The moment in history from which our so-called “Tea Party” movement of today takes its name was a singular event; refusing to pay Parliament’s levy on tea (because doing so would be to acknowledge Britain’s authority to tax the Colonies) was the Colonists’ way of standing up against the tyranny of a King and his Parliament. It was a symbolic gesture on the part of a “handful” of people to lay claim to “control” over their own lives and destiny, and not allow a few men on the other side of the Atlantic to determine if for them. The “standing up” part is where the parallels with our modern-day Tea Party(s) can be drawn, and where the similarities end.
Today’s movement, be it of the Express variety or the Patriot one, more reflects a rejection of the Government by which we are already represented and for which our disdain has reached a point of no return. The Tea Party of today symbolizes the complete lack of trust many Americans now have in their Government and its leaders, and the collective unwillingness of its membership to sit quietly by about it any longer. This is not a Democrat or Republican truth, it is an American one, and for the moment at least, the Tea Party’s purity of intention remains intact.
This Tea Party “movement” has garnered a great deal of attention from Politicians and Media alike, and this serves its organizers and “Party” membership well-they are doing their jobs admirably. You know you’re making an impact when you are ridiculed and marginalized; especially so when aspirants and has-beens, alike, want to sit on your shoulders and lay claim to your message. And as much as I, personally, more closely align myself with the Patriot flavor of Tea, I am troubled by where the movement now finds itself in contrast with where it appeared to be headed not so many months ago.
More and more, the Tea Party movement is becoming a rallying cry for a third party in the political landscape or is being looked at as the blunt-force trauma instrument to be used as a tool for punishing (replacing) the Republican party (rather than punishing the failed leadership of ALL of our elected officials in Washington, Republican and Democrat alike). Conservatives are increasingly associating themselves with it as a response to feeling abandoned by the GOP through its sponsorship and support of increasing numbers of “moderates” or “Progressive Republicans”, or – gasp – RINOs. Folks that feel betrayed by having only Obama or McCain to choose from in ’08, and feeling the need for a shower after having pulled the lever for McCain, see the Tea Party(s) as the path to follow in order to abandon their own significance, meaning, and impact with our Political Heroes in Washington… and feel good about it.
I suggest that hiding within and behind a movement that represents everything you believe in, while ensuring even less say in how you are governed (as the smallest of what would be three), will give you everything you asked for and none of what you wanted.
An article in the Washington Post unwittingly brings this conundrum to light:
“The tea party movement has grown out of a sense of frustration about government here in Washington,” senior adviser David Axelrod said Friday in an interview that will air Sunday on C-SPAN. “It’s not isolated to Democrats or Republicans. . . . There is a sense that this town is consumed by politics, that people are consumed by their own ambitions and that we’re not dealing with the real problems.”
It should be lost on no one that Axelrod is a Democrat. To his credit, Axelrod recognizes the growing dissatisfaction Americans have with how their Government is managing itself…and the lives of those they are paid (by us) to serve. What Axelrod also sees is an opportunity to keep the Democrats in power while promising to address the issues and complaints of the Tea Party…legitimizing them while marginalizing them…and keeping the Democrats’ hold on power as they pat the Tea Partiers on the head.
The bad news here is that the Democrats, and the Republicans hoping to co-opt the growing relevance of the Tea Party movement, are seeking to hold (or acquire) power – ostensibly – through it, and the Tea Party movements are becoming unwitting accomplices so long as they direct their energies toward displacing someone else’s power with their own rather than focusing on un-doing the things that got the country where it is today in the first place.
Washington is all about power…who has it and who wants it. The strength of the Tea Party has been its ability to communicate their dissatisfaction with Government. When they become another party in a long line of parties, they become part of the problem, not part of the solution. The ideal next step for the Tea Party movement is for them to grow their ranks…not only with more Republicans, Conservatives, and Independents…but with Democrats as well. Whether the strength of their convictions lies in taking back control of their country, or in assuming power over it, remains to be seen.
Should the “Tea Party” movement ever become another Political party fighting over scraps and crumbs from the table of power they will eventually become just another part of the problem…and they will have destroyed the last vestiges of what the “idea” of the Tea Party was at its origins.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
This has been my fear
bigmaude Saturday, February 6th at 7:25PM EST (link)about Sarah palin. The people that are following her have the same messianic view of her as the folk who still worship at the Obama alter. Sorry folks, but not that impressed with her. Haystack is right on the money about all of this Tea Party stuff. I was at one on April 15th and wondered what would happen to it. I fear it has been hijacked. I do hope I am wrong.
