The Death of Senator Claiborne Pell (D-RI)


Former Rhode Island Senator Claiborne Pell passed away in the opening hours of 2009. As a Republican and conservative, there was a policy divide between he and I that stretched the length of Rhode Island but, oddly – and much to the amazement of political allies who visit my office - I proudly display a picture taken of me with the Senator circa 1988.

I was a lobbyist for increased student aid then and he was my greatest friend. The man for whom Pell Grants were named opened the halls of power to a neophyte who was still awed by a city where bumping into the powerful was as common as sneezing. His legacy may very well be in that he opened access to the educational system and afforded opportunity to those who would not have otherwise had it. That was where we met in the middle. I believed – and still do – that the greatest ideals of this nation lie in opportunity to achieve being made available to anyone who would take advantage of it.

The Senator was also a foreign policy expert and, in his later years in the exclusive club, Chaired the Senate’s Committee on Foreign Affairs. It was a disappointing culmination of a life dream for him. He was criticized for spreading the committee’s power out among sub-committees and for not using the pulpit and the gavel to challenge Republican Presidents Reagan and Bush 41.

Therein lies the point of my thoughts: Claiborne Pell was, perhaps, the last of a dying breed – the brontosaurus in the tar pit or the buffalo on the plains. He was a Democrat to be sure but he was an American first and tried to follow his conscience and to do what he thought right. He was a diplomat and a statesman and always brought class to the fight, whether we agreed with him or not.

The other day, on twitter, I was referred to a post about “sock puppet” attacks on Sarah Palin attempting to paint her supporters as racist and ignorant. I read another piece that spoke to the left’s mission to make the word “conservative” equal the worst four letter word that has every crossed the lips of “Joe the Carpenter” as he smashed his thumb with the hammer. These are not people who respect their opponents nor are the combatants who bring class to the debate. They do not believe, as Pell did, that the best interests of the nation dwell at the center of the discussion.

Today’s Democrats believe that they must win at all costs, defeat the Republicans once and for all, and create a one Party state that feeds at the tax trough. Not all of today’s Democrats subscribe to the mantra, I know, but the modus operandi has become about negativity and about hate and about Bush derangement syndrome. The message is not one of pride in America but rooted in hatred of America – Not a celebration of success but a condemnation of success. They have lost all sense that where bipartisan ideas come from is in a shared belief in opportunity for everyone and have, instead,  focused on their own opportunity to solidify power while creating a culture of dependence for America.

Claiborne Pell was an amazingly wealthy son of privilege who believed that others should have the opportunity to rise above. If, on the way up, he believed, they could have the benefit of a helping hand, they could then add to, and further, the greatness of our nation. Once upon a time, his Democrat ideals and my own, born of the “Reagan Revolution” found common ground. That’s why I display his picture in my office. May we all endeavour to champion opportunity for everyone. Rest in Peace.

JPS


Category: , , , ,

RSS feed

17 Comments Leave a comment

Thanks.

SeriousLaff (Diary) Sunday, January 4th at 2:42PM EST (link)

All those parents who had children who majored in “Queer Theory” and other garbage can thank Claiborne Pell for sticking the taxpayers with the the bill. These should have been loan programs given to those students that might benefit society instead of every kid who wanted a 4 year party vacation.

Thanks for confirming...

RandomGuy (Diary) Sunday, January 4th at 9:54PM EST (link)

that you have neither the character, nor the intelligence, of someone like Frm. Sen. Pell.

I may have disagreed with him on a lot, but he’s head and shoulders above you.

Draft Mitch Daniels for President ’12

 
 

Jon,

mailloux (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 2:10PM EST (link)

Great piece. Despite ideological differences, I too thought Claiborne Pell was a politician that put country first rather than the DNC first. May God rest his soul.

Pell also loomed large in the RI psyche. Although I now live in Wisconsin (went to grad school here and met my wife), I grew up in Providence and my parents (and most of my side of the family) still live in RI. Claiborne Pell was a constant in RI politics.

On an entirely non-political note, I sure do miss Rhode Island food. I could really go for an Olneyville NY System hot weiner right about now. I’ll have to wait for our family’s annual visit to RI though and dream for the time being.

