<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CONTRACT WITH AMERICA part two?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-329</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Never before has the choice/contrast between Liberals/Demoncrats [yes, sic, pun] and Conservatives/Republicans (yes, there are still some Progressive &lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/04/28/red-dog-republicans/&quot;&gt;RINOs&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.removerinos.com&quot;&gt;removerinos.com&lt;/a&gt;) but on the whole) have the differences been, ever more, clearer. Democrats&#039; philosophy of Tax, Spend, Regulate, Tax some more, Spend even more, Stagflation, etc... and the Republicans&#039; written (&lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.gop.com/2008platform/&quot;&gt;GOP (still Conservative) Platform&lt;/a&gt; planks, we just need to ensure they adhere to them) positions of Private Sector Growth, minimal Regulations, Personal Responsibility, letting people keep their own money, etc... (related: &lt;a target=&quot;rattle&quot; href=&quot;http://rattlewithus.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hey-democrats-heres-your-sign&quot;&gt;Hey Progressives - Here&#039;s Your Sign!&lt;/a&gt;, see also: &lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/09/05/liberal-religious-distortions/&quot;&gt;Lib-Religion&lt;/a&gt; (Lib. intent: Separation &lt;i&gt;FROM&lt;/i&gt; Church &lt;i&gt;TO&lt;/i&gt; State) and the &lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2010/01/14/martha-coakley-nuns-are-bad-pedophiles-are-good/#comment-3773&quot;&gt;wall of separation between Church &amp; State&lt;/a&gt; twisted by Libs (#comment-3773 of article)) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HOW DO WE GET BACK ON TRACK AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC STAUNCHLY BACK IN THE CONSERVATIVE WING OF THE GOP CAMP?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;What should Republicans do immediately following the swearing in of a CONSERVATIVE majority in the House, the Senate, and POTUS?&lt;/b&gt; Even if the Obama-Bin-Biden and al-Democrats pull squeak out re-election, the Congress needs to pass and make him Pass or Veto what?!?!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;LINE ITEM VETO&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Remember that one?!?! The last one, IMNSHO, was NOT Unconstitutional as previously defined as the SCOTUS failed to consider and contrast the Congressional employed &quot;Omni-Bill&quot; process to reduce the President&#039;s Veto authority lumping more together that should have been presented as separate pieces of Budgetary Legislation. A new Line-Item Veto Constitutional Amendment must be passed and sent onto the States for ratification consideration.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;REPEAL &lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/08/07/refute-townhall-propagand/&quot;&gt;OBA&lt;i&gt;MAO&lt;/i&gt;CARE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Full repeal through the House (again), the Senate, and on to the POTUS for signing.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;REPEAL FRANK/DODD and &lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/04/30/cra-and-deregulation/&quot;&gt;CRA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Raise the FDIC protections to $500,000 and then make clear there will be NO MORE BANK BAILOUTS.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;CUT DEPARTMENTAL PAYROLLS 10%&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As well as cutting their Budgets by 10% also, and NO they are not the same or mutually exclusive (but people who have never run a business may never understand the distinctions). The following Departments need their Payrolls (and Budgets) immediately ordered reduced by 10% as they&#039;ve had far too much time (and too large of Staff) if they could meddle where they shouldn&#039;t. EPA (Cap-And-&lt;strike&gt;Trade&lt;/strike&gt;Tax {&lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/12/09/obama-to-push-global-warming-agenda-despite-the-current-science-data/&quot;&gt;Climate $cam&lt;/a&gt;} end around), FCC (Net Neutrality end around), HHS (&lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/08/07/refute-townhall-propagand/&quot;&gt;Oba&lt;i&gt;mao&lt;/i&gt;care&lt;/a&gt; and more), Education Dept. (No Politician&#039;s relatives left behind Dept.), Dept. of Energy (it only takes one employee to stamp APPROVED or DENIED on Permits), Commerce, Labor (NRLB), Treasury, and on and on... Also, immediately reduce any/all amounts of ANY Department that has GRANT MONEY available by 20% minimum.