Sarah is getting $100,000 for a speech tonight
The_Rebel (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 7:31PM EST (link)at their national convention. And the admission price is $350 a head. I know every movement needs funding, but how long before we see the $5,000 and $10,000 a plate dinners?
Sometimes those high-priced dinners are real productive networking events.
ReaganLives Saturday, February 6th at 9:21PM EST (link)I know they do exclude a lot of people who can’t afford to go, but on the upside, they attract people who have the connections, resources and commitment to fuel the movement.
I’d like to think that the people who can afford the thousand-dollar dinners are the business owners and entrepreneurs that drive the conservative movement with discounts or donations of venues, marketing materials (signs and brochures etc.) and connections to even bigger fish. So, in a way, we all benefit, even if we can’t go.
I just hope there continues to be a mix of all kinds of events so there’s something for everyone.
How can a president not be an actor?
- Ronald Reagan
Reagan Lives Blog
Whatever you may think of Palin, the $100,000
realskinny (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 9:58PM EST (link)is going back into the movement to support conservative candidates—not into Palin’s pocket.
I don't believe the Tea Party have paid ACORNies running around fainting at function like obama has and does. Give it a chance, I don't hear 3rd party except out of anybody except D's and R's that want to marginalize it.
bobojake (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 7:36PM EST (link)We have to have all the fire power we can to stop obama, his party of N0-N0-ACOUNTIBILITY democrats and his lying machine the next 9 months.
Exactly.
philbo Saturday, February 6th at 9:50PM EST (link)In fact, the only people I hear disparaging 3rd party talk are the RINOs who insist on calling us Tea Party activists “tea baggers”.
I believe that a new party is inevitable and we are closer than many people think when the GOP is polling behind the Tea Party (52%) and Democratic Party (30%?). Nevertheless, 2010 has to be the year we brought both parties to their knees and purged the GOP of the leadership that wrought the 2006 and 2008 disasters. These guys have to go. If they don’t, the GOP will be in very deep trouble in 2012.
Pasadena Phil
Well, philbo, I guess you're calling me a RINO then, huh?
Dave Poff (haystack) (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 10:38PM EST (link)and each of the FP contributors here at RS who believes a third party, especially at this time, only serves to ensure that the Dems retain power in the midterms.
That, or you aren’t paying attention to what this post says (I think pretty clearly) about what purpose the Tea Party(s) should continue to serve in America for many years to come.
We don’t need more parties, we need more every-day Americans standing up and speaking out about the whole of the epic failure of Government and it’s poor governance. We already have enough parties that focus on which party sucks less than the other(s). Tea Parties are taking control of the discussion. They are getting people energized, and getting them to pay attention, call their representatives and vote their consciences…and like Cold Warrior and others…get into committee positions or elected office.
It feels good to be part of something new and exciting, but if it guarantees your ideology is listened to even LESS, then you haven’t accomplished much have you…except to make a really good point that less people are listening to you make.
“It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
~Sam Adams
Which rinos are calling us tea-b's?
gekster (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:39PM EST (link)Asking nicely, who are they?
They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.
We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway
Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved
Third parties are the abyss
renny (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:17AM EST (link)See the Bull Moose Party, the Wallace run in ’48, and the famous Perot shots in ’92 and ’96–they all simply siphoned from one end of the pol. spectrum and allowed the lesser party (Dem. or Rep.) to win. Because of Perot, Clinton won twice with 43% of the vote.
The “tea parties” may subsume the Reps., but there should be NO third party called Tea.
Practically, third parties rarely have the legal power and manpower to qualify and cover all ballots on all levels for all elections. They also do not have the candidate stable. Backing an existing party that is ballot-ready in local, state, and fed. elections is the pragmatic solution to tea party aspirations, now.
Axelrod and the Dems. have misread the tea parties twice: once as rabble (teabaggers) and secondly as “populist” (O’s attack the banks and business revealing the idiot White House response). Tea parties are non-structured, but not mobs, and whatever populism is in tea parties, it has nothing to do with class envy of the proletariat rising up against capitalist pigs.
