<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>john_fleming's blog</title>
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/john_fleming</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Obama: Three Key Destructive Policies in Just One Month</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe President Obama sees the writing on the wall. His time in the White House is running out and he knows it. How else can you explain the radical agenda he’s been pushing at full speed lately?</p>
<p>He has been aggressive on three fronts: Energy, defense, and religion.</p>
<p>In January, Mr. Obama baffled even his union allies by rejecting the Keystone pipeline project, with its estimated 20,000 new jobs. He placated his enviro-liberal base at the expense of jobs and energy. Keystone, however, will still build its pipeline… for China. Canada is now likely to go west and build a pipeline that will send billions of barrels of North American oil to China.  It’s akin to moving a life-sustaining IV from one patient to another.</p>
<p>The Obama Administration’s deliberate obtuseness offers another benefit to China. While China builds up its military at an alarming pace, President Obama is slashing U.S. defense. His latest scheme? Reduce our nuclear capability by up to 80% <span style="text-decoration: underline">unilaterally</span>, even as potential foes around the world are increasing and modernizing their nuclear stockpiles. As far back as 1983, Mr. Obama said he wanted, “a nuclear free world.” That kind of thinking always sends a dangerous message to the bad players of the world that the U.S. is in appeasement mode and is deliberately weakening its ability to deter attacks.</p>
<p>Next up? Religious freedom. Apparently Mr. Obama’s thinking hasn’t changed since he mocked people who, he said, “cling to guns or religion.” Now he’s flatly disregarding conscientious objections they may have to abortion-inducing drugs. Deeply held beliefs that are protected by the First Amendment are being trampled by the administration in an unprecedented way.</p>
<p>What is the goal behind all this hardball politics?  Could it be his only chance for reelection? Or, is this a last, desperate push to deploy his transformational socialistic agenda? General Patton once said, “Never let the enemy pick the battle site.&#8221; Obama appears to be trying to gain a tactical advantage by seeking to divide and preoccupy his opponents, while obfuscating his real record. It’s a ‘Let’s Change the Subject’ playbook, and these aren’t small-ball diversions. That’s how bad his record is.</p>
<p>We should not assume his strategy will fall under its own weight. There’s determination behind these destructive policies, and it must be met by greater determination from conservatives.</p>
<p>__</p>
<p>Congressman John Fleming, M.D., represents Louisiana’s 4th District. He is Co-Chair of the Congressional Values Action Team, Chairman of the Natural Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans and Insular Affairs, and is a member of the House Armed Services Committee. He is a physician and small business owner.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/john_fleming/2012/02/17/obama-three-key-destructive-policies-in-just-one-month/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can Justice Kagan be Impartial on Obamacare?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the next couple of weeks, two things could happen that will affect the future of Obamacare. It has been widely reported that the Justices of the Supreme Court will meet privately on November 10<sup>th </sup>to decide if they will hear the case against President Obama’s health care reform. Twenty-six states have challenged the constitutionality of Obamacare’s individual mandate, and even the Obama Administration has asked the High Court to rule. But, a critical deadline precedes the November 10<sup>th</sup> meeting.</p>
<p>The House Judiciary Committee has given the Justice Department until this Friday, November 4<sup>th</sup>, to produce documents and witnesses that are necessary to shed light on whether Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan is qualified to render an impartial judgment on Obamacare. Justice Kagan was the Obama Administration’s Solicitor General and she may have had a role in preparing a legal defense for Obamacare before taking her seat on the Supreme Court. In June, I led a group of 49 House members in <a href="http://fleming.house.gov/UploadedFiles/24_JUN_2011_Letter_to_Judiciary_Committee_re_Kagan_Recusal.pdf">requesting</a> a Judiciary Committee investigation. A limited number of Department of Justice <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/documents/FOIA%20DOCUMENTS-DOJ.pdf">emails</a>, which were released through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, have already raised serious questions about whether Justice Kagan has an inherent conflict of interest related to the President’s health care reform, should it could come before the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>As a result of our letter, Judiciary Committee Chairman, Representative Lamar Smith, <a href="http://fleming.