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Spending Cuts A to Z&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those (1 page) individual Bills from each and every member of the House proposing individual (how about, REAL/ACTUAL) Budget Cuts - to be voted up or down, without amendment; but after Public Posting, minimum 72 hour review, with each side for/against putting up their best spokespersons limited to 2 hours (so we actually get votes).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Essential Government Services Act&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This Bill MUST be designed/developed and passed BEFORE the next Budget, Debt Ceiling, etc... crisis comes along to REMOVE any Demoncrat demagoguing of the issues of what Government Services and Processes/Procedures remain in effect should (yeah right, when an eventual) GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN occur. No longer can the Democrats claim troops wouldn&#039;t be paid, because payment to them would be assured under the Act. No longer would they claim Seniors wouldn&#039;t get Social Security checks, because those being cut/sent would also be assured. Grossly reduced (say, 10% funding levels) to most Departments would be allowed to keep the Building lights on and Security Personnel to Guard them while their Staffs&#039; would be furloughed! &lt;i&gt;What else would/should be defined in such an Act&lt;/i&gt;?!?!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;True TAX REFORM&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flat Tax reform or for those who favor the Fair Tax you need a Constitutional Amendment that Repeals Federal Govt. authority to levy an Income related Tax and replaces it with the Consumption Tax or we will land up with both just like Canada.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Federal Officials Enhanced Eligibility (TERM LIMITS)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether any individual Politician wants the limits or not, such an Amendment should be drafted, passed, and sent onto the States for WE THE PEOPLE (to pressure our States&#039; for/against) to decide!!!&lt;br /&gt;Personally, I&#039;d like language &#039;any person having served a period of 9 years&#039; (this allows for some time having been appointed, special elections, split terms of service, etc... concerns) &#039;to be ineligible for any future Elections to the House of Representatives.&#039; *and* same language for 11 years for the Senate. Plus, any person having Term Limited out shall be ineligible for Lobbying for a period of 5 years, if they want to hang around they can serve on the staff of a Freshman Politician and make themselves useful for far less pay and glory (if they truly wish to continue to serve). &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/2008/11/14/repeal-the-17th-amendment/#comment-64&quot;&gt;repeal of the 17th Amendment&lt;/a&gt; Constitutional Amendment&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Repeal of 17th was touched on in the RWU &lt;a target=&quot;rattle&quot; href=&quot;http://rattlewithus.ning.com/xn/detail/3305780:Event:25442?xg_source=activity&quot;&gt;Popular Vote vs. Electoral College - Event&lt;/a&gt; comments section (related RWU discussion: &lt;a target=&quot;rattle&quot; href=&quot;http://rattlewithus.ning.com/forum/topics/exportingexpanding-blueism&quot;&gt;[despite (R) 2010 gains] Exporting/Expanding BLUEism&lt;/a&gt;) or a lengthy old discussion of it: &lt;a target=&quot;blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/2008/11/14/repeal-the-17th-amendment/#comment-64&quot;&gt;17th repeal&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Various organizations have discussed such language for decades, the different plans/approaches can/should be discussed and one chosen or many of them merged/modified to produce a reasonable Amendment.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cross-post/update from &lt;a target=&quot;rattle&quot; href=&quot;http://rattlewithus.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-new-contract-the-contrast&quot;&gt;Rattle With Us Tea Party&lt;/a&gt; blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never before has the choice/contrast between Liberals/Demoncrats [yes, sic, pun] and Conservatives/Republicans (yes, there are still some Progressive <a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/04/28/red-dog-republicans/">RINOs</a> (<a target="blank" href="http://www.removerinos.com">removerinos.com</a>) but on the whole) have the differences been, ever more, clearer. Democrats&#8217; philosophy of Tax, Spend, Regulate, Tax some more, Spend even more, Stagflation, etc&#8230; and the Republicans&#8217; written (<a target="blank" href="http://www.gop.com/2008platform/">GOP (still Conservative) Platform</a> planks, we just need to ensure they adhere to them) positions of Private Sector Growth, minimal Regulations, Personal Responsibility, letting people keep their own money, etc&#8230; (related: <a target="rattle" href="http://rattlewithus.ning.com/profiles/blogs/hey-democrats-heres-your-sign">Hey Progressives &#8211; Here&#8217;s Your Sign!