Tea parties see gov’t as THE PROBLEM and changing representatives as the solution, not revolution that destroys entire institutions, which is what the left attempts.
When 80 year olds take to the streets alongside mothers with three pre-school children, the country has a force it has not dealt with before, and neither pols. not pundits have comprehended it yet.
Philbo, 3rd parties are a loser's game.
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:43AM EST (link)They serve only to siphon votes away from the party that most matches their stated philosphy which guaratees a win for the party which is LEAST to your liking.
It was Ross Perot’s 3rd party that guaranteed us the 8 years of Bill Clinton that we suffered through.
And if you want to call Abraham Lincoln a Rino, go ahead. He was always the first to make disparaging remarks about 3rd parties.
No, 3rd parties aren’t the answer. If you want to make a political change, the way to do it is to take over one of the existing parties. From the ground up. At the precinct committeeman level.
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
Agree on all points except Sarah
philbo Saturday, February 6th at 9:57PM EST (link)If she is determined to campaign for John McCain next month, she doesn’t get it and may be suffering from the same narcissism as Obama where she is the exception that can defy the rules. McCain is the very architect of everything us Tea Party people are angry about. If she feels duty bound from a naive sense of gratitude to McCain for making her famous, she doesn’t get the point. It doesn’t matter that she voices our opinions convincingly. She can’t hug the devil himself right out of the gates. We have enough partly-pregnant, sometimes honest politicians around already. At least maintain the charade long enough to get into the race. She wrote a book then endorsed McCain. Why should we believe that she is “the one” except this time, a conservative “the one”?
Pasadena Phil
Why can't you people get off Palin.
realskinny (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 10:19PM EST (link)This isn’t about Palin. Putting Pelosi and Reid out of power is the most important thing in THIS election. The tea Party people should be going into every state and CD and organizing to find and support the best conservative small government candidates and work to nominate them in BOTH parties. Move into party positions, collect money and then support the most conservative candidate in the general election. Going forward both parties must be pushed back to respecting the Constitution. Wouldn’t it be great if both Dem. and Rep. candidates were competing as to which could shrink government and cut spending the most?
The 20 % of the populace who favor totalitarian government should be the ones feeling unrepresented and talking about a self-defeating third party. If the government can be chained down by the Constitution, Corruption will take care of itself. Lobbyists will not come asking for favors if there are no favors to be had. There will be little to steal when budgets are small.
5. Well said. [nt]
Bill S (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 10:44PM EST (link)“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
DItto fives!
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:03PM EST (link)We have a chance to inject a critical mass of small-govt champions into Congress and into state legislatures this fall. A force that will have impact for years. Perhaps even forcing the RINOs to follow along.
The Presidential election is a LONG, LONG way off. Defending America from Big Govt RIGHT NOW is more important than the leader we’ll choose in 2010. Especially since some of the 2012 choices, those making an impact today, have yet to emerge as viable candidates.
Meant the leader we'll choose in 2012
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:03PM EST (link)nt
I heart you realskinny
Dave Poff (haystack) (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:21PM EST (link).
“It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
~Sam Adams
Maybe she can show him the "light" and he does become conservative.
gekster (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:44PM EST (link)You don.t know her motives.
and also;
you say:
“Why should we believe that she is “the one” except this time, a conservative “the one”?”
Who believes that she is the “one”.
They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.
We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway
Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved
Don't count on it, geks nt
aesthete (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 3:15AM EST (link)The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
Who are you to determine who campaigns for whom?
renny (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:31AM EST (link)Palin’s campaigning for McCain because he recognized her as a force ready for the national level, and if Mac hadn’t tapped her to run as his veep, you likely wouldn’t know who the h*ll she is. There is still personal honor and obligation involved in relationships despite purity of blogger politics.
Personal relations and friendships still function.
And if you look up Mac’s life-long ACU ratings, they run from 72-83, not LIBERAL by any means. He did not vote for the 2003 Bush tax cuts because he complained no spending cuts were offered. He backed Bush 100% on the wars in the Middle East, but he and Bush were never the best of buddies after the 2000 primary. Even when running for pres. himself, McCain too often turned down or refused to utilize much of the Rove get-out-the-vote structure that remained in place. This personal animus explains the Gang of 14 and other Mac choices under Bush. It got him the RINO label more than he deserved.
