I have spent much time during the past few evenings helping my son study for his History test later in the week. As I worked with him through his studies, I found that his class is presenting a brand new version of History, a version that never occurred. While you can make a case for different interpretations of events that happened centuries ago, his text book and curriculum distorts events I saw with my own eyes.
The Book in question is published by McDougal Littell and is called World History Patterns of Interaction. My son’s test covers much of the period from the end of WWII through the 1980′s. It sets up the Cold War period with the mistaken explanation that both sides were aggressors. On page 983 it gives the politically correct, “both sides believed that they needed to stop the other side from extending its power.” What it should have said was that it was a battle between the Soviet side wanting to expand its communist philosophy across the world, and the west trying to prevent the takeover.”
The book also white-washes Castro’s Cuba. Page 985 says “Soviet aid to Cuba ended abruptly with the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1981. This dealt a crippling blow to the Cuban Economy.” There was no mention of the brutality of the Cuban regime, the fact that all opposition newspapers had been closed down, all radio and television stations were in state control, moderates, teachers and professors were purged, or the torture and inhumane treatment in Cuban prisons.
Perhaps the biggest rewriting of history was the discussion regarding the end of the Cold War. It talks about Nixon and detente, then BOOM on page 991,” fiercely anti-Communist U.S. president, Ronald Reagan took office in 1991. He continued to move away from detente. He increased defense spending, putting both economic and military pressure on the Soviets.”
And the result of Reagan’s policies? Tensions increased. That’s it! According to the text book, an increase in tensions were the only result of the evil Reagan’s polices. But never fear, because there arose a leader in the USSR who knew not the cold war. The book explains later on page 991 ...”a change in soviet leadership in 1985 brought a new policy toward the United States and the beginnings of a final thaw in the cold war.” Wow, look at that…out of the blue the USSR woke up and decided to play nice.
This explanation doesn’t mesh with history (or my eyes). I witnessed the peace-through-strength strategy executed by the Reagan Administration which drove the Soviet economy into the sewer. I saw Reagan announce what may be the greatest bluff in the history of man the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars). This initiative posed a technological challenge to the Soviet Union. The part we never told the Soviet Union (until President Obama blurted it out a few months ago) is that the technology posed a challenge to us also. But the prospect of Star Wars Technology scared the pants off the USSR, so did Reagan’s willingness to apply significant rhetorical and other pressures against the Soviet or as he called it, evil empire. This pressure was on top of the political pressure applied by a Pope born in Poland.
At a session of the Russian Politburo in October 1986 Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev tried to sell a groundbreaking disarmament plan including a 50 percent reduction in nuclear arsenals. If he didn’t propose these cuts, Gorbachev told his colleagues, the USSR’s weak economy could not keep up with Reagan’s military expansion.
[W]e will be pulled into an arms race that is beyond our capabilities, and we will lose it because we are at the limit of our capabilities. … If the new round [of an arms race] begins, the pressures on our economy will be unbelievable.
Pope John Paul II provided a moral focus with his constant anti-communist sermons; his visit to his native Poland in 1979 stimulated a religious and nationalist resurgence centered on the Solidarity movement that galvanized opposition.
Reagan imposed economic sanctions on Poland to protest the suppression of Solidarity. In response, Mikhail Suslov, the Kremlin’s top ideologist, advised Soviet leaders not to intervene if Poland fell under the control of Solidarity, for fear it might lead to heavy economic sanctions by the west, representing a further catastrophe for the Soviet economy. That “non-intervention” was the beginning of the slippery slope that lead to the easing of the communist oppression, and the fall the Soviet Union.
It is said that history is written by the victors, but in the case of Cold War history, it has been rewritten by the Progressives who want to indoctrinate our children to their inaccurate version of history.
Reagan’s Cold War Victory based on Peace Through Strength is a lesson that should be taught to our kids. Beyond being the true story of the collapse of the USSR, it is an example that should be followed by our present leadership as we fight a war against Islamic Terrorism.

Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
Russian tensions did increase when Reagan took office
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Friday, March 12th at 12:36AM EST (link)Would you be tense if you were facing Jimmy Carter?
I would be incredibly tense.
michael_j_lambert (Diary) Friday, March 12th at 12:59AM EST (link)Only in the “I’m suppressing laughter and don’t want to offend the kooky old man” sense, but I would still be tense.
Jeff- The worst part of that
Scope (Diary) Friday, March 12th at 7:49AM EST (link)would be if your son answered exam questions correctly and accurately, and not with the misinformation in the text, he would be marked wrong, and his grade would be lowered.
