By: Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/
They’re considered a minority in the United States, composing a rapidly growing sub-set of the population. The majority are immigrants; public sentiment, aroused by nativism, is sometimes hostile towards them. They vote heavily Democratic, but because many are immigrants they turn-out in numbers not as great as the share of the population they compose.
I’m not talking about Latinos. I’m talking about white Catholics in the early 20th century.
Today, Democrats hope that the Latino vote will be an essential part of a permanent majority, the keys to an unyielding period of Democratic dominance. Latinos were a major part of Obama’s victory in states such as Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado. They’ve turned California blue for the foreseeable future. Red states Arizona and Texas are home to millions of Latinos, who represent a threat to the Republican character of those two states. Opportunity beckons.
Or so it seems.
In reality, however, it seems that the path of the Latino vote is the same as that of the white Catholic vote. The more Catholics that entered the country and the more time that passed, the more assimilated they became. In the early 20th century, Catholics were seen as an “other,” as Italian and Irish immigrants not fully part of the Unite States. Today, however, such sentiment is long gone. We regard white Catholics as normal, dull. The days of anti-Catholic discrimination are long gone.
With it has disappeared the Democratic hold over the Catholic vote. JFK won nearly 80% of Catholics because he was Catholic, and because in that time there was still anti-Catholic sentiment. 40 years later, John Kerry lost the Catholic vote, despite being a Catholic.
Will Latinos follow the same path? It seems likely. A large part of what connects Latinos to the Democratic Party is that they are an immigrant community – and Democrats have always represented immigrants. If – when – they assimilate, and the word Latino becomes just another synonym for white, Latinos will behave much as white Catholics do today. Which is to say that they will vote no different from the rest of America.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Meet The LAU
BigGator5 (Diary) Friday, September 3rd at 11:20PM EST (link)Latinos And Americans United
Educated (About The Issues Facing Us Today), Dedicated (To Making A Difference), And Highly Motivated (To Getting Things Done)

hallejahuh
lukematthews (Diary) Saturday, September 4th at 1:09AM EST (link)sing it to me brother. It is absurd for the left to presume that leftists have some kind of lock on those who are looking for freedom as the seek to restrict it. It is indeed the groups who enter and seek freedom who are the most cognisant of its importance.
Welcome to freedom.
Also
zornorph Saturday, September 4th at 3:54AM EST (link)With leaders like Rubio and Sandavol, that will be a big help as well.
It's started already in Texas and New Mexico
scarlos (Diary) Saturday, September 4th at 8:08PM EST (link)Democrats used to get 75-80% of the Hispanic vote in Texas during the 70s and 80s, but now Obama was only able to get 63% in a high-water-mark election for the Democrats.
Also, New Mexico is interesting in the sense that close to 90% of the State’s Hispanics are US-born, and they are also considerably more Conservative than the average.
Socialism is Oligarchy in disguise
In the Valley, that populous strip along the Rio Grande
cactusjack Saturday, September 4th at 8:32PM EST (link)in Texas on the border, and in South Texas in general – I was there at the time – many Hispanics were very, very disappointed that the Dem party went with Obama. They figured for years of loyal support it was “their” turn, or, at least their preferred candidate (Hillary;s) turn. Lot of unhappy campers, yes sir. And the stereotype of the Valley being full of immigrants or beholden to the Dems for traditional program assistance, is dead wrong. Guess what, the last three years, South Texas was a certifiable boom area, there was virtually no recession there, it was one of the top SMSAs for chain retail activity and new business relocation. The Tejano has been there in some instances for three centuries. The trick is respecting that, and figuring out how to appeal to the Tejano’s innate family culture, to get him to vote R. Or, the *beautiful* Tejanas. (Yes, Eva Longoria, Demi Lovato and Selena Gomez are all very easy on this gringo’s eyes. )
Yes, it's quite interesting
inoljt (Diary) Sunday, September 5th at 9:38PM EST (link)especially when comparing Texas with California. The Hispanic vote in California is much more Democratic (I think Obama won 74% of it).
I’m actually not sure why this happens; I think it might have something to do with the liberal/conservative political environment of each state influencing the Hispanic electorate.
A quite interesting subject, to be sure.
http://mypolitikal.com/