Palin and Lieberman: At odds over ANWR


Gone are the days on the campaign trail when Sen. Joe Lieberman would introduce Gov. Sarah Palin at McCain-Palin rallies as “a breath of fresh Alaska air.” Now the two have squared off on opposite sides of a renewed debate over drilling for oil in ANWR, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Lieberman and 23 other U.S. senators introduced a bill Wednesday which would close that part of Alaska’s coastal plain to oil and gas development. In a statement, the Connecticut Senator described ANWR as

“…a pristine natural treasure that must be preserved for future generations.”

But Lieberman and many of his co-sponsors have never even visited ANWR. Jonah Goldberg has been there, and “pristine” is not his word for the relatively small portion of ANWR where energy realists want to drill:

ANWR is 19.6 million acres, about the size of South Carolina. And it’s beautiful. Well, most of it is. But more about that in a moment. On the very northern cusp of ANWR is what is commonly called the coastal plain, a tract of flat tundra largely indistinguishable from other spots along the coast and throughout the region. This comprises about 8 percent of the refuge-but an even smaller fraction of its pretty scenery. Some of this area is already off-limits to oil exploration, permanently. Nonetheless, the U.S. Geological Survey — seconded by industry experts-believes there could be untold billions of barrels of oil in the swath still legally available. The oil industry says it would need to use only 2,000 acres-an area no bigger than Dulles Airport, outside D.C.-to get that oil. This footprint would be 50 times smaller than the Montana ranch owned by Ted Turner, who helps bankroll efforts to keep ANWR off-limits…

There’s little doubt that for much of human history most reasonable people would have considered this spot the definition of the word “godforsaken.” You need not look back, for evidence, to the ancient pilgrims who died on the frozen tundra. You could simply read an old copy of the Washington Post from 14 years ago: “[T]hat part of the [ANWR] is one of the bleakest, most remote places on this continent, and there is hardly any other where drilling would have less impact on the surrounding life.”

Two decades have intervened, and an environmental fatwa has been issued declaring that the word “pristine” is synonymous with “beautiful” or “sacred.” Of course, anyone who has seen a mint-condition AMC Gremlin knows that pristineness and aesthetic appeal have only a coincidental relationship. Even ANWR fetishists concede that in the winter, with its complete darkness and 70-below-zero temperatures-not counting wind chill-this is no paradise.

But then, it’s no paradise in the summertime either. During the winter, the entire coastal plain is covered by a vast tarp of ice; when the sun comes back, the resulting thaw creates, well, lots of puddles. These patches of freestanding water pock the flat tundra for as far as the eye can see; that’s why this barren region is the only place the U.S. government recognizes as both a desert and a wetland. The water in an old tire can breed thousands of mosquitoes; a puddle in a junkyard, millions. ANWR is the Great Kingdom of the Mosquitoes.

In the U.S. House, Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) introduced a measure of his own, the “Udall-Eisenhower Arctic Wilderness Act,” to permanently shut the coastal plain off to oil exploration.

Supporting the legislative initiatives of Markey and Lieberman is an alliance of environmental groups, including the National Audubon Society and the National Wildlife Federation.

On the other side of the debate, Alaska’s governor, who has also been to ANWR, released a statement making the case for leaving open the tiny portion of ANWR where vast reserves of oil and natural gas have been estimated by the U.S. Geological Survey to exist:

* Oil from ANWR represents a huge, secure domestic supply that could help satisfy U.S. demand for more than 25 years.

* ANWR sits within a 20 million acre refuge (the size of South Carolina) but thanks to advanced technology like directional drilling, the aggregated drilling footprint would be less than 2,000 acres (about one-quarter the size of Dulles Airport). This is like laying a two-by-three-foot welcome mat on a basketball court.

* Energy development is quite compatible with the protection of our wildlife and their habitat. For example, North Slope caribou herds have grown and remained healthy throughout more than three decades of our oil development. Most of the year, our coastal plain is frozen solid and thus characterized by low biological productivity.

* ANWR development would create hundreds of thousands of good American jobs, positively affecting every state by providing a safe energy supply and generating demand for goods and services.

* Development here would reduce U.S. dependence on unstable, dangerous sources of energy such as the Middle East, and would decrease our huge trade deficit, a large percentage of which is directly attributable to oil imports.

* Incremental ANWR production would help reduce energy price volatility. Previous price disruptions demonstrate how even relatively low levels of oil production influence world prices.

* Federal revenues from ANWR – cash bids, leases, and oil taxes – would help reduce the multi-trillion dollar national debt, and we’d circulate U.S. petrodollars in our own country instead of continuing to send hundreds of billions of our dollars overseas, creating jobs and stronger economies in other countries.

