple majority, even if they didn&#8217;t have enough votes to outright repeal it over Obama&#8217;s veto. And I also noted how well that would play into the Democrats media game, finding the most telegenic suffering patients that are in excruciating pain, because those nasty Republicans are withholding money for the prescribed medicine that patient is still legally entitled to under Obamacare.</p>
<p>There seems to be a recurring theme, that if we can just manage to get our butts kicked badly enough this round, that will set us up for some smashing victory down the road.</p>
<p>There were at least a few I saw in 2006 who thought a Democratic victory in Congress would teach wayward Republican congresscritters a lesson, and with Democrats in power the public would see them for who they really are. That supposedly would result in invigorated Republicans storming to victory in 2008. And then a few pushed similar silliness in 2008.</p>
<p>Now with Democrats firmly in control, we&#8217;re tempted to pat ourselves on the back for a &#8220;great victory&#8221; whenever the damage Democrats inflict can be limited to something better the worst case scenario.</p>
<p>Sure I&#8217;m glad that another huge &#8220;stimulus&#8221; probably can&#8217;t happen, but the first one already has locked into place long term damage to our economy that will take many years undo. Sure, McCain probably would have appointed some airhead squish to the Supreme Court, but I still would have preferred that to Sotomayor.</p>
<p>Defeating Obamacare now is the best chance, far better than hoping to undo it later.</p>
<p>The problem with the mentality of &#8220;Lets get our butts kicked now so we can win big later&#8221; is that later keeps getting deferred, and we keep seeming to need more butt-kickings under that theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasulli915</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>sasulli915</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=1855  

Obama, Dems Prepare to Move Against American People on Health Care</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=1855  </p>
<p>Obama, Dems Prepare to Move Against American People on Health Care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>At least on the House side - the Democrats currently hold 71 districts with a Cook PVI indicating a Republican leaning district, and the Democrats currently hold 35 districts with PVIs of R+5 or more. 

Based on this, a 30-35 seat gain is probably about the minimum that I&#039;m expecting (provided present trends hold up). 
(And it&#039;ll be more than that if Rasumussen&#039;s Generic Ballot holds up as R+5 or more by election day...) 

The Senate is a whole other kettle of fish that I&#039;m not going to even try to make any judgment on until next Spring, at the earliest...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least on the House side &#8211; the Democrats currently hold 71 districts with a Cook PVI indicating a Republican leaning district, and the Democrats currently hold 35 districts with PVIs of R+5 or more. </p>
<p>Based on this, a 30-35 seat gain is probably about the minimum that I&#8217;m expecting (provided present trends hold up).<br />
(And it&#8217;ll be more than that if Rasumussen&#8217;s Generic Ballot holds up as R+5 or more by election day&#8230;) </p>
<p>The Senate is a whole other kettle of fish that I&#8217;m not going to even try to make any judgment on until next Spring, at the earliest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>You can easily veto something that Congress is trying to put into being. 
Trying to &quot;veto&quot; something that Congress is trying to extinguish is far, far harder. 

In this scenario, Obama would be trying to veto a bill that cuts off funding for a program that is ALREADY UNPOPULAR. 

If Obama shuts down the government over that, he&#039;ll be looking at 15% popularity ratings in no time flat, and a permanent protest rally outside the White House. 

I *dare* him to try that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can easily veto something that Congress is trying to put into being.<br />
Trying to &#8220;veto&#8221; something that Congress is trying to extinguish is far, far harder. </p>
<p>In this scenario, Obama would be trying to veto a bill that cuts off funding for a program that is ALREADY UNPOPULAR. </p>
<p>If Obama shuts down the government over that, he&#8217;ll be looking at 15% popularity ratings in no time flat, and a permanent protest rally outside the White House. </p>
<p>I *dare* him to try that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve either never had your name on the door or didn&#039;t learn anything if you did.  Whether you like it or not, in government you WILL do business with entities and interests that you do not agree with and with some whose very existence you find offensive.  As a Republican officeholder, no matter how you feel about unions, you have to deal with them because they have a legal existence and legal rights.  You have to deal with EEO/AA even if you find it reprehensible.  You have to deal with the &quot;victims&#039; advocates,&quot; and the poverty pimps because even though they hate you and nothing you can do will get their support, they have power and a voice that is often amplified by the usually hostile press.

