The Economy
—Reduce tax rates, corporate and individual. Credit is tight (and should be, it was too loose and a bubble formed). Retained earnings are the key to business growth. Reduced taxes are the best available source, preferable to running the printing presses.
—Reduce government spending. Once the credit markets loosen, too much public debt will squeeze out private business borrowing, as in the late 1930s Recession.
—Loosen environmental and other regulations on the Energy industry. ”Drill here, drill now, pay less” is not your slogan, but it will work and should be implemented (especially given recent oil discoveries under the Black Hills), as should loosened restrictions on coal and natural gas exploration and development. Tar Sands and Shale Oil need to be developed if economically feasible.
—Smash regulatory barriers to the development of atomic power plants. The priority should be replacement of remaining oil and natural gas fired power plants.
—Government grants should go to alternative energy research, but there should be a realistic appreciation that the results will be meager in the near term and that such research is better pursued in the private sector.
—Can a coast-to-coast private passenger rail system be profitably be developed? Can AMTRAC finally be privatized?
—Consider repeal of New Deal Era Legislation, such as Federal Minimum Wage Laws that discourage employers from hiring.
—A strong SEC encouraging transparency in financial markets is critical for promoting stable, sustained growth. There are no free markets in the absence of the rule of law and a rational (hence limited, consistent and enforceable) scheme of regulation.
—Market-based universal health care coverage should be enacted. Similar Republican Legislation in the House indicates a potential for success. The major sticking point will likely be Heathcare Savings Accounts (“HSA”).
—Creation of a more national regulatory scheme for the practice of Medicine and for Insurance will be critical for market based reform. (State corporate practice laws doomed Physician Practice Management Companies, like PhyCor, for example.) Federalism will complicate the problem.
—Lots of covered lives = lower premiums and co-pays. If they are low enough, do we need Medicaid or State Child Health Plus (“SCHIF”)? This does not need to be employer based. Could this be a new role for unions, as in Germany?
—Role of healthcare costs in the crisis facing American Auto makers indicates the centrality of the problem.
—I think bailouts should not be the norm. How can we ask people of limited means to pay more in taxes to invest in businesses no banker would lend money and no venture capitalist or money manager would invest in?
—Never forget that every dollar you take out of a business is money they can’t use to hire someone or invest in Plant Property and Equipment (“PPE”).
—Never forget that every dollar you take out of some workers paycheck in taxes is money they can’t use to buy their spouse or child a Christmas present.
National Defense
—Study the British occupation of Iraq under the League of Nations Mandate in the 1920s and the difficulties that the Brits had maintaining bases there in the run up to World War II. History does not repeat itself but it does show capabilities, motive, intent and propensities and the characteristics of the battlespace.
—Likely, the best course is to expeditiously withdraw conventional forces from Iraq, while keeping diplomatic and development efforts and Special Operations Force support to Iraqi counter-terrorism efforts on the front burner.
—Do we need to “win” in Afghanistan or is it enough to make AQ’s Salafists (Islamic Fundamentalists) our Salafists? The same is true of the Horn of Africa, where the current piracy problem may create both a crisis and an opportunity.
—The real threat from failed states is who restores order and on what template.
—The strength of AQ is not suicide bombers. It is lawyers, preachers and engineers. They are the “stem cells” of the insurgency and what we must counter.
The Supreme Court
—The ideal is not to appoint “empathetic” judges. The ideal is to appoint judges who appreciate that the cases before them are real cases and controversies that involve real people, businesses and not-for-profit entities, rather than some Platonic abstraction. Any judges appointed should understand, as Justice Jackson said, that “they are ‘supreme’ because they are ‘final,’ not ‘final’ because they are ‘supreme.’”
—Such a judges tend to be found among more conservative judges of state high courts, who have this experience of finality and a sense of judicial restraint.
Role Models
—While many potential role models for the new administration have been suggested, the obvious one, given our current challenges, has been ignored.
—Pres. Obama should model his administration on neither Lincoln nor Roosevelt nor Clement Attlee nor even Ronald Reagan. Instead, he should look to England’s “Iron Lady,” Prime Minister Thatcher, who presided over a comparible crisis that affected many people’s lives with a steel spine and a sense of reality and led a dying socialist state into the light of free people and free markets.
Conclusion
As the lady said at the end of Primary Colors (dir. Mike Nichols, 1996), “Don’t break our hearts.”
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Talk about an oxymoron
Jeff Emanuel (Diary) Friday, January 16th at 11:39PM EST (link)I respect your effort here, but I would very much like to hear how that bit is possible.
That smacks of Hillary Clinton’s promise to enact a “universal volunteer service corps” if she became president.
JE
Funny thing is Jeff
Brian Simpson (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:09AM EST (link)I’ve actually started to see a lot on the right try to co-opt the “universal” tag. They are however using it as a weird goal of being able to create market based solutions that would give coverage to all.
I’d rather leave that term to the left.
| My RedState archive |
Important principles may and must be inflexible. ~ Abraham Lincoln
House Republican Proposal
jonathanswift (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 10:49AM EST (link)House Republicans have a proposal that is very workable.
