<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red State Weekly Political Synopsis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/</link>
	<description>Just another RedState: Conservative News and Community weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: athelas</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>athelas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Yet at least he retains a lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet at least he retains a lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esy16</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>esy16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Jane Norton is in (as I said earlier), Ken Buck is out, and Michael Bennet will face a primary challenge from former State House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. 

Also, the point I made earlier about the NRSC being stupid with their premature pseudo-endorsement of Norton should not go unnoticed. There is already backlash in Colorado and I can&#039;t imagine it will get better. Conservatives in the state will now likely start to rally around Frazier with Buck out of the picture and will be directly at odds with Norton and the NRSC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane Norton is in (as I said earlier), Ken Buck is out, and Michael Bennet will face a primary challenge from former State House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. </p>
<p>Also, the point I made earlier about the NRSC being stupid with their premature pseudo-endorsement of Norton should not go unnoticed. There is already backlash in Colorado and I can&#8217;t imagine it will get better. Conservatives in the state will now likely start to rally around Frazier with Buck out of the picture and will be directly at odds with Norton and the NRSC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roscopico</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>roscopico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Walker is the only legitimate candidate for governor.  While Newman is a credible force, this election is not his.  There has been talk of Tim Michaels throwing his hat in the ring as well: and Thompson is done.  Take my word for it.

Meanwhile, Tim Michaels ran a contentious and close campaign against the resident Libbie Senator Feingold. Perhaps now that Governor &quot;Diamond Jim&quot; Doyle has &quot;wee-weed&quot; in the pool quite enough to place WI on par with MI (thus rendering hopes for re-election something similar to catching a leprechaun) Michaels could win this time around.  

The sad thing:  everybody and their cousin is running for governor while &quot;Term Limits&quot; Feingold runs uncontested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walker is the only legitimate candidate for governor.  While Newman is a credible force, this election is not his.  There has been talk of Tim Michaels throwing his hat in the ring as well: and Thompson is done.  Take my word for it.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Tim Michaels ran a contentious and close campaign against the resident Libbie Senator Feingold. Perhaps now that Governor &#8220;Diamond Jim&#8221; Doyle has &#8220;wee-weed&#8221; in the pool quite enough to place WI on par with MI (thus rendering hopes for re-election something similar to catching a leprechaun) Michaels could win this time around.  </p>
<p>The sad thing:  everybody and their cousin is running for governor while &#8220;Term Limits&#8221; Feingold runs uncontested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudgop</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>proudgop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-84</guid>
		<description>IA Branstad would crush Culver I pray he runs

IN Hill; Sodrel should not run again

IL I like Kirk he is best we can do in that state

WI really like Walker; the fact he has won in Milwaukee is plus for us
Hopefully, Thompson who hinted he has one last race in him runs against Feingold

CO Norton seems like good candidate

MA I think the MA GOP should go with Curt Shilling for vacancy; he has state wide name and has money to run short race</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IA Branstad would crush Culver I pray he runs</p>
<p>IN Hill; Sodrel should not run again</p>
<p>IL I like Kirk he is best we can do in that state</p>
<p>WI really like Walker; the fact he has won in Milwaukee is plus for us<br />
Hopefully, Thompson who hinted he has one last race in him runs against Feingold</p>
<p>CO Norton seems like good candidate</p>
<p>MA I think the MA GOP should go with Curt Shilling for vacancy; he has state wide name and has money to run short race</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudgop</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>proudgop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-83</guid>
		<description>because he had image problem and he didn&#039;t even live in district

I think we have great shot off taking down Massa, Bishop, Hall, Acuri, and Murphy with the right candidates

now if only the NY GOP could actually get solid candidate against Gillibrand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because he had image problem and he didn&#8217;t even live in district</p>
<p>I think we have great shot off taking down Massa, Bishop, Hall, Acuri, and Murphy with the right candidates</p>
<p>now if only the NY GOP could actually get solid candidate against Gillibrand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudgop</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>proudgop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Here is the thing we have all these candidate lining  up to take on Lincoln

I&#039;d like to see someone like Baker run against Snyder

or what about all these statewide races; perhaps the AR GOP could actually get some traction in 2010 with getting some statewide people elected</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the thing we have all these candidate lining  up to take on Lincoln</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see someone like Baker run against Snyder</p>
<p>or what about all these statewide races; perhaps the AR GOP could actually get some traction in 2010 with getting some statewide people elected</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psyop_hic</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>psyop_hic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see Terry Branstad back on the political scene.  He was a great governor.  Too bad he was succeeded by our current SecAg (east coast Liberal and father to a classmate of mine) who bankrupted the Hawkeye State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see Terry Branstad back on the political scene.  He was a great governor.  Too bad he was succeeded by our current SecAg (east coast Liberal and father to a classmate of mine) who bankrupted the Hawkeye State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle-MI</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle-MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Just checking his webiste, http://mattsak.com/ Sakalosky seems solidly conservative.

From a CQ article,
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2009/08/nebraska-rep-terry-defending-r.html#more
it seems Sakalosky is unhappy with Terry&#039;s votes on TARP and fuel efficiency standards for autos.  I am not crazy about government imposed fuel efficiency, but it is not high on my priority list either.  On the TARP vote there were other otherwise strong conservatives (i.e. Sen. Coburn R-OK) who voted for it.  Compared to the other liberal Democratic bills such as Healthcare, Cap &amp; Trade, &amp; the Stimulus; I am a little less concerned about TARP than other conservatives.

I am all for primarying RINO&#039;s but there are higher priority targets than Terry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checking his webiste, http://mattsak.com/ Sakalosky seems solidly conservative.</p>
<p>From a CQ article,<br />
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2009/08/nebraska-rep-terry-defending-r.html#more<br />
it seems Sakalosky is unhappy with Terry&#8217;s votes on TARP and fuel efficiency standards for autos.  I am not crazy about government imposed fuel efficiency, but it is not high on my priority list either.  On the TARP vote there were other otherwise strong conservatives (i.e. Sen. Coburn R-OK) who voted for it.  Compared to the other liberal Democratic bills such as Healthcare, Cap &amp; Trade, &amp; the Stimulus; I am a little less concerned about TARP than other conservatives.</p>
<p>I am all for primarying RINO&#8217;s but there are higher priority targets than Terry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mriggio</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>mriggio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-79</guid>
		<description>about right-minded folks in Illinois having no good state-wide candidate choices, a fellow Red Stater advised me to look into this Precinct Chairman thing. I&#039;m just about ready to take his advice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about right-minded folks in Illinois having no good state-wide candidate choices, a fellow Red Stater advised me to look into this Precinct Chairman thing. I&#8217;m just about ready to take his advice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedomlover</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/08/28/red-state-weekly-political-synopsis-11/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedomlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=57#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Giannoulias is a basketball buddy of Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giannoulias is a basketball buddy of Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