Gov. Palin expanded on her argument, putting the issue in the framework of geopolitics:

Energy-producing countries are rapidly gaining world power. Several of these countries have objectives and value systems that are antithetical to U.S. interests.

Washington politicians should be horrified as we become increasingly dependent on these insecure, foreign sources while our U.S. petrodollars finance activities that harm America and our economic and military interests around the world.

If we don’t move now to enact a comprehensive energy policy that includes domestic oil and gas production – including ANWR – we will look back someday and regret that we failed to perceive a critical crossroads in the history of America. It’s not overly dramatic to say our nation’s future depends on the decisions made by the federal government over the next few months.

On the governor’s side in the debate is freshman Senator Mark Begich, a Democrat. The two are not quite the political odd couple they may seem at first glance. All three members of the bi-partisan Alaska delegation to the nation’s capitol agree on the ANWR issue. In addition, opening this small fraction of ANWR’s land to drilling has been supported by the Alaska State Legislature every year since the debate began over a quarter of a century ago. Not one Alaska delegate or Governor has wavered on this issue. They are all Alaskans, and they know ANWR.

Some things have changed since ANWR drilling was last a hot issue. In July, when pump prices were $4.00 a gallon for gasoline, polls showed that public support for drilling there was increasing. Now prices are less than half of their summer levels. With cheaper gasoline available, public support for drilling in ANWR may have fallen off. Also, the complexion of the Congress has changed, as Democrats, who are more likely to side with the environmental lobby on the issue, have increased their numbers in both houses.

But Gov. Palin and Sen. Begich have another ally on their side – resentment. Many Senate Democrats are still seething over Lieberman’s open support for Republican John McCain in the 2008 presidential election, especially his appearance at the GOP convention. In his RNC speech Lieberman criticized president-elect Obama for “voting to cut off funding for our troops on the ground,” and praised McCain for having “the courage to stand against the tide of public opinion and support the surge…” Some Senators may vote against Lieberman’s bill just to give the Connecticut Senator the political payback they have itching to deal out.

- JP


Category: , , , ,

RSS feed

13 Comments Leave a comment

A very good issue for Sarah Palin...

GB221 (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 12:15AM EST (link)

… to bring to national attention. I hope all those who want to see her elected in 2012 support her in this fight. It will be very important to make much of it even if she loses because, when oil goes back over $100 /barrel, people will remember that she was right to push for drilling in ANWAR.

Agreed, but not in the context of a presidential run.

Jim Thursday, January 15th at 12:31AM EST (link)

Governor Palin has a very good opportunity to push the drilling of this area of the STATE of Alaska. I would be very interested to see her push this issue on the basis of states rights. What if Gov. Palin said that the Constitution provides no authority for the federal government to restrict the drilling of oil in the state, and said she was going to authorize drilling in that area as governor of the state. This is a great way to contrast a sitting governor of a state trying to advance an agenda that will bring increased wealth to her state to the bureaucrats in Washington several thousand miles away attempting to micromanage an issue that they have no Constitutional authority to intervene in.

If Conservatives really, really want to start pushing back, we need to stop playing by the rules of Washington D.C. Trying to win supreme court cases or getting “our guy/gal” elected in Washington is nice, but I think the biggest challenges to overreaching federal authority need to take place in the states. Working on a more local level, it is easier to gain support and cast the federal government as an intrusive institution working against the interests of the people of the states. Remember, it was Jefferson and Madison who advanced the policy of nullification (refusing to enforce federal laws that were unconstitutional) over the Alien & Sedition Acts.

Granted this flies in the face of 100+ years of federal overreach but, hey, we have to start somewhere.

“If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion.”
F.A. Hayek

“Laws are no longer made by a rational process of public discussion; they are made by a process of blackmail and intimidation, and they are executed in the same manner. The typical lawmaker of today is a man wholly devoid of principle — a mere counter in a grotesque and knavish game. If the right pressure could be applied to him, he would be cheerfully in favor of polygamy, astrology or cannibalism.”
H.L. Mencken

It isn't state land

zuiko (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 12:56AM EST (link)

It’s federal land like most of the rest of Alaska. She wouldn’t have a leg to stand on in court, any more than if she tried to dictate what went on at a military base in her state.

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. – Milton Friedman

And herein lies the problem.

Jim Thursday, January 15th at 1:16AM EST (link)

The fact that most of the state is “federal land” is the premise that should be challenged. I mean, step back for a minute and look at how perverse this situation is. The federal government has arbitrarily, without any legal backing provided by the Constitution, usurped the ability of the people of Alaska to use their land as they see fit. This isn’t something that a judge needs to decide on in a court, it is a decision that the people and their elected representatives in the state of Alaska have to assert. It is their state, it is their land, they should be able to decide whether they want to let non-existent caribou grange on the northernmost 2000 sq miles or drill the heck out of it. I would argue, on the basis of the 10th amendment, that Gov. Palin could assert that Washington D.C. has no authority to tell her that half her state is “off limits” to her and the people of that state.

