Gandhi was a great man of peace, but India developed nukes anyway just in case their enemies weren’t into Gandhi.

digs a grave for America. I haven’t sorted all of this out yet, but the question arises, how many of our nuclear secrets are going to be revealed in these kinds of moves. Perhaps not only the nuclear issues, but any other American defenses we might have.

An Alpha leader this guy isn’t, the rest of the world is just watching and waiting to move in for the kill.

Wilson and the League of Nations

Chamberlain and his super-air-tight-can’t-be-broken treaty of peace

etc.

Well, here is a student of Saul Alinsky, Che Guevara, Hugo Chavez, Vin Jones, the Rev. Mr. Wright, Bill Ayers, and so on and so forth sitting in the chair of the President of the United States of America. A “post-modern” man who has no known history. Raised and financed by the far left of our political spectrum.

What did you expect? That he really was going to be a center-leftist just because he said so on the campaign trail? You are kidding, right?

We have a narcissist who has no one providing any control whatsoever. It can not end well, not for him and not for us.

One of these days we are going to find deep cuts in Department of Defense budgets. Maybe the moth-balling of all of our Ohio class missile subs, including those for Tomahawks as well as the Tridents. Perhaps we won’t maintain any more of our carriers. Stop the production of the F-35 [the F-22 is toast already.] Cut a couple of divisions from the Army and one from the Marines.

Then look for the establishment of a “home defense force.” If that happens, you better already had thought out how you want to defend yourself and your family.

There is a great piece by Victor Davis Hanson over at pajamasmedia that you might want to look at.

I have seen government OF THE PEOPLE become GOVERNMENT OF the people.

I have seen American liberties trampled upon by a malicious, malignant, tyrannical, ideologically rigid oligarchy.

I have also seen that oligarchy, with its drones and propagandist sneer at, ridicule and insult the overwhelming majority of the American people.

I have seen the government acquire private sector industries in the name of economic stability.

I have seen immorality elevated to a virtue.

I have seen the government force the people, with the stroke of a pen, to pay for millions of abortions against their will, and in violation of long-standing statute.

I have seen the representatives of the people of the United States alienate and insult our allies throughout the world while simultaneously sycophantically fawning over and appeasing regimes and rogue nations who daily announce their desire for our destruction.

Today, I have seen the President of the United States, (a man so drunk with power and so enamored with himself that I am surprised he does not ejaculate at the sound of his own voice,) announce that we will not retaliate with decisive and terrible destruction even in the case of a chemical or biological attack.

And we, who object, are called radicals.

Is this still my country? Is it yours? Have we gone too far to restore America’s singular greatness? Will we be allowed to try?

“Fight and win the nation’s wars” is just rhetoric meant to satisfy Americans interested in a strong defense.

WhatAmerican wants to feel vulnerable when there are rogue nations honing their nukes while we ditch ours?

But he has these missions — including Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc. — where the military is regalated to babysitter while those ROE’s keep getting modified to keep troops’ hands tied behind their backs.

And, as far as I’m concerned, his Defense page is at odds with the new war doctrine he unveiled in March:

1. “Military power should not, maybe cannot, be the last resort of the state.”

2. “To the maximum extent possible, force should be applied in a precise and principled way.”

3. “In the very dynamic security environment we find ourselves in — we should welcome a constant struggle between policy and strategy.”

Number 1 isn’t what you’re thinking. Does he want troops in conflict areas as a possible “first resort”? Sure he does. Before conflict begins, as peacekeepers, much the way it’s being done in Haiti and in the Afghan ‘war” with restrictive ROEs.

More soft power, diplomacy, regotiating and working through “partners.”

Notice how the UN isn’t even mentioned on Obama’s defense page. And they were the ones who raised the biggest ruckus over Bush’s “goin’ cowboy” and his Iraq invasion and subsequent “occupation.”

That dithering last year was because he and his administration were working “back and through” the proper channels — meaning the UN. The internet is laced with articles about the UN trying to send their peacekeepers into Afghanistan, but they kept getting blown to bits until Obama finally made up his freaking mind in December to send in the “surge” in fits and starts.

Now the UN has a presence there, but are they mentioned? No. Because the UN represents multilateralism and diffused decision-making, where Afghanistan is supposed to be “Obama’s War.”

Freaking liars, the lot of them, beginning with Obama.

Again — he wants the military to become osolete. And the way to achieve this is by not having any wars. So, you pacify and peacekeep and have boots on the ground before there’s a need for a strong military.

Take a look at Haiti. How many troops do we have out there?

Right — they’re waiting for the next riot.

No way he’ll bring them back, anyway. It’d boost those unemployment numbers.

Don’t believe the farce!

Dave, thanks for posting this.

My apologies for rambling. It’s tough to take what’s happening to our country.

…yet another Homer Simpson moment from POTUS.

Turkey.

You know……. Istanbul, not Constantinople……. Don’t get ‘em mad because they really are warriors…….. Goin’ more and more hardline on Israel by the day……….

That Turkey.

==========

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/me_turkey0284_04_06.asp

Turkey was said to harbor up to 100 U.S. nuclear weapons as part of NATO. But the warheads were long believed to have been based at the Turkish air base at Incirlik rather than Istanbul, the largest city in Turkey.

Baytok said some of the tactical weapons were located in Istanbul while others were in cities near the Black Sea. He defined tactical weapons as those designed to strike former Warsaw Pact states in Europe.

===========

Nukes go in the silo. Keys go in the launcher. Muslims at the launcher. Our nukes…….. Farewell and adieu to you, fair American ladies. Farewell and adieu, you ladies of America. For we’ve received orders for to sail into Hell. And so nevermore shall we see you again.

Yikes – too long for comments? Instead, I put it over in the Diaries.

Since I can’t post profanity, insert your favorite in the title.

I’m not done. There will be a diary about the decline of our armed forces.

He’s Woodrow II.

Jr. is following big daddy’s footsteps; and you know where those lead.

Put on your leather helmet and dig that foxhole.

. . . when it bends over like that, one can almost see the yellow streak on its back.