You can spout all this purist cant, but that sort of purism assures that there are only a handful of districts in the Country where you could get elected and those attitudes assure that if you held an elected or appointed executive position, you&#039;d have a short and unhappy career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve either never had your name on the door or didn&#8217;t learn anything if you did.  Whether you like it or not, in government you WILL do business with entities and interests that you do not agree with and with some whose very existence you find offensive.  As a Republican officeholder, no matter how you feel about unions, you have to deal with them because they have a legal existence and legal rights.  You have to deal with EEO/AA even if you find it reprehensible.  You have to deal with the &#8220;victims&#8217; advocates,&#8221; and the poverty pimps because even though they hate you and nothing you can do will get their support, they have power and a voice that is often amplified by the usually hostile press.</p>
<p>You can spout all this purist cant, but that sort of purism assures that there are only a handful of districts in the Country where you could get elected and those attitudes assure that if you held an elected or appointed executive position, you&#8217;d have a short and unhappy career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diakrioi</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>diakrioi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>You are right, gensec.  We just witnessed a bipartisan effort to reject HR3200.  The partisan democrats failed in their effort to pass it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, gensec.  We just witnessed a bipartisan effort to reject HR3200.  The partisan democrats failed in their effort to pass it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Remember that the Democrats still have a formidable machine, lots of money, the power of incumbency and are unscrupulous. 

At best I predict about twenty two seat pick up in the house, and maybe four  Senators, not enough to really change the Democratic majorities but enough to make their attempts to change the country a lot harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that the Democrats still have a formidable machine, lots of money, the power of incumbency and are unscrupulous. </p>
<p>At best I predict about twenty two seat pick up in the house, and maybe four  Senators, not enough to really change the Democratic majorities but enough to make their attempts to change the country a lot harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gensec</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>gensec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>but it&#039;s not about how blue state and gerrymandered Democratic safe House seats vote in the general election. I&#039;d love to see a conservative Republican unseat a clown like Graham in the GOP primary for a solidly red state like SC, but that doesn&#039;t get us closer to a 2/3 majority in the Senate.

Yeah, I know, the constituencies who keep electing the likes of Barney Frank and John Kerry are really dying to elect a Republican, but have been voting Democratic only because the Republican nominees haven&#039;t been conservative enough. And if we could just get a true conservative as a Republican nominee for Senate in Maine, maybe we could flip that seat from Democrat to Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but it&#8217;s not about how blue state and gerrymandered Democratic safe House seats vote in the general election. I&#8217;d love to see a conservative Republican unseat a clown like Graham in the GOP primary for a solidly red state like SC, but that doesn&#8217;t get us closer to a 2/3 majority in the Senate.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know, the constituencies who keep electing the likes of Barney Frank and John Kerry are really dying to elect a Republican, but have been voting Democratic only because the Republican nominees haven&#8217;t been conservative enough. And if we could just get a true conservative as a Republican nominee for Senate in Maine, maybe we could flip that seat from Democrat to Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColdWarrior</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>ColdWarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>Conservative?  Want to have a revolution at the polls in 2010?

Become a Republican Party precinct committeeman now.

50 per cent of the PC slots nationwide are unfilled.

Moderates control about 50 per cent of the elected slots, Conservatives the other half.

Want to change that?  

Become a PC NOW.  Get into the real ball game.

Or stay on the sidelines as a bench warmer.

Thank you.