</a>, see also: <a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/09/05/liberal-religious-distortions/">Lib-Religion</a> (Lib. intent: Separation <i>FROM</i> Church <i>TO</i> State) and the <a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2010/01/14/martha-coakley-nuns-are-bad-pedophiles-are-good/#comment-3773">wall of separation between Church &amp; State</a> twisted by Libs (#comment-3773 of article)) </p>
<p>HOW DO WE GET BACK ON TRACK AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC STAUNCHLY BACK IN THE CONSERVATIVE WING OF THE GOP CAMP?</p>
<p><b>What should Republicans do immediately following the swearing in of a CONSERVATIVE majority in the House, the Senate, and POTUS?</b> Even if the Obama-Bin-Biden and al-Democrats pull squeak out re-election, the Congress needs to pass and make him Pass or Veto what?!?!</p>
<ul>
<li><b><u>LINE ITEM VETO</u></b><br />Remember that one?!?! The last one, IMNSHO, was NOT Unconstitutional as previously defined as the SCOTUS failed to consider and contrast the Congressional employed &#8220;Omni-Bill&#8221; process to reduce the President&#8217;s Veto authority lumping more together that should have been presented as separate pieces of Budgetary Legislation. A new Line-Item Veto Constitutional Amendment must be passed and sent onto the States for ratification consideration.</li>
<li><b><u>REPEAL <a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/08/07/refute-townhall-propagand/">OBA<i>MAO</i>CARE</a></u></b><br />Full repeal through the House (again), the Senate, and on to the POTUS for signing.</li>
<li><b><u>REPEAL FRANK/DODD and <a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/04/30/cra-and-deregulation/">CRA</a></u></b><br />Raise the FDIC protections to $500,000 and then make clear there will be NO MORE BANK BAILOUTS.</li>
<li><b><u>CUT DEPARTMENTAL PAYROLLS 10%</u></b><br />As well as cutting their Budgets by 10% also, and NO they are not the same or mutually exclusive (but people who have never run a business may never understand the distinctions). The following Departments need their Payrolls (and Budgets) immediately ordered reduced by 10% as they&#8217;ve had far too much time (and too large of Staff) if they could meddle where they shouldn&#8217;t. EPA (Cap-And-<strike>Trade</strike>Tax {<a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/12/09/obama-to-push-global-warming-agenda-despite-the-current-science-data/">Climate $cam</a>} end around), FCC (Net Neutrality end around), HHS (<a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/08/07/refute-townhall-propagand/">Oba<i>mao</i>care</a> and more), Education Dept. (No Politician&#8217;s relatives left behind Dept.), Dept. of Energy (it only takes one employee to stamp APPROVED or DENIED on Permits), Commerce, Labor (NRLB), Treasury, and on and on&#8230; Also, immediately reduce any/all amounts of ANY Department that has GRANT MONEY available by 20% minimum.</li>
<li><b><u>Spending Cuts A to Z</u></b><br />Those (1 page) individual Bills from each and every member of the House proposing individual (how about, REAL/ACTUAL) Budget Cuts &#8211; to be voted up or down, without amendment; but after Public Posting, minimum 72 hour review, with each side for/against putting up their best spokespersons limited to 2 hours (so we actually get votes).</li>
<li><b><u>Essential Government Services Act</u></b><br />This Bill MUST be designed/developed and passed BEFORE the next Budget, Debt Ceiling, etc&#8230; crisis comes along to REMOVE any Demoncrat demagoguing of the issues of what Government Services and Processes/Procedures remain in effect should (yeah right, when an eventual) GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN occur. No longer can the Democrats claim troops wouldn&#8217;t be paid, because payment to them would be assured under the Act. No longer would they claim Seniors wouldn&#8217;t get Social Security checks, because those being cut/sent would also be assured. Grossly reduced (say, 10% funding levels) to most Departments would be allowed to keep the Building lights on and Security Personnel to Guard them while their Staffs&#8217; would be furloughed! <i>What else would/should be defined in such an Act</i>?!?!</li>
