<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red State Weekly Political Update for Period Ending March 20, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/03/20/red-state-weekly-political-up-date-for-period-ending-march-20-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/03/20/red-state-weekly-political-up-date-for-period-ending-march-20-2009/</link>
	<description>Just another RedState: Conservative News and Community weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/03/20/red-state-weekly-political-up-date-for-period-ending-march-20-2009/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=3#comment-4</guid>
		<description>...Of why the GOP is not bouncing back faster than it is currently. 

Rather than trying a moderate &#039;retread&#039;, why don&#039;t we try someone fresh, new, and actually conservative, for once?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Of why the GOP is not bouncing back faster than it is currently. </p>
<p>Rather than trying a moderate &#8216;retread&#8217;, why don&#8217;t we try someone fresh, new, and actually conservative, for once?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cityonahillpolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/03/20/red-state-weekly-political-up-date-for-period-ending-march-20-2009/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>cityonahillpolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>From www.politickernj.com

Rasmussen poll puts Christie ahead of Corzine by 15, Lonegan leads 

There’s more bad news for Gov. Corzine in a Rasmussen poll released this afternoon.  

The poll, commissioned by the television station My9, shows the Governor’s reelection prospects at their weakest so far, and comes on the heels of two recent independent polls that show Corzine trailing former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie by nine points.  

Christie  is 15 points ahead of Corzine in the Rasmussen poll, 49% to 34%,  in a head-to-head match up, while Christie’s Republican rival, Steve Lonegan, leads Corzine by eight points, 43% to 35%.  

Corzine’s approval ratings are low in the poll, with the largest number of respondents – 42% -- strongly disapproving of his job performance.  Twenty-four percent of respondents “somewhat disapprove” of Corzine, while  24% “somewhat approve” and eight percent “strongly approve.”  

Corzine’s favorability ratings are also upside down, with 54% of respondents either having a “very unfavorable” or “somewhat unfavorable” view of the Governor.

Christie, by contrast, was seen favorably by 52% of respondents – 16% “very favorable” and 36% “somewhat favorable” – while Lonegan was seen favorably by 45%.  Twenty-four percent of those polled weren’t sure how they felt about Christie, while 34% weren’t sure about Lonegan.  

The poll showed Barack Obama remaining popular in New Jersey, however, with 59% approving and 41% disapproving of his performance so far. 

On the budget front, the public does not trust the Governor and state legislature to balance the state budget “in a manner that is good for New Jersey.”  Only 33% expressed confidence in that prospect, while 64% said they were not confident.

Rasmussen surveyed 500 likely voters on March 10 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5%.  

Seriously...if we actually have a shot at electing a Republican governor, that means 1 of 2 things:  either there will be a GOP landslide in the elections of the next few years or the state Democrats will find a way to assassinate or otherwise replace Corzine on the ballot right before the election to keep the seat safe for dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From www.politickernj.com</p>
<p>Rasmussen poll puts Christie ahead of Corzine by 15, Lonegan leads </p>
<p>There’s more bad news for Gov. Corzine in a Rasmussen poll released this afternoon.  </p>
<p>The poll, commissioned by the television station My9, shows the Governor’s reelection prospects at their weakest so far, and comes on the heels of two recent independent polls that show Corzine trailing former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie by nine points.  </p>
<p>Christie  is 15 points ahead of Corzine in the Rasmussen poll, 49% to 34%,  in a head-to-head match up, while Christie’s Republican rival, Steve Lonegan, leads Corzine by eight points, 43% to 35%.  </p>
<p>Corzine’s approval ratings are low in the poll, with the largest number of respondents – 42% &#8212; strongly disapproving of his job performance.  Twenty-four percent of respondents “somewhat disapprove” of Corzine, while  24% “somewhat approve” and eight percent “strongly approve.”  </p>
<p>Corzine’s favorability ratings are also upside down, with 54% of respondents either having a “very unfavorable” or “somewhat unfavorable” view of the Governor.</p>
<p>Christie, by contrast, was seen favorably by 52% of respondents – 16% “very favorable” and 36% “somewhat favorable” – while Lonegan was seen favorably by 45%.  Twenty-four percent of those polled weren’t sure how they felt about Christie, while 34% weren’t sure about Lonegan.  </p>
<p>The poll showed Barack Obama remaining popular in New Jersey, however, with 59% approving and 41% disapproving of his performance so far. </p>
<p>On the budget front, the public does not trust the Governor and state legislature to balance the state budget “in a manner that is good for New Jersey.”  Only 33% expressed confidence in that prospect, while 64% said they were not confident.</p>
<p>Rasmussen surveyed 500 likely voters on March 10 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5%.  </p>
<p>Seriously&#8230;if we actually have a shot at electing a Republican governor, that means 1 of 2 things:  either there will be a GOP landslide in the elections of the next few years or the state Democrats will find a way to assassinate or otherwise replace Corzine on the ballot right before the election to keep the seat safe for dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EagleWatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/2009/03/20/red-state-weekly-political-up-date-for-period-ending-march-20-2009/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>EagleWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jim_ellis/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Nice work guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

