Missing in the entire health care debate (and most others) is that any nationalized healthcare system is somewhere between partly to entirely unconstitutional *at the federal level*. It does not mean that individual states cannot come up with creative ways of improving healthcare quality and affordability within their boundaries.
When Social Security first came about, it was clearly unconstitutional, but judges caved to the prevailing winds rather than doing their jobs. It seems they rationalized the answer that the public wanted, rather than being lynched by angry mobs. They failed to protect the individual.
On the other hand, states should be able to do most anything they please. After all, people can move to another state if they find that their state’s policies are too intrusive. And they can far more easily vote their politicians out of office. These personal insurance plans are not available at the national level.
But I’ve heard no one use the “do whatever you want IN YOUR STATE” argument to combat the idea of ObamaCare. Not at the congressional level, not even in the broad public discourse. Aside from thefact that national healthcare is not warranted by the Constitution, it would allow 50 different experiments to occur with the best of these being adopted by other states. Not all healthcare reform plans are bad, as I lay out in my MRSA idea.
In order to be a Republican, you must wield states’ rights as a primary weapon against national socialism. Let California be Cuba if they like. Allow Montana to become a libertarian paradise if they like. Permit Kansas to be an overtly moral and religious state if they like. Hell, even support Bernie Sanders’ right to form a commune and live in a teepee and share beans around a fire. With guitars. Gotta have guitars on a commune.
Even if it were disingenuous, the argument that having 50 different experiments at the state level *before* picking a national healthcare plan would have merit to all but the extreme left who want communal utopian heaven to arrive tomorrow like so many cultists awaiting a UFO to land or the end of the world to show up. There are reasonable people that feel we should do *something*. After all, if we don’t, nobody will be able to afford health care of any kind in 10-20 years. And that’s an increasingly grim reality.
So I say to Republicans, if you have no plan that you support, you must support states’ rights to do as they wish. Otherwise, we’re going to be stuck with the Healthcare of Dr No in the future.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Texas May Fight National Health Care if Approved
izoneguy (Diary) Friday, August 28th at 5:43PM EST (link)Texas May Fight National Health Care if Approved
http://radio.woai.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=119078&article=5787436
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
So, they gut Medicare/Medicaid as a part of O-Care.
Achance (Diary) Friday, August 28th at 6:17PM EST (link)What are the states going to do? If they aren’t federal old people and poor people, they’re Texas’ old people and poor people and Texans are still going to be paying the taxes to pay for O-Care – short of starting a new “unpleasantness.” The problem is compounded in other western states with lots of federal Indians; they gut IHS as a part of O-Care. Then, if they’re not federal Indians, they’re Alaska or New Mexico Indians, and we can’t afford them. Alaska couldn’t afford the heat and lights on the Native Hospital in Anchorage!
There’s only one way to beat this monster short of civil war, and that is to beat this monster in the Congress. If it is not defeated now, it will never be defeated and the sleighride to Hell is fully underway.
In Vino Veritas
request...
Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle) (Diary) Friday, August 28th at 6:49PM EST (link)Art..
is it possible for you to expound on this in a POST? title it the sleighride to hell…
the request comes from an admiration of your ability to expound upon the realities of public policy, and given your knowledge of the civil war and its causes, your mentioning of civil war being the only other option to defeating our decent to hell intrigues me…
“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. “ -James Madison
Sounds like serious thinking, not just flippant remarks.
Achance (Diary) Friday, August 28th at 7:53PM EST (link)I think I can develop it, depends on the weather; if it’s nice, I’m going fishing, if not, I’ll try to write.
In Vino Veritas
It is about taxes and budgets
archer52 Saturday, August 29th at 10:50PM EST (link)States can’t handle the cost. Not because they don’t have the capability, but they don’t have the funding. And as long as the federal government beats up their citizens, they can’t raise enough in taxes to make anything like that work.
It is a circular trap, set by the government to prevent people from getting too rich and then too independent. They are going to crank down harder in the near future. Expect to look too much like France or Italy soon- small cars, small income and even smaller dreams.