Take Care, mailloux

Thanks

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 2:39PM EST (link)

Mailloux – Thanks. Glad you enjoyed the piece.

Dont know about NY System but you can always get Del’s or coffee syrup via mail order. In the meantime I’ll have “three all the way” for you.

JPS

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com

Jon,

mailloux (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 3:16PM EST (link)

I noticed in your profile that you ran against Patrick Kennedy, which means my parents voted for you!

For what it’s worth, here’s a true Patrick Kennedy story. Back when I was an undergraduate at URI, I volunteered for the Samaritans Suicide Hotline. New telephone volunteers trained as a group. We each went by our first name and got a number for our last name (to somewhat give some anonymity). Training with me was Patrick 457 (honestly, I can’t recall the exact number, but 457 will do).

During the training, we had to share something traumatic that happened in our own lives. Most folks took a few moments and told of something personally painful for them (death in family, loss of job, etc.). Then came Patrick 457 who droned on for nearly an hour (I timed him). I don’t want to sound as if I lack empathy, but Patrick went on a naval gazing journey the likes of which have never been seen. I thought to myself that this guy’s a real mess. I wouldn’t take advice from him on how to unwrap a candy bar, never mind talking to a caller that’s potentially suicidal (now he legislates . . . go figure, eh?)

At the time of the training, I didn’t know who the guy was. Sometime later I saw him on TV. He was just breaking into politics in Providence. I remember I was in my parent’s den watching TV and my jaw dropped. I said, “My God, that’s Patrick 457!”

Maybe he’s gotten his act together, maybe not. My family still refers to him, though, as “Boo Hoo Kennedy”.

By the way, welcome to RedState.

Take Care, mailloux

Great Story

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 5:09PM EST (link)

First time I’ve ever heard that PJK was involved with Samaritans. It amazes me that Rhode Island keeps on sending him back to Congress. I feel for him but he needs to get out from under the pressure cooker that is the US Congress.

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com

 
 
 
 

Needs rethinking

Menlo (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 3:13PM EST (link)

First off, one who claims to be a conservative should not be touting the wonders of government sending kids to college! Were I in Congress, I’d be calling for a repeal of the grants, all student aid programs, and all grants that go to colleges. Despite the changes over the years, those are still liberal programs created by liberals. It is an essential part of fiscal conservatism.

You’re not spending just on education but on living expenses for students and other college programs that serve mainly to provide the “college experience.” It’s like the government sending everyone on a cruise to Europe, and our job should be to change the culture that says otherwise.

While it might not have been true in Pell’s day, too many people today attend college, it is too widely expected where it serves little purpose, and it often serves only to increase the number of liberals in society and to feed and advance the liberal ideology. Theory has largely replaced practice in many programs.

I’m sure Pell meant well. I doubt most colleges back then were so awful. However, this was still a very liberal act that does not deserve any kind of praise from a conservative. We should be opposed to the government’s helping people like that.

It’s fine to honor and respect Pell for his patriotism, but we should not praise the government’s helping to send anyone to college.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

Didn't Intend on Answering Everyone but...

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 5:21PM EST (link)

You bring up a good point.

I see it as a return on investment kind of thing. In Rhode Island we have a huge University influence (has to be more per capita than anywhere). It may be our biggest industry.

Invest in a kid (serious student) going to school and they will add to society we hope. If our state could get out of its own way when it comes to creating batter business climate – we’d keep all of that brain power in RI and increase our entrepreneurial standing.

We need to come up with new ways to deliver education. The Internet means that a prof can video a lesson and lead discussions via chat. It reduces the cost of that class big time. Members of the military serving in ops theatres overseas could now continue studies. They should get college for the goose egg.

In the end, Pell Grants create better educated people who contribute more to the economy over the course of a lifetime. A “stimulus package” that is based on baby mamas getting more foodstamps so that RI gets its share of federal tax dollars… not so much.

JPS

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com

You CAN'T be serious

Menlo (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 6:22PM EST (link)

PLEASE tell me you do not consider yourself a “conservative!”

“Invest in a kid (serious student) going to school and they will add to society we hope.”