Conversely, in this pol. climate, Mac has been a strong leader and voice for the “Party of NO.”
Palin will make her own pol. future, but part of that has to be meeting demands of loyalty and integrity. Pol. capital counts.
As to the Reps. or cons. who stayed home in 2008 to punish McCain or send a Rep. “message,” I hope they like that message now.
It isn't a marginalization, it is a concern about outcome.
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:57AM EST (link)The US is set up as a Single Member District Plurality- winner takes all. One seat – one winner. The system favors, on a national level, the two party system optimally having a winner that does not reflect left or right of the majority of voters in a large election but a more centerist view of the entire country.
While third parties work on a local level with Independents usually focusing on issues crucial to their areas, the national level is a different arena. The issues of local governance in Paducah, KY may not translate well when leading the whole country.
The Tea Party members are not being marginalized by “R”s. Republicans are expressing concern of the impact of the groups splitting votes in elections. Splitting the vote gave us two terms of Clinton. At this juncture in time, do we have 8 years to take back the country? It is a fair question.
Look, I know many people that identify themselves at tea party members and I celebrate that. However, I also hear that they are disgusted with Republicans and basically have taken their bat and ball and gone home. This does us (conservatives) little good when it comes to taking back the country. All it will do is split the vote and give rise to at least another four years of chaos. Because as strong as the tea party is, it’s branding is still dwarfed comparatively to the Republican brand.
Cold Warrior and many others have been working diligently to reach out to self ascribed members of the tea party movement to bring them in to change the current SOP under which the Republican party currently operates.
There is a solution – Tea Party, John Adams Society, all of the independent conservatives groups get involved and take the party back. Go read past posts and diaries about this, especially from Cold Warrior. It’s not that hard and it is win/win for the conservative movement.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
All good ideas of great importance have fits and starts.
archer52 Saturday, February 6th at 7:52PM EST (link)Give it a chance. On one hand people around the country, and here also, complain the “tea party” people cannot wield enough influence because they are disorganized. But, if they try to organize, they are accused of being the “same old, same old.”
The biggest thing that will come out of this will be the sense that they are not alone, that they can impact, that they can organize. Hopefully, your caution will not be lost on them. That is the great thing about starting from scratch, you can correct things long before they become institutionalized .
Saul Alinsky and the Tea Party
valerie Saturday, February 6th at 8:07PM EST (link)The left will take advantage of the Tea Party movement by addressing the prospects of a third party over and over again until we believe it to be so. They will use that weakness to strengthen themselves., We must not let that happen. They cannot be the ones to determine the outcome by defining the conversation.
We set the tone and the conversation.
From the amount of time I have had to watch
Bill Saturday, February 6th at 8:14PM EST (link)the various events on C-Span, it doesn’t look as if the speakers are speaking of a National Movement at this moment. The message seems to be get organized and get motivated and get involved at the precinct, county and state level and vett the campaigns and people running for the local and state offices. This is a grassroots movement to find people who have beliefs and values which you agree and work to get that person elected. Don’t pay attention to D or R by their names, what is in their character by the way the carry themselves and answer your questions. Get to know them and then help spread the information to like minded people who will get out the vote!
Thank God! November 3, 2010. U.S. House, GOP 290, DEM 145; U.S. Senate, GOP 70, DEM 28, IND 2. Keep on praying!
TP and the last election
tngal (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 8:29PM EST (link)I’m curious as to who the tea party(ies) would have endorsed in the last election, OTHER than Sarah Palin. Love Sarah, but she carried baggage, namely McCain. After reading about how the handlers around the campaign treated her I don’t think she would’ve been very influentual in his adminisrtration and she would’ve been relegated to some corner, only to be brought out when conservative votes were needed.. I voted Fred, but he’d already dropped out, so it was a principle thing w/me, Could’ve written in Alan Keyes and still slept well.
Tea Parties are a response to 2008 in many ways
Beaglescout (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 1:08PM EST (link)The problem was that by the time of the general election there was no good choice left. Only a choice for the least worst option. Tea Parties would have been active in the primary season and might have made enough of a difference to get rid of the two most anti-Constitution candidates, who were after all the ones who won their respective party primaries.