Let’s face it, court challenges and passing half-measures in Congress that only slows down leviathan is not working. I am simply suggesting we start thinking about how to take back this country beyond winning elections. Clearly the last 8-12 years has shown that substantial Republican majorities are not effective in curtailing the ever-growing federal goliath. These arrogant, egotistical, power-hungry politicians in Washington are not going to be beaten at their own game under their rules.

“If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion.”
F.A. Hayek

“Laws are no longer made by a rational process of public discussion; they are made by a process of blackmail and intimidation, and they are executed in the same manner. The typical lawmaker of today is a man wholly devoid of principle — a mere counter in a grotesque and knavish game. If the right pressure could be applied to him, he would be cheerfully in favor of polygamy, astrology or cannibalism.”
H.L. Mencken

If memory serves, the land is federal land because the U.S. government bought it

JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 1:20AM EST (link)

Too much federally owned land is an issue. However, Alaska is a special context.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

Ah-Ha!

Jim Thursday, January 15th at 1:58AM EST (link)

Ok, how about this. To cover the massive budget shortfalls to fund this utterly stupid stimulus package, the federal governement sells ANWR and all other federal lands to the highest bidder? I am sure they could raise enough money to fund the economic “stimulus” that will only stimulate the pockets of politicians. And if environmentalist really want to protect the land they cherish so dearly, they can do it on their dime.

Wow, now I am really in fantasy land.

“If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion.”
F.A. Hayek

“Laws are no longer made by a rational process of public discussion; they are made by a process of blackmail and intimidation, and they are executed in the same manner. The typical lawmaker of today is a man wholly devoid of principle — a mere counter in a grotesque and knavish game. If the right pressure could be applied to him, he would be cheerfully in favor of polygamy, astrology or cannibalism.”
H.L. Mencken

Yup (nt)

JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 2:45AM EST (link)

.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Palin vs old boys network

renegade Thursday, January 15th at 7:13AM EST (link)

This is a golden oppotrunity for Palin to garner some “street cred”. The public is on her side with this one, She could put the PR framework together making the case that opening ANWR would be like an insurance policy against runaway oil prices. She could take on typical the Washington bureacracy and invite these blowhard dems to come up and see this barren wasteland they refer to as pristine. If she played her cards right and came out victorious, the image of this media created “airhead”that took on and buried the cronies in DC would make the MSM morons have alot of egg on their face. It would make her a force to be reckoned with.

 

The Territories are US property.

Achance (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 7:52AM EST (link)

Their status is very different from that of the Original Thirteen, Texas, and, sorta, California and Hawaii. From the Northwest Territory to the Lousiana Purchase, the Mexican Cession, the Oregon Territory, and Alaska, all the lands were conquests or acquistions of the US Government

Virtually all of the landmass of the Northwest Territory and the Louisiana Purchase devolved to the territories and then states formed from that landmass. Aside from the Constitutionally sanctioned forts, post offices, customs houses, and courthouses, there is little federal land in these old states and most of the national parks, forests, and monuments were rather lately acquired by the US from the states and private landowners.

The more remote reaches of the Louisana Purchase, the Mexican Cession, the Oregon Territory, and Alaska are another story. In all these areas powerful interests opposed statehood and privitization of the land. In all the western states there was conflict between those citizens who wanted private land and self-determination through statehood and those interests such as mining and large scale ranching and timber harvesting. In the last half of the 19th Century, the West and Alaska were simply a playground for those who could get a sanction from Washington to do something or another on federal lands. Those sanctions were acquired in the time honored ways; political contributions, bribes, and favorable business relationships.

Even as the western territories move towards statehood, the conflict continued as various interests tried to keep land in federal hands rather than turning it over to the newly forming states and then into private hands. If you’d like to see how powerful this still is, see if you can get your Congressman to introduce a “Comprehensive” rewrite of the 1872 Mining Law. On this one, I agree with the Greenies, that law gives the fed and the states no revenue and no protections from the mining industry. Industry abuses under the 1872 Mining Act are one of the major forces behind the Clean Water Act and other environmental laws. Frankly, mines not subject to very strenuous regulation are very, very bad neighbors. Likewise, large scale cattle ranching much preferred essentially free access to federal open range rather than state controlled private lands. Even today, much of the landmass of western “States” isn’t a part of that state, it remains federal land. Best I recall, Nevada is still 83% federal land. I think that’s the worst, but all the intermountain west states remain majority federal owned and controlled. And just to be clear, I’m not talking about “Crown Jewels” like Yellowstone and the other national parks, I’m just talking about land no different from any of the land around it, but which remains in federal hand rather than in the hands of the states. Now, Greenies have replaced miners and ranchers as the primary force to keep western lands in federal hands.