<li><b><u>True TAX REFORM</u></b><br />Flat Tax reform or for those who favor the Fair Tax you need a Constitutional Amendment that Repeals Federal Govt. authority to levy an Income related Tax and replaces it with the Consumption Tax or we will land up with both just like Canada.</li>
<li><b><u>Federal Officials Enhanced Eligibility (TERM LIMITS)</u></b><br />Whether any individual Politician wants the limits or not, such an Amendment should be drafted, passed, and sent onto the States for WE THE PEOPLE (to pressure our States&#8217; for/against) to decide!!!<br />Personally, I&#8217;d like language &#8216;any person having served a period of 9 years&#8217; (this allows for some time having been appointed, special elections, split terms of service, etc&#8230; concerns) &#8216;to be ineligible for any future Elections to the House of Representatives.&#8217; *and* same language for 11 years for the Senate. Plus, any person having Term Limited out shall be ineligible for Lobbying for a period of 5 years, if they want to hang around they can serve on the staff of a Freshman Politician and make themselves useful for far less pay and glory (if they truly wish to continue to serve). </li>
<li><b><u><a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/2008/11/14/repeal-the-17th-amendment/#comment-64">repeal of the 17th Amendment</a> Constitutional Amendment</u></b><br />Repeal of 17th was touched on in the RWU <a target="rattle" href="http://rattlewithus.ning.com/xn/detail/3305780:Event:25442?xg_source=activity">Popular Vote vs. Electoral College &#8211; Event</a> comments section (related RWU discussion: <a target="rattle" href="http://rattlewithus.ning.com/forum/topics/exportingexpanding-blueism">[despite (R) 2010 gains] Exporting/Expanding BLUEism</a>) or a lengthy old discussion of it: <a target="blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/2008/11/14/repeal-the-17th-amendment/#comment-64">17th repeal</a>.</li>
<li><b><u>BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT</u></b><br />Various organizations have discussed such language for decades, the different plans/approaches can/should be discussed and one chosen or many of them merged/modified to produce a reasonable Amendment.</li>
</ul>
<p>Cross-post/update from <a target="rattle" href="http://rattlewithus.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-new-contract-the-contrast">Rattle With Us Tea Party</a> blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-248</guid>
		<description>I was just re-reviewing the older material for the innevitable visits cross-linked materials get and responding to some ;-) Again, though, shows how some material&#039;s subject matter really doesn&#039;t date. So you mind isn&#039;t going - not yet :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just re-reviewing the older material for the innevitable visits cross-linked materials get and responding to some <img src='http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Again, though, shows how some material&#8217;s subject matter really doesn&#8217;t date. So you mind isn&#8217;t going &#8211; not yet <img src='http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-247</guid>
		<description>cross-linking and related-submaterials (at least, IMO) are helpful as I always try to be mindful that NEWBIES come and go all the time and I hope they find them helpful since I started doing it a month or so ago after being challenged by a &quot;ploy&quot; (bad tactic at that) about providing such to topics we&#039;ve already discussed regarding any variety of topics/subject-matter/quotes/etc..... So I&#039;ve started to try and keep some of the better &quot;discussions&quot; (not just links to my Diaries, but usually a conversation I&#039;ve been involved in (of course, or I&#039;d otherwise not have been aware of the discussion - shame I have to point that would otherwise be OBVIOUS to most but others might try and &quot;suggest&quot; it is a matter of my ego or something)) and the link to them handy for use in other discussions. So when folks try to suggest &quot;No-one here has.... blah, blah, blah...&quot; I can hopefully point back to where someone has said such and dispatch the dellusion trying to be perpetrated/maintained - plus, and again, as &quot;support&quot; or places to drill down to for more/additional in-depth thoughts on any given and/or semi-related materials.

Thanks again! It&#039;s NOT about &quot;US&quot; but about convincing others and providing an environment others will want to refer friends, neighbors, enemies, to for Facts and well thought out positions to refute Liberals/Democrats with.