“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”
Oh please don't associate us with....
bobmontgomery (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 8:55PM EST (link)….’birthers’, jerry Falwell, James Dobson, Glenn Beck. We don’t want any albatrosses here. We just spent 40 years caving to the progressives so we wouldn’t be called ‘racists’ and the last decade singing the praises of global warming so the kiddies wouldn’t think we were ‘hurting the environment’. We dare not offend anyone. We want to be a big tent party so we can put on a circus like the Democrats. We can stand a little Tea Party ranting but at the end of the day just go in and pull the “R” lever so John McCain can put the kabosh on freedom of speech again..
If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington
Moderators- More pooping in our house!
Scope (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 8:59PM EST (link)n/t
Excellent Haystack
Scope (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 8:55PM EST (link)We can’t heard the Republicans with the moderates and the conservatives. The Tea Parties started out not being any party, but, Republicans, Democrats and Independents. How can anyone possibly heard this group into support for any one party? It’s been said that the goals more closely align with the Republican party, but, who decided that, what is the overwhelming beliefs, what principles do they stand on, if any? Isn’t it quite well known that “in the absence of leadership, someone will rise to the top, and try to take over that leadership position?” Who will that be, if anyone, or will it be a big fight to gain that voice? Glenn Beck has been wining and crying over both parties. Palin has now endorsed McCain and Rand Paul, who are on opposite sides, as to national defense at least. The Ron Paul, Campaign for Liberty, now calls itself Conservatives, even though they still have a Libertarian platform. They are a very big part of the Tea Parties. How will anyone heard these cats, so to speak? I agree with Haystack, this is the making for a third party movement. Fiscally conservative, socially in the middle, and a mediocre national security position. After all, won’t many believe we can’t afford to pay for any wars with the current economic situation we are in? I’ll give Palin a chance to push the movement to the right, but, I’m not holding my breath.
What I really hope, Scope,
Dave Poff (haystack) (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 9:04PM EST (link)is that they won’t become anything, but will continue to do what they are doing, and-most importantly-stay leaderless while they do it.
A leaderless mob serves our interests best when they focus on what they are trying to say and do, and NOT defining themselves by who is doing the saying and the doing.
“It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
~Sam Adams
'stack, I would bet Cockstardamus' lunch that the Tea Party movement will
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 9:30PM EST (link)be the equivalence of Prop 13 in Cally. It is an omen of what is to come, amd that is huge losses for the party in power, ie, the dems. This is shaping up to be a bit of a repeat of the late 70s and early 80s and really, the continuation of the growth of the conservative movement and the eventual takeover, for good, of the GOP by conservatives. Americans are getting mugged by reality and learning how life is under liberal rule, like the late 70s. And all the GOP has to do this time, is be conservatives even after day three when the msm-pc police run polls saying Americans didn’t really want the conservatism they voted for.
We can do it this time, and we may never have another chance this ripe, so deep is this recession and so much deeper that it will get.
more later
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
I hope it's not the equivalent of P13.
mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 12:04PM EST (link)P13 put the brakes on to taxation in California, but it did absolutely nothing to stop or slow the growth of government.
This time we need a broader movement that will address the Left on issues of of constitutional governance and move the discussion away from “lower taxes” to “elimination of departments”. Tax policy is certainly an issue for debate, but the heart of the argument must move to the elimination of the Department of Education, the Privatization of Social Security and Medicare, elimination of Commerce of HUD, etc. That’s when things will begin to be accomplished.
amen becker, and even as a dem outsider in 1994
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, February 8th at 12:50PM EST (link)I thought the GOP K with America was puny compared to the magnitude of the takeover after so many decades.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
The "tea parties" don't need organization...
Bill S (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 10:29PM EST (link)beyond the local level. There need to be a couple of people in each location to do the basic organizational stuff for rallies, etc. If they can get the people to show up en masse, they’ve done what they need to do. Any organizing over/above this goes too far and takes it beyond a grass roots effort.
What I fear will happen is that the wrong players will get involved with a power trip, and they’ll push for a third party – either local or national. This will turn me off permanently to this thing.
What I expect will happen, frankly, is that 99% of the DC pols will (as they have thus far) completely ignore the whole tea party thing and it will gradually erode away. As I predicted before the Dems started with healthcare socialization, once the Senators and Congresspeople returned to DC, they forgot they have constituents and they went back to business as usual.