JonathanSwift...... You really submitted all that to change.gov ?
Kenny Solomon (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:09AM EST (link)“Gird your loins”… You’re going to have visitors……. The Civilian Defense Corps wants you.
I Think We Should Back Off On Nuclear Power
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:15AM EST (link)I would’ve thought 9/11 would’ve been essentially the nail in the coffin in terms of more nuclear power plants. One bad day for the CIA and you’ve got tens of thousands dead and half of the economies of multiple states wiped out in a heartbeat.
So since you are so fearful of your own ...
rcov092 (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:21AM EST (link)shadow, the rest of us should have to peel back our lifestyle to 75 years ago? Fools like you are what the Environmental Nazi’s thrive on http://the41stvote.org/wp/2009/01/s-231-a-bill-to-designate-a-portion-of-the-arctic-national-wildlife-refuge-as-wilderness/
“Not One Red Dime for the NRSC or NRCC till they stop trying to elect liberals”
Join the RedState Strike Force
That article mentions nuclear power once
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:26AM EST (link)And it does not address my point. How does opposing building more power plants equate to opposing drilling in ANWR anyway?
Nuclear power is not what it used to be
Beaglescout (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:41AM EST (link)Nuclear power is going to offer ways to provide power for small communities for very reasonable prices, using hidden power plants that terrorists won’t even be able to find.
“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”
It Has Potential
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:45AM EST (link)However, there aren’t a lot of details provided in that article and those power plants aren’t even on the market yet, so I’ll withhold judgment. Meanwhile, I maintain that the old style of nuclear power plants are far too dangerous to have lying around our country.
Not even close...
rbdwiggins (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 9:32AM EST (link)The nuclear power plants in use today are not the same design as “Three Mile Island,” and even if they were of similar design, the danger posed by the emergency at TMI was mostly media hype (except to those employees forced to enter the containment vessel). There was no containment breach, and there was no real risk of contamination to the public.
However, it was an exceptionally useful propaganda tool the left, with considerable aid from their willing accomplices in the partisan press, foisted upon an unsuspecting, uniformed American public.
“Scared the bejeebers out of ‘em.”
France generates almost 80% of its total electricity needs through 59 nuclear power plants scattered around a country approximately the size of Texas, and there’s even enough capacity left-over that France sells power to Great Britain.
There’s no legitimate reason we can’t emulate that success. None.
“Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.” – Ronald Reagan
France Doesn't Have Our Security Concerns
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:22PM EST (link)My attitude is this: Never build anything that dangerous that you wouldn’t trust Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, or Jimmy Carter to keep safe.
France has plenty of security concerns.
JustLeaveMeAlone (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:49PM EST (link)Remember that they have been invaded and overrun by a foreign power twice in the past century.
They also have a huge immigration problem, primarily with Muslims from North Africa (their former colonies). There is quite a bit of violence related to high unemployment, perceived police harassment, and even anti-semitic sentiment.
“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
...the Rollover Monkey tendency being one of them nt
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 2:39PM EST (link)I was attempting to be charitable
JustLeaveMeAlone (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 7:38PM EST (link)and not mention their propensity to grab their own ankles.
“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
You're just plain either ignorant or stupid basketball.
HappyBunny Saturday, January 17th at 2:17PM EST (link)In reality, France’s internal security concerns are significantly higher than ours. They have a very large “immigrant population” of people who are concentrated in what are basically ghettos. They are, for all intents and purposes, unemployable. They are young. And they typically attend what any rational person would classify as “radical Islamist Mosques”. And they have no problem rioting and burning out fairly large sections of urban real estate on a fairly regular basis.
They’d be pretty easy to organize if someone decided to try.
And, as far as your premise, the logical application would be that we should all just hide under our beds.
Bottom line, if the French can manage to keep their nuke plants safe, we could probably do it with a troop of boy scouts.
For the next 4 years, he may be right.
Rod_Patrick (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:27AM EST (link)Nuclear power is too “complex” for the incompetent people of Obama.
I studied Nuclear physics...
izoneguy (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:41AM EST (link)..it is not rocket science. The concept of a nuclear reactor is quite simple. What do they need to know? I can help. Put me on the payroll for $400,000 a year and I will be there.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
Some light nuclear reading
izoneguy (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:51PM EST (link)http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/561553
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf33.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4273386.html
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
Anuclear power plant is not an easy target for terrorists.
Michael M. Keohane (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:21AM EST (link)In my misbegotten youth, I had the opportunity to work with people who were paid to think about destroying infrastructure. Yes, we were military and the infrastructure we were considering was that of potential enemies.
However, to do our work properly, we would visit compatable operations here in the United States and talk with the people who operated those locations. We talked to several electrical engineers at a hydro-electric plant who were very obliging. They showed us where to place demolition charges to temporarily disable a plant as well as places to permanently disable the plant.
Regarding nuclear plants, a nuclear power plant is a very easy target if all you want to do is disrupt energy transmission. However, if you want to cause a major nuclear explosion (or even a minor nuclear incident) you will have problems. The “China Syndrome’ is a piece of fiction not fact and it is very difficult to cause a nuclear meltdown.
