The Idea that Republicans Used to be Liberals…


..Is ridiculous and is linked to liberals arrogance regarding Civil Rights. The Republican Party has always had a conservative wing and a liberal wing, they even do today. Even though Benjamin Harrison, Teddy Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft were from a more liberal bend (and to call them ‘liberal’ is pushing it.) Abe Lincoln was certainly not a liberal.

The reason they paint early Republicans as liberal and Democrats of the same era as conservatives is because Republicans supported the end of slavery and Democrats at the time were state’s rights supporters. While it’s true Dems of the era supported States Rights, as Barry Goldwater points out in “Conscience of a Conservative,” if you do not recognize individual civil rights for all people as the foundation of society, then you are not practicing true conservatism. True conservatives recognize civil rights first, then states rights, then national sovereignty.

Those Dems may have had some similar ideas and Republicans back then had similar ideas to us as well, but neither were conservatives. Why are we allowing modern Democrats to paint Abe Lincoln as a liberal? He himself was not a conservative, but he certainly was not a liberal.



RSS feed

4 Comments Leave a comment

I agree! From a RedState posting yesterday:

Praying (Diary) Wednesday, January 21st at 5:01PM EST (link)

“You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away men’s initiative and independence. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.”
–Abraham Lincoln

So you tell me – does that sound like a liberal! Ha!

No!!!11!1!!1!1! The Bilderbergers are coming

Sorry to be a pedant, but yes.

MMAlpha Wednesday, January 21st at 5:37PM EST (link)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism

“…a doctrine stressing individual freedom and limited government. This includes the importance of human rationality, individual property rights, natural rights, the protection of civil liberties, individual freedom from restraint, constitutional limitation of government, free markets…”

In Lincoln’s time he would undoubtedly have been described as a liberal. The problem with modern terminology is that ‘liberal’ has for some reason displaced ‘socialist’ as the opposite of conservative.

 

Classic liberalism, conservatism and our Founding principles are one-and-the-same...

rbdwiggins (Diary) Wednesday, January 21st at 10:28PM EST (link)

That’s why “conservatism wins at the ballot-box every time it’s tried.”

“Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.” – Ronald Reagan

 
 

It's mostly the basic state distribution

baseketball (Diary) Wednesday, January 21st at 11:45PM EST (link)

If you look at a map of presidential elections, you could understand how people think the parties have reversed roles. Consider that pre-1964, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Louisiana, and Arkansas were solid blue states, while Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Jersey were pretty solidly Republican.