Comments on: News Flash: Obama Sucks At His Job

By: doctort

doctort — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:39:09 +0000

God help us! He sucks at more than that. He sucks big-time as an American…..if he is one! And, in my opinion, he sucks as a human being, as do all who surround him. Socialists/Marxists don’t care about America; the are in it for power and money and total control.

If he really is an American, he would have produced all the documentation required of him. He is under subpoena to produce those docs, as we speak.

Personally, I believe he is the worst president this great country has ever elected. Speaking of which, check out impeachobama.com. Join the rest of us advocating for his immediate removal for ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’. He is guilty of no fewer than a dozen of ‘em.

Please check it out!

By: idealjoe

idealjoe — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:32:48 +0000

No body ever told me that a President can’t vote PRESENT…..this was not in my job description, can I poll the audience or call a friend? Wait! I’ll say PRESENT, yes that is my final answer. Do I win?
Crap! wait till I see Ayers. Wait! where is Biden? He knows the answer, uh stand up and take a bow………..

By: patrickmcminn

patrickmcminn — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:25:00 +0000

His poll number are lower the GB’s even pre 9/11. His poll numbers have plummeted faster than any president since Truman. Learn before you speak.

By: patrickmcminn

patrickmcminn — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:19:34 +0000

What do you expect from a community organizer. BO is clinging on to the little experience he has in campaigning for a cause: health care change. He doesn’t know anything about leadership. He doesn’t know anything about running a system as complicated and awkward as the U.S machinery. And he certainly has no idea of what mainstream America wants. The sad part is that he thinks he has a mandate from the people for change, when all it was was a mandate to remove Republican leadership. He was in the right place at the right time; the right color; the right economy; and the right rebellion. Now we’re all paying for it.

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:24:34 +0000

By: ATG

ATG — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:35:27 +0000

Long time no see!

I believe that the best thing for the Bush presidency and historical perspective is the current occupant of the oval office. Each day that goes by makes GWB seem like a rocket scientist and more to the point a man dedicated to the countries good instead of a political whore (am I allowed to say that, the word not the intent?).

It’s pretty pathetic that this clown has spent more time in private meeting’s with liberal bloggers and media scum than he has with his pick to run the war in the AF/PAK theatre.

Elections have consequences, God help us all.

By: Joe_Cor

Joe_Cor — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:36:34 +0000

But he’s still at 53%. That seems pretty high to be talking about plummeting poll numbers. GWB would have killed for 53%.

By: red_dawn

red_dawn — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:56:49 +0000

stupid libs don’t know how to spell!

By: The_Gadfly

The_Gadfly — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:24:15 +0000

Liberal Democrats have little heartburn over the administration’s attacks on Fox and Limbaugh.

They don’t yet. But when they realize at least part of the reason for their increasing share of the Neilson numbers? Not sure they’ll be able buy enough Rolaids.

By: AceInTX

AceInTX — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:18:26 +0000

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:33 +0000

first… and we get this alot along the Canadian border States (those of us who have spent significant time over there) falling into the British and/or French-English hypbrid (FrenGlish) spellings (Defense, Defence… etc…) …. so yes…

sceptic archaic and US, skeptic [?sk?pt?k]
n
1. (Philosophy) a person who habitually doubts the authenticity of accepted beliefs
2. a person who mistrusts people, ideas, etc., in general
3. (Philosophy) a person who doubts the truth of religion, esp Christianity
adj
(Philosophy) of or relating to sceptics; sceptical
[from Latin scepticus, from Greek skeptikos one who reflects upon, from skeptesthai to consider]
scepticism archaic and US, skepticism n

but….
I still think it was a typo…. he meant septic…. for those the administration is going to FLUSH THEIR WEALTH away. lol

By: janis

janis — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:13:38 +0000

top, namely independents and R moderates. (Retch.) After all, when you’ve lost Peggy Noonan, well….. If you look at the ones who seem to be his hard core supporters, that would be the 28% who still dream that he’s doing a bang-up job. I refuse to use the word “think” with regard to those idiots.

Fight for the right results in 2010 and then let’s worry about 2012.

By: wennejunk

wennejunk — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:08:39 +0000

…because they spell differently than we do

They would argue they spell correctly (owning the name ‘English’, the history to support it and fountain from whence it came Westward), while we butcher the spelling.

I agree, the leadership positions are largely vacant and there are very few who wish to hold those positions for the purposes of actually leading.

I believe most GOP politicians who profess a conservative bent do so for the sake of reelection in conservative districts, not because of core beliefs.

They would rather talk tough behind the shield of minority party status and perpetuate their positions.

I’ve argued many times before that the GOP leadership was not interested in holding power when they were handed the reins in 2004. Leadership implies making tough decisions and taking the knocks for doing so. Leaders are rarely popular at the time.

By: haystack

haystack — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:06:43 +0000

My limited knowledge of British English forced me into an “assume” mode…I never WAS very good at hard and soft C’s exsept in my high school GPA.

(s strategically located there, intentionally) :=)

By: DerKrieger

DerKrieger — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:19:54 +0000

…, the next time you call their office ask if they’re willing to go down with Obama’s sinking ship. I asked that rhetorically of Lincoln (D-AR) and Pryor (D-AR). They need to remember that their fates are only tied to Obama’s by choice and not necessarily because they’re D’s.

By: BlueFalcon

BlueFalcon — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:16:54 +0000

“sceptic”, despite the red underline Firefox puts on it in this text-edit box, is an alternative correct spelling, chiefly British. Add this to the fact that Telegraph is a British newspaper, and “Bob’s your uncle.”

As a rule of thumb, you should be careful when criticising (see what I did there?) spelling in a British newspaper, because they spell differently than we do.

Now, to stay on-topic: what percentage of this disapproval comes from liberals who are disappointed that he has thus far failed to create the utopian soviet America he has promised? There’s little chance they will vote Republican in 2010, which means we have a way to go to prevent a 2012 reelection. Also, we need strong, vocal leadership, a position that so far looks vacant.

By: janis

janis — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:15:56 +0000

So who’s he referring to? I’d love to know that Obama knows someone who has done that very thing, but I can’t think of anyone he’s cozied up to or praised in the last 10 months who would fit that bill.

Of course, he might consider that Iran’s leader did the hard and right thing by murdering those who didn’t agree with him, or perhaps he thinks that Chavez has done the hard and right things by running drugs through Honduras with the permission of their former president and by taking control of the media in Venezuela. Yeah, that’s it…..

By: gonzo55

gonzo55 — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:45:37 +0000

He’s failed to pass health care. He’s losing the war in Afghanastan through inaction. He’s failed to protect the homeland by neutering the CIA. He’s failed to protect our allies by removing the missile shields in Eastern Europe. He’s failed to improve education. He’s failed to protect the free market, and as a consequence, countless major firms are now wards of the state. He’s failed to stimulate the economy, and now they took our jobs. He’s failed to improve our standing in the world, despite his worldwide apology tour.

So it’s no wonder that his approval ratings are at historic lows (GWB’s approval rating at this point in his presidency was +54, Obama’s is -13. I miss GWB!). As unplesant as it is to live in a National Socialist dictatorship for 4 years, I have no doubt whatsoever that Grand Ayatollah Obama will not win more than the very most liberal states in 2012 and we will have a real president, and this Constitutional crisis will end.