&lt;u&gt;For anyone visiting, here are some current items (Summer 09)&lt;/u&gt;:
+Obama Legislation list - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/26/obamas-agenda/&quot;&gt;the 14 Legislative agenda items (and other things) Obama wants to distract from&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;Obama FAILure&lt;/b&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/11/obamas-failures/&quot;&gt;ObamaFAIL: How Obama&#039;s FAILURES are the country&#039;s SUCCESSES - since we have to spell it out&lt;/a&gt;
+ObamAgenda - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/26/obamas-agenda/&quot;&gt;ObamAgenda - So, What does Obama NOT want you paying attention to?&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;overcoming ObamaZombies/(h/t scarlos: Barracklash)&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/rightsideredux/2009/06/01/va-gop-2009-2010-victory/#comment-8&quot;&gt;awaking ObamaZombies&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/rightsideredux/2009/06/01/va-gop-2009-2010-victory/#comment-14&quot;&gt;scarlos: Barracklash&lt;/a&gt;
+Conservatives - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/29/conservative-nominees/&quot;&gt;Are we preparing Conservatives via 2010 Campaigns for &#039;12,&#039;14,&#039;16 Races? - shouldn&#039;t we be?!?!&lt;/a&gt;
+ConservCand&#039;s - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/29/conservative-nominees/&quot;&gt;Conservative Candidates (the Diary)&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;MSM challenge&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/06/02/msm-challenge/&quot;&gt;The &quot;Pretend you&#039;re a Liberal MSM reporter (and Spin the story)&quot; Challenge&lt;/a&gt;
+Daniel Hannan (British MEP) - mbecker&#039;s: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/mbecker908/2009/03/28/want-to-know-what-the-leader-of-the-republlican-party-should-sound-like/&quot;&gt;What the Leader of the Republican Party should sound like!&lt;/a&gt; Productive vs non-Productive sectors of the Economy same here as in UK.
+EIT&#039;s are NOT torture - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/warner_todd_huston/2009/05/17/disingenuous-lefts-confusion-over-pelosis-lies-and-the-right%E2%80%99s-reaction/#comment-6992&quot;&gt;EIT&#039;s are NOT torture&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;Extortion&lt;/b&gt;   - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2009/05/19/california-election-returns-open-thread/#comment-2369&quot;&gt;Extortion, pure and simple (to raise taxes or avoid/enact legislation)&lt;/a&gt;
+AK/HI exceptions - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/05/24/governor-palin-cites-alaska-constitution-in-stimulus-veto/#comment-200&quot;&gt;AK/HI get exceptions (as non-contiguous States)&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;No Federal taxation&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/05/24/governor-palin-cites-alaska-constitution-in-stimulus-veto/#comment-211&quot;&gt;NO Federal Taxation (States&#039; Rights)&lt;/a&gt;
+Militarized Oil Drilling - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2008/11/19/drill-for-oil-as-act-of-civil-disobediance/#comment-376&quot;&gt;using the Military to Drill (Natl. Defense Strategic issue)&lt;/a&gt;
+DL&#039;s Son jokes - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/12/new-york-lawmakers-to-cbs-fire-letterman/#comment-5810&quot;&gt;DL&#039;s Son jokes&lt;/a&gt; 
or Hilary jokes for DL rather than Palin jokes - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/11/palins-no-intentions-of-giving-dave-a-rating-boost/#comment-5764&quot;&gt;Hey DL, how &#039;bout these &quot;poor taste&quot; Hilary jokes?!?!&lt;/a&gt;
+Palin Gov resignation spin - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/03/breaking-gov-sarah-palin-wont-seek-a-second-term/#comment-6203&quot;&gt;Gov Palin resigns&lt;/a&gt; and it goes on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/03/sarahs-satisfaction/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;
+using Primaries to build up future candidates - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/19/the-problem-with-the-nrscs-crist-endorsement/#comment-23616&quot;&gt;using Primaries to build up future candidates&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;GOP Platform&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gopplatform2008.com/&quot;&gt;GOP (still Conservative) Platform&lt;/a&gt;
+17th Amend/Elect Senators chg - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/2008/11/14/repeal-the-17th-amendment/#comment-64&quot;&gt;repeal the 17th? YES please&lt;/a&gt;
+Dem&#039;s weak on crime - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/mark_i/2009/06/01/sotomayor-obama-and-the-felon-vote/#comment-1036&quot;&gt;Dem&#039;s weak on crime. Always!&lt;/a&gt;