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Judiciary_Letter_to_DOJ_7-6-11.pdf">wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder</a> on July 6<sup>th</sup>. He asked the Justice Department to turn over any documents related to the health care legislation that also mentioned or involved then-Solicitor General Kagan. It took almost four months for the Attorney General’s office to reply, which they finally did on October 27<sup>th</sup>. <a href="http://fleming.house.gov/UploadedFiles/DOJ_Response_to_Chairman_Smith_10-27-11.pdf">In that letter</a> an Assistant Attorney General characterized the request for information as “unseemly.” Without offering any legal basis, the Justice Department refused to cooperate. Chairman Smith rejected this stonewalling and <a href="http://fleming.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Judiciary_Reply_to_DOJ_10-28-11.pdf">wrote back</a>, giving the Justice Department until Friday, November 4<sup>th</sup> to produce the documents and make two former colleagues of Solicitor Kagan available to be interviewed.</p>
<p>Before the Supreme Court Justices meet to discuss whether to hear the case against Obamacare, it is imperative that the American people know whether one of those Justices had any role in helping to prepare the Administration’s legal defense for Obamacare. If Justice Kagan was offering guidance to the Administration on how to withstand legal challenges to Obamacare, then she cannot be impartial and should recuse herself from any of the Supreme Court’s official decision-making about this critical issue.</p>
<p>__</p>
<p>Congressman John Fleming, M.D., represents Louisiana&#8217;s 4th District. He is Co-Chair of the Congressional Values Action Team, Chairman of the Natural Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans and Insular Affairs, and is a member of the House Armed Services Committee. He is a physician and small business owner.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/john_fleming/2011/10/31/can-justice-kagan-be-impartial-on-obamacare/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>John Fleming, Republican for LA-04.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.redstate.com/static/redstate/photo/2008/12/03/fleming.jpg" style="float:right;margin:5px;margin-left:8px;margin-right:0px;" alt="John Fleming">My name is John Fleming and I am running for Congress in Louisiana&#8217;s 4th Congressional District.  We are the last congressional race in the country.  Voters go to the polls this Saturday, December 6, and I am asking each of you to join my campaign and help start the movement to take back the House.  I am a man of conviction, drive and the desire to uphold America&#8217;s Constitution. I want to go to Washington with a single purpose: to represent the people as a servant leader.</p>
<p>I am a true social and fiscal conservative.  Unlike many so-called politicians today, I am standing firm on my conservative values and traditions. My top priority is helping our economy by supporting tax cuts and drilling to create American jobs.</p>
<p>I am endorsed by Governor Bobby Jindal, Senator David Vitter, Representative Charles Boustany, Representative Steve Scalise, Representative Rodney Alexander and Representative Jim McCrery.</p>
<p><span id="more-1"></span><br />
I am also endorsed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, NFIB, Gun Owners of America and has received an A rating from the NRA.  I have signed the ATR&#8217;s &#8220;No New Tax&#8221; pledge and have gained the support of Eagle Forum for my willingness to fight for the unborn.</p>
<p>I have been married to my wife, Cindy, for 29 years and am the father of four adult children. My background as a Medical Officer in the United States Navy laid a path for my future small business medical practice. My background as a family physician awarded him the Louisiana Family Doctor of the Year in 2007.</p>
<p>I have served as a Deacon, Sunday School teacher, and School Department Director at First Baptist of Minden. My medical practice, which is a small business, and several non-medical businesses that I own provide over 500 jobs to Louisianians.</p>
<p>I am facing a liberal Democrat endorsed by Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Charlie Rangel and Steny Hoyer.  This election is the start of us taking back the House and is critical to moving Congress back to the center from left leaning leadership intent on pushing through a liberal agenda. </p>
<p>I am asking for your help today.  Join my campaign.  Visit my website and if you agree with my vision and values, please consider making a donation at <a href="http://www.flemingforcongress.com">www.flemingforcongress.com</a>. </p>
<p>Thank you and God Bless!</p>
<p>John Fleming</p>
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/john_fleming/2008/12/03/john-fleming-republican-la-04/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