Cynical? You bet. But the Senate/House votes on health care tell me that they didn’t hear a damned thing in those town hall meetings during the summer recess and the tea party rallies were largely for naught. Where the tea party folks can really make a difference is to organize in the manner that our friend ColdWarrior is pushing – local activism within the GOP.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
The real hope for change came 4-15-09
realskinny (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 10:30PM EST (link)After 5 months of indigestion, the first of the tea parties brought hope the Republic could be saved. Been gaining altitude ever since.
If they can stay motivated,
realskinny (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 10:40PM EST (link)and work at the grassroots in both parties to put forward conservatives, this can be an influential movement. Conservatives outnumber the statists in every state of the union. If we can’t remove Pelosi-Reid from power this year, it may not matter. These Bolsheviks have no intention of giving up power just because the livestock are restless.
I prefer a conservative takeover
scottbomb (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:48PM EST (link)All tea party protesters I have met are conservatives. They’re republicans who are fed up with liberals and RINOs. If there are Democrats among us, and they truly stand with us, then they need to get honest with themselves and change parties.
I do not support a 3rd party, but I do believe that most tea party protesters would like to see conservative Republicans take over the party and do away with the RINOs.
On the other hand, should a third party – a truly conservative party – REPLACE the Republican party, I’ve got no problem with that at all. The Republicans replaced the Wigs.
www.HowObamaGotElected.com
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” – Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948
The Whigs disintegrated before the Republicans became a force.
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:52AM EST (link)The Whig party had internal problems and self destructed. The Republican Party grew out of it’s ashes formed by most of the Whigs and a few anti-slavery Democrats (then as now, a minority in the party leadership).
Just saying the situation was different and the Republicans didn’t take down the Whigs to replace them. The Whigs took themselves out.
A better strategy for modern times is to take over one party or another. This happens more often than people realize. The socialists took over the Democrat party. The Republican Party was taken by conservatives in the late 70′s early 80s, but have let control go back to moderates. We need to take it back again and ColdWarrior has the method all planned out.
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
5^5. Exactly. nt
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:59AM EST (link)To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
Not only that...
Neil Stevens (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:04AM EST (link)…but the American party made a good and credible try at being the lead opposition of the Democrat party before the Republicans did.
They failed, obviously.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
Exactly...
kchand Sunday, February 7th at 1:37PM EST (link)… hijack back the Republican Party.
——————–
The ‘N’ word is November! Nov 6, 2012 will be the next cleansing.
The Tea Party ought to be a "party within a party"
kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:17AM EST (link)I mean a full fledged party with it’s own platform and contacts and candidates but operate within the Republican party and take them over, or at least greatly influence them.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
That is still promoting a third party
Scope (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:25AM EST (link)Just exactly who are you saying should make up that “Party” within the Republican party.? Are you implying that the tactics of ColdWarrior and many others joining as Precinct Committeeman is a waste of time, or, that they are promoting ideas you don’t agree with?
I think your idea is one of the most wrongheaded I’ve heard yet.
really? well what is your idea?
kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:40AM EST (link)The tea party is still in the formative stages so it’s make up would be what ever it is going to be.
The tactics would include taking over precincts and everything else that can be done to push an agenda.
And it would not be a third party in the sense that it runs as a third party so that is not anything to worry about.
The reason to set it up that way is to have some real control over what gets done, and which ideas and candidates are promoted.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
So, in essence, you are saying to become an active member of the Republican party.
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:43AM EST (link)That is what CW and other RSers have been saying for a long time.
This is not a party within a party – it IS the party.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
but it would be an organized, group effort
kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 11:16AM EST (link)and that strikes me as having a better chance of working.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
I give. This conversation is going nowhere.
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 11:22AM EST (link)You are fixated on the title “Tea Party” that you fail to see anything further than that.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
ocleverone- I commend you
Scope (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 12:02PM EST (link)for your patience and rationality in trying to educate some that have no intention of seeing beyond their own noses. It’s as though a light bulb went on in their head, and, they are missing the off switch, no matter how much you explain the dangers to their misguided ideas. For some, seeing the word “party” in Tea Party has a whole different meaning that what the movement actually is.
Thanks Scope and right back at you doubly.
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 12:09PM EST (link)I have grave concerns about a third party at this juncture.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
and I think you are both nervous nancy's
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, February 8th at 12:00AM EST (link)lighten up Francis
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Whatever Skippy.