advocating voting for Dem if not 1st choice - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/06/10/mr-smith-goes-to-washington-again/#comment-941&quot;&gt;one example here (and I respect him for being &quot;honest&quot; about it, others beat around the bush)&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;RS:Tunes (some fun)&lt;/b&gt;   - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/penguin2/2009/05/17/a-reason-for-hope-a-view-of-two-college-graduations/#comment-12&quot;&gt;RSers song parodies&lt;/a&gt;
+DailyKooks quoting me info - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/11/the-lesbian-who-loved-a-man-wanda-sykes-is-hot-for-barry-cold-for-rush-and-cheney/#comment-23245&quot;&gt;Daily-Kooks quote me (I&#039;m so proud)&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;TEApeats (Official and UnOfficial rally) info&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/congressman_pete_sessions/2009/06/25/our-goal-is-to-retire-nancy-pelosi-by-electing-republicans-who-represent-your-values-in-government/#comment-33&quot;&gt;TEApeats (info) PLUS How to organize an UNOFFICIAL non-permit TEApeat&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2881&quot;&gt;Doc&#039;s comment about focusing on the protest and NOT the &quot;Party&quot; (here)&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;b&gt;Issues recap&lt;/b&gt;    - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/31/issues-recap-categorized-reasons-why-bho-wou/&quot;&gt;2008 Election Issues recap [with links]&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;ll stop there, I&#039;ve got so many links saved off I can&#039;t possibly share them all in one spot. And, of course, countless great things are being created/said in the Members Diaries List on a Daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cross-linking and related-submaterials (at least, IMO) are helpful as I always try to be mindful that NEWBIES come and go all the time and I hope they find them helpful since I started doing it a month or so ago after being challenged by a &#8220;ploy&#8221; (bad tactic at that) about providing such to topics we&#8217;ve already discussed regarding any variety of topics/subject-matter/quotes/etc&#8230;.. So I&#8217;ve started to try and keep some of the better &#8220;discussions&#8221; (not just links to my Diaries, but usually a conversation I&#8217;ve been involved in (of course, or I&#8217;d otherwise not have been aware of the discussion &#8211; shame I have to point that would otherwise be OBVIOUS to most but others might try and &#8220;suggest&#8221; it is a matter of my ego or something)) and the link to them handy for use in other discussions. So when folks try to suggest &#8220;No-one here has&#8230;. blah, blah, blah&#8230;&#8221; I can hopefully point back to where someone has said such and dispatch the dellusion trying to be perpetrated/maintained &#8211; plus, and again, as &#8220;support&#8221; or places to drill down to for more/additional in-depth thoughts on any given and/or semi-related materials.</p>
<p>Thanks again! It&#8217;s NOT about &#8220;US&#8221; but about convincing others and providing an environment others will want to refer friends, neighbors, enemies, to for Facts and well thought out positions to refute Liberals/Democrats with.</p>
<p><u>For anyone visiting, here are some current items (Summer 09)</u>:<br />
+Obama Legislation list &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/26/obamas-agenda/">the 14 Legislative agenda items (and other things) Obama wants to distract from</a><br />
+<b>Obama FAILure</b>  &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/11/obamas-failures/">ObamaFAIL: How Obama&#8217;s FAILURES are the country&#8217;s SUCCESSES &#8211; since we have to spell it out</a><br />
+ObamAgenda &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/26/obamas-agenda/">ObamAgenda &#8211; So, What does Obama NOT want you paying attention to?</a><br />
+<b>overcoming ObamaZombies/(h/t scarlos: Barracklash)</b> &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/rightsideredux/2009/06/01/va-gop-2009-2010-victory/#comment-8">awaking ObamaZombies</a> and <a href="http://www.redstate.com/rightsideredux/2009/06/01/va-gop-2009-2010-victory/#comment-14">scarlos: Barracklash</a><br />
+Conservatives &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/29/conservative-nominees/">Are we preparing Conservatives via 2010 Campaigns for &#8217;12,&#8217;14,&#8217;16 Races? &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t we be?!?!</a><br />
+ConservCand&#8217;s &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/29/conservative-nominees/">Conservative Candidates (the Diary)</a><br />
+<b>MSM challenge</b> &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/06/02/msm-challenge/">The &#8220;Pretend you&#8217;re a Liberal MSM reporter (and Spin the story)&#8221; Challenge</a><br />
