<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dealergate 10: The cost of closing dealers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eburke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5712</link>
		<dc:creator>eburke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5712</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m grateful that The One and his Teleprompter have disabused you of the antiquated notion that Adam Smith knew what he was talking about and that the words in the Constitution actually mean what they say.

The Messiah saves yet another of the unwashed and unenlightened.

I think I feel my leg tingliing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m grateful that The One and his Teleprompter have disabused you of the antiquated notion that Adam Smith knew what he was talking about and that the words in the Constitution actually mean what they say.</p>
<p>The Messiah saves yet another of the unwashed and unenlightened.</p>
<p>I think I feel my leg tingliing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eburke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5711</link>
		<dc:creator>eburke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5711</guid>
		<description>the actual mileage increase requirements.

What a pathetic joke!

GOP Leadership speaking out blasting this ridiculously stupid bill which is nothing but a sop to the auto industry with our money?

Chirp....chirp....chirp.

Sigh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the actual mileage increase requirements.</p>
<p>What a pathetic joke!</p>
<p>GOP Leadership speaking out blasting this ridiculously stupid bill which is nothing but a sop to the auto industry with our money?</p>
<p>Chirp&#8230;.chirp&#8230;.chirp.</p>
<p>Sigh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Painter</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5710</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Painter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5710</guid>
		<description>And the task force and Chrysler said at first that &quot;underperforming&quot; dealers would get the ax. But when the lists were examined, many of the better-performing dealers were actually closed. 

That&#039;s one of the many inconsistencies about the entire dealer evalution process which didn&#039;t pass the smell test and prompted the Dealergate bloggers to dig deeper.

No small wonder that GM refused to release lists of the dealers it was closing.

- JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the task force and Chrysler said at first that &#8220;underperforming&#8221; dealers would get the ax. But when the lists were examined, many of the better-performing dealers were actually closed. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the many inconsistencies about the entire dealer evalution process which didn&#8217;t pass the smell test and prompted the Dealergate bloggers to dig deeper.</p>
<p>No small wonder that GM refused to release lists of the dealers it was closing.</p>
<p>- JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5709</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5709</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.all-star.tv/images/fleet/black-h2-hummer.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;

And the wife will drive it fast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.all-star.tv/images/fleet/black-h2-hummer.jpg" alt=""/></p>
<p>And the wife will drive it fast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gensec</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5708</link>
		<dc:creator>gensec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inclined to accept the idea that cutting some dealerships can be good for the manufacturer&#039;s bottom line. That&#039;s simply because the ability to terminate dealership contracts more easily was cited as one of the advantages of bankruptcy, back when the discussion was about a real bankruptcy as opposed to the current Five Year Plan with political hacks deciding which dealerships had the right connections.

Whether or not that&#039;s correct though is probably beside the point. The current path is one that ultimately leads to the demise of GM and Chrysler, after enough years of dumping more billions into those ratholes wears out the patience of voters. Any dealerships that survive for now are just getting a stay of execution.

With Uncle Sam and the UAW having a big role in the management of Chrysler and GM, it&#039;s a safe bet they&#039;ll have an unprofitable business model, that can only stay afloat until the plug is pulled on their subsidies. That would be true even without the added factor that many past and potential customers like myself will be deliberately excluding them from contention in our future purchases.

Over the years I&#039;ve bought cars by Japanese, American and now Korean companies  (not sure whether they were manufactured in the US). In every case when I was deciding what car to buy, there were both American and foreign companies&#039; cars among my finalists. In the future when I buy a car, I refuse to even consider GM or Chrysler. I&#039;m not sure if my disgust with the UAW may lead me to write off Ford too.