I can’t believe you could say that with a straight face! IT’S NOT THE GOVERNMENT’S JOB to “invest” in anything outside of law enforcement and military! Besides, your “hope” is quite misplaced and far outdated. You might be surprised how many have subtracted from society. Regardless though, it’s not for the government.

“In the end, Pell Grants create better educated people who contribute more to the economy over the course of a lifetime.”

Again, I can’t believe you can say that with a straight face! Next thing you’ll be touting the economic woders of China. They’ve also contributed more to the leftist ideology and Democrat Party over the course of a lifetime. It Law schools have made a shambles of the legal, judicial, and political system; and they helped energize a litigious society. And I doubt most of them have done much for the economy, especially those with the most costly education. I’ll admit the blame also goes to fuddy-duddy employers who want a college education in positions where it is useless, largely because colleges teach theory in lieu of practice and too many people go to college. Even if my assumptions were wrong, it’s not cause for taxpayer funding.

“We need to come up with new ways to deliver education.”

Yeah, but you want to keep funding its current delivery. Think how much college expenses could be slashed if colleges had no facilities for the “college experience,” residency, or social and political activism. Are you aware of all the vile programs, behaviors, and policies that are rampant on college campuses?! But no, you want to fund it any way they choose to do it. You don’t want grants to have any preconditions. That’s nuts, and it works against your own position.

As for the military, I’d give them the money instead to use as they wish.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

Really Didn't Intend on Debating w/Comments

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 7:23PM EST (link)

Menlo

You are wrong about federal government responsibilities. There are three and law enforcement is not one of them. Common defense, regulation of interstate commerce and printing money. That’s it. Founding Fathers were wary of a police state and mandated that the military never be used against the citizens. That’s the whole citizens’ militia thing in the 2nd Amendment.

I’d love to be able to get back there but is that really possible? In the meantime, I’ll take my “return on investment” litmus test. I sure as hell don’t want a nation where only the very rich can afford to go to school. That plays right into the political system where only the wealthy can run for Congress and, thus, we have no representation for the middle class who are getting screwed. Reps and Sens are wealthy and serve the wealthy. The Ds pander to the poor and trade votes for handouts.

As for your concerns about the state of our nation’s colleges and universities – A good friend was recently on Fox and Friends because he is suing The RI College School of Social Work. Seems they told him that he’d never be allowed to graduate if he advocated “work first” welfare. He needed to drink the Kool Aid. I am well aware of what is happening on today’s campuses and am involved in the fight to change it.

I agree on the employer part. Somewhere along the line, having a college degree became synonymous with “following through on commitments”. The public has been sold on the idea that a piece of paper confers respectability. That’s a huge problem.

As for law schools, I don’t disagree. I am a huge supporter of tort reform. Trial lawyers give to the D’s more than any other group. They do it on the backs of businesses and we now have a C.Y.A. attitude that costs more money – particularly in the health care field.

Never said that grants shouldn’t have pre-conditions. Would love to hear your ideas on what some good pre-conditions would be though. I think that when I referred to internet based education, I was saying exactly what you are about slashing costs and affecting the “college experience”. My son chose not to go to college but, if he had, I would have sent off a kid who would’ve either gone to Hillsdale or battled the left on campus just as I fought groups that supported the FMLN and the PIRGs when I was a student. Colleges have fallen into this mess because we, as parents are allowing teachers to parent our kids.

We didn’t get here over night and we’re not going to change it overnight. Its called incrementalism and it works. Just ask the other side. and… yes… I do consider myself a fiscal conservative. Sorry that you feel a piece on the passing of a non-nasty Democrat who I respected disqualifies me.

Thanks for the interest. I do like a good debate. Where you from?

JPS

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com

Can't have it both ways

Menlo (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 9:06PM EST (link)

You are NOT a fiscal conservative. There is nothing wrong with praising or supporting Pell or admiring his intentions at the time, but, like it or not, supporting his POLICY makes you a fiscal liberal! You oppose the Constitution to boot! As an aside, federal government is able to make laws to enforce the 14th and other amendments. However, that doesn’t change its unconstitutionality and illegality.

Either you support the grants, you oppose them until conditions are met, or you oppose them altogether. You obviously support the grants more than the conditions. That’s quite a liberal (and unconstitutional) position.

