<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Obama White House&#8217;s Self-Proclaimed &#8216;Viral Email&#8217; Violate Federal Law?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tallicedtea</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6899</link>
		<dc:creator>tallicedtea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6899</guid>
		<description>I started receiving unsolicited emails from Obama when I commented on his campaign website well before he was elected.  It was a non-supportive comment on an issue at the time.   I never signed up to receive emails, but suddenly started receiving them, and still do. 

So, I think this is his pattern of behavior, apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started receiving unsolicited emails from Obama when I commented on his campaign website well before he was elected.  It was a non-supportive comment on an issue at the time.   I never signed up to receive emails, but suddenly started receiving them, and still do. </p>
<p>So, I think this is his pattern of behavior, apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellisclarke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6897</link>
		<dc:creator>ellisclarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6897</guid>
		<description>A White House E-Mail-Gate! 

The biggest story since Watergate and news media like ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN etc. with their pro and biased Obama reporting are no where to be found or heard.

So, this Administration is attempting to shift the blame from the President and his un-elected czars to “third parties-unnamed”.  

Laws that the President was sworn to uphold, the privacy act of 1974 and The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988, have been broken by the illegal act of gathering and soliciting emails and conversations about information from one citizen concerning another American citizen relating to health care. 

Where are the voice and outrage from our elected Senators and Congress members. NOT a word spoken from them against this abuse of power and illegal act by the white house (snitch e-mails and a &quot;reality check&quot; section on the White House Web site). I guess they are still on vacation and hiding from the voters.

Time for Congress and the Senate to do their job of representing the people by holding hearings on the possible impeachment of this President for such illegal activities which are clearly in violation of the constitution. 

Where, at least, is the appointment of an independent prosecutor to investigate such abuse of power by the President and his administration. 

No one, including our President is above the law! Please help inform the American public, by forwarding this article to all your individual friends and news blogs etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A White House E-Mail-Gate! </p>
<p>The biggest story since Watergate and news media like ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN etc. with their pro and biased Obama reporting are no where to be found or heard.</p>
<p>So, this Administration is attempting to shift the blame from the President and his un-elected czars to “third parties-unnamed”.  </p>
<p>Laws that the President was sworn to uphold, the privacy act of 1974 and The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988, have been broken by the illegal act of gathering and soliciting emails and conversations about information from one citizen concerning another American citizen relating to health care. </p>
<p>Where are the voice and outrage from our elected Senators and Congress members. NOT a word spoken from them against this abuse of power and illegal act by the white house (snitch e-mails and a &#8220;reality check&#8221; section on the White House Web site). I guess they are still on vacation and hiding from the voters.</p>
<p>Time for Congress and the Senate to do their job of representing the people by holding hearings on the possible impeachment of this President for such illegal activities which are clearly in violation of the constitution. </p>
<p>Where, at least, is the appointment of an independent prosecutor to investigate such abuse of power by the President and his administration. </p>
<p>No one, including our President is above the law! Please help inform the American public, by forwarding this article to all your individual friends and news blogs etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livefreenh</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6896</link>
		<dc:creator>livefreenh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6896</guid>
		<description>The terms used in the phrase &quot;e-mails that fly unchecked and under the radar&quot; are of a military nature.

&quot;Fly unchecked&quot; implies that someone should be checking private emails between citizens.  Or do they want to treat our emails the same way they treat luggage at airports?  Examine the unchecked stuff also?

&quot;Under the radar&quot; implies that someone is doing something where he does not want to be detected by the government, for example, smuggling drugs or invading a country.

I remember in the former United States we used to have a First Amendment.  Emails were supposed to be un-checked.  And the government&#039;s radar was facing the ocean, not facing me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terms used in the phrase &#8220;e-mails that fly unchecked and under the radar&#8221; are of a military nature.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fly unchecked&#8221; implies that someone should be checking private emails between citizens.  Or do they want to treat our emails the same way they treat luggage at airports?  Examine the unchecked stuff also?</p>
<p>&#8220;Under the radar&#8221; implies that someone is doing something where he does not want to be detected by the government, for example, smuggling drugs or invading a country.</p>
<p>I remember in the former United States we used to have a First Amendment.  Emails were supposed to be un-checked.  And the government&#8217;s radar was facing the ocean, not facing me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dudette</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6895</link>
		<dc:creator>dudette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6895</guid>
		<description>What a great pic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great pic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellisclarke</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6894</link>
		<dc:creator>ellisclarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6894</guid>
		<description>What clearly can be labelled Un-American, while our Politicians take a vacation, is the news medias cover- up and non reporting on one of the most illegal activities of an American President since Richard Nixon. A little further investigation might undercover a campaign of political spying and sabotage against Americans, on behalf of the current Administration?


President Obama and his administrations illegal act of gathering and soliciting emails and conversations about information from one citizen concerning another American citizen concerning health care is breaking The 1974 privacy act and the Constitution.


Why have elected Senators and Congress members NOT spoken out against this abuse of power and illegal act by the white house (snitch e-mails and a &quot;reality check&quot; section on the White House Web site). 


Will this attempt against the people of America, to erode civil liberties, which has been orchestrated from the white house NOT be challenged in courts of Law? It is time for criminal charges to be laid in a court of law against Obama, his administration and his unelected gang of czars for these unconstitutional acts against the American people. 


As always the pro and biased Obama USA main stream media is no where to be found these days when it comes to reporting facts or informing the public about Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional acts. For them all criticism about Obama and his policies are labelled as racist! Yet, the only anti-white remarks are emanating directly from within the white house.


Time for Congress and the Senate to do their job of representing the people by holding hearings on the possible impeachment of this President for such illegal activities which are clearly in violation of the constitution; the 1974 privacy act and The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988. Where is the appointment of an independent prosecutor to investigate such abuse of power 


No one, including our President is above the law!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What clearly can be labelled Un-American, while our Politicians take a vacation, is the news medias cover- up and non reporting on one of the most illegal activities of an American President since Richard Nixon. A little further investigation might undercover a campaign of political spying and sabotage against Americans, on behalf of the current Administration?</p>
<p>President Obama and his administrations illegal act of gathering and soliciting emails and conversations about information from one citizen concerning another American citizen concerning health care is breaking The 1974 privacy act and the Constitution.</p>
<p>Why have elected Senators and Congress members NOT spoken out against this abuse of power and illegal act by the white house (snitch e-mails and a &#8220;reality check&#8221; section on the White House Web site). </p>
<p>Will this attempt against the people of America, to erode civil liberties, which has been orchestrated from the white house NOT be challenged in courts of Law? It is time for criminal charges to be laid in a court of law against Obama, his administration and his unelected gang of czars for these unconstitutional acts against the American people. </p>
<p>As always the pro and biased Obama USA main stream media is no where to be found these days when it comes to reporting facts or informing the public about Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional acts. For them all criticism about Obama and his policies are labelled as racist! Yet, the only anti-white remarks are emanating directly from within the white house.</p>
<p>Time for Congress and the Senate to do their job of representing the people by holding hearings on the possible impeachment of this President for such illegal activities which are clearly in violation of the constitution; the 1974 privacy act and The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988. Where is the appointment of an independent prosecutor to investigate such abuse of power </p>
<p>No one, including our President is above the law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoFiMil</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6892</link>
		<dc:creator>SoFiMil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6892</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know enough about computer technology, but did recall something several years ago about a cookie-issue and so did some quick checking. Hopefully there are readers out there that can add insight and comment whether this is related to individuals receiving unsolicited e-mails from the White House.

A June 22, 2000 memo (MM-00-13) re guidance issued on June 2, 1999: &quot;Because of the unique laws and traditions about government access to citizens&#039; personal information, the presumption should be that &quot;cookies&quot; will not be used at Federal web sites.&quot; 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda_m00-13/

http://blog.ostp.gov/2009/07/24/cookiepolicy/ (The original date of this posting appears to be /07/24/2009)

http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/opengov_inbox/ISPAB_Report_dc_w_lh.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know enough about computer technology, but did recall something several years ago about a cookie-issue and so did some quick checking. Hopefully there are readers out there that can add insight and comment whether this is related to individuals receiving unsolicited e-mails from the White House.</p>
<p>A June 22, 2000 memo (MM-00-13) re guidance issued on June 2, 1999: &#8220;Because of the unique laws and traditions about government access to citizens&#8217; personal information, the presumption should be that &#8220;cookies&#8221; will not be used at Federal web sites.&#8221; </p>
<p>http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda_m00-13/</p>
<p>http://blog.ostp.gov/2009/07/24/cookiepolicy/ (The original date of this posting appears to be /07/24/2009)</p>
<p>http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/opengov_inbox/ISPAB_Report_dc_w_lh.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redneck_hippie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>redneck_hippie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>of those receiving emails in order to &quot;check whether or not&quot; they are on the list. Then he puts words into Major Garret&#039;s mouth to the effect that Major Garret asked Gibbs whether or not the people who received emails are &quot;on the list.&quot;  Fancy dancing, but Major Garret did not state the people who received emails might be on a list. He clearly stated that they couldn&#039;t be on a list because they never requested any such thing.

Oops!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of those receiving emails in order to &#8220;check whether or not&#8221; they are on the list. Then he puts words into Major Garret&#8217;s mouth to the effect that Major Garret asked Gibbs whether or not the people who received emails are &#8220;on the list.&#8221;  Fancy dancing, but Major Garret did not state the people who received emails might be on a list. He clearly stated that they couldn&#8217;t be on a list because they never requested any such thing.</p>
<p>Oops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charliebravoNH</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>charliebravoNH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>Some how some where the White House put me on their distribution list. If you go to the White House website you will find it to pretty easy. I never signed up though. If you think of it, it is easy to sign up  some one else if you know their zip code. Below is the copy of the email I received from the White House.

&quot;The White House, Washington
  	
Good afternoon,

You are receiving this email because you signed up at WhiteHouse.gov. My staff and I plan to use these messages as a way to directly communicate about important issues and opportunities, and today I have some encouraging updates about health care reform.

The Vice President and I just met with leaders from the House of Representatives and received their commitment to pass a comprehensive health care reform bill by July 31.

We also have an unprecedented commitment from health care industry leaders, many of whom opposed health reform in the past. Monday, I met with some of these health care stakeholders, and they pledged to do their part to reduce the health care spending growth rate, saving more than two trillion dollars over the next ten years -- around $2,500 for each American family. Then on Tuesday, leaders from some of America&#039;s top companies came to the White House to showcase innovative ways to reduce health care costs by improving the health of their workers.

Now the House and Senate are beginning a critical debate that will determine the health of our nation&#039;s economy and its families. This process should be transparent and inclusive and its product must drive down costs, assure quality and affordable health care for everyone, and guarantee all of us a choice of doctors and plans.

Reforming health care should also involve you. Think of other people who may want to stay up to date on health care reform and other national issues and tell them to join us here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/EmailUpdates

Health care reform can&#039;t come soon enough. We spend more on health care than any country, but families continue to struggle with skyrocketing premiums and nearly 46 million are without insurance entirely. It is a priority for the American people and a pillar of the new foundation we are seeking to build for our economy.

We&#039;ll continue to keep you posted about this and other important issues.

Thank you,
Barack Obama

P.S. If you&#039;d like to get more in-depth information about health reform and how you can participate, be sure to visit http://www.HealthReform.gov.&quot;

This email was sent to (deleted by CharliebravoNH)
Unsubscribe &#124; Privacy Policy

The White House · 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW · Washington, DC 20500 · 202-456-1111</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some how some where the White House put me on their distribution list. If you go to the White House website you will find it to pretty easy. I never signed up though. If you think of it, it is easy to sign up  some one else if you know their zip code. Below is the copy of the email I received from the White House.</p>
<p>&#8220;The White House, Washington</p>
<p>Good afternoon,</p>
<p>You are receiving this email because you signed up at WhiteHouse.gov. My staff and I plan to use these messages as a way to directly communicate about important issues and opportunities, and today I have some encouraging updates about health care reform.</p>
<p>The Vice President and I just met with leaders from the House of Representatives and received their commitment to pass a comprehensive health care reform bill by July 31.</p>
<p>We also have an unprecedented commitment from health care industry leaders, many of whom opposed health reform in the past. Monday, I met with some of these health care stakeholders, and they pledged to do their part to reduce the health care spending growth rate, saving more than two trillion dollars over the next ten years &#8212; around $2,500 for each American family. Then on Tuesday, leaders from some of America&#8217;s top companies came to the White House to showcase innovative ways to reduce health care costs by improving the health of their workers.</p>
<p>Now the House and Senate are beginning a critical debate that will determine the health of our nation&#8217;s economy and its families. This process should be transparent and inclusive and its product must drive down costs, assure quality and affordable health care for everyone, and guarantee all of us a choice of doctors and plans.</p>
<p>Reforming health care should also involve you. Think of other people who may want to stay up to date on health care reform and other national issues and tell them to join us here:</p>
<p>http://www.whitehouse.gov/EmailUpdates</p>
<p>Health care reform can&#8217;t come soon enough. We spend more on health care than any country, but families continue to struggle with skyrocketing premiums and nearly 46 million are without insurance entirely. It is a priority for the American people and a pillar of the new foundation we are seeking to build for our economy.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll continue to keep you posted about this and other important issues.</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Barack Obama</p>
<p>P.S. If you&#8217;d like to get more in-depth information about health reform and how you can participate, be sure to visit http://www.HealthReform.gov.&#8221;</p>
<p>This email was sent to (deleted by CharliebravoNH)<br />
Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy</p>
<p>The White House · 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW · Washington, DC 20500 · 202-456-1111</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Apple Infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6887</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Apple Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6887</guid>
		<description>a picture of a fish to the flag@whitehouse.gov address.  They didn&#039;t get back to me for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a picture of a fish to the flag@whitehouse.gov address.  They didn&#8217;t get back to me for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gahazzah</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6886</link>
		<dc:creator>gahazzah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6886</guid>
		<description>The point of the Flag@WhiteHouse.gov was to find out who was spreading misinformation, the Axelrod emails are meant to combat said misinformation.

It seems like a somewhat obvious correlation. Maybe they compiled a list from forwards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of the Flag@WhiteHouse.gov was to find out who was spreading misinformation, the Axelrod emails are meant to combat said misinformation.</p>
<p>It seems like a somewhat obvious correlation. Maybe they compiled a list from forwards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie_in_Indiana</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6885</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie_in_Indiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6885</guid>
		<description>And I know for 100% fact I have never contacted this administration for anything. ..But I did send emails to Bush through comments@whitehouse.gov . this link sends you to another/replaced link. Suppose they are accessing all of the old comments email addresses ?  Possible ,ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I know for 100% fact I have never contacted this administration for anything. ..But I did send emails to Bush through comments@whitehouse.gov . this link sends you to another/replaced link. Suppose they are accessing all of the old comments email addresses ?  Possible ,ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Emanuel</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6884</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Emanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6884</guid>
		<description>And it contained just the last two lines of that footer

&lt;blockquote&gt;Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it contained just the last two lines of that footer</p>
<blockquote><p>Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House</p>
<p>The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: get2djnow</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6883</link>
		<dc:creator>get2djnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6883</guid>
		<description>NOTHING!  Because answering a question directly would have gotten his nipple in a ringer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTHING!  Because answering a question directly would have gotten his nipple in a ringer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tfunk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6882</link>
		<dc:creator>tfunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6882</guid>
		<description>If people signed up under a different administration, would they still be on the White House list?

Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people signed up under a different administration, would they still be on the White House list?</p>
<p>Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: potter</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6881</link>
		<dc:creator>potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6881</guid>
		<description>I just found the Axelrod email in my box.  They sent it at 7:15 pm on 8/13.  Like so many others, I DID NOT subscribe to anything from the White House.

 My copy has an unsubscribe option at the bottom which says:

This email was sent to blank@blank.net
Unsubscribe &#124; Privacy Policy
Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found the Axelrod email in my box.  They sent it at 7:15 pm on 8/13.  Like so many others, I DID NOT subscribe to anything from the White House.</p>
<p> My copy has an unsubscribe option at the bottom which says:</p>
<p>This email was sent to blank@blank.net<br />
Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy<br />
Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House</p>
<p>The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swamp_Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6880</link>
		<dc:creator>Swamp_Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6880</guid>
		<description>A significant other trying to give you a hint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A significant other trying to give you a hint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muffin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6879</link>
		<dc:creator>muffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6879</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6878</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6878</guid>
		<description>I do get a few of those every day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do get a few of those every day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tfunk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6877</link>
		<dc:creator>tfunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6877</guid>
		<description>...and I volunteered for the campaign for a year.

they must be sending them out to a different list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and I volunteered for the campaign for a year.</p>
<p>they must be sending them out to a different list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farstar99</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/08/14/does-the-obama-white-houses-self-proclaimed-viral-email-violate-federal-law/#comment-6876</link>
		<dc:creator>farstar99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=1148#comment-6876</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll sign up.
I caught one of their spam waves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll sign up.<br />
I caught one of their spam waves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