I don&#039;t know how many other people will feel a similar revulsion toward the prospect of ever buying another GM car, but you can be sure it&#039;s enough lost customers to twist the knife even further into the company&#039;s dying corpse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inclined to accept the idea that cutting some dealerships can be good for the manufacturer&#8217;s bottom line. That&#8217;s simply because the ability to terminate dealership contracts more easily was cited as one of the advantages of bankruptcy, back when the discussion was about a real bankruptcy as opposed to the current Five Year Plan with political hacks deciding which dealerships had the right connections.</p>
<p>Whether or not that&#8217;s correct though is probably beside the point. The current path is one that ultimately leads to the demise of GM and Chrysler, after enough years of dumping more billions into those ratholes wears out the patience of voters. Any dealerships that survive for now are just getting a stay of execution.</p>
<p>With Uncle Sam and the UAW having a big role in the management of Chrysler and GM, it&#8217;s a safe bet they&#8217;ll have an unprofitable business model, that can only stay afloat until the plug is pulled on their subsidies. That would be true even without the added factor that many past and potential customers like myself will be deliberately excluding them from contention in our future purchases.</p>
<p>Over the years I&#8217;ve bought cars by Japanese, American and now Korean companies  (not sure whether they were manufactured in the US). In every case when I was deciding what car to buy, there were both American and foreign companies&#8217; cars among my finalists. In the future when I buy a car, I refuse to even consider GM or Chrysler. I&#8217;m not sure if my disgust with the UAW may lead me to write off Ford too.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how many other people will feel a similar revulsion toward the prospect of ever buying another GM car, but you can be sure it&#8217;s enough lost customers to twist the knife even further into the company&#8217;s dying corpse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustLeaveMeAlone</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5707</link>
		<dc:creator>JustLeaveMeAlone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5707</guid>
		<description>so it can reflect back that sunshine and help with global warming :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so it can reflect back that sunshine and help with global warming <img src='http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustLeaveMeAlone</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5706</link>
		<dc:creator>JustLeaveMeAlone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5706</guid>
		<description>If you seriously believe this, you need to get a real job in the real world, run a business, and read up on how Chapter 11 actually works. 

I am stunned anew at ignorance. Sheer arrogant ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you seriously believe this, you need to get a real job in the real world, run a business, and read up on how Chapter 11 actually works. </p>
<p>I am stunned anew at ignorance. Sheer arrogant ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5705</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5705</guid>
		<description>I might sell them my perfect running &#039;88 BMW 735i that gets about 15mpg.  I&#039;d like a Hummer.  Prolly get a good deal on one right about now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might sell them my perfect running &#8217;88 BMW 735i that gets about 15mpg.  I&#8217;d like a Hummer.  Prolly get a good deal on one right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5704</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5704</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve never run a business have you putz.  Note, not a question.

The &quot;job loss&quot; question, to a business owner is absolutely, utterly not an issue.  The issues are those things that ultimately lead to either real job loss or job gains.  If you even CARE about &quot;job loss&quot; when you get to the point of either GM or Chrysler you are a damned fool.  Please take that personally.  Oh, and while your wadding up your panties, you can apply it to your BoyPresident&#8482; too.

Just for your edification, the thing that IS important is being able to structure the company so it can design, manufacture (or purchase), goods and services and deliver them to the marketplace in a productive and profitable way.

GM is now being run by people who&#039;ve never made a profit in their lives, they&#039;ve just stolen what they thought they deserved.  See BFrank.

Now then, lets get back to the real question.  Where&#039;s the constitutional authority to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve never run a business have you putz.  Note, not a question.</p>
<p>The &#8220;job loss&#8221; question, to a business owner is absolutely, utterly not an issue.  The issues are those things that ultimately lead to either real job loss or job gains.  If you even CARE about &#8220;job loss&#8221; when you get to the point of either GM or Chrysler you are a damned fool.  Please take that personally.  Oh, and while your wadding up your panties, you can apply it to your BoyPresident&trade; too.</p>
<p>Just for your edification, the thing that IS important is being able to structure the company so it can design, manufacture (or purchase), goods and services and deliver them to the marketplace in a productive and profitable way.</p>
<p>GM is now being run by people who&#8217;ve never made a profit in their lives, they&#8217;ve just stolen what they thought they deserved.  See BFrank.</p>
<p>Now then, lets get back to the real question.  Where&#8217;s the constitutional authority to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DONTREADONME</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5703</link>
		<dc:creator>DONTREADONME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5703</guid>
		<description>so which one will you turn in to be?  Back to old self.

Ok there lightweight lets examine your issue here, Chrysler should have been allowed to enter bankruptcy without interference from Government.  Now due to Government intervention we have dealerships losing their franchise support and most likely losing their ability to sell inventoried vehicles with warranties.  

