That is why Barack is a tough opponent. If you try to debate him he just agrees with you and that becomes his position (not that he sticks with it). The media doesn’t call him on it either. Barack Obama does not have ideas he just promotes other peoples ideas (and he is apparently a good salesman). I am more confident today than yesterday that he really isn’t a leader. He is being lead by everyone else

With this type of a record what message is being sent to our future leaders. “Just avoid the issues lay low and you too can be President some day.” a Sad Sad Sad day for all of us!

This is the Standard Operating Procedure of the Democrat Party under Howard Dean and Rahm Emanuel: you develop a an official position once the answer is clear in the polls as to which answer you should politically, and not one moment before.

If it means you have to completely change your position from your previously stated positions, that’s OK. If you never had a previously stated position, that’s even better.

This is how Barack Obama got to be the Donk nominee for President under the stewardship of Joe Biden in the U.S. Senate.

The scary part is that half of the country and the majority of the rest of the world believes this is the way America should be run.

In 2004 Kerry would wait for Bush to take a position, then offer one diametrically opposed.
Now Obama waits to see what McCain says and presents the same position, only with lights and bells provided by the media.
If you can’t provide leadership, do whatever a real leader does and claim the glory.
Who does Boot Licker Barry actually represent?

http://minx.cc/?post=273925

on 60 mins. There goes attacking Democrats for causing the mortgage crisis. Awesome, Mac, put one of the guys in charge of oversight who was culpable for the mortgage meltdown.

that’ll be what everyone is saying by February 20th if he gets elected.

a certain Orifice is getting tighter & tighter & tighter

http://wizbangblog.com/content/2008/09/21/obama-yells-at-an-elderly-woman-questioning-him-about-national-security.php

While some may appreciate the shoot-from-the-hip style of governance that has led us into the current sorry state of our union, economically and otherwise, many of us appreciate the care and calm manner with which our future President, Barack Hussein Obama, has approached the current financial mess.

What we don’t appreciate is the misrepresentation here at Red-State that Senator Obama offers no plan. So for those who care, here is Obama’s seven-point plan for the protection of American taxpayers at this time of rush-to-judgment:

• No blank check. If we grant the Treasury broad authority to address the immediate crisis {…and that should be enough text to let anybody who actually cares find Obama’s talking points. Next time, kid: provide a link instead of astroturfing Democratic talking points. – Moe Lane}

at being asked so many questions first during the Democratic debates. It wasn’t that she was disproportionately put on the spot – she’s a pro and could discuss any issue (even if I don’t like her positions on it).

She resented the number of times Obama basically said, “Yeah, me too, I agree.” If you go back to the earlier primary debates with several participants, you will see how often he does just this. Ditto for this case, and the Russian invasion of Georgia, to name two off the top.

Democrats definitely contributed more to the financial crisis, though, especially Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. Republicans allowed it to happen, so they share responsibility, but it was Democrats who demanded the rules be changed to enable their deadbeat constituencies to qualify for mortgages.

Oh, and “reformer” Obama never lifted a finger to address the problem – other than to pocket more contributions from the GSEs than any other elected official, EVER – including helping John McCain when he first proposed reforming them in 2005.

O.K. Jeff, I’m calling for tightening your Red-State Security on this one. Barry and the Dems do not rate any such category that I spotted under this last volley, as “Pathetic-Girly-Men,” and a contingent of us pistol-packin’ Idaho Mothers would appreciate if you’d modify to something like, “Pathetic-Baby-Men” –(or perhaps “snivelling whiners,” she said with partial tongue in cheek). After all, the only “girl”–no REAL woman–in this race seems to have removed their collective “pairs,” wrapped them in the wreaking disposable diapers they came in wearing, while simultaneously (translation: multi-tasking) applying the blazing RED lipstick around her piercing smile, to prepare for the debate-hall lecturn!
What say you, category-swammy?

I’m trying to find out who it was from the Obama campaign that said this today (I think it was on CNN). When I heard it, my jaw dropped.

The chatterhead actually said that (a) Obama had a plan, but (b) did not release it on Friday as planned after a late-night call from Sec. Paulson.

What tripe!

 I'm very much looking forward to the debates. It should finally shed a light on Nobama's lack of ANY worthwhile experience to lead this country. Ever in the military? Nope. Ever Goverened? Nope. Ever been a CEO, or held any other high ranking position in a private company? Nope. Length of term in US Senate? 200 days!?  At which you voted 'Present' how many times?! What legislation have you authored? What have you done to bring 'Change' to the US Senate? Are you for real?! These are questions I want asked! (and answered) Problem is, that if you ask any questions the Obama's don't like, you're simply a racist! It's so easy! Why didn't I think of that?
 Also, let's ask Nobama about his relationship with unrepentant terrorist William Ayers. I'd like to see him stumble about how he was a guy who lived next door...
 This guy is a socialist plain and simple. America is heading down  slippery slope of more regulation, more taxes, less individual freedom, and lots and lots of handouts....God help us!