People can donate money for less affluent people to go to college. Let the colleges who charge so much cut their excess useless programs to take some people at low cost. Otherwise, it shouldn’t matter who gets to go to college. I think if the education were made available to fewer people, employers and others in society would take a different view. Withholding money would force colleges to cut and modify their useless or vile programs and/or change exmployers’ expectations.

Conservatives, or even people who believe in the Constitution, cannot by definition support any federal grants to colleges. They should be repealed or stricken by a court. They are illegal!

I’m from Texas.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

If I had to guess...

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 9:25PM EST (link)

I’d say that you are a Ron Paul supporter and dedicated Libertarian.

I disagree with your black and white view of the political world and it was probably the failure of the Paul campaign. It’s all or nothing. There’s also a bit of lala land dreaming in there. I am certain that my support of a flat tax indicates to you that, since I support taxes on any level, i am a tax and spend liberal. I’ve got some news for you: It ain’t an all or nothing world. I am a conservative. Not a zealot.

I liked Congressman Paul… a lot. I think that the Republican Party makes a serious mistake if they don’t find a way to include his supporters in GOP 2.0 but you all need to learn that supporting anything other than pulling out of the world banking community and sticking to defense, interstate commerce and money is not liberalism.

I love Texas, although I used to think that it would be the last bastion of freedom. Was in Dallas recently. Scary how much they’re trying to be like the northeast. No cigars in bars and steakhouses.

BTW You never listed those pre conditions that you had in mind.

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com

Not really

Menlo (Diary) Tuesday, January 6th at 1:14AM EST (link)

I’m not and never was a Paul supporter for elected office though I would have loved him on the Supreme Court. Anyway, I’ve been called a “lefty” on economics for favoring a ban on Chinese imports, so assume what you will. I’m not a libertarian though as I do support somewhat liberal labor laws and business regulations (including those against smoking).

Of course even fiscal conservatives must support taxes for any government or the nation to exist. You can’t have anarchy. However, college education is not even remotely an essential function of government. That said, the Constitution is a separate matter from ideology. Conservative or not, neither you nor most any member of Congress, follows the Constitution. That means what you (and they) are advocating is illegal.

Preconditions would need to first be allowed by a Constitutional amendment, though it would still be a liberal cause. One intended to help the future economy would need to start by seriously cutting the size and scope of colleges to focus on actual non-theoretical real-world work training. Every penny spent would need to be accounted for in light of its benefit. Essentially, the government would have to take most of it over. Perhaps you can see why I am not a fan of the funding.

I live just north of Dallas, and pretty much all of us have smoking bans, even where there are no elected Democrats. I’m pretty content if that’s as close as we’ve come to the northeast. I don’t think people here would put up with a fast food or trans fat ban like LA did though.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Rhode Islander Here

dld1717 (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 7:35PM EST (link)

I grew up in RI and most of my family still resides there and I used to the Senator jogging all the time in Newport. I have huge respect for him over the Pell Grants they helped so many people go to college to help better themselves and their country in long run.

Rhode Island has lost a giant. I do remember going to Pell DC office and being amazed at all his art work it was all over his office.

Funny you mention that...

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 7:42PM EST (link)

I was struck by that, as well. It’s very prominent in the picture that I have in my office and everyone who really looks at the picture always asks about it. Then i get the comments that refer to the fact that my own office has a similar quality. Osmosis I guess.

Thanks for reading and for reminding me of that.

JPS

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com

 
 

Good Job

baseketball (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 9:20PM EST (link)

A very nice diary about a wonderful man. Real shame that he’s gone.

Also, apparently I’m a bad conservative because I apply for and accept a Pell grant to help me get through college.

Most of us are I guess.

jonscott (Diary) Monday, January 5th at 9:34PM EST (link)

Some folks have a certain way of seeing the world that is all or nothing. Hope that you didn’t enjoy your “college experience” too much. Most of us have gotten ahead because opportunity was afforded us. When the Constitution was written I could call myself a lawyer and hang out my shingle. Times have changed.

Glad you liked the piece and, yes,the Senator was a good man – Party aside.

Thanks.

JPS
scottricongress@yahoo.com