Now many of the people around here have told you that the dealerships pay for franchise rights and they buy the cars they keep in their inventory.  The only thing Chrysler does is pay for advertising and factory warranties.  Now terminating franchise agreements will solely destroy the dealerships that probably employ more people then all of Chrysler combined.  The others around me have brought you additonal information to debate your point.

In a bankruptcy world, Chrysler would have had to make certain restructuring plans which would most likely include the renegotiation of Union contracts and other cost cutting measures to ensure future success in exiting bankruptcy with the ability to continue operations without folding dealerships across the country.  

Regardless of either way this goes people yes will be losing jobs; however, doing it the way their doing it now with Government involvement has serious longterm Constitutional and Economical impacts that will have a dramatic effect on a larger segment of the working population then terminating the union contracts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so which one will you turn in to be?  Back to old self.</p>
<p>Ok there lightweight lets examine your issue here, Chrysler should have been allowed to enter bankruptcy without interference from Government.  Now due to Government intervention we have dealerships losing their franchise support and most likely losing their ability to sell inventoried vehicles with warranties.  </p>
<p>Now many of the people around here have told you that the dealerships pay for franchise rights and they buy the cars they keep in their inventory.  The only thing Chrysler does is pay for advertising and factory warranties.  Now terminating franchise agreements will solely destroy the dealerships that probably employ more people then all of Chrysler combined.  The others around me have brought you additonal information to debate your point.</p>
<p>In a bankruptcy world, Chrysler would have had to make certain restructuring plans which would most likely include the renegotiation of Union contracts and other cost cutting measures to ensure future success in exiting bankruptcy with the ability to continue operations without folding dealerships across the country.  </p>
<p>Regardless of either way this goes people yes will be losing jobs; however, doing it the way their doing it now with Government involvement has serious longterm Constitutional and Economical impacts that will have a dramatic effect on a larger segment of the working population then terminating the union contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5702</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5702</guid>
		<description>Under bankruptcy, (not liquidation) the company continues to operate, some jobs would be lost, but most would stay.

Under the current schemes many more jobs will potentially be lost because they are propping up a unprofitable business and not making the necessary changes to make it profitable. When the taxpayers get tired of footing the bill, like in the next administration, they will pull the rug out.

It is not as though we don&#039;t have plenty of examples form history to point to. Nationalized industries always descend into endless hemorrhage, and poor performance.  See Amtrak for an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under bankruptcy, (not liquidation) the company continues to operate, some jobs would be lost, but most would stay.</p>
<p>Under the current schemes many more jobs will potentially be lost because they are propping up a unprofitable business and not making the necessary changes to make it profitable. When the taxpayers get tired of footing the bill, like in the next administration, they will pull the rug out.</p>
<p>It is not as though we don&#8217;t have plenty of examples form history to point to. Nationalized industries always descend into endless hemorrhage, and poor performance.  See Amtrak for an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llgm</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5701</link>
		<dc:creator>llgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5701</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t understand your position.  You say Chrysler should have been allowed to go into bankruptcy, partly because fewer jobs would have been lost that way?  (And partly to keep government out of business affairs).  I don&#039;t think there are very many people on the left or right who think bankruptcy would have led to less job loss.  Obama took over Chrysler exactly to prevent more serious job loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand your position.  You say Chrysler should have been allowed to go into bankruptcy, partly because fewer jobs would have been lost that way?  (And partly to keep government out of business affairs).  I don&#8217;t think there are very many people on the left or right who think bankruptcy would have led to less job loss.  Obama took over Chrysler exactly to prevent more serious job loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack_Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack_Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5700</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll read over it some more, and I will bet you are exactly right.

