Comments on: Whopper of the week http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/ Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:51:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: gekster http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2141 gekster Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:56:01 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2141 By: davo119 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2140 davo119 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:51:41 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2140 People like Fagan don"t care how many innocents have to suffer or how many lives are ruined because of their relentless hate driven agendas. http://thealaskastandard.com/?q=node/243 People like Fagan don”t care how many innocents have to suffer or how many lives are ruined because of their relentless hate driven agendas.

http://thealaskastandard.com/?q=node/243

]]> By: itrytobenice http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2139 itrytobenice Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:54:12 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2139 but you could use him for one until you found one. but you could use him for one until you found one.

]]> By: The_Gadfly http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2138 The_Gadfly Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:49:28 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2138 temporarily coincide with liberal agenda also do not lie with regrd to that coincidence. They may accidentally “misspeak”, requiring a “clarification”, or more often they may be “taken out of context”. Sad but true. Of course, this doesn't mean we conservatives shouldn't hold him or the newspaper accountable. I would think a suite against both of them by the son-in-law for libel could have some interesting results. He is NOT a public figure, and has suffered significant harm from the gross negligence shown by both the author and the paper. temporarily coincide with liberal agenda also do not lie with regrd to that coincidence. They may accidentally “misspeak”, requiring a “clarification”, or more often they may be “taken out of context”.

Sad but true.

Of course, this doesn’t mean we conservatives shouldn’t hold him or the newspaper accountable. I would think a suite against both of them by the son-in-law for libel could have some interesting results. He is NOT a public figure, and has suffered significant harm from the gross negligence shown by both the author and the paper.

]]> By: Josh Painter http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2137 Josh Painter Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:52:56 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2137 He's a proud conservative. He’s a proud conservative.

]]> By: olsmithie http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2136 olsmithie Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:42:27 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2136 Sad , but not surprising Regards Sad , but not surprising

Regards

]]> By: bk http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/01/09/whopper-of-the-week/#comment-2135 bk Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:37:10 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=370#comment-2135 They may accidentally "misspeak", requiring a "clarification", or more often they may be "taken out of context". They may accidentally “misspeak”, requiring a “clarification”, or more often they may be “taken out of context”.

]]>