Answers
edintexas Friday, March 12th at 10:04AM EST (link)My degree program required 2 minors. Since I was married with 2 kids and working full time at night, I sought a relatively easy second minor – and found it in Sociology. I could take any test, or write any paper, with ease. I would determine what my answer would be, then write the opposite. Simple and effective. My GPA for Sociology courses was 4.0. Sad that we now have to teach our children (or Grandchildren in my case) lessons such as this. But it isn’t cheating to know the answer they want is wrong, and give it to them anyway.
Fox News Channel was covering this story (Reagan cheated out of his place in US history texts) this morning. But for the internet, AM radio and FNC we’d never hear any of these stories.
Another reason to homeschool
Fla Mom (Diary) Friday, March 12th at 8:17AM EST (link)You happened to discover this while helping your son prepare for one test out of one course out of many years of ‘schooling.’ My own experience was that since my parents didn’t really know the content of my education they didn’t know how it was opposite to their own beliefs in so many ways and so provided me with no counter-argument or context. Unless you are very involved with all of your son’s courses and also do ‘clean-up’ on past ‘education,’ the same could be true of him. It took me many years in adulthood to learn enough outside the formal education system to understand what my parents meant by so many of their comments. As a young person, I just thought they were somewhat silly and wrong, on these issues as on so many others, like what I should wear. Of course, over time as I got older, they ‘became’ a lot smarter.
Fla Mom
At this point is there any reason NOT to homeschool?
RoguePolitics (Diary) Friday, March 12th at 8:26AM EST (link)Or private school if you can afford it.
“So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.” George Orwell
“Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what’s going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?” Will Rogers
When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: Liberty, sir, was the primary object. Patrick Henry
http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com
Because the Republican Party is NOT going to fix the Republican Party.
http://americanamendment.com/
Because Washington is NOT going to fix Washington.
Sadly, it is true
daconia (Diary) Friday, March 12th at 6:28PM EST (link)I brought some books home from the library so my daughter could learn about Ronald Reagan. They were disgusting blasphemies. I taught her the truth myself, because I lived through that time and I know what he did for us. Though I never had the opportunity to meet him, I can say that I loved that man, the most remarkable President in my lifetime.
gh
Reagan - the giant
in_awe Saturday, March 13th at 3:12PM EST (link)Get a copy of “Reagan in His Own Hand” that traces back his speech writing from his days doing national tours representing GE. The book not only provides the fantastic insights into his political and moral development over decades, they show examples of his hand written speeches – blowing apart the liberal lies that he was just a talking puppet of speech writers.
Another fine book was written by a liberal skeptic of Reagan and the right’s devotion to him and his ideals. The author came away a Reagan fan. Douglas Brinkley’s “The Reagan Diaries”.
Buh?
Finrod (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 4:35AM EST (link)If my kids were being taught that crap, I’d go burn down the school. The USSR dissolved in 1989, not 1981; Ronald Reagan was elected in 1980 and took office in 1981, not 1991.
If they can’t even meet Wikipedia’s standards of accuracy, what good are they, other than as kindling?
Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?
Huh, I thought the USSR imploded via a coup in 1991
Richard Mullins (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 11:06PM EST (link)so they were still around in 1989, even thought the Berlin Wall was going down in November 1989. I think that these Textbook writers think that the parents are ignorant of History(how can you be when it was on TV). I think we just need to replace the History book with the correct history that is available. Otherwise, we have ignorant children.
Richard Phillip Mullins BlogThe Squash Satire SiteNews on Happy Jet Airlines
Rmullins Pics
Rpmullins Twitter
Joe Biden is like a Decrepit Park owner with a Meth lab that happens to not only be a dealer but a user.
Let’s Bankrupt the Democratic paty. Make spend all the money to defend thier candidates.
You're probably right
Finrod (Diary) Monday, March 15th at 10:54PM EST (link)My poor memory was still closer than the textbook, sadly, and I have a memory like a sieve.
Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?
we don't need new text books, we need old ones
Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 10:43PM EST (link)I purchased a set of the first edition Norton Anthology of American literature. It gives all the classic novelists, poets, and important writers. The new versions delete major Western Civ writers so they can ad cum baye yah lesbian, communist, native, orgy lovers lol.
But I have found that reality can be found by looking back 40 or even 20 years. It is like a new Renaissance. It is like the Italians who wanted to get out of the Dark Ages by looking back to Ancient Rome for the truth.
This country has changed because we have taught our young to change in a very warped way. We don’t need new text books, we need to dust off the old ones. Also, get rid of the NEA!
Molon Labe!
5 x 5. I wonder if students today still read "Man Without a Country"
David123 (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 10:51PM EST (link)It was about a man who cursed America and was banished to never see the United States or hear it spoken of again.
I hadn’t thought of that story in years but Rev Wright reminded me of it.
David123