Alaskan resentment towards the federal government became something of an issue in the recent Presidential Campaign when Goveror Palin’s ties to the Alaska Independence Party came to light. That was a nothing issue, but the AIP is very real. From the purchase in 1867 until the 1912 Organic Act, Alaska was the ruthlessly exploited playground of the mining, fishing, and fur industries. Alaska was merely a military district with no self-governance, no infrastructure, no law while untold fortunes were removed from the Territory by whatever company could get US sanction to do so.

From 1913 until Statehood in 1959, Alaska continued to be ruthlessly exploited but it had some semblance of self-governance through a Territorial Legislature. It really didn’t have the power to legislate about anything that meant anything, but its legislative acts were important enough to cause the Alaska-Juneau Mine and the Alaska Canned Salmon Industry to rent the top floor of the Baranof Hotel in Juneau during the Session and stock it with Seattle hookers and free bar.

The Alaska Statehood Act promised the State of Alaska the right to select from the landmass of the Alaska Territory 117 Million acres of land (or thereabouts, I’m working from memory). The US almost immediately reneged on the promise and began to place all sorts of restrictions on the State’s land selections. Fortunately, some of Alaska’s Founders had the foresight to make some very nondescript land near Prudhoe Bay one of the State’s first selections. Alaska fought with the US all through the Sixties over land selection and the US largely held up State selection. The Prudhoe Bay oil discovery of 1968 brought some of the land claims issue to a head as rights of way had to be settled for a pipeline to bring the Prudhoe Bay field’s oil to market. This led to the 1972 Alaska Native Lands Claim Settlement Act (ANCSA), which putatively settled aboriginal claims against the US and the State of Alaska.

ANCSA didn’t really put the whole matter to rest because the State was still in conflict with the US over State selections. I’m not sure that to this day Alaska has completed its selections but the framework of selections was set out an turned on its head with the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANCSA) passed in ’80. This is one where the Democrat was right. Sen. Mike Gravel wanted to kill the Carter Administration legislation and get along, go along Ted Stevens wanted to help pass it. Steven’s complicity in this caused him to have a political near death experience. In any event, ANILCA turned the Statehood Compact on its head and let the US select first and Alaska got the scraps.

After ANILCA, the US designated its lands and designated them as national forests, parks, reserves, and wilderness areas. ANWR is a reserve. It was so designated under intense pressure from the State and the oil industry in opposition to the Environazis who wanted wilderness designation. Federal wilderness might as well be land on the dark side of the moon. The “reserve” designation was to keep this known oil province from being cast into the outer darkness of wilderness designation.

So, had the US not almost immediately reneged on its promises in the Statehood Act, what is now known as ANWR would in all likelihood be State of Alaska lands and would long ago have been producing oil. Now we get the almost annual ritual battle of Alaska politicians trying to wrest ANWR development from a recalcitrant Congress. Ain’t happenin’!

In Vino Veritas

Thanks for the history

kyle8 (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 8:18AM EST (link)

I knew a lot of that, but not all.

I have often wondered at the lack of any realistic fees for mining, logging, and grazing rights. It is corporate welfare, but it’s a very old form of corporate welfare.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

One of the very first things the first Alaska Legislature did

Achance (Diary) Thursday, January 15th at 8:32AM EST (link)

was outlaw “fish traps.” A “fish trap” was an enormous wooden structure built accross the mouth of a river that captured ALL the salmon migrating up that river. All you had to do to get the right to build one was know the right person in DC and exchange the right amount of money.

I defended Sen. McCain about some of his populist, anti-business stances to some criticism here. But McCain is a Westerner, and we well know what a big business with a friend in Washington can do Any Westerner is going to have a jaundiced eye towards big business. I watched first hand as the oil industry even under today’s laws, and Alaska has pretty strict ethics and campaign laws, bought my State legislature. We had perp walk number nine or ten the other day.

In Vino Veritas

 
 
 

jtkell

jtkell100 Thursday, January 15th at 8:49AM EST (link)

Sarah, Looking forward to your speach at CPAC. When speaking or campaigning always speak to all Americians with the same message.Never try to single out one group just to get their vote. Never single out male or female.
The message you have is for all Americans that believe in our constitution and the rule of law.All Americans should obey the laws of the land. Give us a hard hitting Federalist speech and be sure to hit hard on free interprise. Seems like some of our Republician Learders are gona let us down. You will bring the house down. Give us a had hitting energy lesson. America sure needs some uplifting encouragement from you. You are our greatest hope for the future.
JTK

100% AGREED!

AHALgal Thursday, January 15th at 10:23PM EST (link)

Governor Palin is our best hope for the future. Can’t wait to see her at CPAC.