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Monday, February 8th at 12:06AM EST (link)And I think you come across a little too blase to be taken seriously.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
Exactly how can a party within a party shape the party's political ideals?
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:36AM EST (link)I see massive rice bowl issues with this idea.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
by becoming a loud or the loudest voice within that party
kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:43AM EST (link)IF, for instance, a conservative Tea party were a large component of the republican party, then the likelihood of some rino winning the nomination in any given state or district would be much reduced.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Still- Why do you need a "party"
Scope (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 11:20AM EST (link)within the Republican party to accomplish those goals when what you are suggesting is already being done by people like ColdWarrior and many others he has recruited. The way to take over the Republican party is to work at it locally. ColdWarrior for example has been a fountain of ideas for other localities to get involved. He goes to Tea Parties, and other conservative functions to recruit conservatives to take back the political power within the Republican/GOP local units to promote conservative candidates in primaries. Have you even bothered to read anything he has written. Have you refused to read about the great success that the project has been enjoying? Are you aware that there is a national website set up to promote these goals which are enjoying great success, and, will eventually take back the Republican party nationwide? It sure sounds as though what you are really promoting is “purity tests” or “watch dogs” as though the conservative push isn’t capable of choosing the correct candidates. Guess what, there are no absolutes or guaranties in politics.
Again, your idea is not only wrongheaded, it would be a disaster waiting to happen.
BTW Kyle- The most important question for you
Scope (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 12:12PM EST (link)is have you gotten involved in your local Republican party, as a Precinct Committeeman or in any other capacity? Or, is your idea of involvement to sit behind your computer and promote brain spasms?
Unfortunately the Tea Parties are having a lot of infighting..
ladyimpactohio (Diary) Saturday, February 6th at 11:52PM EST (link)Which is really too bad. I have been receiving a ton of e-mails from various groups suing others, having catfights, etc. For many it has turned into a paid business. I am going to be slowly divesting myself from them.
We the people tell government what to do, it does not tell us.–Ronald Reagan in his farewell speech
Might I recommend a different strategy?
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:10AM EST (link)Rather than divesting yourself from them, be a peacemaker. Guide them back towards working together. Remind them that they have at least SOME common goals and ask that they work towards what core values they share.
If there are some more reasonable people in the groups, get them involved in local politics inside the party. I pointed to ColdWarrior’s page above and I’m starting to sound like a broken record, but it really IS the easiest way to correct the problems in this country. It will take time, but conservatives CAN take back the party and the Tea Parties are a gold mine of people who are conservative and ready to do something to fix the problems.
Most just don’t know what they can do. And the leaders of most of the “Tea Party” groups don’t really know either or they want to start their own parties so they have their own agendas.
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
Just stop Palin...
StopTheInsanity Sunday, February 7th at 4:04AM EST (link)Palin is hurting the Tea Party movement. Sure, she gives it airtime on television, but she herself is embarrassing. Hearing her talk about “divine intervention” is just weird.
Palin is not a problem for the Tea Party movement.
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:28AM EST (link)She has been saying things that resonate with the people that tend to go to the Tea Party protests and other events. She’s a messenger, not the message.
I’m hoping that enough of the people she speaks to will equate her with the Republican Party than we can start recruiting more of them into our ranks. We need more conservative Precinct Committeemen and the people who are involved in the Tea Party movements seem the ideal choices for those positions.
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
G'bye (nt)
Neil Stevens (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:03AM EST (link)RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
Notions of Third Party...
seaweaver (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 8:02AM EST (link)seem to be notions pushed forth by the Talking Heads. Having been to only one Party Here in Savannah (the first) I have not heard what the mass may be murmuring now. I do hear it as a question or point of interest being asked by the media. It is usually followed by “who’s the leader?”
I think it is this point of Query that drives both.
Third party and Who’s the leader….
The Movement needs only to be a third party in Primaries.
The Movement needs to force Primaries at every given chance be the incumbent a facade or a bulwark of principals.
The Tea party must assail all candidates to test for erosion. This is what has been lacking in comfortable incumbency. A tidal force strong enough to place fear in a Saxby Chamblis or Johnny Isakson that their foundations will shift under minor fluctuations in principal like Prescription Drug or Amnesty.
No more comfortable incumbency, no more wavering on principal accepted.
cw
If the Tea Parties are not going to be a party, how is your statement
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 9:50AM EST (link)of being a third party in primaries justified?
