<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the DCCC&#8217;s new anti-Rush ad is good for Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlSchurz</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlSchurz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Just bombing and air-raiding villages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bombing and air-raiding villages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack_Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack_Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>As of January 20th, it&#039;s a Law Enforcement Issue. Get it right or your buddies with torches and pitchforks will be knocking at your door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of January 20th, it&#8217;s a Law Enforcement Issue. Get it right or your buddies with torches and pitchforks will be knocking at your door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janis</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>that President George W. Bush once had ratings in the high 70&#039;s following that little 9/11 incident?  And his numbers were pretty high a couple of other times as well.  Your little tinhorn god&#039;s numbers will also sink when things don&#039;t go as his true believers think they ought to in the months to come.

As to not criticizing a president in time of war, when did your side EVER admit that we were at war?  Your bunch called it all sorts of things, but a legitimate war was never one of them.  And if you think that we are some vast echo chamber that blindly worshiped Bush no matter what he did, then you grossly uninformed.  Unlike the hive mentality on the left, we actually use our brains for reasoning purposes.

Try it sometime.  It might hurt at first, but it&#039;s positively exhilirating once you get the hang of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that President George W. Bush once had ratings in the high 70&#8242;s following that little 9/11 incident?  And his numbers were pretty high a couple of other times as well.  Your little tinhorn god&#8217;s numbers will also sink when things don&#8217;t go as his true believers think they ought to in the months to come.</p>
<p>As to not criticizing a president in time of war, when did your side EVER admit that we were at war?  Your bunch called it all sorts of things, but a legitimate war was never one of them.  And if you think that we are some vast echo chamber that blindly worshiped Bush no matter what he did, then you grossly uninformed.  Unlike the hive mentality on the left, we actually use our brains for reasoning purposes.</p>
<p>Try it sometime.  It might hurt at first, but it&#8217;s positively exhilirating once you get the hang of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlSchurz</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlSchurz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>If Bush said that, the Left would have a stroke.

When he said that, any doubt I had evaporated.

He is POTUS, not God King of the United States. He has no Divine Right to do as he pleases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bush said that, the Left would have a stroke.</p>
<p>When he said that, any doubt I had evaporated.</p>
<p>He is POTUS, not God King of the United States. He has no Divine Right to do as he pleases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DefendUSA</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>DefendUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>I sense that you haven&#039;t left your mother&#039;s basement, yet with the &quot;my President is more popular than yours was&quot; bs. 

Seriously, you have missed the whole point. That Obama has to call out an entertainer or utter the words &quot;I won&quot; is not even close to the bipartisan ship he said he would bring to the table. 
Here&#039;s a clue. Put on your rose-colored glasses and do not take them off for as long as Obama is President. The truth will hurt less. NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sense that you haven&#8217;t left your mother&#8217;s basement, yet with the &#8220;my President is more popular than yours was&#8221; bs. </p>
<p>Seriously, you have missed the whole point. That Obama has to call out an entertainer or utter the words &#8220;I won&#8221; is not even close to the bipartisan ship he said he would bring to the table.<br />
Here&#8217;s a clue. Put on your rose-colored glasses and do not take them off for as long as Obama is President. The truth will hurt less. NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, I &lt;I&gt;do&lt;/I&gt; ban one-handed typists who show up here and scream about our supposed sins in order to forget that they only believe in helping people when a Democrat can take credit for it.

So have a nice day, and enjoy watching the President betray every policy position that caused you to vote for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, I <i>do</i> ban one-handed typists who show up here and scream about our supposed sins in order to forget that they only believe in helping people when a Democrat can take credit for it.</p>
<p>So have a nice day, and enjoy watching the President betray every policy position that caused you to vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdrlib</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3068</link>
		<dc:creator>fdrlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3068</guid>
		<description>I truly didn&#039;t mean to post this twice; I don&#039;t know how that happened.  Sorry mods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly didn&#8217;t mean to post this twice; I don&#8217;t know how that happened.  Sorry mods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdrlib</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>fdrlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>but why not liberal/conservative??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but why not liberal/conservative??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>They are being addressed.  The problems should not persist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are being addressed.  The problems should not persist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdrlib</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>fdrlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>But I thought that attacking (or simply criticizing) the President during a time of war was considered unpatriotic in the Redstate circle.  How can a core value such as that change with the shifting of partisan winds?

In case you haven&#039;t noticed our President happens to be more popular than Rush Limbaugh ever was (and Reagan for that matter, who never came near Obama&#039;s approval rating), so it is good strategy to show moderates the type of unintelligible partisan hackery that Obama is up against.  

