Do todays polls mean the President is doomed? Read on and decide what your take is on the prophetic power of polls…..
Ronald Reagan, the nation’s 40th president, became one of the nation’s most revered public figures in recent years, a distinct turnabout from the more routinely average ratings he received while he served in office between 1981 and 1989. Reagan’s job approval ratings in his first years in office were hurt by the bad economy.
Things got worse for Reagan in 1982. The public’s view of the economy remained sour, and the president’s ratings during 1982 stayed concomitantly low, in the 40% range, ending the year at 41%. The 1982 midterm elections were not good ones for Reagan and for the GOP. The Republicans lost about 25 seats in the House.
A clear cause for all of this was the economy. Still, Gallup analysts at the time presciently noted that there was some cause for optimism for Reagan:
10/9/82
***Jobless Rate Is Up To 10.1% In Month. Worst In 42 Years. 11 Million Are Idle – The New York Times***
Throughout the year [1982] a solid majority of Gallup’s respondents have taken the position that Reaganomics will worsen, rather than improve, their own financial situation.
Yet, Gallup consistently has found somewhat more public faith that Reaganomics will help the nation as a whole and even more faith in the president’s program when the question is posed with regard to the long run.
Surveys also indicate that the public has more confidence in Reagan than approval ratings of his performance would suggest. While only one third approve of the way he is handling the economy, close to half express some degree of confidence that he will do the right thing with regard to the economy.
Indeed, although 1983 began for Reagan with a 35% job approval rating — the worst of his administration — things started to look better.
By 1984, Reagan’s job approval ratings were consistently above the 50% line that is a symbolic standard for an incumbent president seeking re-election. In Gallup’s last October poll before the November 1984 election, Reagan received a 58% job approval rating, and he went on to soundly defeat Democratic nominee Walter Mondale by a 59% to 41% popular vote margin, receiving 525 electoral votes to Mondale’s 13.
Reagan continued to soar in 1985, routinely receiving ratings in the 60% range. In May 1986, Reagan received a 68% job approval rating, tied for the highest of his administration.
Reagan’s last two Gallup job approval ratings before he left office were 57% in mid-November and 63% in December 1988.
The highest job approval rating of the Reagan administration was 68% — reached twice, in May 1981 and as previously indicated, in May 1986.
***As noted, the low point was 35% in January 1983.***
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
Obama is no Reagan
izoneguy (Diary) Wednesday, September 8th at 2:05PM EST (link)It is just laughable when all the leftys talk of a hard pivot to the economy & jobs…..LOL
Obama is a die hard Marxist who refuses to believe in the private sector. He will not do a pivot to let private industry create jobs.
He still believes that government is the only answer and refuses to believe that his policies have failed.
Americans are more freedom loving and hard working than Obama gives them credit for.
The ONLY way the economy will recover is to throw out Obama & his bums.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
Comrade Obama?
jgbennet (Diary) Wednesday, September 8th at 2:32PM EST (link)I’m a Goldwater Conservative so a small non invasive government is of course the way to go but what is all of this socialist talk when it comes to Obama?
I consider myself a thinker and not prone to propaganda.
To izoneguy….Who just made the Marxist comment on my post.
“The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts .
Thomas Jefferson: Diffusion of Knowledge Bill, 1779
I have looked high and low for proof of Obama being a Socialist and all I find are opinions that are not based on fact.
Here is some proof that is contrary to the socialist propaganda we all hear…
[Copyright Infringement Redacted - NS]
G'bye (nt)
Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, September 8th at 2:37PM EST (link)RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
Neil, I was going to have some more fun with this guy
izoneguy (Diary) Wednesday, September 8th at 5:49PM EST (link)But I see you booted him out….
Obama is a Marxist by his words & deeds.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
I tend to do that
Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, September 8th at 5:57PM EST (link)When somebody is here to portray Obama as the new Reagan, and defend him on substance, he doesn’t really have a role to play at this site.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
I agree - that is why I always say "Obama is no Reagan"
izoneguy (Diary) Wednesday, September 8th at 6:25PM EST (link)As much as the left holds Obama up as some savior – the evidence is that Obama is the same old tired leftist dressed up in a new suit.
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.