+Daniel Hannan (British MEP) &#8211; mbecker&#8217;s: <a href="http://www.redstate.com/mbecker908/2009/03/28/want-to-know-what-the-leader-of-the-republlican-party-should-sound-like/">What the Leader of the Republican Party should sound like!</a> Productive vs non-Productive sectors of the Economy same here as in UK.<br />
+EIT&#8217;s are NOT torture &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/warner_todd_huston/2009/05/17/disingenuous-lefts-confusion-over-pelosis-lies-and-the-right%E2%80%99s-reaction/#comment-6992">EIT&#8217;s are NOT torture</a><br />
+<b>Extortion</b>   &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2009/05/19/california-election-returns-open-thread/#comment-2369">Extortion, pure and simple (to raise taxes or avoid/enact legislation)</a><br />
+AK/HI exceptions &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/05/24/governor-palin-cites-alaska-constitution-in-stimulus-veto/#comment-200">AK/HI get exceptions (as non-contiguous States)</a><br />
+<b>No Federal taxation</b> &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/wmiar/2009/05/24/governor-palin-cites-alaska-constitution-in-stimulus-veto/#comment-211">NO Federal Taxation (States&#8217; Rights)</a><br />
+Militarized Oil Drilling &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2008/11/19/drill-for-oil-as-act-of-civil-disobediance/#comment-376">using the Military to Drill (Natl. Defense Strategic issue)</a><br />
+DL&#8217;s Son jokes &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/12/new-york-lawmakers-to-cbs-fire-letterman/#comment-5810">DL&#8217;s Son jokes</a><br />
or Hilary jokes for DL rather than Palin jokes &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/06/11/palins-no-intentions-of-giving-dave-a-rating-boost/#comment-5764">Hey DL, how &#8217;bout these &#8220;poor taste&#8221; Hilary jokes?!?!</a><br />
+Palin Gov resignation spin &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/03/breaking-gov-sarah-palin-wont-seek-a-second-term/#comment-6203">Gov Palin resigns</a> and it goes on <a href="http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/03/sarahs-satisfaction/">here</a><br />
+using Primaries to build up future candidates &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/19/the-problem-with-the-nrscs-crist-endorsement/#comment-23616">using Primaries to build up future candidates</a><br />
+<b>GOP Platform</b> &#8211; <a href="http://www.gopplatform2008.com/">GOP (still Conservative) Platform</a><br />
+17th Amend/Elect Senators chg &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/2008/11/14/repeal-the-17th-amendment/#comment-64">repeal the 17th? YES please</a><br />
+Dem&#8217;s weak on crime &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/mark_i/2009/06/01/sotomayor-obama-and-the-felon-vote/#comment-1036">Dem&#8217;s weak on crime. Always!</a><br />
advocating voting for Dem if not 1st choice &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/06/10/mr-smith-goes-to-washington-again/#comment-941">one example here (and I respect him for being &#8220;honest&#8221; about it, others beat around the bush)</a><br />
+<b>RS:Tunes (some fun)</b>   &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/penguin2/2009/05/17/a-reason-for-hope-a-view-of-two-college-graduations/#comment-12">RSers song parodies</a><br />
+DailyKooks quoting me info &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/11/the-lesbian-who-loved-a-man-wanda-sykes-is-hot-for-barry-cold-for-rush-and-cheney/#comment-23245">Daily-Kooks quote me (I&#8217;m so proud)</a><br />
+<b><i><u>TEApeats (Official and UnOfficial rally) info</u></i></b> &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/congressman_pete_sessions/2009/06/25/our-goal-is-to-retire-nancy-pelosi-by-electing-republicans-who-represent-your-values-in-government/#comment-33">TEApeats (info) PLUS How to organize an UNOFFICIAL non-permit TEApeat</a> and <a href="http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/07/03/government-squashes-nantucket-tea-party/#comment-2881">Doc&#8217;s comment about focusing on the protest and NOT the &#8220;Party&#8221; (here)</a><br />
+<b>Issues recap</b>    &#8211; <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/31/issues-recap-categorized-reasons-why-bho-wou/">2008 Election Issues recap [with links]</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll stop there, I&#8217;ve got so many links saved off I can&#8217;t possibly share them all in one spot. And, of course, countless great things are being created/said in the Members Diaries List on a Daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DONTREADONME</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>DONTREADONME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-246</guid>
		<description>is a 33 year old senility kicking in or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is a 33 year old senility kicking in or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-245</guid>
		<description>The 7 month time-frame from the creation of this Diary is irrelevant because until Republicans wake up, and they won&#039;t if we do not keep reminding them .... so let me break for another reminder:
