But these kind of statements vindicate his critics who claim he is a self- serving egomaniac.

“Whether he steps down today or I retire him in November , either way, he will not be the leader in 2011,” said Steele on NBC’s "Meet the Press."

C’mon! What in the heck would he have to do with a Reid defeat besides the allocation of some funds to the eventual Republican Candidate? None of us RedStaters are dumb,  we all know the answer. NOTHING!

The winning candidate and Reid himself (more then his eventual opponent) will be responsible for his ultimate demise. Not Michael Steele.

This statement more then anything he has done or said has ushered in the feeling that Steele is the wrong type of personality to be a Party Chair. He shows himself to be self absorbed and out for himself, not the Republican Party.

Hes not a bad guy and I hope god blesses him with health and prosperity, but I stand corrected on my previous stance that he was a decent choice for RNC Chair.

“It seems to be that we can forgive a 100-year-old senator for some of the indiscretion of his youth, but, what is more difficult to forgive is the current president of the U.S. Senate (Lott) suggesting we had been better off if we had followed a segregationist path in this country after all of the battles and fights for civil rights and all the work that we still have to do,” said Obama.”

I like most of you know that Obama’s Ivy League credentials do not afford him more ability, acumen or foresight then me or you. We also know that these experiences were much more likely to corrupt him into a brainwashed ideologue seeking to undermine the fabric of America from within. On the other hand, one would be inclined to think that somewhere in 7 or so years at Columbia University and Harvard Law he would have picked up the proper structure of the United States Senate, a body he would join 2 or so years later.

My question to you is does he know now?

PS: Imagine if the left ever had a quote from W. that misread the structure of the federal government. Gotta love the double standard.

I think as the Blue Dogs welcome their new colleague Congressman Owens and remind themselves that he’s the first Democrat to hold that seat in 140 years, since Ulysses S. Grant, and that he campaigned on the Obama program, they’ll have to say, ‘You know what, we’re onto something here if we stick with the program…

Unbelievable, I guess Obama has abandoned the Public Option, the Air Tax and now opposes his own stimulus package. From here on out, I guess we should consider the President a Blue Dog.

I really amazes me just how easy it is for this White House to distort obvious fact and flat-out lie to the American people who have entrusted them with the sacred Presidency of this great nation. In Axelrod’s eyes running against Obamacare and the stimulus while intentionally running to the right of the Republican nominee is running on the Obama program.

The reality – for those of us who don’t pride ourselves on being deceptive pathological liars- is that the only Democrat that won Tuesday was the only one that was not lockstep in line with the the Obama agenda.  Corzine and Thompson ran as if they had a Bat-Phone that ran directly to the Oval Office. While Deeds ran farther and farther left and kept falling farther and farther behind McDonnell. The more in line Deeds became with the Obama way the more points he ceded.

This kinda stuff really burns me up.

Iowa was a state President Bush won in 2004 by a narrow margin (approx. 10,000 votes). In 2008 President Obama won by almost ten percentage points( approx 140,000 votes) .

In his work, Mr. Zeleny  talks to many independent and alleged former Republicans who express the reality now faced by many  Obama supporters. That they were decieved into trusting a long ago radicalized community organizer as their President.

This is a reality has been known to the RedState Community since Obama announced his candidacy. The determination of this White House to socialize our health care system, tax the very air we breathe, destroy private enterprise not sympathetic to the Democrat agenda and the destruction  personal wealth- has allowed a much larger swath of Americans to accept this reality as well.

As Mr. Zeleny reports, Iowa, a state many thought Obama had turned permantley blue, now expresses a large level of concern for the direction of our nation under the leadership of this President.

Throughout his writing he cites an interview with a 76 year old former Republican activist who switched parties because she was bemused with the charm and new style of politics that Mr. Obama  promised.  She even opened her home to a couple of activist liberal college students to help elect this compelling community organizer from Chicago, Illinois by way of Hawaii and Kenya get elected President of the United States.

Predictably after she expressed her frustration with the administration the reporter for the esteemed and always forthright Times cited the following supporters whom are still lockstep in support of the President and his fascist agenda:

Yet a laid-off factory worker who returned to school for a degree said Mr. Obama’s support for a new economy had changed his thinking. A public relations executive who changed parties to support Mr. Obama says he saved the nation from fiscal collapse. And a nurse who believes Mr. Obama could be a transformative president, because of health care and other issues, worries that the vitriol could endanger his life.

Notice that these alleged supporters of the President have not revealed their identities. I think we all know why. In a state where 829,940 people voted for the President, this “reporter” couldn’t find 3 or 4 Obama supporters who could give him attributable evidence that they voted for and continue to support the most  radical elements of the Presidents agenda.

I wonder why?