Now, This Is Guaranteed To Confuse A Lot Of Leftists…


Muslim Guy Vs Gay Guy.  Who’s side the liberals will take?

A newspaper from Seattle reports:

“Anti gay attack in Seattle. Attacker claimed homosexuality “against his religion”

By LEVI PULKKINEN

Prosecutors have filed hate crime charges against an 18-year-old Seattle man accused of accosting another man on a Metro bus while yelling anti-gay slurs.

Abiazzizi I. Idris has been charged with second-degree attempted robbery and malicious harassment, the state’s hate crime statute, in the March 10 attack.

In court documents, police claim Idris was riding on a Metro coach near the 9000 block of Rainier Avenue South when he slapped the man in the back of the head. He then allegedly asked, using a slur, if he was homosexual.

The man disembarked the bus moments later, followed by Idris and an associate. Police say Idris again approached him, telling the man that homosexuality violates his religion.

Confronted by Idris, the man again said he was not gay. Idris then, police assert, “grabbed the victim around his neck and said ‘Give me $10 and your cell phone and I’ll let you go.’”

The owner of a nearby grocery store spotted the altercation and phoned 911. Police arrived and arrested Idris, who was later identified as the assailant, according to prosecutor’s statements.

Idris remains in King County Jail on $50,000 bail. He has not entered a plea in the case.

The victim’s sexual orientation is not noted in court documents. Under state law, malicious harassment occurs when a defendant threatens someone based on their perception of their sexual orientation or other factor.”

Let’s see…You have a Muslim man (according to liberals, Islam is a peaceful and tolerant religion) attacking a homosexual. Why? Because he claims his religion is feeling violated by the victims sexual preferences.
Now what’s the politically correct approach a liberal should take on this issue?

On one side, equal rights and non-discrimination against gay people is a favorite cause of the left. A poor gay guy beaten and robbed because he is gay is a sure case of outrage and condemnation, and not only for the left but for every civilized individual.

On the other side, how can a leftist say a Muslim beat a homosexual? We all know Islam is a religion of tolerance, pink bunnies, etc and it is grossly misunderstood by evil people (mostly conservatives of course). Even if the agressor admitted he did it because of the teachings of his religion, it still must be a cultural thing, nothing to do with Islam whatsoever. And anyway who are we Americans to judge other peoples cultures?

So you see, here is the dilemma: are the leftists gonna side with the homosexual victim or with the Muslim aggressor? Because both causes are dear to the liberals, the rights of the homosexuals and the claim that Islam is a peaceful, non violent religion. What are they gonna do? Gee, I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.


Category: , , ,

RSS feed

5 Comments Leave a comment

Sounds like the perp was a thug first, and being a muslim was just an excuse......

larueladue (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 1:56PM EST (link)

Not wanting to pick sides here, though….

 

Sadly enough, there's always away.

RJD (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 2:05PM EST (link)

Liberals will find away to make Idris some sort of victim of right-wing theology or he will be mentally handicapped (which is actually a favorite lefty out for this sort of thing – see UNC student drives Jeep through cafe).

 

Well, there are many other stories in the European media...

incitatus (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 2:06PM EST (link)

…about homosexuals living in Denmark, Netherlands, France, Sweden or England who were beaten, stabbed or even killed by people with names like Hussein, Aziz, Muhammad or Ali. I am absolutely there is no relationship whatsoever between the religion of the perpetrators and their violent acts against gay people ;)

 

They'll find a PC way around it.

Steph C (Diary) Friday, March 27th at 8:39PM EST (link)

Nevermind that P.C. ties just about everybody up in knots trying to remember all the rules.

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

 

This is an easy one....

harpsichord (Diary) Saturday, March 28th at 6:17PM EST (link)

Let’s see…..

1. The Islamists might kill me for insulting them
2. The gays will make me cookies.

I’ll go with the islamists, and start a pot of coffee to dunk the cookies in.