If you were a terrorist, a nuclear meltdown would only be step one. The second step is to release the resulting radioactivity into the environment. That is a major sticking point for terrorists. Trigering a nuclear meltdown takes time – and I mean time – hours not minutes. Breaching the containment vessel not only takes a lot of time but a lot of carefully placed explosives.
The terrorists must attack in sufficient numbers to overcome site security and capture the reactor and control rooms. They must have sufficient personnel to establish a defense of the plant while they bring in and place the explosives. They must conduct a successfull defense of the plant while they try to get the reactor to go critical.
Our reactors are designed to shut down not to go critical so they must have experienced operators to man the controls. Then, when and if the rector goes critical, they must be able to breach the containment vessel. We are talking about a couple of trucklods of high explosive not an amonium nitrate and oil mixture.
I once played a “mind game” regarding a terrorist attack on Indian Point. I allowed myself total operational security, a sufficient force of trained personnel and all the necessary equipment and financing to make a successfull attack.
I could not come up with a plan of operations that would work. Even with using a freighter sailing up the Hudson as a base, the logistics of moving all the necessary personnel and equipment to the plant site, even without the need to fight plant security, proved too difficult.
The only successful op-plan was to use a “pocket nuke.” However, if a terrorist had a “pocket nuke,” there would be no need to attack Indian Point. Just place the “pocket nuke” anywhere in mid-town Manhattan and set the timer or press the switch.
Do not classify the words or deeds of your opponents as being hatefull, malicious or criminal in nature if they can also be easily characterized as simple ignorance or gross stupidity. Anon.
Can a nuclear power plant handle a plane impact?
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 2:14AM EST (link)As it has been endlessly pointed out, terrorists are unlikely to successfully hit us that way again. By the same token, my point here is that there are many ways of damaging a target which we can’t entirely comprehend, and it is impossible to prepare for all of them. As much confidence as I have in law enforcement at all levels in this country, it is an old axiom that there is no such thing as absolute security, and putting a nuclear bomb in the middle of, say, Iowa, would seem to provide way more risk then there is reward. I don’t remember what TV show I saw this on:
“NOTHING is completely safe! People get into car accidents every day-”
“And when they do, they don’t tell people to stop eating produce three states away!”
Yes, the containment vessel is designed to
Michael M. Keohane (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 7:37AM EST (link)deflect a plane.
Unlike the Twin Towers, the containment vessel is round with a dome on top. It is also quite a bit lower and smaller that the Twin Towers. Even relatively inexperienced pilots can manage to fly straight into the side of a tall building.
To hit a containment vessel, however, the pilot must dive towards the containment vessel and must hit the vessel dead on. Anything less than dead on and the plane will fail to penatrate. That is why the containment vessels are round and domed.
Even if the plane does hit straight on, it may not penatrate the reinforced concrete of the containment vessel. Imagine Willie Coyote slamming into the cliff side! Same thing would happen to most planes hitting the vessel.
So, Baseketball, you can stop worrying about planes hitting a nuclear power plant and consentrate on real possibilities such as an eighten wheeler skidding on snow and ice and sideswiping your Prius.
Do not classify the words or deeds of your opponents as being hatefull, malicious or criminal in nature if they can also be easily characterized as simple ignorance or gross stupidity. Anon.
Can a nuclear power plant withstand a well-aimed shoe?
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 9:08AM EST (link)While such an attack might not trigger the release of radioactivity, the resulting belittlement could be lethal.
You missed the point
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:11PM EST (link)Although it wasn’t a well thought out title, and for that I apologize. What I was trying to point out was that we are facing enemies who aren’t bound by the traditional rules of engagement, and they are very good at thinking of new ways of damaging targets that we aren’t prepared for.
You hunker down in your bomb shelter then
Bill S (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:24PM EST (link)and the rest of us will go on about our lives. Your attitude simply indicates that the 9/11 terrorists accomplished their mission.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
What, just because I think nuclear power is risky? nt
baseketball (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 1:28PM EST (link)No, because stupidity on the order of yours is a danger walking the streets. nt
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 3:49PM EST (link)I would prefer to call it ignorance, mbecker908
Michael M. Keohane (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 4:09PM EST (link)there is so much misinformation out there about nuclear power that people more knowlegable than baseketball are confused. Also, calling someone ignorant is nicer than calling them stupid.
Do not classify the words or deeds of your opponents as being hatefull, malicious or criminal in nature if they can also be easily characterized as simple ignorance or gross stupidity. Anon.
I generally agree longwalker.
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 5:42PM EST (link)But this guy wrote enough to convince me otherwise.
And besides, I’m just generally not a “nice” guy.
And you shouldn't even try.
itrytobenice (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 7:46PM EST (link)1. I’ve got that spot.
2. We need at least a few crusty old men to make it fun around here.
Proper grammar saves lives.
Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.
Heh.
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 8:44PM EST (link)And you do it so well ITTBN that I’d never challenge you.
Dang, they keep modifying the IP address...
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Saturday, January 17th at 12:29AM EST (link)http://change.gov/