The American people will understand that bipartisanship is a two way street and certain factions on the right have developed an aversion to compromise. After getting their own way under GW for so long they think compromise (or concession) is only something that they force Democrats to do.  But now that their ideas have been rejected it&#039;s time that they get back to work and stop using their office as a test kitchen for their free-market utopian bs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I thought that attacking (or simply criticizing) the President during a time of war was considered unpatriotic in the Redstate circle.  How can a core value such as that change with the shifting of partisan winds?</p>
<p>In case you haven&#8217;t noticed our President happens to be more popular than Rush Limbaugh ever was (and Reagan for that matter, who never came near Obama&#8217;s approval rating), so it is good strategy to show moderates the type of unintelligible partisan hackery that Obama is up against.  </p>
<p>The American people will understand that bipartisanship is a two way street and certain factions on the right have developed an aversion to compromise. After getting their own way under GW for so long they think compromise (or concession) is only something that they force Democrats to do.  But now that their ideas have been rejected it&#8217;s time that they get back to work and stop using their office as a test kitchen for their free-market utopian bs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdrlib</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>fdrlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>But I thought that attacking (or simply criticizing) the President during a time of war was considered unpatriotic in the Redstate circle.  How can a core value such as that change with the shifting of partisan winds?

In case you haven&#039;t noticed our President happens to be more popular than Rush Limbaugh ever was (and Reagan for that matter, who never came near Obama&#039;s approval rating), so it is good strategy to show moderates the type of unintelligible partisan hackery that Obama is up against.  

The American people will understand that bipartisanship is a two way street and certain factions on the right have developed an aversion to compromise. After getting their own way under GW for so long they think compromise (or concession) is only something that they force Democrats to do.  But now that their ideas have been rejected it&#039;s time that they get back to work and stop using their office as a test kitchen for their free-market utopian bs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I thought that attacking (or simply criticizing) the President during a time of war was considered unpatriotic in the Redstate circle.  How can a core value such as that change with the shifting of partisan winds?</p>
<p>In case you haven&#8217;t noticed our President happens to be more popular than Rush Limbaugh ever was (and Reagan for that matter, who never came near Obama&#8217;s approval rating), so it is good strategy to show moderates the type of unintelligible partisan hackery that Obama is up against.  </p>
<p>The American people will understand that bipartisanship is a two way street and certain factions on the right have developed an aversion to compromise. After getting their own way under GW for so long they think compromise (or concession) is only something that they force Democrats to do.  But now that their ideas have been rejected it&#8217;s time that they get back to work and stop using their office as a test kitchen for their free-market utopian bs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlSchurz</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlSchurz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I gotta press refresh alot to get redstate where as other sites do not have that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I gotta press refresh alot to get redstate where as other sites do not have that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3061</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegas_Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3059</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegas_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3059</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegas_Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3060</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegas_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3060</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegas_Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegas_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3057</guid>
		<description>The GOP should be firing back with media ads explaining the conservative position and how it is a more realistic and effective way to get the economy moving again.

The dems operate in a vacuum. We need to fill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP should be firing back with media ads explaining the conservative position and how it is a more realistic and effective way to get the economy moving again.</p>
<p>The dems operate in a vacuum. We need to fill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegas_Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegas_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>The GOP should be firing back with media ads explaining the conservative position and how it is a more realistic and effective way to get the economy moving again.

The dems operate in a vacuum. We need to fill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP should be firing back with media ads explaining the conservative position and how it is a more realistic and effective way to get the economy moving again.</p>
<p>The dems operate in a vacuum. We need to fill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwarfmama</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>dwarfmama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>The DCCC is a PAC whose leadership is entirely composed of members of Congress. These members of Congress are campaigning to stifle the free speech rights of a private citizen, whether through intimidation or by whipping up public support for unConstitutional restrictions.

That point needs to be emphasized, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DCCC is a PAC whose leadership is entirely composed of members of Congress. These members of Congress are campaigning to stifle the free speech rights of a private citizen, whether through intimidation or by whipping up public support for unConstitutional restrictions.</p>
<p>That point needs to be emphasized, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekster</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>gekster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>Ive also explained his signature line to him, how it is a total contradiction of real liberals. Some people don&#039;t listen, and when they listen, don&#039;t learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive also explained his signature line to him, how it is a total contradiction of real liberals. Some people don&#8217;t listen, and when they listen, don&#8217;t learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalrepublican</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2009/01/29/why-the-dcccs-new-anti-rush-ad-is-good-for-republicans/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalrepublican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/?p=351#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>I am saying that I believe there was criminal activity on Wall St.

And that criminals should go to jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am saying that I believe there was criminal activity on Wall St.</p>
<p>And that criminals should go to jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