Isn’t that exactly what constitutes a party be it third or otherwise?
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
Tea Party PEOPLE are misunderstood.
richt55 Sunday, February 7th at 10:31AM EST (link)WE are identified by issues ,candidates and protests. Every Axelrod ,Rove, Maher and O’Rielly think they get it.They do not. We know what a republic is and the constitutions role in it. We are not angry or frustrated. We will not have a three party system that will create europen style factions. We believe in the system and are merely participating to the fullist.
Can you please expound on how you are participating to the fullest?
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 10:39AM EST (link)Thanks.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
We don't need new ideas
richt55 Sunday, February 7th at 12:39PM EST (link)The party system of committees allow individuals at the most local level or the national level to involve themselves in the election process which is meant to be bottom up. It is also necessary to keep elected officials cognisent of who they are employed by or should I say serve on an issue by issue basis. Over time the power will truly be to the people. A very long time. This is not about Healthcare ,Obama,Democrats, or terrorists. its about our country.
That isn't what I asked. I asked how the Tea Party is "participating to the fullest". nt
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 12:42PM EST (link)To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
The Tea Party ought to be a "party within a party"
radioone Sunday, February 7th at 11:37AM EST (link)I concur. “If you build it, they will come.”
If the Republican party can swing back to the more Conservative elements
Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 11:49AM EST (link)then the Tea Partiers will come back into the fold. I do think that this will happen at the local level; however, with the Internet, most of us are leading the way to an entirely new type of politics.
Through reading blogs from people across the country, we are finding out about candidates that we might never have known about in the past. We are able to use our money in races where we can promote people in other states who reflect what we want to see in representatives in Washington.
I really think that this is going to be the politics of the future – we will still need a National party to tie everything together, but they will be more willing to promote candidates who reflect the wishes of the people. This will enable Conservative candidates to flourish, because conservative people are more willing to donate their own money to causes that they believe in.
I, for one, have NEVER donated to a political party; however, in the past year, I have donated money to several INDIVIDUAL candidates in states other than my own. Right now, I am happy with my local representatives, so there isn’t any reason to want change. However, I have sent money to candidates in other races because I liked what they had to say, and wanted to encourage their candidacy.
After all, Scott Brown was able to raise $12 million in less than a week – I don’t think that EITHER political party would be willing to invest that kind of money in any individual race. I think that a lot of that money came from out-of-state donors. I seriously doubt that any Democratic candidate could raise that kind of money – especially from out of state – in such a short amount of time (well, legally, anyway…..).
We can stay in the Republican party, but they are starting to see what kind of candidates are getting the bulk of the donations. The party leaders – if they are paying attention – have to realize by now that they aren’t going to continue to get broad support from voters unless they are willing to promote the candidates that people are comfortable rallying behind.
Change is happening – it’s just going to take a little bit of time to groom people for these positions. If we are willing to get involved at the local level, we can influence that change.
Fasten your seatbelts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..
Your title and lead in reinforces an earlier point.
Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 12:00PM EST (link)Instead of taking a stand and making the Republican Party the party of conservatives, Tea Partiers want to wait until it finds its own way there.
How will the party do that if those that are doing the day to day heavy lifting are not conservative or as conservative as desired? Who is going to lead it to the desired outcome?
The only way the party is going to reshape itself is from the inside out and not waiting for people to jump on the bandwagon when it gets there.
To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher
Time for a take over
student Sunday, February 7th at 3:06PM EST (link)40% of the population is Conservative, 35% of the population are moderates yet Democrats still cream Republicans in registered voters. The reason is that most Conservatives have abandoned the Republican party since it is not reliably Conservative. Republicans draw on Conservative voters, use them to get elected, then make compromises with lobbyists and sell out the values of small frugal limited government, free enterprise, and maximization of individual liberty down the river to subsidies, new agencies, higher taxes, regulation, litigation, and the nanny state supplemented by imposition of religious values, The Tea Party movement can hopefully take over the Republican party, boot out the statistists, boot out the collectivist-fellow travellers, boot out the servants of the monopolies and oligopolies and make the party a true Conservative party.
Correction
Neil Stevens (Diary) Sunday, February 7th at 3:13PM EST (link)40% of the population identifies as conservative. But a great many of them hold views that would get them branded as RiNOs.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder