Now, meet your likely primary challengers:
Rep. Joe Sestak, who’s been a prolific fundraiser, is considering defying party leaders and running against Specter despite Tuesday’s hoopla, though he told FOXNews.com on Wednesday, “I have not made up my mind on it.”
Sestak, a second-term House member, is basing his decision on what Specter may do or say in the coming days. Sestak said he wants to hear Specter make his case to Pennsylvania voters about why Specter now should carry the banner for Democrats after representing the Keystone State as a Republican for 29 years.
Sestak released a critical statement about Specter’s switch from the GOP back to Democrat (where he originally started) Tuesday:
“This shows the principle rule of politics: tomorrow is always another day — as today was. This may be good for Arlen, politically; however, two key questions need to be answered. First, after 31 years in the military, I learned that you run for something, not against someone. Arlen has made a decision to leave a race because he could not win against someone. What needs to be known is what he is running for. Second, I watched then-Gov. Clinton and then-Sen. Obama take a leadership position in the Democratic Party and shape it. The leadership that would have been most impressive would be if Arlen had used his role to reshape the Republican Party that he said he had entered when it was a “big tent,” but now is leaving because it has gotten too small. In short, I believe that the principles of what he is running for and his commitment to accountable leadership are questions that still need to be addressed.”
Another potential challenger to Specter is Pennsylvania Board of Education chairman Joe Torsella, previously an aide to Gov. Rendell. Torsella, who has already raised nearly $600,000 in campaign cash, released a statement of his own Tuesday. It doesn’t sound like he’s willing to play second fiddle to anyone, Specter included:
“I decided to run for the United States Senate from Pennsylvania for one simple reason: I believe we need new leadership, new ideas and new approaches in Washington. Nothing about today’s news regarding Sen. Specter changes that or my intention to run for the Democratic nomination to the Senate in 2010 — an election that is still a full year away.”
It will be interesting to see if Rendell can persuade either of the two potential primary opponents to back out of the race. His defection was not quite jumping from the frying pan into the fire, since Specter was certain dead meat if he had remained with the GOP. But the couple of Joes he may have to battle to retain his Senate seat don’t appear ready to go quietly into the night.
Play ball!
- JP
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
What exactly do you promise someone?
JoeG Thursday, April 30th at 12:58AM EST (link)Being Senator is only beat by sitting on the Supreme court or being VP or President.
What exactly do you promise someone that is better than being Senator?
being a retired senator with a pension???
cannedjam (Diary) Thursday, April 30th at 1:37AM EST (link)Anyway, he didn’t switch parties, he just traded seats in the Spendopublicancratic Party. Explanation in my sig…
http://cannedjam.com
Clarifying
JoeG Thursday, April 30th at 11:47AM EST (link)I believe that you were doing a reply to my above post.
I failed to convey my concept completely so here’s another try:
The senior party leaders of the Dem party may attempt to clear the field in the Dem Primary for Specter. The problem they have is making a deal with anyone planning to run. A Senate seat is such a plumb prize that there is very little you could possibly entice someone with to keep them from running. If they think they have a chance there isn’t much that could dissuade someone from running. Any solid Dem does have a chance at knocking off Specter and while all of us wish otherwise they could win the general election.
They may convince a few big names to not run, but that primary registration is just too much of a magnet. You’ve got to figure every one of the Dem house members from Pennsylvania is going to mull jumping to that seat if no one registers against Specter.
Maybe Joe and Harry should have mentioned the deal to their fellow Democrat colleagues.
Husker (Diary) Thursday, April 30th at 2:08AM EST (link)Sounds like a little trouble in Specter’s new Democrat paradise.
Specter said he would still vote against card check.
mbecker908 (Diary) Thursday, April 30th at 8:42AM EST (link)And unions pretty well control the D primary in PA. This one will be interesting.
But he will vote for cloture, that's the key vote.
Achance (Diary) Thursday, April 30th at 9:17AM EST (link)His vote is immaterial on the substantive question, though he’ll try to pose as some sort of conciliator seeking a “compromise.” Actually, the bill as it is is pretty much like a union’s initial proposal; only a fool would take it, but I suspect it will pass pretty much as is.
In Vino Veritas
This is what happens when I post a comment before
mbecker908 (Diary) Thursday, April 30th at 10:43AM EST (link)sufficient coffee. You’re right, I’m wrong.