ColdWarrior

www.theprecinctproject.wordpress. com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative?  Want to have a revolution at the polls in 2010?</p>
<p>Become a Republican Party precinct committeeman now.</p>
<p>50 per cent of the PC slots nationwide are unfilled.</p>
<p>Moderates control about 50 per cent of the elected slots, Conservatives the other half.</p>
<p>Want to change that?  </p>
<p>Become a PC NOW.  Get into the real ball game.</p>
<p>Or stay on the sidelines as a bench warmer.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>ColdWarrior</p>
<p>www.theprecinctproject.wordpress. com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gensec</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>gensec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>Because that what it will take to get the &quot;repeal of Obamacare&quot; that you expect. Obamacare will not be repealed unless 2/3 of both the House and Senate vote to override Obama&#039;s veto.

So is that what you base your claim on, that you think the Republicans will have 67 Senate seats and 290 House seats in 2011 if Obamacare passes now?

No, don&#039;t count on many &quot;moderate&quot; Democrats voting to repeal Obamacare after the 2010 election, In any major election sweep, the centrists/moderates/squishes of the losing party, i.e. the ones in districts/states that are at least somewhat competitive, are mostly the ones being displaced by winners of the other party. That dynamic is why the current Democratic majority has a hard time finding even a dozen Republicans to support their bills (while struggling to keep a larger number of their own squishes from defecting).

If we get a big win in 2010, most of the Democrats you have any hope of voting Republican will have been replaced by Republicans. To get the 2/3 vote to override Obama&#039;s veto, it will have to be done almost exclusively with Republican Senators and Representatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because that what it will take to get the &#8220;repeal of Obamacare&#8221; that you expect. Obamacare will not be repealed unless 2/3 of both the House and Senate vote to override Obama&#8217;s veto.</p>
<p>So is that what you base your claim on, that you think the Republicans will have 67 Senate seats and 290 House seats in 2011 if Obamacare passes now?</p>
<p>No, don&#8217;t count on many &#8220;moderate&#8221; Democrats voting to repeal Obamacare after the 2010 election, In any major election sweep, the centrists/moderates/squishes of the losing party, i.e. the ones in districts/states that are at least somewhat competitive, are mostly the ones being displaced by winners of the other party. That dynamic is why the current Democratic majority has a hard time finding even a dozen Republicans to support their bills (while struggling to keep a larger number of their own squishes from defecting).</p>
<p>If we get a big win in 2010, most of the Democrats you have any hope of voting Republican will have been replaced by Republicans. To get the 2/3 vote to override Obama&#8217;s veto, it will have to be done almost exclusively with Republican Senators and Representatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OccamsRazor</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>OccamsRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>Can you imagine what happens to your party if this scenario happens? Don&#039;t use your imagination, just use reason. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you imagine what happens to your party if this scenario happens? Don&#8217;t use your imagination, just use reason. <img src='http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OccamsRazor</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>OccamsRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>How much of the house is up for reelection in &#039;12? Maybe there will be less than in &#039;10. I dunno.

  Also, nightmare scenario (just typing aloud), picture a 2nd term BO with a majority. Point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of the house is up for reelection in &#8217;12? Maybe there will be less than in &#8217;10. I dunno.</p>
<p>  Also, nightmare scenario (just typing aloud), picture a 2nd term BO with a majority. Point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>In fact, I agree with Dave_in_FL that it&#039;s *already* buried, and the Radical Left &amp; Obama just haven&#039;t realized it yet. 

My original point was only that if the Dems pass this with no GOP crossover votes, and bare minimum majorities (losing even most of their own Dem &quot;centrists&quot; in the Congress on the vote), that the &quot;this will never be repealed&quot; meme goes right out the window - the people will *demand* that it be repealed under those circumstances. The Obamacare program will never even be implemented under that scenario - it&#039;ll be strangled in the crib. 