These subsidies are just insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll read over it some more, and I will bet you are exactly right.</p>
<p>These subsidies are just insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common_Cents</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5699</link>
		<dc:creator>Common_Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5699</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack_Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5698</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack_Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5698</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cash For Clunkers&quot; passed the House today. Here is a summary from the Energy Committee&#039;s website:

&quot;Under the program, consumers may trade in their old, gas-guzzling vehicles and receive vouchers worth up to $4,500 to help pay for new, more fuel efficient cars and trucks. The program will be authorized for up to one year and provide for approximately one million new car or truck purchases. The agreement divides these new cars and trucks into four categories. Miles per gallon figures below refer to EPA “window sticker” values.&quot;

If they were real men, they would get a pistol and rob us instead of pulling crap like this time and time and time again. Will we ever stop subsidizing these idiots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cash For Clunkers&#8221; passed the House today. Here is a summary from the Energy Committee&#8217;s website:</p>
<p>&#8220;Under the program, consumers may trade in their old, gas-guzzling vehicles and receive vouchers worth up to $4,500 to help pay for new, more fuel efficient cars and trucks. The program will be authorized for up to one year and provide for approximately one million new car or truck purchases. The agreement divides these new cars and trucks into four categories. Miles per gallon figures below refer to EPA “window sticker” values.&#8221;</p>
<p>If they were real men, they would get a pistol and rob us instead of pulling crap like this time and time and time again. Will we ever stop subsidizing these idiots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furious</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5697</link>
		<dc:creator>furious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5697</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightline/2009/06/auto-task-force-led-by-31-year-old-during-first-three-months-of-existence.html&quot;&gt;Deesey&lt;/a&gt; must have suggested that one.

&lt;i&gt;Tom Wilkinson, a GM spokesman, said once the “current glut” of car brands disappears, prices for GM cars will increase anywhere from $2,000 to $6,000 for a new vehicle.&lt;/i&gt;

Price increase x Cars nobody wants to buy = $0.  Absolute bloody marketing GENIUS!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightline/2009/06/auto-task-force-led-by-31-year-old-during-first-three-months-of-existence.html">Deesey</a> must have suggested that one.</p>
<p><i>Tom Wilkinson, a GM spokesman, said once the “current glut” of car brands disappears, prices for GM cars will increase anywhere from $2,000 to $6,000 for a new vehicle.</i></p>
<p>Price increase x Cars nobody wants to buy = $0.  Absolute bloody marketing GENIUS!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegas_Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5696</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegas_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5696</guid>
		<description>ignorance of the issue show through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ignorance of the issue show through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Painter</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5695</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Painter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5695</guid>
		<description>econimic fascism wasn&#039;t being taught. So what do I know of such things?

Not to mention my Polyannish notion that the Constitution of the United States means what it says. Who am I to argue with a &quot;constitutional scholar&quot; on the order of the Obamaduce&#039;s magnitude?

- JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>econimic fascism wasn&#8217;t being taught. So what do I know of such things?</p>
<p>Not to mention my Polyannish notion that the Constitution of the United States means what it says. Who am I to argue with a &#8220;constitutional scholar&#8221; on the order of the Obamaduce&#8217;s magnitude?</p>
<p>- JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eburke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5694</link>
		<dc:creator>eburke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5694</guid>
		<description>I mean what you&#039;re talking about here is trickle-down economics which has long ago been discredited as an economic theory as its results under Reagan ended up doing nothing but producing the longest peacetime economic expansion in our history.

In addition, you also are apparently laboring under the delusion that private enterprise creates jobs rather than massive amounts of government dollars injected strategically and efficiently into the markets. 

TOTUS will not be pleased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean what you&#8217;re talking about here is trickle-down economics which has long ago been discredited as an economic theory as its results under Reagan ended up doing nothing but producing the longest peacetime economic expansion in our history.</p>
<p>In addition, you also are apparently laboring under the delusion that private enterprise creates jobs rather than massive amounts of government dollars injected strategically and efficiently into the markets. </p>
<p>TOTUS will not be pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hinz</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/09/dealergate-10-the-costs-of-closing-dealerships/#comment-5693</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1297#comment-5693</guid>
		<description>...but how exactly do open dealers cost Chrysler money?


Dealers BUY cars from Chrysler and SELL them to American buyers. A dealership that does not make money will go out of business on its own -- if it does make money it is none of your business.

The dealer closings make no sense at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but how exactly do open dealers cost Chrysler money?</p>
<p>Dealers BUY cars from Chrysler and SELL them to American buyers. A dealership that does not make money will go out of business on its own &#8212; if it does make money it is none of your business.</p>
<p>The dealer closings make no sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