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
[from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/29/conservative-nominees/&quot;&gt;Conservative Candidates (the Diary)&lt;/a&gt;]
the &quot;Republican Revolution&quot; of the 90&#039;s was mis-labeled, it was really the &quot;CONSERVATIVE Revolution&quot; and it brought Republicans to power; likewise, it was the &quot;Reagan Conservative&quot; Revolution, not a Republican Revolution. Many Republicans forgot that along the way. That led the way for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/04/28/red-dog-republicans/&quot;&gt;CINO&lt;/a&gt; Democrats to lie their way back into power, but it was a &quot;Conservative&quot; co-opted (read: they lied about their intent) that voters allowed themselves to be duped into. Republicans need to REMEMBER that! Conservatism did NOT lose Elections, bad Politicians (with R&#039;s beside their name) did!
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
back on point, though that wasn&#039;t really a variation from point (Conservatism), is that we must remind Republicans that a return to those things not accomplished under the Contract should be revisited and fought for!!!! That message will remain pertinant until they again &quot;GET IT&quot; (hopefully by 2010)!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 7 month time-frame from the creation of this Diary is irrelevant because until Republicans wake up, and they won&#8217;t if we do not keep reminding them &#8230;. so let me break for another reminder:</p>
<blockquote><p>
[from <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/05/29/conservative-nominees/">Conservative Candidates (the Diary)</a>]<br />
the &#8220;Republican Revolution&#8221; of the 90&#8242;s was mis-labeled, it was really the &#8220;CONSERVATIVE Revolution&#8221; and it brought Republicans to power; likewise, it was the &#8220;Reagan Conservative&#8221; Revolution, not a Republican Revolution. Many Republicans forgot that along the way. That led the way for <a href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2009/04/28/red-dog-republicans/">CINO</a> Democrats to lie their way back into power, but it was a &#8220;Conservative&#8221; co-opted (read: they lied about their intent) that voters allowed themselves to be duped into. Republicans need to REMEMBER that! Conservatism did NOT lose Elections, bad Politicians (with R&#8217;s beside their name) did!
</p></blockquote>
<p>back on point, though that wasn&#8217;t really a variation from point (Conservatism), is that we must remind Republicans that a return to those things not accomplished under the Contract should be revisited and fought for!!!! That message will remain pertinant until they again &#8220;GET IT&#8221; (hopefully by 2010)!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekster</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>gekster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-244</guid>
		<description>theres nothing to get up to??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theres nothing to get up to??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DONTREADONME</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>DONTREADONME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-243</guid>
		<description>I followed the link here, yes there are some of us (now I have to be careful because $pecialist could be reading) who follow your links and read your stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed the link here, yes there are some of us (now I have to be careful because $pecialist could be reading) who follow your links and read your stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod_Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2008/10/30/contract-with-america-part-two/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod_Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since then the Contract was sidelined.  Later in his term, Bush has embraced the socialism of Obama.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is up to another true &quot;Republican&quot; President to keep the promises of the said contract.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That Contract must be re-established.  I hope the McCain/Palin ticket wins this election and does what Democrat-controlled Bush Administration has failed to deliver.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since then the Contract was sidelined.  Later in his term, Bush has embraced the socialism of Obama.</p>
<p>It is up to another true &#8220;Republican&#8221; President to keep the promises of the said contract.</p>
<p>That Contract must be re-established.  I hope the McCain/Palin ticket wins this election and does what Democrat-controlled Bush Administration has failed to deliver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