(And for those that doubt this - look up the catastrophic medical plans that the Dems attempted to pass in 1988 &amp; 1994. Never heard of them? Well, that right there tells you that not all government programs that are passed end up being eternal...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I agree with Dave_in_FL that it&#8217;s *already* buried, and the Radical Left &amp; Obama just haven&#8217;t realized it yet. </p>
<p>My original point was only that if the Dems pass this with no GOP crossover votes, and bare minimum majorities (losing even most of their own Dem &#8220;centrists&#8221; in the Congress on the vote), that the &#8220;this will never be repealed&#8221; meme goes right out the window &#8211; the people will *demand* that it be repealed under those circumstances. The Obamacare program will never even be implemented under that scenario &#8211; it&#8217;ll be strangled in the crib. </p>
<p>(And for those that doubt this &#8211; look up the catastrophic medical plans that the Dems attempted to pass in 1988 &amp; 1994. Never heard of them? Well, that right there tells you that not all government programs that are passed end up being eternal&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OccamsRazor</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>OccamsRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>This is historically untreaded waters and I think the backlash will be as equally historical. 

  Personally, I&#039;m pissed that this country is having this discussion at ALL.

 Let us lock shields now however, dig in our boots, and push with all our heart. Let us move the Overton window as far right as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is historically untreaded waters and I think the backlash will be as equally historical. </p>
<p>  Personally, I&#8217;m pissed that this country is having this discussion at ALL.</p>
<p> Let us lock shields now however, dig in our boots, and push with all our heart. Let us move the Overton window as far right as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1197</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gensec</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/08/19/bipartisanship-is-dead-say-top-democrats/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>gensec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/?p=211#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It [enactment of Obamacare] will result in 2010 being a political bloodbath of historic proportion (i.e. a blowout the likes of which none of us have seen in our lifetimes -it’ll make 1994 look like a piker), and the &lt;b&gt;repeal of Obamacare will be so fast&lt;/b&gt; your head would swim.&lt;/i&gt;

Congressional districts are so gerrymandered into guaranteed Democratic and Republican seats, that the number of seats that can swing to either party in even the most sweeping landslide is extremely limited. In a very optimistic scenario, we could win a significant majority in the House (but not much better than 1994), and maybe a slight majority in the Senate given what seats are up for election this cycle.

But there&#039;s no way we would have enough to repeal Obamacare, requiring 2/3 votes in both houses voting to override Obama&#039;s veto. The most we could do is try to starve the program by not appropriating as much money as it needs.

But that tactic is tailor made for Democratic media spin. We&#039;d see sob stories of suffering ladies on Obamacare needing a hip replacement or their arthritis medicine, but having to suffer excruciating pain because those heartless Republicans won&#039;t appropriate the money. Eventually Republicans in swing districts and purple states (i.e. the ones who flipped the congress from Dem. to Rep.) would buckle under the pressure and vote the money to let the poor suffering lady get the treatment she needs.

The best chance is holding our ground, stopping Obamacare now. Failure now makes any attempt to take back the lost ground a much longer shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It [enactment of Obamacare] will result in 2010 being a political bloodbath of historic proportion (i.e. a blowout the likes of which none of us have seen in our lifetimes -it’ll make 1994 look like a piker), and the <b>repeal of Obamacare will be so fast</b> your head would swim.</i></p>
<p>Congressional districts are so gerrymandered into guaranteed Democratic and Republican seats, that the number of seats that can swing to either party in even the most sweeping landslide is extremely limited. In a very optimistic scenario, we could win a significant majority in the House (but not much better than 1994), and maybe a slight majority in the Senate given what seats are up for election this cycle.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s no way we would have enough to repeal Obamacare, requiring 2/3 votes in both houses voting to override Obama&#8217;s veto. The most we could do is try to starve the program by not appropriating as much money as it needs.</p>
<p>But that tactic is tailor made for Democratic media spin. We&#8217;d see sob stories of suffering ladies on Obamacare needing a hip replacement or their arthritis medicine, but having to suffer excruciating pain because those heartless Republicans won&#8217;t appropriate the money. Eventually Republicans in swing districts and purple states (i.e. the ones who flipped the congress from Dem. to Rep.) would buckle under the pressure and vote the money to let the poor suffering lady get the treatment she needs.</p>
<p>The best chance is holding our ground, stopping Obamacare now. Failure now makes any attempt to take back the lost ground a much longer shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

